PartnerFacts
Data last updated: Oct 23, 2026, 5:45 PM ETLatest filing: Oct 22, 2026Now: Oct 24, 2026, 7:47 AM ET

Sponsor Check › Sponsor group

RD

Red Dot

One sponsor team, 2 deal companies · Louisville, CO

Grouped because: 2 shared people, 1 shared management entity, similar issuer names (2) (automatic match from the filings) · not the same sponsor?

2deal companies
$85.6Mreported sold
254investors
4Form D filings
2017–2020active
0new, last 12 mo
Follow this sponsor groupLook further ↓

Data last updated Oct 23, 2026, 5:45 PM ET · Latest filing in this group Apr 9, 2020 · Courts (RECAP) last checked: Oct 24, 2026, 2:16 AM ET · SEC enforcement last checked: covered by the index scan as of Oct 24, 2026, 2:50 AM ET

The short version

Red Dot is a sponsor group of 2 issuers that PartnerFacts links to one sponsor (shared people, shared management entity, similar issuer names; automatic match from the filings), filing 4 Form D filings between May 2017 and Apr 2020.

What this means One team, 2 deal companies, about 3 years of track record in SEC filings. We link the companies because the same people or address appear on their forms — tap "Request a correction" if that is wrong.

Combined reported sold: $85.6M to 254 investors (latest filing per issuer). Industries as reported: Pooled Investment Fund (2). Issuers are based in CO (2).

What this means $85.6M raised across the group, about $337K per investor. Amounts come from each company's latest Form D; they are what the sponsor reported, not audited figures.

Principal people: Adam Lefkowitz (2 issuers, executive officer), Red Dot Management, LLC (2 issuers, executive officer, entity), Seth Bent (2 issuers, executive officer), Chris Ringenberger (1 issuer, executive officer), Kate Matheny (1 issuer, executive officer) and 3 more.

What this means The person on the most companies is usually the one running the show; their page lists every deal.

Activity: 0 new offerings in the last 12 months; latest filing Apr 9, 2020.

What this means No new raise filed in the past year.

Public records searched: federal courts (CourtListener / RECAP), SEC enforcement releases, state securities regulators (AK, AL, AR, AZ, CA, CT, DE, FINRA, GA, HI, ID, IL, KS, KY, LA, MA, MD, ME, MI, MO, MS, MT, NASAA, NC, ND, NH, NM, NV, OK, OR, PA, RI, SC, SD, TN, TX, VT, WA, WI, WV, WY), property records (NYC, FL, IL and TX counties) — 17 court cases matching the name, 3 bankruptcy cases matching the name listed in Key records below.

What this means 20 records came back, including 2 court cases still open — open cases can take years and cost money. Each one is listed below with a link to the original document and a line saying why it matched. A name match is not proof it is the same person or company — read the why line and the document. Being sued or named in a release is an accusation, not a finding.

We compared 4 public filings for Red Dot and found 9 differences, 4 worth asking the sponsor about: 6 court cases name Red Dot; SETH BENT is no longer listed on the Apr 9, 2020 amendment; and more below.

What this means These are differences between the sponsor's own SEC filings — both values, dates and sources are listed in Key records, section 4. Most have ordinary explanations; ask the sponsor.

What the community is saying

Community search for Red Dot has not run yet — it is joining a line of 27,481 names; searches run around the clock at the hosts' allowed rate. Searched so far: 638 names.

Community comments are quoted as written by their authors. Sources searched: BiggerPockets forums (via DuckDuckGo, Brave, Bing and BiggerPockets search) and Reddit (search feed + public archive).

Key records

Five things investors ask first. Items still in human review are counted, not shown.

1. Lawsuits

17 cases: 2 open, 7 closed (disposition not in docket feed), 6 dismissed, 2 judgment

Bickham (PS) v. Red Dot Storage LLC open matched at sponsor-group level (Red Dot)
District Court, D. Colorado · No. 1:26-cv-03260 · Filed Jul 17, 2026
Role of Red Dot Storage LLC: Defendant · Outcome: Open — no termination date on the docket (bulk snapshot 2026-09-30) Docket on CourtListener ↗
exact company name; court in the group's state (CO)
Bickham (PS) v. Red Dot Storage closed matched at sponsor-group level (Red Dot)
District Court, D. Colorado · No. 1:25-cv-02246 · Filed Jul 21, 2025 · Closed Feb 24, 2026 · Nature of suit: 190 Contract: Other · Cause: 41:6503 - Walsh-Healy Act -- Breach of Public Contract
Role of Red Dot Storage: Defendant · Outcome: Terminated 2026-02-24 (disposition not included in the bulk docket feed — see docket) Docket on CourtListener ↗
exact company name; court in the group's state (CO)
United States v. In the matter of the search of Red Dot Storage, Unit I5 at 9006 E. 22nd Terrace, Kansas City, MO within the Western District of MO closed matched at sponsor-group level (Red Dot)
District Court, W.D. Missouri · No. 4:22-sw-00238 · Filed Apr 6, 2022 · Closed Apr 19, 2022
Role of United States v. In the matter of the search of Red Dot Storage, Unit I5 at 9006 E. 22nd Terrace, Kansas City, MO within the Western District of MO: Party · Outcome: Terminated 2022-04-19 (disposition not included in the bulk docket feed — see docket) Docket on CourtListener ↗
company name words appear in the caption; court in MO (not the issuer's state)
United States v. In the matter of the search of Red Dot Storage, Unit I5 at 9006 E. 22nd Terrace, Kansas City, MO within the Western District of MO closed matched at sponsor-group level (Red Dot)
District Court, W.D. Missouri · No. 4:22-sw-00238 · Filed Apr 6, 2022 · Closed Apr 19, 2022
Role of United States v. In the matter of the search of Red Dot Storage, Unit I5 at 9006 E. 22nd Terrace, Kansas City, MO within the Western District of MO: Party · Outcome: Terminated 2022-04-19 (disposition not included in the bulk docket feed — see docket) Docket on CourtListener ↗
company name words appear in the caption; court in MO (not the issuer's state)
Red Dot Corporation v. Ward Construction Inc closed matched at sponsor-group level (Red Dot)
District Court, W.D. Oklahoma · No. 5:21-cv-00768 · Filed Aug 4, 2021 · Closed Jan 19, 2022
Role of Red Dot Corporation: Plaintiff · Outcome: Terminated 2022-01-19 (disposition not included in the bulk docket feed — see docket) Docket on CourtListener ↗
exact company name; court in OK (not the issuer's state)
Paus v. Red Dot Storage 4, LLC closed matched at sponsor-group level (Red Dot)
District Court, N.D. Illinois · No. 1:20-cv-04328 · Filed Jul 23, 2020 · Closed Oct 1, 2020
Role of Red Dot Storage 4, LLC: Defendant · Outcome: Terminated 2020-10-01 (disposition not included in the bulk docket feed — see docket) Docket on CourtListener ↗
exact company name; court in IL (not the issuer's state)
Gilberto Zambrano v. Red Dot Storage open matched at sponsor-group level (Red Dot)
District Court, N.D. Illinois · No. 1:19-cv-00100 · Filed Jan 4, 2019 · Nature of suit: Contract: Other · Cause: 28:1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Role of Red Dot Storage: Defendant · Outcome: Open — no termination date on the docket (bulk snapshot 2026-09-30) Docket on CourtListener ↗
exact company name; court in IL (not the issuer's state)
Red Dot Management LLC v. Precision Contracting Services LLC dismissed matched at sponsor-group level (Red Dot)
District Court, E.D. Wisconsin · No. 2:17-cv-01177 · Filed Aug 29, 2017 · Closed Apr 27, 2021 · Nature of suit: 150 Contract: Recovery/Enforcement · Cause: 28:1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Role of Red Dot Management LLC: Plaintiff · Outcome: Terminated 2021-04-27 — FJC Integrated Database disposition: Dismissed: other Docket on CourtListener ↗
exact company name; court in WI (not the issuer's state)
Red Dot Buildings, Inc. v. GM & R Construction Company, Inc. closed
District Court, E.D. Louisiana · No. 2:14-cv-02803 · Filed Dec 11, 2014 · Closed Aug 31, 2016 · Nature of suit: Contract: Other · Cause: 28:1332 Diversity-Contract Dispute
Role of Red Dot Buildings, Inc. v. GM & R Construction Company, Inc.: Party · Outcome: Terminated 2016-08-31 — FJC Integrated Database disposition: Statistical closing Docket on CourtListener ↗
company name words appear in the caption; court in LA (not the issuer's state)
Red Dot Corporation v. Douglas Electrical Components, Inc. dismissed
District Court, W.D. Washington · No. 2:11-cv-00852 · Filed May 20, 2011 · Closed Sep 28, 2012 · Nature of suit: 190 Other contract actions
Role of Red Dot Corporation v. Douglas Electrical Components, Inc.: Party · Outcome: Terminated 2012-09-28 — FJC Integrated Database disposition: Dismissed: settled Docket on CourtListener ↗
company name words appear in the caption; court in WA (not the issuer's state)
Red Dot Buildings v. Jacobs Technology, Inc. dismissed matched at sponsor-group level (Red Dot)
District Court, E.D. Louisiana · No. 2:11-cv-01142 · Filed May 13, 2011 · Closed Jun 18, 2012 · Nature of suit: Miller Act · Cause: 40:3131 Miller Act
Role of Red Dot Buildings v. Jacobs Technology, Inc.: Party · Outcome: Terminated 2012-06-18 — FJC Integrated Database disposition: Dismissed: settled Docket on CourtListener ↗
company name words appear in the caption; court in LA (not the issuer's state)
Advanced Simulations, LLC v. Red Dot Square Solutions, Ltd. dismissed
District Court, N.D. Georgia · No. 1:10-cv-02592 · Filed Aug 18, 2010 · Closed Feb 2, 2011 · Nature of suit: 190 Other contract actions
Role of Advanced Simulations, LLC v. Red Dot Square Solutions, Ltd.: Party · Outcome: Terminated 2011-02-02 — FJC Integrated Database disposition: Dismissed: settled Docket on CourtListener ↗
company name words appear in the caption; court in GA (not the issuer's state)
Qpay, Inc. v. Red Dot Wireless, LLC judgment
District Court, S.D. Florida · No. 1:09-cv-23863 · Filed Dec 30, 2009 · Closed Jun 4, 2010 · Nature of suit: 470 Civil (RICO)
Role of Qpay, Inc. v. Red Dot Wireless, LLC: Party · Outcome: Terminated 2010-06-04 — FJC Integrated Database disposition: Judgment on default; judgment for plaintiff Docket on CourtListener ↗
company name words appear in the caption; court in FL (not the issuer's state)
Central Laborers' Pension, Welfare and Annuity Funds v. Red Dot Construction and Equipment Rentals, Inc. dismissed
District Court, S.D. Illinois · No. 3:08-cv-00799 · Filed Nov 13, 2008 · Closed Oct 21, 2010 · Nature of suit: 791 Employee Retirement Income Security Act
Role of Central Laborers' Pension, Welfare and Annuity Funds v. Red Dot Construction and Equipment Rentals, Inc.: Party · Outcome: Terminated 2010-10-21 — FJC Integrated Database disposition: Voluntarily dismissed Docket on CourtListener ↗
company name words appear in the caption; court in IL (not the issuer's state)
In Re: Red Dot Scenic, Inc. v. Tese-Milner judgment
District Court, S.D. New York · No. 1:01-cv-07980 · Filed Aug 24, 2001 · Closed Mar 26, 2003 · Nature of suit: 422 Bankruptcy appeals rule 28 USC 158
Role of In Re: Red Dot Scenic, Inc. v. Tese-Milner: Party · Outcome: Terminated 2003-03-26 — FJC Integrated Database disposition: Other; judgment for defendant Docket on CourtListener ↗
company name words appear in the caption; court in NY (not the issuer's state)
RED DOT FOODS, INC. v. KELLEY-PERRY, INC. closed
District Court, D. Nevada · No. · Filed Aug 5, 1996 · Closed Mar 31, 1997 · Nature of suit: 190 Other contract actions
Role of RED DOT FOODS, INC. v. KELLEY-PERRY, INC.: Party · Outcome: Terminated 1997-03-31 — FJC Integrated Database disposition: Remanded to state court Docket on CourtListener ↗
company name words appear in the caption; court in NV (not the issuer's state)
Sup Fast Freight Inc v. Red Dot Corporation dismissed
District Court, W.D. Washington · No. 2:95-cv-01937 · Filed Dec 13, 1995 · Closed Feb 22, 1996 · Nature of suit: 450 Interstate commerce
Role of Sup Fast Freight Inc v. Red Dot Corporation: Party · Outcome: Terminated 1996-02-22 — FJC Integrated Database disposition: Dismissed: other Docket on CourtListener ↗
company name words appear in the caption; court in WA (not the issuer's state)
What was searched

Sources searched: CourtListener bulk data (RECAP dockets as of 2026-09-30; recall-first rule 10-24) — federal district + bankruptcy courts State courts: not covered (one-tap state court links under Look further). PACER: not searched. · Last checked Oct 24, 2026, 2:16 AM ET.

Court records show docket facts only; we never restate allegations as facts. Outcome wording comes from the docket feed; where it does not state a disposition we say so.

State courts: not covered (one-tap state court links under Look further). No state offers a lawful automated statewide source PartnerFacts can use today. Texas (re:SearchTX) terms prohibit storing results in a database open to third parties; New York (WebCivil) and Massachusetts (MassCourts) require a browser check that blocks scripted queries; California has no statewide index (58 county portals; Rule of Court 2.503 grants name-based access case by case); Florida, Utah and Illinois offer paid or partial access whose terms for automated use are unverified. Washington (dw.courts.wa.gov; bulk index reports under a JISC data-dissemination agreement), Delaware (CourtConnect; Court of Chancery not included) and Arizona (apps.azcourts.gov/publicaccess, which has an official channel to request high-volume access) are the candidates; PartnerFacts will request written permission before any automated search. Federal courts are searched through CourtListener / RECAP.

2. Regulatory actions

None found in sources searched — SEC enforcement releases (index scan as of Oct 24, 2026, 2:50 AM ET) · state securities regulators: VA (crawled Oct 23, 2026)

What was searched

SEC enforcement searched: SEC litigation releases and administrative proceedings — respondent names in the sec.gov index titles (30,205 releases, 1995-09-19 to 2026-10-23); release text is read only to confirm a candidate. Names that appear only in the body of a release are not found. — Searched SEC litigation releases and administrative proceedings (1995→ / 2007→) (30,205 records as of Oct 24, 2026, 2:50 AM ET) — nothing matched Red Dot..

State securities regulators: Securities regulators searched (3,318 actions): AZ Corporation Commission Securities Division (411 actions, 2017–2026), CA DFPI (25 actions, 2007–2024; listing starts 2002 — 16 of 12,159 DFPI respondent pages read so far; sponsor-name matches are read first), DE DOJ Investor Protection Unit (257 actions, 1987–2026), TX State Securities Board (586 actions, 2006–2026), WA DFI (2,039 actions, 2001–2026) — last crawled Oct 23, 2026, 9:57 PM ET. No machine-readable public listing today for CO, FL, IA, IN, MN, NE, NJ, NY, OH, UT, VA (see docs/state-regulators.md).

3. Bankruptcies

3 cases: 3 closed (disposition not in docket feed)

Red Dot Foods Inc closed
United States Bankruptcy Court, C.D. California · No. 8:98-bk-19947 · Filed Jul 14, 1998 · Closed Sep 17, 1998
Role of Red Dot Foods Inc: Party · Outcome: Case closed 1998-09-17 (disposition not included in the bulk docket feed — see docket) Docket on CourtListener ↗
company name words appear in the caption; court in CA (not the issuer's state)
Red Dot Scenic, Inc. closed
United States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. New York · No. 98-41216 · Filed Feb 23, 1998 · Closed Oct 11, 2006
Role of Red Dot Scenic, Inc.: Party · Outcome: Case closed 2006-10-11 (disposition not included in the bulk docket feed — see docket) Docket on CourtListener ↗
company name words appear in the caption; court in NY (not the issuer's state)
Whitaker v. Red Dot Corporation closed
United States Bankruptcy Court, M.D. Florida · No. 3:92-ap-10660 · Filed Jul 7, 1992 · Closed Sep 25, 1997
Role of Whitaker v. Red Dot Corporation: Party · Outcome: Case closed 1997-09-25 (disposition not included in the bulk docket feed — see docket) Docket on CourtListener ↗
company name words appear in the caption; court in FL (not the issuer's state)
What was searched

Sources searched: Federal bankruptcy courts via CourtListener / RECAP archive (federal district courts, federal bankruptcy courts). State courts: not covered (one-tap state court links under Look further). PACER: not searched (RECAP only). · Last checked Oct 24, 2026, 2:16 AM ET.

Court records show docket facts only; we never restate allegations as facts. Outcome wording comes from the docket feed; where it does not state a disposition we say so.

State courts: not covered (one-tap state court links under Look further). No state offers a lawful automated statewide source PartnerFacts can use today. Texas (re:SearchTX) terms prohibit storing results in a database open to third parties; New York (WebCivil) and Massachusetts (MassCourts) require a browser check that blocks scripted queries; California has no statewide index (58 county portals; Rule of Court 2.503 grants name-based access case by case); Florida, Utah and Illinois offer paid or partial access whose terms for automated use are unverified. Washington (dw.courts.wa.gov; bulk index reports under a JISC data-dissemination agreement), Delaware (CourtConnect; Court of Chancery not included) and Arizona (apps.azcourts.gov/publicaccess, which has an official channel to request high-volume access) are the candidates; PartnerFacts will request written permission before any automated search. Federal courts are searched through CourtListener / RECAP.

4. Differences between public sources

No comparisons published

What is compared

No public statement by this sponsor group has been collected yet, so there is nothing to compare. Sources compared: the sponsor's own website (known from the issuer's own filings — Form C issuer website, EDGAR company profile — an approved profile claim or Form ADV Item 1.I of its matched adviser) · SEC Form D · SEC Form ADV (IAPD) · Internet Archive · No website is on file for this sponsor group yet.

9 differences found between the filings for Red Dot — 4 worth asking about (compared 4 filings on Oct 24, 2026)

Worth asking · Aug 29, 2017 – Jul 17, 2026

6 court cases name Red Dot — 4 as defendant

By role: defendant in 4, plaintiff in 2. Newest: "Bickham (PS) v. Red Dot Storage LLC" (District Court, D. Colorado, Jul 17, 2026); "Bickham (PS) v. Red Dot Storage" (District Court, D. Colorado, Jul 21, 2025); "Red Dot Corporation v. Ward Construction Inc" (District Court, W.D. Oklahoma, Aug 4, 2021). Some of these are name matches with a match estimate below 95% — check each docket.

What this means Several court cases name this subject. Some are routine business suits. Ask what each was about and how it ended.

Docket · Bickham (PS) v. Red Dot Storage LLC ↗Docket · Bickham (PS) v. Red Dot Storage ↗Docket · Red Dot Corporation v. Ward Construction Inc ↗Docket · Paus v. Red Dot Storage 4, LLC ↗
Sources
Note · Oct 1, 2018 – Apr 9, 2020

No amendment in the last 12 months on an offering that may still be open — RED DOT HOLDINGS III, LP (latest filing Apr 9, 2020)

The latest filing for this offering is dated Apr 9, 2020 (first sale Oct 1, 2018). It reports $62,811,947 sold of an indefinite amount offered. No later amendment is in our index as of Oct 24, 2026.

What this means SEC rules expect a yearly amendment while an offering is still going. The raise may simply have ended — a Form D does not say when it closed. Ask the sponsor whether the offering closed, when, and at what amount.

Form D/A · Apr 9, 2020 ↗RED DOT HOLDINGS III, LP — PartnerFacts page ↗
Sources
Note · May 22, 2017 – May 25, 2017

No amendment in the last 12 months on an offering that may still be open — Red Dot Holdings II, LP (latest filing May 25, 2017)

The latest filing for this offering is dated May 25, 2017 (first sale May 22, 2017). It reports $22,805,000 sold of $35,000,000 offered. No later amendment is in our index as of Oct 24, 2026.

What this means SEC rules expect a yearly amendment while an offering is still going. The raise may simply have ended — a Form D does not say when it closed. Ask the sponsor whether the offering closed, when, and at what amount.

Form D · May 25, 2017 ↗Red Dot Holdings II, LP — PartnerFacts page ↗
Sources
Worth asking · Jan 16, 2019 – Apr 9, 2020

SETH BENT is no longer listed on the Apr 9, 2020 amendment — RED DOT HOLDINGS III, LP

SETH BENT appears on the Jan 16, 2019 Form D/A (executive officer) but not on the Apr 9, 2020 Form D/A for the same offering.

What this means People leave, and the issuer must list only current officers, directors and promoters. It is still worth asking why this person left and who replaced them.

Form D/A · Jan 16, 2019 ↗Form D/A · Apr 9, 2020 ↗SETH BENT — PartnerFacts page ↗RED DOT HOLDINGS III, LP — PartnerFacts page ↗
Sources
Worth asking · Jan 16, 2019 – Apr 9, 2020

KATE MATHENY is no longer listed on the Apr 9, 2020 amendment — RED DOT HOLDINGS III, LP

KATE MATHENY appears on the Jan 16, 2019 Form D/A (executive officer) but not on the Apr 9, 2020 Form D/A for the same offering.

What this means People leave, and the issuer must list only current officers, directors and promoters. It is still worth asking why this person left and who replaced them.

Form D/A · Jan 16, 2019 ↗Form D/A · Apr 9, 2020 ↗KATE MATHENY — PartnerFacts page ↗RED DOT HOLDINGS III, LP — PartnerFacts page ↗
Sources
Worth asking · Oct 16, 2018 – Jan 16, 2019

Adam Lefkowitz is no longer listed on the Jan 16, 2019 amendment — RED DOT HOLDINGS III, LP

Adam Lefkowitz appears on the Oct 16, 2018 Form D (executive officer) but not on the Jan 16, 2019 Form D/A for the same offering.

What this means People leave, and the issuer must list only current officers, directors and promoters. It is still worth asking why this person left and who replaced them.

Form D · Oct 16, 2018 ↗Form D/A · Jan 16, 2019 ↗Adam Lefkowitz — PartnerFacts page ↗RED DOT HOLDINGS III, LP — PartnerFacts page ↗
Sources
Note · Jan 16, 2019 – Apr 9, 2020

Offering amount changed between filings — RED DOT HOLDINGS III, LP

The Jan 16, 2019 filing says $50,000,000 offered; the Apr 9, 2020 Form D/A says an indefinite amount.

What this means The target raise changed. Raising the cap is common when a deal grows; ask whether the extra money has the same terms and use.

Form D/A (earlier) · Jan 16, 2019 ↗Form D/A (later) · Apr 9, 2020 ↗RED DOT HOLDINGS III, LP — PartnerFacts page ↗
Sources
Note · Apr 9, 2020

Address on file is a registered agent / shared office — RED DOT HOLDINGS III, LP

The latest filing lists 248 Centennial Parkway, Suite 100, Louisville, CO. That address is used by 6 issuers in our index (6 issuers in 4 unrelated clusters).

What this means Many small companies use a registered agent's address — it is legal and common. It means the Form D address is not where the team works. Ask where the business operates and who runs it day to day.

Form D/A · Apr 9, 2020 ↗RED DOT HOLDINGS III, LP — PartnerFacts page ↗
Sources
Note · May 25, 2017

Address on file is a registered agent / shared office — Red Dot Holdings II, LP

The latest filing lists 248 Centennial Parkway, Suite 100, Louisville, CO. That address is used by 6 issuers in our index (6 issuers in 4 unrelated clusters).

What this means Many small companies use a registered agent's address — it is legal and common. It means the Form D address is not where the team works. Ask where the business operates and who runs it day to day.

Form D · May 25, 2017 ↗Red Dot Holdings II, LP — PartnerFacts page ↗
Sources
What is compared

What is compared: every Form D and D/A we hold for this subject, side by side — filing dates vs. first-sale dates (the 15-day rule), amendment timing on open offerings (the yearly-amendment expectation), amounts sold, investor counts, offering amounts and minimums across amendments, industry and size bands, addresses, how each person's name and role is written, paid sellers' CRD numbers, and (for groups) where the member companies were formed and sit. Everything is as filed by the issuer; the SEC does not check it. Differences are common and usually have ordinary explanations — we show both values, the dates, and the source so you can ask. As of Oct 24, 2026.

5. Money to insiders

2 of 2 offerings report sales commissions totalling $1,737,862; 0 report finder's fees; 0 report proceeds to related persons. (includes amounts the issuer reported as estimates)

Offering (latest filing)Sales commissionsFinder's feesTo insidersPaid to sell itSource
Apr 9, 2020 D/A
RED DOT HOLDINGS III, LP
File 021-323709
$1,037,862 (est.)$0$0 (est.)
The GP is entitled to a carried interest and acquisition fees. The Investment Manager is entitled to management fees. The carried interest, acquisition fees, and management fees are fully discussed in the Issuer's confidential offering materials.
FRONTIER SOLUTIONS, LLC BrokerCheck CRD 136102 ↗
via FRONTIER SOLUTIONS, LLC (CRD 136102 ↗)
EDGAR ↗
May 25, 2017 D
Red Dot Holdings II, LP
File 021-287522
$700,000 (est.)$0$0 (est.)Douglas Jegi BrokerCheck CRD 2167031 ↗
via Frontier Solutions (CRD 136102 ↗)
EDGAR ↗
How this is counted

Counts come from Form D Items 12–15 on the filings in our index (latest filing per offering; one offering = one SEC file number; an amendment updates its offering rather than adding one). "To insiders" = gross proceeds used for payments to executive officers, directors or promoters. "—" = not reported on that filing. Amounts marked (est.) were reported as estimates. "Paid to sell it" = sales compensation recipients named on that filing (Item 12), each linked to FINRA BrokerCheck when a CRD number is reported.

Counted across all 2 issuers in this group — every filing in our index, latest filing per offering (SEC file number).

Property records 0 documents · 0 ownership records · last checked Oct 24, 2026, 7:46 AM ET · NYC and Cook County lookup still to run

0 recorded documents and 0 ownership records matched to Red Dot in the sources searched.

Not found in sources searched as of Oct 24, 2026, 7:46 AM ET: Hillsborough County FL Clerk of Court Official Records daily index (publicrec.hillsclerk.com D/P/M files), 2 daily files (Oct 14, 2026 to Oct 15, 2026) — loaded Oct 23, 2026, 8:59 PM ET; Harris County TX (HCAD ownership rolls 2009–2026) — 893,433 records, loaded Oct 24, 2026, 7:46 AM ET; Dallas County TX (DCAD ownership roll 2026) — 173,688 records, loaded Oct 23, 2026, 8:58 PM ET; Hillsborough County FL (FL DOR 2026 ownership roll + Clerk recorded-document index Oct 14, 2026 to Oct 15, 2026), Miami-Dade County FL (FL DOR 2026 ownership roll) — 294,950 records, loaded Oct 23, 2026, 8:58 PM ET. Still to be looked up for this group: NYC ACRIS via NYC Open Data (Real Property Parties 636b-3b5g, Master bnx9-e6tj, Legals 8h5j-fqxa, Document Control Codes 7isb-wh4c) · NYC PLUTO ownership via NYC Open Data (64uk-42ks) · Cook County IL Assessor via Cook County Open Data (Parcel Sales wvhk-k5uv; Parcel Addresses 3723-97qp). Records in other counties, and recorder indexes we do not yet cover, were not searched.

Property records coverage: New York City (ACRIS recorded documents and PLUTO ownership, looked up per issuer when its page is viewed; re-checked when the page is viewed again more than 30 days after the last check); Harris County TX (ownership only, no deed, mortgage or sale records; HCAD ownership rolls 2009–2026); Dallas County TX (ownership only, no deed, mortgage or sale records; DCAD ownership roll 2026); Hillsborough County FL (FL DOR 2026 ownership roll + Clerk recorded-document index Oct 14, 2026 to Oct 15, 2026), Miami-Dade County FL (FL DOR 2026 ownership roll); Cook County IL (assessor ownership and deed/sale records, looked up per issuer when its page is viewed). Recorder indexes (party names on deeds, mortgages and liens) in TX, AZ, NV, CA and WA counties and outside the Clerk index in FL, mortgages and liens outside NYC and Hillsborough County, lis pendens and foreclosure notices everywhere, Los Angeles County CA, Clark County NV, King County WA (loader ready; first load not finished), Cook County IL bulk pass (not finished; per-issuer lookups only so far), New York City bulk pass (not finished; per-issuer lookups only so far), Maricopa County AZ (loader ready; commercial-purpose statement not yet filed), Salt Lake County UT, and all other counties are not covered — not searched. Last refresh by source: Harris County Appraisal District real_acct.txt Oct 24, 2026, 7:46 AM ET; Hillsborough County FL Clerk daily index Oct 23, 2026, 8:59 PM ET; Dallas Central Appraisal District ACCOUNT_INFO.CSV Oct 23, 2026, 8:58 PM ET; Florida DOR NAL roll (Dade 23) Oct 23, 2026, 8:58 PM ET; Florida DOR NAL roll (Hillsborough 39) Oct 23, 2026, 8:54 PM ET. NYC and Cook County are also looked up per issuer when its page is viewed; the most recent such lookup on this site finished Oct 24, 2026, 3:30 AM ET. Parties are named as the recorder's index names them (role suffixes as recorded); no address, account number or trust date is shown for an individual, and individual owners of record (home ownership) are not matched or shown. Items still in human review are not shown.

Issuers in this group

Why each issuer is here is stated in the "Linked by" column. Low-confidence links are never shown — they wait for human review.

SourceIssuerLinked byLocationIndustryFilingsSold (max)InvestorsMin. investment (latest filing)Active
EDGAR ↗RD Red Dot Holdings II, LPshared people, shared management entity, similar issuer namesLOUISVILLE, COPooled Investment Fund1$22,805,000
offering $35,000,000 · similar: $155,000–$5,250,000
61
similar: 4–27
No minimum reported
similar: $1,000–$100,000
2017–2017
EDGAR ↗RD RED DOT HOLDINGS III, LPshared people, shared management entity, similar issuer namesLOUISVILLE, COPooled Investment Fund3$62,811,947
offering Indefinite · similar: $155,000–$5,250,000
193
similar: 4–27
No minimum reported
similar: $1,000–$100,000
2018–2020

"Similar" = offerings in the same industry claiming the same exemption, filed in the last 5 years: Pooled Investment Fund / 506(b) (83,801 filings); ranges are the middle half (25th–75th percentile). Computed by PartnerFacts from SEC EDGAR Form D data as of Oct 23, 2026, 5:45 PM ET. Rows without a range: fewer than 30 comparable filings, or not a Rule 506 offering. No ranking or score.

Timeline of offerings

SourceFiledIssuerFormIndustryOfferedSold
EDGAR ↗Apr 9, 2020RED DOT HOLDINGS III, LPD/APooled Investment FundIndefinite$62,811,947
EDGAR ↗Jan 16, 2019RED DOT HOLDINGS III, LPD/APooled Investment Fund$50,000,000$28,850,000
EDGAR ↗Oct 16, 2018RED DOT HOLDINGS III, LPDPooled Investment Fund$50,000,000$12,150,000
EDGAR ↗May 25, 2017Red Dot Holdings II, LPDPooled Investment Fund$35,000,000$22,805,000

Activity: 0 new offerings in the last 12 months across all issuers in this group (new offering = a Form D that is not an amendment, D/A) · most recent filing Apr 9, 2020. Industry history, as reported on each offering's latest filing: All 2 offerings reported: Pooled Investment Fund (2017–2018).

People across the group

NameRolesIssuers hereFirst → last listed
RD Red Dot Management, LLC entityExecutive Officer2May 25, 2017 → Apr 9, 2020
SB SETH BENTExecutive Officer2May 25, 2017 → Jan 16, 2019
AL Adam LefkowitzExecutive Officer2May 25, 2017 → Oct 16, 2018
RD RED DOT HOLDINGS III GP, LLC entityPromoter1Oct 16, 2018 → Apr 9, 2020
CR CHRIS RINGENBERGERExecutive Officer1Apr 9, 2020 → Apr 9, 2020
WB WILLIAM J BUTLERExecutive Officer1Apr 9, 2020 → Apr 9, 2020
KM KATE MATHENYExecutive Officer1Jan 16, 2019 → Jan 16, 2019
RD Red Dot Holdings II GP, LLC entityPromoter1May 25, 2017 → May 25, 2017

Adviser registration (Form ADV)

Searched SEC Form ADV bulk data (registered + exempt reporting advisers) (24,962 records as of Oct 2, 2026, 8:00 AM ET) — nothing matched Red Dot.

Meta advertising

No Meta Pixel ids or Facebook / Instagram page links on file for Red Dot as of Oct 24, 2026 — the sponsor website is read for them once it is on file (runs automatically). Meta Ad Library: not searched by PartnerFacts (no API access); a one-tap Ad Library search is under Look further.

Other offering types (Regulation A and Regulation Crowdfunding)

Searched SEC Regulation A Data Sets (Forms 1-A, 1-K, 1-Z; 2015 Q2 → 2026 Q3); SEC Crowdfunding Offerings Data Sets (Form C family; 2016 Q2 → 2026 Q3); EDGAR form index for 2026 Q3 → 2026 Q4 (51,358 records as of Oct 23, 2026, 8:41 PM ET) — nothing matched this name.

Public profiles and social

No website or social profile named in Red Dot's SEC filings (Form C, Reg A, Form ADV; checked Oct 24, 2026). Web search for this name: #216,697 of 374,652 in line (1,334 issuers searched so far). One-tap searches: Look further ↓

Export this report as PDF · Premium

Request diligence pack (Premium) PartnerFacts asks the sponsor for the standard information pack and delivers it to you labelled "provided by the sponsor".

Change history

No corrections have been requested for this page.

Request a correction

Free. Covers the grouping itself or any record shown here. Logged with status: received → under review → fixed / confirmed with source.

Sponsor response

Add a sourced explanation next to any fact. Reviewed before publishing.

Grouping is PartnerFacts' inference from public filings (shared related persons, management entities, business address). Everything else on this page is drawn from the filings themselves. Not the same sponsor? Request a correction.

Look further

One-tap searches on sites we do not index ourselves, with the name pre-filled (outside the US (as filed: LOUISVILLE), CO). Each opens in a new tab; what you find there is not verified by PartnerFacts.

Social and web

LinkedIn companies ↗Instagram ↗X (Twitter) ↗Facebook ↗YouTube ↗Google ↗Google Images ↗Google News ↗Meta Ad Library ↗

Courts

CourtListener / RECAP (federal) ↗PACER case locator (federal, login) ↗Colorado state courts — find the court ↗

Securities regulators

SEC EDGAR full-text search ↗SEC action look-up ↗FINRA BrokerCheck ↗SEC IAPD adviser search ↗

Business registries

Colorado Secretary of State business search ↗OpenCorporates ↗