PartnerFacts
Data last updated: Oct 23, 2026, 5:45 PM ETLatest filing: Oct 22, 2026Now: Oct 24, 2026, 5:21 AM ET

Sponsor Check › Sponsor group

Q

Quantum

One sponsor team, 2 deal companies · Northfield, NJ

Grouped because: 2 shared people, same business address (2 issuers), similar issuer names (2) (automatic match from the filings) · not the same sponsor?

2deal companies
$153.1Mreported sold
163investors
15Form D filings
2013–2026active
0new, last 12 mo
Follow this sponsor groupLook further ↓

Data last updated Oct 23, 2026, 5:45 PM ET · Latest filing in this group Jul 22, 2026 · Courts (RECAP) last checked: Oct 24, 2026, 2:16 AM ET · SEC enforcement last checked: covered by the index scan as of Oct 24, 2026, 2:50 AM ET

The short version

Quantum is a sponsor group of 2 issuers that PartnerFacts links to one sponsor (shared people, same business address, similar issuer names; automatic match from the filings), filing 15 Form D filings between Jul 2013 and Jul 2026.

What this means One team, 2 deal companies, about 13 years of track record in SEC filings. We link the companies because the same people or address appear on their forms — tap "Request a correction" if that is wrong.

Combined reported sold: $153.1M to 163 investors (latest filing per issuer). Industries as reported: Pooled Investment Fund (2). Issuers are based in NJ (2).

What this means $153.1M raised across the group, about $939K per investor. Amounts come from each company's latest Form D; they are what the sponsor reported, not audited figures.

Principal people: Giridhar M Reddy (2 issuers, executive officer) and John J Hughes (2 issuers, executive officer).

What this means The person on the most companies is usually the one running the show; their page lists every deal.

Activity: 0 new offerings in the last 12 months; latest filing Jul 22, 2026.

What this means No new raise filed in the past year.

Public records searched: federal courts (CourtListener / RECAP), SEC enforcement releases, state securities regulators (AZ, CA, DE, TX, WA), property records (NYC, FL, IL and TX counties) — 33 court cases matching the name, 6 bankruptcy cases matching the name listed in Key records below.

What this means 39 records came back, including 3 court cases still open — open cases can take years and cost money. Each one is listed below with a link to the original document and a line saying why it matched. A name match is not proof it is the same person or company — read the why line and the document. Being sued or named in a release is an accusation, not a finding.

We compared 15 public filings for Quantum and found 9 differences, 5 worth asking the sponsor about: 7 offerings reported less sold on a later filing than an earlier one; 10 offerings reported fewer investors on a later filing; and more below.

What this means These are differences between the sponsor's own SEC filings — both values, dates and sources are listed in Key records, section 4. Most have ordinary explanations; ask the sponsor.

What the community is saying

Community search for Quantum has not run yet — it is joining a line of 13,647 names; searches run around the clock at the hosts' allowed rate. Searched so far: 28 names.

Community comments are quoted as written by their authors. Sources searched: BiggerPockets forums (via DuckDuckGo, Brave, Bing and BiggerPockets search) and Reddit (search feed + public archive).

Key records

Five things investors ask first. Items still in human review are counted, not shown.

1. Lawsuits

33 cases: 3 open, 7 closed (disposition not in docket feed), 15 dismissed, 8 judgment

United States ex rel. Black Arrow Strategies LLC v. Quantum Corporation open matched at sponsor-group level (Quantum)
District Court, N.D. California · No. 5:26-cv-06340 · Filed Jun 25, 2026 · Nature of suit: 376 Qui Tam (31 U.S.C. § 3729(a)) · Cause: 31:3730 Qui Tam False Claims Act
Role of Quantum Corporation: Defendant · Outcome: Open — no termination date on the docket (bulk snapshot 2026-09-30) Docket on CourtListener ↗
exact company name; name has one distinctive word; court in CA (not the issuer's state)
Lee v. Quantum Corporation open matched at sponsor-group level (Quantum)
District Court, D. Colorado · No. 1:25-cv-02770 · Filed Sep 4, 2025 · Nature of suit: 850 Securities, Commodities, Exchange · Cause: 15:78 Securities Exchange Act
Role of Quantum Corporation: Defendant · Outcome: Open — no termination date on the docket (bulk snapshot 2026-09-30) Docket on CourtListener ↗
exact company name; name has one distinctive word; court in CO (not the issuer's state)
Arrow Electronics, Inc. v. Quantum Corporation closed matched at sponsor-group level (Quantum)
District Court, N.D. California · No. 5:23-cv-03746 · Filed Jul 27, 2023 · Closed Mar 31, 2025 · Nature of suit: 190 Contract: Other · Cause: 28:1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Role of Quantum Corporation: Defendant · Outcome: Terminated 2025-03-31 (disposition not included in the bulk docket feed — see docket) Docket on CourtListener ↗
exact company name; name has one distinctive word; court in CA (not the issuer's state)
Nabhan v. Quantum Corp. dismissed matched at sponsor-group level (Quantum)
District Court, N.D. California · No. 3:18-cv-00925 · Filed Feb 13, 2018 · Closed May 18, 2020 · Nature of suit: 850 Securities/Commodities · Cause: 15:78m(a) Securities Exchange Act
Role of Quantum Corp.: Defendant · Outcome: Terminated 2020-05-18 — FJC Integrated Database disposition: Dismissed: other Docket on CourtListener ↗
exact company name; name has one distinctive word; court in CA (not the issuer's state)
Lazan v. Quantum Corporation judgment matched at sponsor-group level (Quantum)
District Court, N.D. California · No. 3:18-cv-00923 · Filed Feb 13, 2018 · Closed Nov 27, 2019 · Nature of suit: 850 Securities/Commodities · Cause: 15:78m(a) Securities Exchange Act
Role of Quantum Corporation: Defendant · Outcome: Terminated 2019-11-27 — FJC Integrated Database disposition: Other; judgment for unknown Docket on CourtListener ↗
exact company name; name has one distinctive word; court in CA (not the issuer's state)
Quantum, Inc v. Akeso Health Sciences, LLC open matched at sponsor-group level (Quantum)
District Court, E.D. Michigan · No. 2:16-mc-51574 · Filed Oct 28, 2016 · Nature of suit: Other Statutory Actions · Cause: No cause code entered
Role of Quantum, Inc: Plaintiff · Outcome: Open — no termination date on the docket (bulk snapshot 2026-09-30) Docket on CourtListener ↗
exact company name; name has one distinctive word; court in MI (not the issuer's state)
Quantum, Inc. v. Akeso Health Sciences, LLC judgment matched at sponsor-group level (Quantum)
District Court, D. Oregon · No. 3:16-cv-00334 · Filed Feb 23, 2016 · Closed Aug 8, 2017 · Nature of suit: 190 Contract: Other Contract Actions · Cause: 28:2201 Declaratory Judgment
Role of Quantum, Inc.: Plaintiff · Outcome: Terminated 2017-08-08 — FJC Integrated Database disposition: Judgment on jury verdict; judgment for defendant Docket on CourtListener ↗
exact company name; name has one distinctive word; court in OR (not the issuer's state)
ONE BEACON INSURANCE COMPANY v. QUANTUM CORPORATION dismissed matched at sponsor-group level (Quantum)
District Court, D. New Jersey · No. 2:10-cv-01174 · Filed Mar 4, 2010 · Closed Nov 10, 2011 · Nature of suit: 380 Other personal property damage
Role of QUANTUM CORPORATION: Defendant · Outcome: Terminated 2011-11-10 — FJC Integrated Database disposition: Dismissed: settled Docket on CourtListener ↗
exact company name; name has one distinctive word; court in the group's state (NJ)
MOORBY v. QUANTUM INC dismissed matched at sponsor-group level (Quantum)
District Court, District of Columbia · No. 1:07-cv-01596 · Filed Sep 7, 2007 · Closed Nov 5, 2007 · Nature of suit: 890 Other statutory actions
Role of QUANTUM INC: Defendant · Outcome: Terminated 2007-11-05 — FJC Integrated Database disposition: Voluntarily dismissed Docket on CourtListener ↗
exact company name; name has one distinctive word; court in DC (not the issuer's state)
Quantum Corporation v. AMG Technologies Inc closed matched at sponsor-group level (Quantum)
District Court, C.D. California · No. 8:05-cv-00413 · Filed May 3, 2005 · Closed Mar 16, 2006 · Nature of suit: 190 Other contract actions
Role of Quantum Corporation: Plaintiff · Outcome: Terminated 2006-03-16 (disposition not included in the bulk docket feed — see docket) Docket on CourtListener ↗
exact company name; name has one distinctive word; court in CA (not the issuer's state)
Storage Technology Corporation v. Quantum Corporation closed matched at sponsor-group level (Quantum)
District Court, D. Minnesota · No. 0:04-mc-00074 · Filed Dec 3, 2004 · Closed Jan 12, 2005
Role of Quantum Corporation: Defendant · Outcome: Terminated 2005-01-12 (disposition not included in the bulk docket feed — see docket) Docket on CourtListener ↗
exact company name; name has one distinctive word; court in MN (not the issuer's state)
Cincom Systems Inc v. Quantum Corporation dismissed matched at sponsor-group level (Quantum)
District Court, S.D. Ohio · No. 1:04-cv-00025 · Filed Jan 14, 2004 · Closed Dec 6, 2004 · Nature of suit: 850 Securities, Commodities, Exchange
Role of Quantum Corporation: Defendant · Outcome: Terminated 2004-12-06 — FJC Integrated Database disposition: Dismissed: settled Docket on CourtListener ↗
exact company name; name has one distinctive word; court in OH (not the issuer's state)
Matsushita Kotobuki Electronics Industies, LTD v. Quantum Corporation dismissed matched at sponsor-group level (Quantum)
District Court, N.D. California · No. 5:03-cv-05860 · Filed Dec 30, 2003 · Closed Oct 28, 2004 · Nature of suit: 190 Contract: Other · Cause: 28:1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Role of Quantum Corporation: Defendant · Outcome: Terminated 2004-10-28 — FJC Integrated Database disposition: Dismissed: settled Docket on CourtListener ↗
exact company name; name has one distinctive word; court in CA (not the issuer's state)
Imation Corp. v. Quantum Corporation judgment matched at sponsor-group level (Quantum)
District Court, D. Minnesota · No. 0:01-cv-01798 · Filed Oct 1, 2001 · Closed May 31, 2002 · Nature of suit: 410 Antitrust
Role of Quantum Corporation: Defendant · Outcome: Terminated 2002-05-31 — FJC Integrated Database disposition: Other; judgment for both plaintiff and defendant Docket on CourtListener ↗
exact company name; name has one distinctive word; court in MN (not the issuer's state)
Quantum Corporation v. Harris Environmental dismissed matched at sponsor-group level (Quantum)
District Court, N.D. California · No. 5:00-cv-20420 · Filed Apr 17, 2000 · Closed Jun 1, 2000 · Nature of suit: 190 Other contract actions
Role of Quantum Corporation: Plaintiff · Outcome: Terminated 2000-06-01 — FJC Integrated Database disposition: Voluntarily dismissed Docket on CourtListener ↗
exact company name; name has one distinctive word; court in CA (not the issuer's state)
Lunaire Limited v. Quantum Corporation closed matched at sponsor-group level (Quantum)
District Court, N.D. California · No. 5:00-cv-20541 · Filed Mar 31, 2000 · Closed May 31, 2001
Role of Quantum Corporation: Defendant · Outcome: Terminated 2001-05-31 (disposition not included in the bulk docket feed — see docket) Docket on CourtListener ↗
exact company name; name has one distinctive word; court in CA (not the issuer's state)
Quantum Corporation v. Lunaire Limited dismissed matched at sponsor-group level (Quantum)
District Court, N.D. California · No. 5:00-cv-20178 · Filed Feb 16, 2000 · Closed Nov 2, 2000 · Nature of suit: 190 Other contract actions
Role of Quantum Corporation: Plaintiff · Outcome: Terminated 2000-11-02 — FJC Integrated Database disposition: Voluntarily dismissed Docket on CourtListener ↗
exact company name; name has one distinctive word; court in CA (not the issuer's state)
Quantum Corporation v. CHS Electrinics, Inc dismissed matched at sponsor-group level (Quantum)
District Court, N.D. California · No. 5:99-cv-21229 · Filed Dec 21, 1999 · Closed Apr 10, 2000 · Nature of suit: 190 Other contract actions
Role of Quantum Corporation: Plaintiff · Outcome: Terminated 2000-04-10 — FJC Integrated Database disposition: Voluntarily dismissed Docket on CourtListener ↗
exact company name; name has one distinctive word; court in CA (not the issuer's state)
Lunaire Limited v. Quantum Corporation closed matched at sponsor-group level (Quantum)
District Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · No. 4:99-cv-02167 · Filed Dec 16, 1999 · Closed Mar 28, 2000 · Nature of suit: 190 Other contract actions
Role of Quantum Corporation: Defendant · Outcome: Terminated 2000-03-28 — FJC Integrated Database disposition: Transfer to another district Docket on CourtListener ↗
exact company name; name has one distinctive word; court in PA (not the issuer's state)
Quantum Corporation v. TJX Companies closed matched at sponsor-group level (Quantum)
District Court, S.D. New York · No. 1:99-cv-09835 · Filed Sep 17, 1999 · Closed Nov 9, 1999 · Nature of suit: 190 Other contract actions
Role of Quantum Corporation: Plaintiff · Outcome: Terminated 1999-11-09 — FJC Integrated Database disposition: Transfer to another district Docket on CourtListener ↗
exact company name; name has one distinctive word; court in NY (not the issuer's state)
Quantum Corporation v. Gateway Freight Svcs dismissed matched at sponsor-group level (Quantum)
District Court, N.D. California · No. 3:99-cv-00715 · Filed Feb 19, 1999 · Closed Sep 22, 1999 · Nature of suit: 890 Other statutory actions
Role of Quantum Corporation: Plaintiff · Outcome: Terminated 1999-09-22 — FJC Integrated Database disposition: Voluntarily dismissed Docket on CourtListener ↗
exact company name; name has one distinctive word; court in CA (not the issuer's state)
Quantum Company, The v. United Fire dismissed matched at sponsor-group level (Quantum)
District Court, D. Idaho · No. 1:98-cv-00451 · Filed Nov 13, 1998 · Closed Apr 13, 2001 · Nature of suit: 130 Miller act
Role of Quantum Company, The: Plaintiff · Outcome: Terminated 2001-04-13 — FJC Integrated Database disposition: Dismissed: other Docket on CourtListener ↗
exact company name; name has one distinctive word; court in ID (not the issuer's state)
Quantum Corporation v. Phelps Technologies judgment matched at sponsor-group level (Quantum)
District Court, N.D. California · No. 5:97-cv-20535 · Filed Jun 18, 1997 · Closed Dec 22, 1998 · Nature of suit: 190 Other contract actions
Role of Quantum Corporation: Plaintiff · Outcome: Terminated 1998-12-22 — FJC Integrated Database disposition: Judgment on motion before trial; judgment for defendant Docket on CourtListener ↗
exact company name; name has one distinctive word; court in CA (not the issuer's state); filed 1997, first Form D 2013
Howard Gunty Profit v. Quantum Corporation judgment matched at sponsor-group level (Quantum)
District Court, N.D. California · No. 5:96-cv-20711 · Filed Aug 30, 1996 · Closed Apr 6, 1998 · Nature of suit: 850 Securities, Commodities, Exchange
Role of Quantum Corporation: Defendant · Outcome: Terminated 1998-04-06 — FJC Integrated Database disposition: Judgment on motion before trial; judgment for defendant Docket on CourtListener ↗
exact company name; name has one distinctive word; court in CA (not the issuer's state); filed 1996, first Form D 2013
Quantum Corporation v. NCR Corporation dismissed matched at sponsor-group level (Quantum)
District Court, N.D. California · No. 5:96-cv-20157 · Filed Feb 28, 1996 · Closed Jul 8, 1996 · Nature of suit: 190 Other contract actions
Role of Quantum Corporation: Plaintiff · Outcome: Terminated 1996-07-08 — FJC Integrated Database disposition: Voluntarily dismissed Docket on CourtListener ↗
exact company name; name has one distinctive word; court in CA (not the issuer's state); filed 1996, first Form D 2013
South Elec Dist Inc v. Quantum Corporation dismissed matched at sponsor-group level (Quantum)
District Court, N.D. California · No. 5:94-cv-20158 · Filed Mar 3, 1994 · Closed Nov 15, 1994 · Nature of suit: 410 Antitrust
Role of Quantum Corporation: Defendant · Outcome: Terminated 1994-11-15 — FJC Integrated Database disposition: Voluntarily dismissed Docket on CourtListener ↗
exact company name; name has one distinctive word; court in CA (not the issuer's state); filed 1994, first Form D 2013
Quantum Corporation v. Southern Elec. Dist. dismissed matched at sponsor-group level (Quantum)
District Court, N.D. California · No. 5:93-cv-20704 · Filed Sep 21, 1993 · Closed Oct 13, 1993 · Nature of suit: 190 Other contract actions
Role of Quantum Corporation: Plaintiff · Outcome: Terminated 1993-10-13 — FJC Integrated Database disposition: Voluntarily dismissed Docket on CourtListener ↗
exact company name; name has one distinctive word; court in CA (not the issuer's state); filed 1993, first Form D 2013
Quantum Corp. v. Siessa Informatica judgment matched at sponsor-group level (Quantum)
District Court, N.D. California · No. 5:93-cv-20680 · Filed Sep 13, 1993 · Closed Mar 7, 1995 · Nature of suit: 190 Other contract actions
Role of Quantum Corp.: Plaintiff · Outcome: Terminated 1995-03-07 — FJC Integrated Database disposition: Judgment on default; judgment for plaintiff Docket on CourtListener ↗
exact company name; name has one distinctive word; court in CA (not the issuer's state); filed 1993, first Form D 2013
Quantum Corporation v. Northgate Computer judgment matched at sponsor-group level (Quantum)
District Court, N.D. California · No. 5:93-cv-20646 · Filed Sep 1, 1993 · Closed Jan 12, 1994 · Nature of suit: 190 Other contract actions
Role of Quantum Corporation: Plaintiff · Outcome: Terminated 1994-01-12 — FJC Integrated Database disposition: Judgment on motion before trial; judgment for plaintiff Docket on CourtListener ↗
exact company name; name has one distinctive word; court in CA (not the issuer's state); filed 1993, first Form D 2013
Quantum Corporation v. Mitchell dismissed matched at sponsor-group level (Quantum)
District Court, D. Arizona · No. 2:93-cv-00141 · Filed Jan 22, 1993 · Closed Jun 16, 1993 · Nature of suit: 370 Other fraud
Role of Quantum Corporation: Plaintiff · Outcome: Terminated 1993-06-16 — FJC Integrated Database disposition: Voluntarily dismissed Docket on CourtListener ↗
exact company name; name has one distinctive word; court in AZ (not the issuer's state); filed 1993, first Form D 2013
Quantum Corp. v. GCC Technologies dismissed matched at sponsor-group level (Quantum)
District Court, N.D. California · No. 5:93-cv-20036 · Filed Jan 20, 1993 · Closed May 14, 1993 · Nature of suit: 190 Other contract actions
Role of Quantum Corp.: Plaintiff · Outcome: Terminated 1993-05-14 — FJC Integrated Database disposition: Dismissed: settled Docket on CourtListener ↗
exact company name; name has one distinctive word; court in CA (not the issuer's state); filed 1993, first Form D 2013
MICRO-WORLD CORP v. QUANTUM CORPORATION judgment matched at sponsor-group level (Quantum)
District Court, D. Arizona · No. · Filed Sep 29, 1992 · Closed Dec 10, 1992 · Nature of suit: 190 Other contract actions
Role of QUANTUM CORPORATION: Defendant · Outcome: Terminated 1992-12-10 — FJC Integrated Database disposition: Judgment on motion before trial; judgment for defendant Docket on CourtListener ↗
exact company name; name has one distinctive word; court in AZ (not the issuer's state); filed 1992, first Form D 2013
Quantum Corporation v. Sony Corporation closed matched at sponsor-group level (Quantum)
District Court, D. Colorado · No. 1:91-mc-00264 · Filed Aug 15, 1991 · Closed Jul 31, 2015 · Nature of suit: 999 Invalid · Cause: Civil Miscellaneous Case
Role of Quantum Corporation: Plaintiff · Outcome: Terminated 2015-07-31 (disposition not included in the bulk docket feed — see docket) Docket on CourtListener ↗
exact company name; name has one distinctive word; court in CO (not the issuer's state); filed 1991, first Form D 2013
What was searched

Sources searched: CourtListener bulk data (RECAP dockets as of 2026-09-30; recall-first rule 10-24) — federal district + bankruptcy courts State courts: not covered (one-tap state court links under Look further). PACER: not searched. · Last checked Oct 24, 2026, 2:16 AM ET.

Court records show docket facts only; we never restate allegations as facts. Outcome wording comes from the docket feed; where it does not state a disposition we say so.

State courts: not covered (one-tap state court links under Look further). No state offers a lawful automated statewide source PartnerFacts can use today. Texas (re:SearchTX) terms prohibit storing results in a database open to third parties; New York (WebCivil) and Massachusetts (MassCourts) require a browser check that blocks scripted queries; California has no statewide index (58 county portals; Rule of Court 2.503 grants name-based access case by case); Florida, Utah and Illinois offer paid or partial access whose terms for automated use are unverified. Washington (dw.courts.wa.gov; bulk index reports under a JISC data-dissemination agreement), Delaware (CourtConnect; Court of Chancery not included) and Arizona (apps.azcourts.gov/publicaccess, which has an official channel to request high-volume access) are the candidates; PartnerFacts will request written permission before any automated search. Federal courts are searched through CourtListener / RECAP.

2. Regulatory actions

None found in sources searched — SEC enforcement releases (index scan as of Oct 24, 2026, 2:50 AM ET) · state securities regulators: AZ, CA, DE, TX, WA (crawled Oct 23, 2026)

What was searched

SEC enforcement searched: SEC litigation releases and administrative proceedings — respondent names in the sec.gov index titles (30,205 releases, 1995-09-19 to 2026-10-23); release text is read only to confirm a candidate. Names that appear only in the body of a release are not found. — Searched SEC litigation releases and administrative proceedings (1995→ / 2007→) (30,205 records as of Oct 24, 2026, 2:50 AM ET) — nothing matched Quantum..

State securities regulators searched: AZ (Corporation Commission Securities Division), CA (DFPI — 16 of 12,159 DFPI respondent pages read so far; sponsor-name matches are read first), DE (DOJ Investor Protection Unit), TX (State Securities Board), WA (DFI) — last crawled Oct 23, 2026, 9:57 PM ET. Other states are not covered.

3. Bankruptcies

6 cases: 6 closed (disposition not in docket feed)

Peters v. Quantum Corporation closed matched at sponsor-group level (Quantum)
United States Bankruptcy Court, D. Colorado · No. 09-01735 · Filed Nov 25, 2009 · Closed Apr 1, 2013
Role of Quantum Corporation: Defendant · Outcome: Case closed 2013-04-01 (disposition not included in the bulk docket feed — see docket) Docket on CourtListener ↗
exact company name; name has one distinctive word; court in CO (not the issuer's state)
Official Unsecured Creditors Committee v. Quantum Corp. closed matched at sponsor-group level (Quantum)
United States Bankruptcy Court, N.D. California · No. 03-04165 · Filed Mar 17, 2003 · Closed Jul 29, 2003
Role of Quantum Corp.: Defendant · Outcome: Case closed 2003-07-29 (disposition not included in the bulk docket feed — see docket) Docket on CourtListener ↗
exact company name; name has one distinctive word; court in CA (not the issuer's state)
Calascibetta v. Quantum, Inc closed matched at sponsor-group level (Quantum)
United States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. New York · No. 8-03-08055 · Filed Feb 7, 2003 · Closed Jan 13, 2004
Role of Quantum, Inc: Defendant · Outcome: Case closed 2004-01-13 (disposition not included in the bulk docket feed — see docket) Docket on CourtListener ↗
exact company name; name has one distinctive word; court in NY (not the issuer's state)
Whitaker v. Quantum Corporation closed matched at sponsor-group level (Quantum)
United States Bankruptcy Court, M.D. Florida · No. 3:92-ap-29154 · Filed Dec 26, 1992 · Closed Oct 8, 1993
Role of Quantum Corporation: Defendant · Outcome: Case closed 1993-10-08 (disposition not included in the bulk docket feed — see docket) Docket on CourtListener ↗
exact company name; name has one distinctive word; court in FL (not the issuer's state); filed 1992, first Form D 2013
Whitaker v. Quantum Corp. closed matched at sponsor-group level (Quantum)
United States Bankruptcy Court, M.D. Florida · No. 3:92-ap-06516 · Filed Jun 11, 1992 · Closed Aug 13, 1996
Role of Quantum Corp.: Defendant · Outcome: Case closed 1996-08-13 (disposition not included in the bulk docket feed — see docket) Docket on CourtListener ↗
exact company name; name has one distinctive word; court in FL (not the issuer's state); filed 1992, first Form D 2013
Quantum Corporation closed matched at sponsor-group level (Quantum)
United States Bankruptcy Court, D. New Jersey · No. 89-91799 · Filed Mar 10, 1989 · Closed Aug 22, 1995
Role of Quantum Corporation: Debtor · Outcome: Case closed 1995-08-22 (disposition not included in the bulk docket feed — see docket) Docket on CourtListener ↗
exact company name; name has one distinctive word; court in the group's state (NJ); filed 1989, first Form D 2013
What was searched

Sources searched: Federal bankruptcy courts via CourtListener / RECAP archive (federal district courts, federal bankruptcy courts). State courts: not covered (one-tap state court links under Look further). PACER: not searched (RECAP only). · Last checked Oct 24, 2026, 2:16 AM ET.

Court records show docket facts only; we never restate allegations as facts. Outcome wording comes from the docket feed; where it does not state a disposition we say so.

State courts: not covered (one-tap state court links under Look further). No state offers a lawful automated statewide source PartnerFacts can use today. Texas (re:SearchTX) terms prohibit storing results in a database open to third parties; New York (WebCivil) and Massachusetts (MassCourts) require a browser check that blocks scripted queries; California has no statewide index (58 county portals; Rule of Court 2.503 grants name-based access case by case); Florida, Utah and Illinois offer paid or partial access whose terms for automated use are unverified. Washington (dw.courts.wa.gov; bulk index reports under a JISC data-dissemination agreement), Delaware (CourtConnect; Court of Chancery not included) and Arizona (apps.azcourts.gov/publicaccess, which has an official channel to request high-volume access) are the candidates; PartnerFacts will request written permission before any automated search. Federal courts are searched through CourtListener / RECAP.

4. Differences between public sources

No comparisons published

What is compared

No public statement by this sponsor group has been collected yet, so there is nothing to compare. Sources compared: the sponsor's own website (known from the issuer's own filings — Form C issuer website, EDGAR company profile — an approved profile claim or Form ADV Item 1.I of its matched adviser) · SEC Form D · SEC Form ADV (IAPD) · Internet Archive · No website is on file for this sponsor group yet.

9 differences found between the filings for Quantum — 5 worth asking about (compared 15 filings on Oct 24, 2026)

Worth asking · Jul 31, 2014 – Jul 22, 2026

7 offerings reported less sold on a later filing than an earlier one

Amount sold went down between filings — Quantum Strategic Value Fund, LP · Amount sold went down between filings — Quantum Strategic Value Fund, LP · Amount sold went down between filings — Quantum Strategic Value Fund, LP · Amount sold went down between filings — Quantum Strategic Value Fund, LP · Amount sold went down between filings — Quantum Strategic Value Fund, LP · and 2 more

What this means Amounts sold normally only go up. Ask the sponsor what happened on each.

Form D/A (earlier) · Jul 24, 2025 ↗Form D/A (later) · Jul 22, 2026 ↗Quantum Strategic Value Fund, LP — PartnerFacts page ↗Form D/A (earlier) · Jul 20, 2021 ↗
Sources
Worth asking · Jul 31, 2014 – Jul 22, 2026

10 offerings reported fewer investors on a later filing

Investor count went down between filings — Quantum Strategic Value Fund, LP · Investor count went down between filings — Quantum Strategic Value Fund, LP · Investor count went down between filings — Quantum Strategic Value Fund, LP · Investor count went down between filings — Quantum Strategic Value Fund, LP · Investor count went down between filings — Quantum Strategic Value Fund, LP · and 5 more

What this means Investor counts normally only grow. Ask the sponsor what happened on each.

Form D/A (earlier) · Jul 24, 2025 ↗Form D/A (later) · Jul 22, 2026 ↗Quantum Strategic Value Fund, LP — PartnerFacts page ↗Form D/A (earlier) · Jul 19, 2023 ↗
Sources
Worth asking · Oct 1, 2007 – Jul 31, 2013

Form D filed 2,130 days after the first sale — Quantum Strategic Value Fund, LP

The filing says the first sale was Oct 1, 2007. The Form D was filed Jul 31, 2013 — 2,130 days later. The rule: a Form D is generally due within 15 days after the first sale, so this one is 2,115 days past that.

What this means The notice went in months after money was taken in. Late notices are common and carry no penalty by themselves, but it is fair to ask the sponsor why the paperwork lagged.

Form D · Jul 31, 2013 ↗Quantum Strategic Value Fund, LP — PartnerFacts page ↗
Sources
Worth asking · Oct 1, 2007 – Jul 29, 2013

Form D filed 2,128 days after the first sale — Quantum Strategic Value Fund, LP,The

The filing says the first sale was Oct 1, 2007. The Form D was filed Jul 29, 2013 — 2,128 days later. The rule: a Form D is generally due within 15 days after the first sale, so this one is 2,113 days past that.

What this means The notice went in months after money was taken in. Late notices are common and carry no penalty by themselves, but it is fair to ask the sponsor why the paperwork lagged.

Form D · Jul 29, 2013 ↗Quantum Strategic Value Fund, LP,The — PartnerFacts page ↗
Sources
Worth asking · Jul 29, 2013 – Jul 31, 2013

2 separate companies in this group use the same name: "Quantum Strategic Value Fund, LP,The"

CIK 1580348 (first filed Jul 29, 2013, Northfield, NJ); CIK 1582941 (first filed Jul 31, 2013, Northfield, NJ).

What this means Two legal entities with one name can make it unclear which one you invested in. Match the CIK and the SEC file number on your documents, not just the name.

Quantum Strategic Value Fund, LP,The — PartnerFacts page ↗Quantum Strategic Value Fund, LP — PartnerFacts page ↗EDGAR filer page · CIK 1580348 ↗EDGAR filer page · CIK 1582941 ↗
Sources
Note · Oct 1, 2007 – Jul 29, 2013

No amendment in the last 12 months on an offering that may still be open — Quantum Strategic Value Fund, LP,The (latest filing Jul 29, 2013)

The latest filing for this offering is dated Jul 29, 2013 (first sale Oct 1, 2007). It reports $84,663,393 sold of an indefinite amount offered. No later amendment is in our index as of Oct 24, 2026.

What this means SEC rules expect a yearly amendment while an offering is still going. The raise may simply have ended — a Form D does not say when it closed. Ask the sponsor whether the offering closed, when, and at what amount.

Form D · Jul 29, 2013 ↗Quantum Strategic Value Fund, LP,The — PartnerFacts page ↗
Sources
Note · Jul 31, 2013 – Jul 29, 2020

Reported net asset value range changed between filings — Quantum Strategic Value Fund, LP

"$50,000,001 - $100,000,000" (Jul 31, 2013); then "$25,000,001 - $50,000,000" (Jul 19, 2019); then "$50,000,001 - $100,000,000" (Jul 29, 2020).

What this means This is the size band the issuer picks for itself on the form. A change can mean the business grew or shrank — or that it chose not to say. Ask for current numbers.

Form D · Jul 31, 2013 ↗Form D/A · Jul 19, 2019 ↗Form D/A · Jul 29, 2020 ↗Quantum Strategic Value Fund, LP — PartnerFacts page ↗
Sources
Note · Jul 28, 2022 – Jul 19, 2023

Minimum investment changed between filings — Quantum Strategic Value Fund, LP

The Jul 28, 2022 filing lists a minimum of $1,000,000; the Jul 19, 2023 Form D/A lists $2,000,000.

What this means A different minimum usually means the offering terms changed. Check which terms apply to you.

Form D/A (earlier) · Jul 28, 2022 ↗Form D/A (later) · Jul 19, 2023 ↗Quantum Strategic Value Fund, LP — PartnerFacts page ↗
Sources
Note · Jul 29, 2013

Issuer used a different name before — Quantum Strategic Value Fund, LP,The

SEC records list prior names for this filer: Quantum Capital Advisors, LLC. The current name on file is "Quantum Strategic Value Fund, LP,The".

What this means A name change is normal, but your documents may show the old name. Match the CIK, not just the name.

EDGAR filer page ↗Quantum Strategic Value Fund, LP,The — PartnerFacts page ↗
Sources
What is compared

What is compared: every Form D and D/A we hold for this subject, side by side — filing dates vs. first-sale dates (the 15-day rule), amendment timing on open offerings (the yearly-amendment expectation), amounts sold, investor counts, offering amounts and minimums across amendments, industry and size bands, addresses, how each person's name and role is written, paid sellers' CRD numbers, and (for groups) where the member companies were formed and sit. Everything is as filed by the issuer; the SEC does not check it. Differences are common and usually have ordinary explanations — we show both values, the dates, and the source so you can ask. As of Oct 24, 2026.

5. Money to insiders

0 of 2 offerings report sales commissions; 0 report finder's fees; 0 report proceeds to related persons.

Offering (latest filing)Sales commissionsFinder's feesTo insidersPaid to sell itSource
Jul 22, 2026 D/A
Quantum Strategic Value Fund, LP
File 021-200540
$0$0$0n/a no CRD number reported
via n/a
EDGAR ↗
Jul 29, 2013 D
Quantum Strategic Value Fund, LP,The
File 021-200407
$0$0$0n/a no CRD number reported
via n/a
EDGAR ↗
How this is counted

Counts come from Form D Items 12–15 on the filings in our index (latest filing per offering; one offering = one SEC file number; an amendment updates its offering rather than adding one). "To insiders" = gross proceeds used for payments to executive officers, directors or promoters. "—" = not reported on that filing. Amounts marked (est.) were reported as estimates. "Paid to sell it" = sales compensation recipients named on that filing (Item 12), each linked to FINRA BrokerCheck when a CRD number is reported.

Counted across all 2 issuers in this group — every filing in our index, latest filing per offering (SEC file number).

Property records 0 documents · 0 ownership records · last checked Oct 23, 2026, 8:59 PM ET · NYC and Cook County lookup still to run

0 recorded documents and 0 ownership records matched to Quantum in the sources searched.

Not found in sources searched as of Oct 23, 2026, 8:59 PM ET: Hillsborough County FL Clerk of Court Official Records daily index (publicrec.hillsclerk.com D/P/M files), 2 daily files (Oct 14, 2026 to Oct 15, 2026) — loaded Oct 23, 2026, 8:59 PM ET; Florida DOR NAL roll (Hillsborough 39) roll year 2026 — loaded Oct 23, 2026, 8:54 PM ET; Florida DOR NAL roll (Dade 23) roll year 2026 — loaded Oct 23, 2026, 8:58 PM ET; Harris County Appraisal District real_acct.txt roll year 2026 — loaded Oct 23, 2026, 8:58 PM ET; Dallas Central Appraisal District ACCOUNT_INFO.CSV roll year 2026 — loaded Oct 23, 2026, 8:58 PM ET. Still to be looked up for this group: NYC ACRIS via NYC Open Data (Real Property Parties 636b-3b5g, Master bnx9-e6tj, Legals 8h5j-fqxa, Document Control Codes 7isb-wh4c) · NYC PLUTO ownership via NYC Open Data (64uk-42ks) · Cook County IL Assessor via Cook County Open Data (Parcel Sales wvhk-k5uv; Parcel Addresses 3723-97qp). Records in other counties, and recorder indexes we do not yet cover, were not searched.

Property records coverage: New York City (ACRIS recorded documents and PLUTO ownership, looked up per issuer when its page is viewed; re-checked when the page is viewed again more than 30 days after the last check); Hillsborough County FL (recorded documents from Oct 14, 2026 forward; ownership from FL DOR roll 2026); Cook County IL (assessor ownership and deed/sale records, looked up per issuer when its page is viewed); Harris County TX and Dallas County TX (assessor ownership rolls only, 2026 roll; no deed, mortgage or sale records); Miami-Dade County FL (ownership from FL DOR roll only; Clerk recorded documents not covered). Recorder indexes for TX, AZ, IL and WA counties, mortgages and liens outside NYC and FL, lis pendens and foreclosure notices everywhere, Miami-Dade County FL recorded documents, Maricopa County AZ, King County WA, Salt Lake County UT, and all other counties are not covered — not searched. Last refresh by source: Hillsborough County FL Clerk daily index Oct 23, 2026, 8:59 PM ET; Dallas Central Appraisal District ACCOUNT_INFO.CSV Oct 23, 2026, 8:58 PM ET; Harris County Appraisal District real_acct.txt Oct 23, 2026, 8:58 PM ET; Florida DOR NAL roll (Dade 23) Oct 23, 2026, 8:58 PM ET; Florida DOR NAL roll (Hillsborough 39) Oct 23, 2026, 8:54 PM ET. NYC and Cook County are looked up per issuer when its page is viewed; the most recent such lookup on this site finished Oct 24, 2026, 3:30 AM ET. Parties are named as the recorder's index names them (role suffixes as recorded); no address, account number or trust date is shown for an individual, and individual owners of record (home ownership) are not matched or shown. Items still in human review are not shown.

Issuers in this group

Why each issuer is here is stated in the "Linked by" column. Low-confidence links are never shown — they wait for human review.

SourceIssuerLinked byLocationIndustryFilingsSold (max)InvestorsMin. investment (latest filing)Active
EDGAR ↗QS Quantum Strategic Value Fund, LP,Theshared people, same business address, similar issuer namesNORTHFIELD, NJPooled Investment Fund1$84,663,39380$1,000,0002013–2013
EDGAR ↗QS Quantum Strategic Value Fund, LPshared people, same business address, similar issuer namesNORTHFIELD, NJPooled Investment Fund14$86,610,909
offering Indefinite · similar: $155,000–$5,250,000
83
similar: 4–27
$2,000,000
similar: $1,000–$100,000
2013–2026

"Similar" = offerings in the same industry claiming the same exemption, filed in the last 5 years: Pooled Investment Fund / 506(b) (83,801 filings); ranges are the middle half (25th–75th percentile). Computed by PartnerFacts from SEC EDGAR Form D data as of Oct 23, 2026, 5:45 PM ET. Rows without a range: fewer than 30 comparable filings, or not a Rule 506 offering. No ranking or score.

Timeline of offerings

SourceFiledIssuerFormIndustryOfferedSold
EDGAR ↗Jul 22, 2026Quantum Strategic Value Fund, LPD/APooled Investment FundIndefinite$68,404,129
EDGAR ↗Jul 24, 2025Quantum Strategic Value Fund, LPD/APooled Investment FundIndefinite$83,330,880
EDGAR ↗Jul 29, 2024Quantum Strategic Value Fund, LPD/APooled Investment FundIndefinite$70,613,937
EDGAR ↗Jul 19, 2023Quantum Strategic Value Fund, LPD/APooled Investment FundIndefinite$63,094,236
EDGAR ↗Jul 28, 2022Quantum Strategic Value Fund, LPD/APooled Investment FundIndefinite$54,436,810
EDGAR ↗Jul 20, 2021Quantum Strategic Value Fund, LPD/APooled Investment FundIndefinite$62,315,856
EDGAR ↗Jul 29, 2020Quantum Strategic Value Fund, LPD/APooled Investment FundIndefinite$53,920,576
EDGAR ↗Jul 19, 2019Quantum Strategic Value Fund, LPD/APooled Investment FundIndefinite$49,233,705
EDGAR ↗Jul 19, 2018Quantum Strategic Value Fund, LPD/APooled Investment FundIndefinite$49,458,149
EDGAR ↗Jul 20, 2017Quantum Strategic Value Fund, LPD/APooled Investment FundIndefinite$52,994,226
EDGAR ↗Jul 22, 2016Quantum Strategic Value Fund, LPD/APooled Investment FundIndefinite$70,464,664
EDGAR ↗Jul 31, 2015Quantum Strategic Value Fund, LPD/APooled Investment FundIndefinite$75,910,653
EDGAR ↗Jul 31, 2014Quantum Strategic Value Fund, LPD/APooled Investment FundIndefinite$86,610,909
EDGAR ↗Jul 31, 2013Quantum Strategic Value Fund, LPDPooled Investment FundIndefinite$84,663,393
EDGAR ↗Jul 29, 2013Quantum Strategic Value Fund, LP,TheDPooled Investment FundIndefinite$84,663,393

Activity: 0 new offerings in the last 12 months across all issuers in this group (new offering = a Form D that is not an amendment, D/A) · most recent filing Jul 22, 2026. Industry history, as reported on each offering's latest filing: All 2 offerings reported: Pooled Investment Fund (2013).

People across the group

NameRolesIssuers hereFirst → last listed
GR Giridhar M ReddyExecutive Officer2Jul 29, 2013 → Jul 22, 2026
JH John J HughesExecutive Officer2Jul 29, 2013 → Jul 22, 2026

Adviser registration (Form ADV)

Searched SEC Form ADV bulk data (registered + exempt reporting advisers) (24,962 records as of Oct 2, 2026, 8:00 AM ET) — nothing matched Quantum.

Meta advertising

No Meta Pixel ids or Facebook / Instagram page links on file for Quantum as of Oct 24, 2026 — the sponsor website is read for them once it is on file (runs automatically). Meta Ad Library: not searched by PartnerFacts (no API access); a one-tap Ad Library search is under Look further.

Other offering types (Regulation A and Regulation Crowdfunding)

Searched SEC Regulation A Data Sets (Forms 1-A, 1-K, 1-Z; 2015 Q2 → 2026 Q3); SEC Crowdfunding Offerings Data Sets (Form C family; 2016 Q2 → 2026 Q3); EDGAR form index for 2026 Q3 → 2026 Q4 (51,358 records as of Oct 23, 2026, 8:41 PM ET) — nothing matched this name.

Public profiles and social

No website or social profile named in Quantum's SEC filings (Form C, Reg A, Form ADV; checked Oct 24, 2026). Web search for this name: #17,065 of 374,652 in line (14 issuers searched so far). One-tap searches: Look further ↓

Export this report as PDF · Premium

Request diligence pack (Premium) PartnerFacts asks the sponsor for the standard information pack and delivers it to you labelled "provided by the sponsor".

Change history

No corrections have been requested for this page.

Request a correction

Free. Covers the grouping itself or any record shown here. Logged with status: received → under review → fixed / confirmed with source.

Sponsor response

Add a sourced explanation next to any fact. Reviewed before publishing.

Grouping is PartnerFacts' inference from public filings (shared related persons, management entities, business address). Everything else on this page is drawn from the filings themselves. Not the same sponsor? Request a correction.

Look further

One-tap searches on sites we do not index ourselves, with the name pre-filled (outside the US (as filed: NORTHFIELD), NJ). Each opens in a new tab; what you find there is not verified by PartnerFacts.

Social and web

LinkedIn companies ↗Instagram ↗X (Twitter) ↗Facebook ↗YouTube ↗Google ↗Google Images ↗Google News ↗Meta Ad Library ↗

Courts

CourtListener / RECAP (federal) ↗PACER case locator (federal, login) ↗New Jersey state courts — find the court ↗

Securities regulators

SEC EDGAR full-text search ↗SEC action look-up ↗FINRA BrokerCheck ↗SEC IAPD adviser search ↗

Business registries

New Jersey Secretary of State business search ↗OpenCorporates ↗