PartnerFacts
Data last updated: Oct 23, 2026, 5:45 PM ETLatest filing: Oct 22, 2026Now: Oct 24, 2026, 5:19 AM ET

Sponsor Check › Sponsor group

P

Prism

One sponsor team, 2 deal companies · San Francisco, CA

Grouped because: 2 shared people, 1 shared management entity, similar issuer names (2) (automatic match from the filings) · not the same sponsor?

2deal companies
$1.09Breported sold
354investors
8Form D filings
2009–2012active
0new, last 12 mo

Data last updated Oct 23, 2026, 5:45 PM ET · Latest filing in this group Mar 8, 2012 · Courts (RECAP) last checked: Oct 24, 2026, 2:16 AM ET · SEC enforcement last checked: covered by the index scan as of Oct 24, 2026, 2:50 AM ET

The short version

Prism is a sponsor group of 2 issuers that PartnerFacts links to one sponsor (shared people, shared management entity, similar issuer names; automatic match from the filings), filing 8 Form D filings between Mar 2009 and Mar 2012.

What this means One team, 2 deal companies, about 3 years of track record in SEC filings. We link the companies because the same people or address appear on their forms — tap "Request a correction" if that is wrong.

Combined reported sold: $1.09B to 354 investors (latest filing per issuer). Industries as reported: Pooled Investment Fund (2). Issuers are based in CA (2).

What this means $1.09B raised across the group, about $3.07M per investor. Amounts come from each company's latest Form D; they are what the sponsor reported, not audited figures.

Principal people: Jerald M. Weintraub (2 issuers, executive officer and promoter), Nancy J. DeSchane (2 issuers, executive officer and promoter) and Weintraub Capital Management, L.P. (2 issuers, executive officer, entity).

What this means The person on the most companies is usually the one running the show; their page lists every deal.

Activity: 0 new offerings in the last 12 months; latest filing Mar 8, 2012.

What this means No new raise filed in the past year.

Public records searched: federal courts (CourtListener / RECAP), SEC enforcement releases, state securities regulators (AZ, CA, DE, TX, WA), property records (NYC, FL, IL and TX counties) — 10 court cases matching the name, 2 bankruptcy cases matching the name listed in Key records below.

What this means 12 records came back. Each one is listed below with a link to the original document and a line saying why it matched. A name match is not proof it is the same person or company — read the why line and the document. Being sued or named in a release is an accusation, not a finding.

We compared 8 public filings for Prism and found 9 differences: 6 role changes for the same people across filings; Offering amount changed between filings; and more below.

What this means These are differences between the sponsor's own SEC filings — both values, dates and sources are listed in Key records, section 4. Most have ordinary explanations; ask the sponsor.

What the community is saying

Community search for Prism has not run yet — it is joining a line of 12,726 names; searches run around the clock at the hosts' allowed rate. Searched so far: 27 names.

Community comments are quoted as written by their authors. Sources searched: BiggerPockets forums (via DuckDuckGo, Brave, Bing and BiggerPockets search) and Reddit (search feed + public archive).

Key records

Five things investors ask first. Items still in human review are counted, not shown.

1. Lawsuits

10 cases: 2 closed (disposition not in docket feed), 5 judgment, 3 dismissed

Nix v. Prism, Inc. closed matched at sponsor-group level (Prism)
District Court, E.D. Virginia · No. 1:19-cv-00759 · Filed Jun 11, 2019 · Closed Sep 6, 2019
Role of Prism, Inc.: Defendant · Outcome: Terminated 2019-09-06 (disposition not included in the bulk docket feed — see docket) Docket on CourtListener ↗
exact company name; name has one distinctive word; court in VA (not the issuer's state)
Goodland Holdings LLC v. Prism Corporation closed matched at sponsor-group level (Prism)
District Court, N.D. Texas · No. 3:12-mc-00012 · Filed Jan 27, 2012 · Closed Jan 27, 2012
Role of Prism Corporation: Defendant · Outcome: Terminated 2012-01-27 (disposition not included in the bulk docket feed — see docket) Docket on CourtListener ↗
exact company name; name has one distinctive word; court in TX (not the issuer's state)
Max Cash Media, Inc. v. Prism Corporation judgment matched at sponsor-group level (Prism)
District Court, S.D. New York · No. 1:12-cv-00147 · Filed Jan 9, 2012 · Closed May 22, 2012 · Nature of suit: 140 Negotiable Instrument · Cause: 28:1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Role of Prism Corporation: Defendant · Outcome: Terminated 2012-05-22 — FJC Integrated Database disposition: Other; judgment for plaintiff Docket on CourtListener ↗
exact company name; name has one distinctive word; court in NY (not the issuer's state)
Prism Corporation v. BuRay Energy International, LLC judgment matched at sponsor-group level (Prism)
District Court, N.D. Oklahoma · No. 4:11-cv-00543 · Filed Aug 31, 2011 · Closed Nov 10, 2011 · Nature of suit: Contract: Other · Cause: 28:1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Role of Prism Corporation: Plaintiff · Outcome: Terminated 2011-11-10 — FJC Integrated Database disposition: Judgment on motion before trial; judgment for unknown Docket on CourtListener ↗
exact company name; name has one distinctive word; court in OK (not the issuer's state)
BURAY ENERGY INTERNATIONAL LLC v. PRISM CORPORATION judgment matched at sponsor-group level (Prism)
District Court, S.D. Indiana · No. 3:11-cv-00101 · Filed Aug 22, 2011 · Closed Feb 24, 2014 · Nature of suit: Contract: Other · Cause: 28:1332 Diversity-Contract Dispute
Role of PRISM CORPORATION: Defendant · Outcome: Terminated 2014-02-24 — FJC Integrated Database disposition: Judgment on default; judgment for plaintiff Docket on CourtListener ↗
exact company name; name has one distinctive word; court in IN (not the issuer's state)
Kauffman v. Prism Corporation dismissed matched at sponsor-group level (Prism)
District Court, D. Montana · No. 2:11-cv-00016 · Filed Mar 30, 2011 · Closed Aug 16, 2011 · Nature of suit: 190 Other contract actions
Role of Prism Corporation: Defendant · Outcome: Terminated 2011-08-16 — FJC Integrated Database disposition: Dismissed: settled Docket on CourtListener ↗
exact company name; name has one distinctive word; court in MT (not the issuer's state)
Goodland Holdings, LLC v. Prism Corporation judgment matched at sponsor-group level (Prism)
District Court, D. Montana · No. 2:11-cv-00014 · Filed Mar 24, 2011 · Closed Jan 12, 2012 · Nature of suit: 370 Other Fraud · Cause: 28:1332 Diversity-Fraud
Role of Prism Corporation: Defendant · Outcome: Terminated 2012-01-12 — FJC Integrated Database disposition: Judgment on default; judgment for plaintiff Docket on CourtListener ↗
exact company name; name has one distinctive word; court in MT (not the issuer's state)
Prism Corporation v. Roland Oil & Gas dismissed matched at sponsor-group level (Prism)
District Court, D. Montana · No. 4:10-cv-00078 · Filed Dec 10, 2010 · Closed Mar 22, 2011 · Nature of suit: 370 Other fraud
Role of Prism Corporation: Plaintiff · Outcome: Terminated 2011-03-22 — FJC Integrated Database disposition: Voluntarily dismissed Docket on CourtListener ↗
exact company name; name has one distinctive word; court in MT (not the issuer's state)
Painters Dist Coun v. Prism Inc. dismissed matched at sponsor-group level (Prism)
District Court, E.D. Missouri · No. 4:92-cv-01820 · Filed Sep 11, 1992 · Closed Jun 18, 1993 · Nature of suit: 791 Employee Retirement Income Security Act
Role of Prism Inc.: Defendant · Outcome: Terminated 1993-06-18 — FJC Integrated Database disposition: Voluntarily dismissed Docket on CourtListener ↗
exact company name; name has one distinctive word; court in MO (not the issuer's state); filed 1992, first Form D 2009
PRISM CORP. v. NANEX CORP judgment matched at sponsor-group level (Prism)
District Court, District of Columbia · No. 1:85-cv-02614 · Filed Aug 15, 1985 · Closed Jan 6, 1986 · Nature of suit: 190 Other contract actions
Role of PRISM CORP.: Plaintiff · Outcome: Terminated 1986-01-06 — FJC Integrated Database disposition: Judgment on motion before trial; judgment for unknown Docket on CourtListener ↗
exact company name; name has one distinctive word; court in DC (not the issuer's state); filed 1985, first Form D 2009
What was searched

Sources searched: CourtListener bulk data (RECAP dockets as of 2026-09-30; recall-first rule 10-24) — federal district + bankruptcy courts State courts: not covered (one-tap state court links under Look further). PACER: not searched. · Last checked Oct 24, 2026, 2:16 AM ET.

Court records show docket facts only; we never restate allegations as facts. Outcome wording comes from the docket feed; where it does not state a disposition we say so.

State courts: not covered (one-tap state court links under Look further). No state offers a lawful automated statewide source PartnerFacts can use today. Texas (re:SearchTX) terms prohibit storing results in a database open to third parties; New York (WebCivil) and Massachusetts (MassCourts) require a browser check that blocks scripted queries; California has no statewide index (58 county portals; Rule of Court 2.503 grants name-based access case by case); Florida, Utah and Illinois offer paid or partial access whose terms for automated use are unverified. Washington (dw.courts.wa.gov; bulk index reports under a JISC data-dissemination agreement), Delaware (CourtConnect; Court of Chancery not included) and Arizona (apps.azcourts.gov/publicaccess, which has an official channel to request high-volume access) are the candidates; PartnerFacts will request written permission before any automated search. Federal courts are searched through CourtListener / RECAP.

2. Regulatory actions

None found in sources searched — SEC enforcement releases (index scan as of Oct 24, 2026, 2:50 AM ET) · state securities regulators: AZ, CA, DE, TX, WA (crawled Oct 23, 2026)

What was searched

SEC enforcement searched: SEC litigation releases and administrative proceedings — respondent names in the sec.gov index titles (30,205 releases, 1995-09-19 to 2026-10-23); release text is read only to confirm a candidate. Names that appear only in the body of a release are not found. — Searched SEC litigation releases and administrative proceedings (1995→ / 2007→) (30,205 records as of Oct 24, 2026, 2:50 AM ET) — nothing matched Prism..

State securities regulators searched: AZ (Corporation Commission Securities Division), CA (DFPI — 16 of 12,159 DFPI respondent pages read so far; sponsor-name matches are read first), DE (DOJ Investor Protection Unit), TX (State Securities Board), WA (DFI) — last crawled Oct 23, 2026, 9:57 PM ET. Other states are not covered.

3. Bankruptcies

2 cases: 2 closed (disposition not in docket feed)

Brown Trustee v. Prism, LLC closed matched at sponsor-group level (Prism)
United States Bankruptcy Court, N.D. Illinois · No. 06-01368 · Filed Aug 30, 2006 · Closed Mar 29, 2007
Role of Prism, LLC: Defendant · Outcome: Case closed 2007-03-29 (disposition not included in the bulk docket feed — see docket) Docket on CourtListener ↗
exact company name; name has one distinctive word; court in IL (not the issuer's state)
PRISM LLC v. Merchant closed matched at sponsor-group level (Prism)
United States Bankruptcy Court, N.D. Illinois · No. 05-00969 · Filed Mar 21, 2005 · Closed Jul 19, 2005
Role of PRISM LLC: Plaintiff · Outcome: Case closed 2005-07-19 (disposition not included in the bulk docket feed — see docket) Docket on CourtListener ↗
exact company name; name has one distinctive word; court in IL (not the issuer's state)
What was searched

Sources searched: Federal bankruptcy courts via CourtListener / RECAP archive (federal district courts, federal bankruptcy courts). State courts: not covered (one-tap state court links under Look further). PACER: not searched (RECAP only). · Last checked Oct 24, 2026, 2:16 AM ET.

Court records show docket facts only; we never restate allegations as facts. Outcome wording comes from the docket feed; where it does not state a disposition we say so.

State courts: not covered (one-tap state court links under Look further). No state offers a lawful automated statewide source PartnerFacts can use today. Texas (re:SearchTX) terms prohibit storing results in a database open to third parties; New York (WebCivil) and Massachusetts (MassCourts) require a browser check that blocks scripted queries; California has no statewide index (58 county portals; Rule of Court 2.503 grants name-based access case by case); Florida, Utah and Illinois offer paid or partial access whose terms for automated use are unverified. Washington (dw.courts.wa.gov; bulk index reports under a JISC data-dissemination agreement), Delaware (CourtConnect; Court of Chancery not included) and Arizona (apps.azcourts.gov/publicaccess, which has an official channel to request high-volume access) are the candidates; PartnerFacts will request written permission before any automated search. Federal courts are searched through CourtListener / RECAP.

4. Differences between public sources

No comparisons published

What is compared

No public statement by this sponsor group has been collected yet, so there is nothing to compare. Sources compared: the sponsor's own website (known from the issuer's own filings — Form C issuer website, EDGAR company profile — an approved profile claim or Form ADV Item 1.I of its matched adviser) · SEC Form D · SEC Form ADV (IAPD) · Internet Archive · No website is on file for this sponsor group yet.

9 differences found between the filings for Prism (compared 8 filings on Oct 24, 2026)

Note · Mar 7, 2011 – Mar 8, 2012

6 role changes for the same people across filings

Weintraub Capital Management, L.P.'s role changed at PRISM PARTNERS I L P: executive officer, promoter → executive officer · Weintraub Capital Management, L.P.'s role changed at Prism Partners III Leveraged LP: executive officer, promoter → executive officer · Nancy J. DeSchane's role changed at PRISM PARTNERS I L P: executive officer, promoter → executive officer · Nancy J. DeSchane's role changed at Prism Partners III Leveraged LP: executive officer, promoter → executive officer · Jerald M. Weintraub's role changed at PRISM PARTNERS I L P: executive officer, promoter → executive officer · and 1 more

What this means Roles on Form D are self-reported. Ask who runs the company today.

Sources
Note · Mar 12, 2010 – Jun 7, 2010

Offering amount changed between filings — PRISM PARTNERS I L P

The Mar 12, 2010 filing says $500,000,000 offered; the Jun 7, 2010 Form D/A says an indefinite amount.

What this means The target raise changed. Raising the cap is common when a deal grows; ask whether the extra money has the same terms and use.

Sources
Note · Apr 1, 1992 – Mar 8, 2012

No amendment in the last 12 months on an offering that may still be open — PRISM PARTNERS I L P (latest filing Mar 8, 2012)

The latest filing for this offering is dated Mar 8, 2012 (first sale Apr 1, 1992). It reports $408,050,204 sold of an indefinite amount offered. No later amendment is in our index as of Oct 24, 2026.

What this means SEC rules expect a yearly amendment while an offering is still going. The raise may simply have ended — a Form D does not say when it closed. Ask the sponsor whether the offering closed, when, and at what amount.

Sources
Note · Oct 1, 2004 – Mar 8, 2012

No amendment in the last 12 months on an offering that may still be open — Prism Partners III Leveraged LP (latest filing Mar 8, 2012)

The latest filing for this offering is dated Mar 8, 2012 (first sale Oct 1, 2004). It reports $680,370,268 sold of $1,000,000,000 offered. No later amendment is in our index as of Oct 24, 2026.

What this means SEC rules expect a yearly amendment while an offering is still going. The raise may simply have ended — a Form D does not say when it closed. Ask the sponsor whether the offering closed, when, and at what amount.

Sources
Note · Mar 3, 2009 – Mar 12, 2010

Nancy J. DeSchane is written 2 different ways on the filings

listed as "Nancy DeSchane" on the Mar 3, 2009 filing, and "Nancy J. DeSchane" on 7 filings (from Mar 12, 2010).

What this means Same person, written differently — a middle name or suffix left off, or spelled another way. It is normal, but check that the full legal name matches your subscription documents.

Sources
Note · Mar 3, 2009 – Mar 12, 2010

Jerald M. Weintraub is written 2 different ways on the filings

listed as "Jerald Weintraub" on the Mar 3, 2009 filing, and "Jerald M. Weintraub" on 7 filings (from Mar 12, 2010).

What this means Same person, written differently — a middle name or suffix left off, or spelled another way. It is normal, but check that the full legal name matches your subscription documents.

Sources
Note · Mar 8, 2012

Address on file is a registered agent / shared office — PRISM PARTNERS I L P

The latest filing lists 44 Montgomery Street, Suite 4100, San Francisco, CA. That address is used by 28 issuers in our index (28 issuers in 20 unrelated clusters).

What this means Many small companies use a registered agent's address — it is legal and common. It means the Form D address is not where the team works. Ask where the business operates and who runs it day to day.

Sources
Note · Mar 8, 2012

Address on file is a registered agent / shared office — Prism Partners III Leveraged LP

The latest filing lists 44 Montgomery Street, Suite 4100, San Francisco, CA. That address is used by 28 issuers in our index (28 issuers in 20 unrelated clusters).

What this means Many small companies use a registered agent's address — it is legal and common. It means the Form D address is not where the team works. Ask where the business operates and who runs it day to day.

Sources
Note · Mar 8, 2012

Member companies were formed in 2 different states

Delaware (1), California (1) — out of 2 member issuers. The odd ones out: PRISM PARTNERS I L P (California).

What this means Sponsors often form each deal company in Delaware or Wyoming no matter where the property is. A mix is common; it just tells you which state's rules each company lives under.

Sources
What is compared

What is compared: every Form D and D/A we hold for this subject, side by side — filing dates vs. first-sale dates (the 15-day rule), amendment timing on open offerings (the yearly-amendment expectation), amounts sold, investor counts, offering amounts and minimums across amendments, industry and size bands, addresses, how each person's name and role is written, paid sellers' CRD numbers, and (for groups) where the member companies were formed and sit. Everything is as filed by the issuer; the SEC does not check it. Differences are common and usually have ordinary explanations — we show both values, the dates, and the source so you can ask. As of Oct 24, 2026.

5. Money to insiders

None reported on 2 offerings — no sales commissions, finder's fees or proceeds to insiders

Per-offering detail
Offering (latest filing)Sales commissionsFinder's feesTo insidersPaid to sell itSource
Mar 8, 2012 D/A
PRISM PARTNERS I L P
File 021-88806-0L
$0 (est.)$0 (est.)$0 (est.)
None, although the general partner of the issuer receives investment management fees and a special profit allocation.
None listed on this filingEDGAR ↗
Mar 8, 2012 D/A
Prism Partners III Leveraged LP
File 021-69473
$0 (est.)$0 (est.)$0 (est.)
None, although the general partner of the issuer receives investment management fees and a special profit allocation.
None listed on this filingEDGAR ↗

Counts come from Form D Items 12–15 on the filings in our index (latest filing per offering; one offering = one SEC file number; an amendment updates its offering rather than adding one). "To insiders" = gross proceeds used for payments to executive officers, directors or promoters. "—" = not reported on that filing. Amounts marked (est.) were reported as estimates. "Paid to sell it" = sales compensation recipients named on that filing (Item 12), each linked to FINRA BrokerCheck when a CRD number is reported.

Counted across all 2 issuers in this group — every filing in our index, latest filing per offering (SEC file number).

Property records 0 documents · 0 ownership records · last checked Oct 23, 2026, 8:59 PM ET · NYC and Cook County lookup still to run

0 recorded documents and 0 ownership records matched to Prism in the sources searched.

Not found in sources searched as of Oct 23, 2026, 8:59 PM ET: Hillsborough County FL Clerk of Court Official Records daily index (publicrec.hillsclerk.com D/P/M files), 2 daily files (Oct 14, 2026 to Oct 15, 2026) — loaded Oct 23, 2026, 8:59 PM ET; Florida DOR NAL roll (Hillsborough 39) roll year 2026 — loaded Oct 23, 2026, 8:54 PM ET; Florida DOR NAL roll (Dade 23) roll year 2026 — loaded Oct 23, 2026, 8:58 PM ET; Harris County Appraisal District real_acct.txt roll year 2026 — loaded Oct 23, 2026, 8:58 PM ET; Dallas Central Appraisal District ACCOUNT_INFO.CSV roll year 2026 — loaded Oct 23, 2026, 8:58 PM ET. Still to be looked up for this group: NYC ACRIS via NYC Open Data (Real Property Parties 636b-3b5g, Master bnx9-e6tj, Legals 8h5j-fqxa, Document Control Codes 7isb-wh4c) · NYC PLUTO ownership via NYC Open Data (64uk-42ks) · Cook County IL Assessor via Cook County Open Data (Parcel Sales wvhk-k5uv; Parcel Addresses 3723-97qp). Records in other counties, and recorder indexes we do not yet cover, were not searched.

Property records coverage: New York City (ACRIS recorded documents and PLUTO ownership, looked up per issuer when its page is viewed; re-checked when the page is viewed again more than 30 days after the last check); Hillsborough County FL (recorded documents from Oct 14, 2026 forward; ownership from FL DOR roll 2026); Cook County IL (assessor ownership and deed/sale records, looked up per issuer when its page is viewed); Harris County TX and Dallas County TX (assessor ownership rolls only, 2026 roll; no deed, mortgage or sale records); Miami-Dade County FL (ownership from FL DOR roll only; Clerk recorded documents not covered). Recorder indexes for TX, AZ, IL and WA counties, mortgages and liens outside NYC and FL, lis pendens and foreclosure notices everywhere, Miami-Dade County FL recorded documents, Maricopa County AZ, King County WA, Salt Lake County UT, and all other counties are not covered — not searched. Last refresh by source: Hillsborough County FL Clerk daily index Oct 23, 2026, 8:59 PM ET; Dallas Central Appraisal District ACCOUNT_INFO.CSV Oct 23, 2026, 8:58 PM ET; Harris County Appraisal District real_acct.txt Oct 23, 2026, 8:58 PM ET; Florida DOR NAL roll (Dade 23) Oct 23, 2026, 8:58 PM ET; Florida DOR NAL roll (Hillsborough 39) Oct 23, 2026, 8:54 PM ET. NYC and Cook County are looked up per issuer when its page is viewed; the most recent such lookup on this site finished Oct 24, 2026, 3:30 AM ET. Parties are named as the recorder's index names them (role suffixes as recorded); no address, account number or trust date is shown for an individual, and individual owners of record (home ownership) are not matched or shown. Items still in human review are not shown.

Issuers in this group

Why each issuer is here is stated in the "Linked by" column. Low-confidence links are never shown — they wait for human review.

SourceIssuerLinked byLocationIndustryFilingsSold (max)InvestorsMin. investment (latest filing)Active
EDGAR ↗PP PRISM PARTNERS I L Pshared people, shared management entity, similar issuer namesSAN FRANCISCO, CAPooled Investment Fund5$408,050,204250$1,000,0002009–2012
EDGAR ↗PP Prism Partners III Leveraged LPshared people, shared management entity, similar issuer namesSAN FRANCISCO, CAPooled Investment Fund3$680,370,268104$1,000,0002010–2012

Market context: not shown for these offerings — fewer than 30 Form D filings in the last 5 years share the offering's industry and exemption, or the exemption claimed is not Rule 506(b)/506(c). No ranking or score.

Timeline of offerings

SourceFiledIssuerFormIndustryOfferedSold
EDGAR ↗Mar 8, 2012PRISM PARTNERS I L PD/APooled Investment FundIndefinite$408,050,204
EDGAR ↗Mar 8, 2012Prism Partners III Leveraged LPD/APooled Investment Fund$1,000,000,000$680,370,268
EDGAR ↗Jun 6, 2011PRISM PARTNERS I L PD/APooled Investment FundIndefinite$408,050,204
EDGAR ↗Mar 7, 2011Prism Partners III Leveraged LPD/APooled Investment Fund$1,000,000,000$638,221,489
EDGAR ↗Jun 7, 2010PRISM PARTNERS I L PD/APooled Investment FundIndefinite$404,648,190
EDGAR ↗Mar 12, 2010Prism Partners III Leveraged LPD/APooled Investment Fund$1,000,000,000$548,334,709
EDGAR ↗Mar 12, 2010PRISM PARTNERS I L PD/APooled Investment Fund$500,000,000$377,105,693
EDGAR ↗Mar 3, 2009PRISM PARTNERS I L PD/APooled Investment Fund$500,000,000$377,105,693

Activity: 0 new offerings in the last 12 months across all issuers in this group (new offering = a Form D that is not an amendment, D/A) · most recent filing Mar 8, 2012. Industry history, as reported on each offering's latest filing: All 2 offerings reported: Pooled Investment Fund (2009–2010).

People across the group

NameRolesIssuers hereFirst → last listed
WC Weintraub Capital Management, L.P. entityExecutive Officer2Mar 3, 2009 → Mar 8, 2012
ND Nancy J. DeSchaneExecutive Officer, Promoter2Mar 3, 2009 → Mar 8, 2012
JW Jerald M. WeintraubExecutive Officer, Promoter2Mar 3, 2009 → Mar 8, 2012

Adviser registration (Form ADV)

Searched SEC Form ADV bulk data (registered + exempt reporting advisers) (24,962 records as of Oct 2, 2026, 8:00 AM ET) — nothing matched Prism.

Meta advertising

No Meta Pixel ids or Facebook / Instagram page links on file for Prism as of Oct 24, 2026 — the sponsor website is read for them once it is on file (runs automatically). Meta Ad Library: not searched by PartnerFacts (no API access); a one-tap Ad Library search is under Look further.

Other offering types (Regulation A and Regulation Crowdfunding)

Searched SEC Regulation A Data Sets (Forms 1-A, 1-K, 1-Z; 2015 Q2 → 2026 Q3); SEC Crowdfunding Offerings Data Sets (Form C family; 2016 Q2 → 2026 Q3); EDGAR form index for 2026 Q3 → 2026 Q4 (51,358 records as of Oct 23, 2026, 8:41 PM ET) — nothing matched this name.

Public profiles and social

No website or social profile named in Prism's SEC filings (Form C, Reg A, Form ADV; checked Oct 24, 2026). Web search for this name: #344,458 of 374,652 in line (14 issuers searched so far). One-tap searches: Look further ↓

Export this report as PDF · Premium

Request diligence pack (Premium) PartnerFacts asks the sponsor for the standard information pack and delivers it to you labelled "provided by the sponsor".

Change history

No corrections have been requested for this page.

Request a correction

Free. Covers the grouping itself or any record shown here. Logged with status: received → under review → fixed / confirmed with source.

Sponsor response

Add a sourced explanation next to any fact. Reviewed before publishing.

Grouping is PartnerFacts' inference from public filings (shared related persons, management entities, business address). Everything else on this page is drawn from the filings themselves. Not the same sponsor? Request a correction.

Look further

One-tap searches on sites we do not index ourselves, with the name pre-filled (outside the US (as filed: SAN FRANCISCO), CA). Each opens in a new tab; what you find there is not verified by PartnerFacts.