PartnerFacts
Data last updated: Oct 23, 2026, 5:45 PM ETLatest filing: Oct 22, 2026Now: Oct 24, 2026, 5:20 AM ET

Sponsor Check › Sponsor group

P

Point

One sponsor team, 2 deal companies · Dubai, United Arab Emirates (as filed: C0)

Grouped because: 2 shared people, same business address (2 issuers) (automatic match from the filings) · not the same sponsor?

2deal companies
$777Mreported sold
11investors
3Form D filings
2022–2022active
0new, last 12 mo
Follow this sponsor groupLook further ↓

Data last updated Oct 23, 2026, 5:45 PM ET · Latest filing in this group Oct 31, 2022 · Courts (RECAP) last checked: Oct 24, 2026, 2:16 AM ET · SEC enforcement last checked: covered by the index scan as of Oct 24, 2026, 2:50 AM ET

The short version

Point is a sponsor group of 2 issuers that PartnerFacts links to one sponsor (shared people, same business address; automatic match from the filings), filing 3 Form D filings between Jul 2022 and Oct 2022.

What this means One team, 2 deal companies. We link the companies because the same people or address appear on their forms — tap "Request a correction" if that is wrong.

Combined reported sold: $777M to 11 investors (latest filing per issuer). Industries as reported: Pooled Investment Fund (2). Issuers are based in United Arab Emirates (as filed: C0) (2).

What this means $777M raised across the group, about $70.6M per investor. Amounts come from each company's latest Form D; they are what the sponsor reported, not audited figures.

Principal people: Daniel Schwarz (2 issuers, director) and Katja Lake (2 issuers, director).

What this means The person on the most companies is usually the one running the show; their page lists every deal.

Activity: 0 new offerings in the last 12 months; latest filing Oct 31, 2022.

What this means No new raise filed in the past year.

Public records searched: federal courts (CourtListener / RECAP), SEC enforcement releases, state securities regulators (AZ, CA, DE, TX, WA), property records (NYC, FL, IL and TX counties) — 6 court cases matching the name, 13 bankruptcy cases matching the name listed in Key records below.

What this means 19 records came back. Each one is listed below with a link to the original document and a line saying why it matched. A name match is not proof it is the same person or company — read the why line and the document. Being sued or named in a release is an accusation, not a finding.

We compared 3 public filings for Point and found 2 differences: Form D filed 27 days after the first sale; Issuer used a different name before.

What this means These are differences between the sponsor's own SEC filings — both values, dates and sources are listed in Key records, section 4. Most have ordinary explanations; ask the sponsor.

What the community is saying

Community search for Point has not run yet — it is joining a line of 13,419 names; searches run around the clock at the hosts' allowed rate. Searched so far: 28 names.

Community comments are quoted as written by their authors. Sources searched: BiggerPockets forums (via DuckDuckGo, Brave, Bing and BiggerPockets search) and Reddit (search feed + public archive).

Key records

Five things investors ask first. Items still in human review are counted, not shown.

1. Lawsuits

6 cases: 3 dismissed, 2 closed (disposition not in docket feed), 1 judgment

NovAtel Inc. v. POINT Inc. dismissed matched at sponsor-group level (Point)
District Court, D. Kansas · No. 2:09-cv-02137 · Filed Mar 19, 2009 · Closed Sep 15, 2009 · Nature of suit: 190 Other contract actions
Role of POINT Inc.: Defendant · Outcome: Terminated 2009-09-15 — FJC Integrated Database disposition: Dismissed: settled Docket on CourtListener ↗
exact company name; name has one distinctive word; court in KS (not the issuer's state); filed 2009, issuer incorporated 2021
IPofA West 86th Street v. Point to Point Express, Inc. closed
District Court, D. Nebraska · No. 8:06-cv-00557 · Filed Aug 22, 2006 · Closed Dec 7, 2006 · Nature of suit: Contract: Other · Cause: 28:1332 Diversity-Petition for Removal
Role of IPofA West 86th Street v. Point to Point Express, Inc.: Party · Outcome: Terminated 2006-12-07 — FJC Integrated Database disposition: Remanded to state court Docket on CourtListener ↗
company name words appear in the caption; court in NE (not the issuer's state)
Point to Point Business Development, Inc. v. Weiss dismissed
District Court, W.D. Missouri · No. 4:04-cv-00467 · Filed May 24, 2004 · Closed Sep 12, 2007 · Nature of suit: 160 Stockholder's suits
Role of Point to Point Business Development, Inc. v. Weiss: Party · Outcome: Terminated 2007-09-12 — FJC Integrated Database disposition: Voluntarily dismissed Docket on CourtListener ↗
company name words appear in the caption; court in MO (not the issuer's state)
Weiss v. Point to Point Business Development, Inc. dismissed
District Court, W.D. Missouri · No. 4:04-cv-00466 · Filed May 24, 2004 · Closed Dec 21, 2004 · Nature of suit: 160 Stockholder's suits
Role of Weiss v. Point to Point Business Development, Inc.: Party · Outcome: Terminated 2004-12-21 — FJC Integrated Database disposition: Voluntarily dismissed Docket on CourtListener ↗
company name words appear in the caption; court in MO (not the issuer's state)
United States v. Point Corporation judgment matched at sponsor-group level (Point)
District Court, S.D. West Virginia · No. 3:97-cv-00294 · Filed Mar 27, 1997 · Closed Nov 26, 1997 · Nature of suit: 893 Environmental matters
Role of Point Corporation: Defendant · Outcome: Terminated 1997-11-26 — FJC Integrated Database disposition: Judgment on motion before trial; judgment for plaintiff Docket on CourtListener ↗
exact company name; name has one distinctive word; court in WV (not the issuer's state); filed 1997, issuer incorporated 2021
WARE, JOHN HARREL, ET AL. v. POINT TO POINT COMMUNICATIONS closed
District Court, D. Nevada · No. · Filed Oct 28, 1996 · Closed Dec 2, 1996 · Nature of suit: 190 Other contract actions
Role of WARE, JOHN HARREL, ET AL. v. POINT TO POINT COMMUNICATIONS: Party · Outcome: Terminated 1996-12-02 — FJC Integrated Database disposition: Remanded to state court Docket on CourtListener ↗
company name words appear in the caption; court in NV (not the issuer's state)
What was searched

Sources searched: CourtListener bulk data (RECAP dockets as of 2026-09-30; recall-first rule 10-24) — federal district + bankruptcy courts State courts: not covered (one-tap state court links under Look further). PACER: not searched. · Last checked Oct 24, 2026, 2:16 AM ET.

Court records show docket facts only; we never restate allegations as facts. Outcome wording comes from the docket feed; where it does not state a disposition we say so.

State courts: not covered (one-tap state court links under Look further). No state offers a lawful automated statewide source PartnerFacts can use today. Texas (re:SearchTX) terms prohibit storing results in a database open to third parties; New York (WebCivil) and Massachusetts (MassCourts) require a browser check that blocks scripted queries; California has no statewide index (58 county portals; Rule of Court 2.503 grants name-based access case by case); Florida, Utah and Illinois offer paid or partial access whose terms for automated use are unverified. Washington (dw.courts.wa.gov; bulk index reports under a JISC data-dissemination agreement), Delaware (CourtConnect; Court of Chancery not included) and Arizona (apps.azcourts.gov/publicaccess, which has an official channel to request high-volume access) are the candidates; PartnerFacts will request written permission before any automated search. Federal courts are searched through CourtListener / RECAP.

2. Regulatory actions

None found in sources searched — SEC enforcement releases (index scan as of Oct 24, 2026, 2:50 AM ET) · state securities regulators: AZ, CA, DE, TX, WA (crawled Oct 23, 2026)

What was searched

SEC enforcement searched: SEC litigation releases and administrative proceedings — respondent names in the sec.gov index titles (30,205 releases, 1995-09-19 to 2026-10-23); release text is read only to confirm a candidate. Names that appear only in the body of a release are not found. — Searched SEC litigation releases and administrative proceedings (1995→ / 2007→) (30,205 records as of Oct 24, 2026, 2:50 AM ET) — nothing matched Point..

State securities regulators searched: AZ (Corporation Commission Securities Division), CA (DFPI — 16 of 12,159 DFPI respondent pages read so far; sponsor-name matches are read first), DE (DOJ Investor Protection Unit), TX (State Securities Board), WA (DFI) — last crawled Oct 23, 2026, 9:57 PM ET. Other states are not covered.

3. Bankruptcies

13 cases: 1 open, 12 closed (disposition not in docket feed)

Leros Point to Point, Inc. v. Aucar open
United States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. New York · No. 25-07023 · Filed Sep 15, 2025 · Nature of suit: 67 Dischargeability - 523(a)(4), fraud as fiduciary, embezzlement, larceny; 68 Dischargeability - 523(a)(6), willful and malicious injury
Role of Leros Point to Point, Inc. v. Aucar: Party · Outcome: Open — no termination date on the docket (bulk snapshot 2026-09-30) Docket on CourtListener ↗
company name words appear in the caption; court in NY (not the issuer's state)
IPoFA West 86th Street, LLC v. Point to Point Express, Inc. closed
United States Bankruptcy Court, D. Nebraska · No. 06-08110 · Filed Oct 4, 2006 · Closed Feb 7, 2007
Role of IPoFA West 86th Street, LLC v. Point to Point Express, Inc.: Party · Outcome: Case closed 2007-02-07 (disposition not included in the bulk docket feed — see docket) Docket on CourtListener ↗
company name words appear in the caption
Point-To-Point Express, Inc. closed
United States Bankruptcy Court, D. Nebraska · No. 06-81466 · Filed Sep 25, 2006 · Closed May 21, 2010
Role of Point-To-Point Express, Inc.: Party · Outcome: Case closed 2010-05-21 (disposition not included in the bulk docket feed — see docket) Docket on CourtListener ↗
company name words appear in the caption
Point to Point Business Development, Inc. closed
United States Bankruptcy Court, W.D. Missouri · No. 05-44642 · Filed Jul 7, 2005 · Closed May 23, 2007
Role of Point to Point Business Development, Inc.: Party · Outcome: Case closed 2007-05-23 (disposition not included in the bulk docket feed — see docket) Docket on CourtListener ↗
company name words appear in the caption; court in MO (not the issuer's state)
Kaye v. Point to Point, LLC closed
United States Bankruptcy Court, N.D. Georgia · No. 04-06220 · Filed May 21, 2004 · Closed Mar 29, 2007
Role of Kaye v. Point to Point, LLC: Party · Outcome: Case closed 2007-03-29 (disposition not included in the bulk docket feed — see docket) Docket on CourtListener ↗
company name words appear in the caption; court in GA (not the issuer's state)
Nomus-New York, Inc. v. Point to Point Transportation, Inc. closed
United States Bankruptcy Court, M.D. North Carolina · No. 03-06054 · Filed Feb 18, 2003 · Closed Jun 27, 2003
Role of Nomus-New York, Inc. v. Point to Point Transportation, Inc.: Party · Outcome: Case closed 2003-06-27 (disposition not included in the bulk docket feed — see docket) Docket on CourtListener ↗
company name words appear in the caption; court in NC (not the issuer's state)
Walsh v. Point To Point Pipeline Co., Inc closed
United States Bankruptcy Court, N.D. Oklahoma · No. 02-00266 · Filed Dec 16, 2002 · Closed Jan 29, 2003
Role of Walsh v. Point To Point Pipeline Co., Inc: Party · Outcome: Case closed 2003-01-29 (disposition not included in the bulk docket feed — see docket) Docket on CourtListener ↗
company name words appear in the caption; court in OK (not the issuer's state)
Point to Point, Inc. v. Nardini closed
United States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. Michigan · No. 94-04506 · Filed May 20, 1994 · Closed Aug 8, 1994
Role of Point to Point, Inc. v. Nardini: Party · Outcome: Case closed 1994-08-08 (disposition not included in the bulk docket feed — see docket) Docket on CourtListener ↗
company name words appear in the caption; court in MI (not the issuer's state)
Point to Point, Inc. v. D.C. Express, Inc. closed
United States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. Michigan · No. 94-04507 · Filed May 20, 1994 · Closed Aug 8, 1994
Role of Point to Point, Inc. v. D.C. Express, Inc.: Party · Outcome: Case closed 1994-08-08 (disposition not included in the bulk docket feed — see docket) Docket on CourtListener ↗
company name words appear in the caption; court in MI (not the issuer's state)
Point to Point, Inc. v. L.L.C., Inc. closed
United States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. Michigan · No. 94-04508 · Filed May 20, 1994 · Closed Aug 23, 1994
Role of Point to Point, Inc. v. L.L.C., Inc.: Party · Outcome: Case closed 1994-08-23 (disposition not included in the bulk docket feed — see docket) Docket on CourtListener ↗
company name words appear in the caption; court in MI (not the issuer's state)
Point to Point, Inc. v. Hartford Insurance Company of Canada closed
United States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. Michigan · No. 94-04319 · Filed Mar 3, 1994 · Closed Apr 21, 1994
Role of Point to Point, Inc. v. Hartford Insurance Company of Canada: Party · Outcome: Case closed 1994-04-21 (disposition not included in the bulk docket feed — see docket) Docket on CourtListener ↗
company name words appear in the caption; court in MI (not the issuer's state)
Point to Point, Inc. closed
United States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. Michigan · No. 94-40772 · Filed Jan 25, 1994 · Closed Feb 12, 1996
Role of Point to Point, Inc.: Party · Outcome: Case closed 1996-02-12 (disposition not included in the bulk docket feed — see docket) Docket on CourtListener ↗
company name words appear in the caption; court in MI (not the issuer's state)
Point to Point Limousine Service, Inc. closed
United States Bankruptcy Court, D. New Jersey · No. 92-27921 · Filed Sep 30, 1992 · Closed Jan 28, 1993
Role of Point to Point Limousine Service, Inc.: Party · Outcome: Case closed 1993-01-28 (disposition not included in the bulk docket feed — see docket) Docket on CourtListener ↗
company name words appear in the caption; court in NJ (not the issuer's state)
What was searched

Sources searched: Federal bankruptcy courts via CourtListener / RECAP archive (federal district courts, federal bankruptcy courts). State courts: not covered (one-tap state court links under Look further). PACER: not searched (RECAP only). · Last checked Oct 24, 2026, 2:16 AM ET.

Court records show docket facts only; we never restate allegations as facts. Outcome wording comes from the docket feed; where it does not state a disposition we say so.

State courts: not covered (one-tap state court links under Look further). No state offers a lawful automated statewide source PartnerFacts can use today. Texas (re:SearchTX) terms prohibit storing results in a database open to third parties; New York (WebCivil) and Massachusetts (MassCourts) require a browser check that blocks scripted queries; California has no statewide index (58 county portals; Rule of Court 2.503 grants name-based access case by case); Florida, Utah and Illinois offer paid or partial access whose terms for automated use are unverified. Washington (dw.courts.wa.gov; bulk index reports under a JISC data-dissemination agreement), Delaware (CourtConnect; Court of Chancery not included) and Arizona (apps.azcourts.gov/publicaccess, which has an official channel to request high-volume access) are the candidates; PartnerFacts will request written permission before any automated search. Federal courts are searched through CourtListener / RECAP.

4. Differences between public sources

No comparisons published

What is compared

No public statement by this sponsor group has been collected yet, so there is nothing to compare. Sources compared: the sponsor's own website (known from the issuer's own filings — Form C issuer website, EDGAR company profile — an approved profile claim or Form ADV Item 1.I of its matched adviser) · SEC Form D · SEC Form ADV (IAPD) · Internet Archive · No website is on file for this sponsor group yet.

2 differences found between the filings for Point (compared 3 filings on Oct 24, 2026)

Note · Jun 16, 2022 – Jul 13, 2022

Form D filed 27 days after the first sale — Point 2 Prove Investment Ltd

The filing says the first sale was Jun 16, 2022. The Form D was filed Jul 13, 2022 — 27 days later. The rule: a Form D is generally due within 15 days after the first sale, so this one is 12 days past that.

What this means A late notice is common and carries no penalty by itself. It is worth asking the sponsor why the paperwork lagged.

Form D · Jul 13, 2022 ↗Point 2 Prove Investment Ltd — PartnerFacts page ↗
Sources
Note · Jul 13, 2022 – Jul 14, 2022

Issuer used a different name before — Point 2 Prove Investment Ltd

SEC records list prior names for this filer: Point to Prove Investment Ltd; Point to Point Investment Ltd. The current name on file is "Point 2 Prove Investment Ltd".

What this means A name change is normal, but your documents may show the old name. Match the CIK, not just the name.

EDGAR filer page ↗Point 2 Prove Investment Ltd — PartnerFacts page ↗
Sources
What is compared

What is compared: every Form D and D/A we hold for this subject, side by side — filing dates vs. first-sale dates (the 15-day rule), amendment timing on open offerings (the yearly-amendment expectation), amounts sold, investor counts, offering amounts and minimums across amendments, industry and size bands, addresses, how each person's name and role is written, paid sellers' CRD numbers, and (for groups) where the member companies were formed and sit. Everything is as filed by the issuer; the SEC does not check it. Differences are common and usually have ordinary explanations — we show both values, the dates, and the source so you can ask. As of Oct 24, 2026.

5. Money to insiders

None reported on 2 offerings — no sales commissions, finder's fees or proceeds to insiders

Per-offering detail
Offering (latest filing)Sales commissionsFinder's feesTo insidersPaid to sell itSource
Oct 31, 2022 D
VYC25 Ltd
File 021-463307
$0$0$0None listed on this filingEDGAR ↗
Jul 14, 2022 D/A
Point 2 Prove Investment Ltd
File 021-452232
$0$0$0None listed on this filingEDGAR ↗

Counts come from Form D Items 12–15 on the filings in our index (latest filing per offering; one offering = one SEC file number; an amendment updates its offering rather than adding one). "To insiders" = gross proceeds used for payments to executive officers, directors or promoters. "—" = not reported on that filing. Amounts marked (est.) were reported as estimates. "Paid to sell it" = sales compensation recipients named on that filing (Item 12), each linked to FINRA BrokerCheck when a CRD number is reported.

Counted across all 2 issuers in this group — every filing in our index, latest filing per offering (SEC file number).

Property records 0 documents · 0 ownership records · last checked Oct 23, 2026, 8:59 PM ET · NYC and Cook County lookup still to run

0 recorded documents and 0 ownership records matched to Point in the sources searched.

Not found in sources searched as of Oct 23, 2026, 8:59 PM ET: Hillsborough County FL Clerk of Court Official Records daily index (publicrec.hillsclerk.com D/P/M files), 2 daily files (Oct 14, 2026 to Oct 15, 2026) — loaded Oct 23, 2026, 8:59 PM ET; Florida DOR NAL roll (Hillsborough 39) roll year 2026 — loaded Oct 23, 2026, 8:54 PM ET; Florida DOR NAL roll (Dade 23) roll year 2026 — loaded Oct 23, 2026, 8:58 PM ET; Harris County Appraisal District real_acct.txt roll year 2026 — loaded Oct 23, 2026, 8:58 PM ET; Dallas Central Appraisal District ACCOUNT_INFO.CSV roll year 2026 — loaded Oct 23, 2026, 8:58 PM ET. Still to be looked up for this group: NYC ACRIS via NYC Open Data (Real Property Parties 636b-3b5g, Master bnx9-e6tj, Legals 8h5j-fqxa, Document Control Codes 7isb-wh4c) · NYC PLUTO ownership via NYC Open Data (64uk-42ks) · Cook County IL Assessor via Cook County Open Data (Parcel Sales wvhk-k5uv; Parcel Addresses 3723-97qp). Records in other counties, and recorder indexes we do not yet cover, were not searched.

Property records coverage: New York City (ACRIS recorded documents and PLUTO ownership, looked up per issuer when its page is viewed; re-checked when the page is viewed again more than 30 days after the last check); Hillsborough County FL (recorded documents from Oct 14, 2026 forward; ownership from FL DOR roll 2026); Cook County IL (assessor ownership and deed/sale records, looked up per issuer when its page is viewed); Harris County TX and Dallas County TX (assessor ownership rolls only, 2026 roll; no deed, mortgage or sale records); Miami-Dade County FL (ownership from FL DOR roll only; Clerk recorded documents not covered). Recorder indexes for TX, AZ, IL and WA counties, mortgages and liens outside NYC and FL, lis pendens and foreclosure notices everywhere, Miami-Dade County FL recorded documents, Maricopa County AZ, King County WA, Salt Lake County UT, and all other counties are not covered — not searched. Last refresh by source: Hillsborough County FL Clerk daily index Oct 23, 2026, 8:59 PM ET; Dallas Central Appraisal District ACCOUNT_INFO.CSV Oct 23, 2026, 8:58 PM ET; Harris County Appraisal District real_acct.txt Oct 23, 2026, 8:58 PM ET; Florida DOR NAL roll (Dade 23) Oct 23, 2026, 8:58 PM ET; Florida DOR NAL roll (Hillsborough 39) Oct 23, 2026, 8:54 PM ET. NYC and Cook County are looked up per issuer when its page is viewed; the most recent such lookup on this site finished Oct 24, 2026, 3:30 AM ET. Parties are named as the recorder's index names them (role suffixes as recorded); no address, account number or trust date is shown for an individual, and individual owners of record (home ownership) are not matched or shown. Items still in human review are not shown.

Issuers in this group

Why each issuer is here is stated in the "Linked by" column. Low-confidence links are never shown — they wait for human review.

SourceIssuerLinked byLocationIndustryFilingsSold (max)InvestorsMin. investment (latest filing)Active
EDGAR ↗P2 Point 2 Prove Investment Ltdshared people, same business addressDUBAI, United Arab Emirates (as filed: C0)Pooled Investment Fund2$77,000,000
offering $77,000,000 · similar: $155,000–$5,250,000
4
similar: 4–27
$2,000,000
similar: $1,000–$100,000
2022–2022
EDGAR ↗V VYC25 Ltdshared people, same business addressDUBAI, United Arab Emirates (as filed: C0)Pooled Investment Fund1$700,000,000
offering $700,000,000 · similar: $155,000–$5,250,000
7
similar: 4–27
$5,000,000
similar: $1,000–$100,000
2022–2022

"Similar" = offerings in the same industry claiming the same exemption, filed in the last 5 years: Pooled Investment Fund / 506(b) (83,801 filings); ranges are the middle half (25th–75th percentile). Computed by PartnerFacts from SEC EDGAR Form D data as of Oct 23, 2026, 5:45 PM ET. Rows without a range: fewer than 30 comparable filings, or not a Rule 506 offering. No ranking or score.

Timeline of offerings

SourceFiledIssuerFormIndustryOfferedSold
EDGAR ↗Oct 31, 2022VYC25 LtdDPooled Investment Fund$700,000,000$700,000,000
EDGAR ↗Jul 14, 2022Point 2 Prove Investment LtdD/APooled Investment Fund$77,000,000$77,000,000
EDGAR ↗Jul 13, 2022Point 2 Prove Investment LtdDPooled Investment Fund$77,000,000$77,000,000

Activity: 0 new offerings in the last 12 months across all issuers in this group (new offering = a Form D that is not an amendment, D/A) · most recent filing Oct 31, 2022. Industry history, as reported on each offering's latest filing: All 2 offerings reported: Pooled Investment Fund (2022).

People across the group

NameRolesIssuers hereFirst → last listed
DS Daniel SchwarzDirector2Jul 13, 2022 → Oct 31, 2022
KL Katja LakeDirector2Jul 13, 2022 → Oct 31, 2022

Adviser registration (Form ADV)

Searched SEC Form ADV bulk data (registered + exempt reporting advisers) (24,962 records as of Oct 2, 2026, 8:00 AM ET) — nothing matched Point.

Meta advertising

No Meta Pixel ids or Facebook / Instagram page links on file for Point as of Oct 24, 2026 — the sponsor website is read for them once it is on file (runs automatically). Meta Ad Library: not searched by PartnerFacts (no API access); a one-tap Ad Library search is under Look further.

Other offering types (Regulation A and Regulation Crowdfunding)

Searched SEC Regulation A Data Sets (Forms 1-A, 1-K, 1-Z; 2015 Q2 → 2026 Q3); SEC Crowdfunding Offerings Data Sets (Form C family; 2016 Q2 → 2026 Q3); EDGAR form index for 2026 Q3 → 2026 Q4 (51,358 records as of Oct 23, 2026, 8:41 PM ET) — nothing matched this name.

Public profiles and social

No website or social profile named in Point's SEC filings (Form C, Reg A, Form ADV; checked Oct 24, 2026). Web search for this name: #142,248 of 374,652 in line (14 issuers searched so far). One-tap searches: Look further ↓

Export this report as PDF · Premium

Request diligence pack (Premium) PartnerFacts asks the sponsor for the standard information pack and delivers it to you labelled "provided by the sponsor".

Change history

No corrections have been requested for this page.

Request a correction

Free. Covers the grouping itself or any record shown here. Logged with status: received → under review → fixed / confirmed with source.

Sponsor response

Add a sourced explanation next to any fact. Reviewed before publishing.

Grouping is PartnerFacts' inference from public filings (shared related persons, management entities, business address). Everything else on this page is drawn from the filings themselves. Not the same sponsor? Request a correction.

Look further

One-tap searches on sites we do not index ourselves, with the name pre-filled (outside the US (as filed: DUBAI), C0). Each opens in a new tab; what you find there is not verified by PartnerFacts.

Social and web

LinkedIn companies ↗Instagram ↗X (Twitter) ↗Facebook ↗YouTube ↗Google ↗Google Images ↗Google News ↗Meta Ad Library ↗

Courts

CourtListener / RECAP (federal) ↗PACER case locator (federal, login) ↗

Securities regulators

SEC EDGAR full-text search ↗SEC action look-up ↗FINRA BrokerCheck ↗SEC IAPD adviser search ↗

Business registries

OpenCorporates ↗