Data last updated: Oct 23, 2026, 5:45 PM ETLatest filing: Oct 22, 2026Now: Oct 24, 2026, 3:53 AM ET

Paradigm Developers

One sponsor team, 3 deal companies · Beverly Hills, CA

Grouped because: 2 shared people, 1 shared management entity, same business address (2 issuers) · 2 issuers also list a director who sits on many unrelated issuers (not used to group) (automatic match from the filings) · not the same sponsor?

3deal companies

$9.38Mreported sold

17investors

3Form D filings

2014–2017active

0new, last 12 mo

Follow this sponsor group Look further ↓

Data last updated Oct 23, 2026, 5:45 PM ET · Latest filing in this group Feb 2, 2017 · Courts (RECAP) last checked: Oct 24, 2026, 2:16 AM ET · SEC enforcement last checked: not yet

The short version

Paradigm Developers is a sponsor group of 3 issuers that PartnerFacts links to one sponsor (shared people, shared management entity, same business address; automatic match from the filings), filing 3 Form D filings between Jun 2014 and Feb 2017.

What this means One team, 3 deal companies, about 3 years of track record in SEC filings. We link the companies because the same people or address appear on their forms — tap "Request a correction" if that is wrong.

Combined reported sold: $9.38M to 17 investors (latest filing per issuer). Industries as reported: Residential (3). Issuers are based in CA (3).

What this means $9.38M raised across the group, about $551K per investor. Amounts come from each company's latest Form D; they are what the sponsor reported, not audited figures.

Principal people: Todd DeMann (3 issuers, executive officer and promoter), David Kramer (2 issuers, executive officer and promoter) and Paradigm Developers LLC (2 issuers, director, entity).

What this means The person on the most companies is usually the one running the show; their page lists every deal.

Activity: 0 new offerings in the last 12 months; latest filing Feb 2, 2017.

What this means No new raise filed in the past year.

Public records searched: federal courts (CourtListener / RECAP), state securities regulators (AZ, CA, DE, TX, WA), property records (NYC, FL, IL and TX counties) — 7 court cases matching the name, 1 bankruptcy case matching the name listed in Key records below. Not yet searched: SEC enforcement releases.

What this means 8 records came back, including 1 court case still open — open cases can take years and cost money. Each one is listed below with a link to the original document and a line saying why it matched. A name match is not proof it is the same person or company — read the why line and the document. Being sued or named in a release is an accusation, not a finding.

What the community is saying

Nothing found on Reddit, BiggerPockets or community forums for high-net-worth investors (searched Oct 24, 2026) — search queued; this line updates when it has run.

Community comments are quoted as written by their authors. Sources searched: BiggerPockets forums (via DuckDuckGo, Brave, Bing and BiggerPockets search) and Reddit (search feed + public archive).

Key records

Five things investors ask first. Items still in human review are counted, not shown.

1. Lawsuits

7 cases: 1 open, 2 closed (disposition not in docket feed), 1 judgment, 3 dismissed

Marquardt v. Crescent Heights Capital LLC open

District Court, E.D. Washington · No. 2:25-cv-00158 · Filed May 13, 2025

Role of Marquardt v. Crescent Heights Capital LLC: Party · Outcome: Pending — no termination date on the docket (bulk snapshot 2026-09-30) Docket on CourtListener ↗

company name words appear in the caption; court in WA (not the issuer's state)

CRESCENT HEIGHTS R&D, LLC v. BOOMERANG SYSTEMS, INC. closed

District Court, S.D. Florida · No. 1:13-cv-21447 · Filed Apr 23, 2013 · Closed May 14, 2013 · Nature of suit: 190 Other contract actions · Cause: 28:1332 Diversity-Contract Dispute

Role of CRESCENT HEIGHTS R&D, LLC v. BOOMERANG SYSTEMS, INC.: Party · Outcome: Terminated 2013-05-14 — FJC Integrated Database disposition: Statistical closing Docket on CourtListener ↗

company name words appear in the caption; court in FL (not the issuer's state)

Falls and Pinnacle Owners' Association, The v. Crescent Heights of America, Inc. judgment

District Court, D. Minnesota · No. 0:09-cv-01849 · Filed Jul 15, 2009 · Closed Oct 20, 2009 · Nature of suit: 190 Other contract actions

Role of Falls and Pinnacle Owners' Association, The v. Crescent Heights of America, Inc.: Party · Outcome: Terminated 2009-10-20 — FJC Integrated Database disposition: Judgment on motion before trial; judgment for defendant Docket on CourtListener ↗

company name words appear in the caption; court in MN (not the issuer's state)

AT&T Corp. v. Crescent Heights of dismissed

District Court, S.D. Florida · No. 1:04-cv-23179 · Filed Dec 20, 2004 · Closed Aug 30, 2005 · Nature of suit: 190 Other contract actions

Role of AT&T Corp. v. Crescent Heights of: Party · Outcome: Terminated 2005-08-30 — FJC Integrated Database disposition: Dismissed: settled Docket on CourtListener ↗

company name words appear in the caption; court in FL (not the issuer's state)

CONTAWE v. CRESCENT HEIGHTS OF AMERICA, INC. dismissed

District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · No. 2:04-cv-02304 · Filed May 26, 2004 · Closed Nov 16, 2005 · Nature of suit: 190 Other contract actions

Role of CONTAWE v. CRESCENT HEIGHTS OF AMERICA, INC.: Party · Outcome: Terminated 2005-11-16 — FJC Integrated Database disposition: Dismissed: settled Docket on CourtListener ↗

company name words appear in the caption; court in PA (not the issuer's state)

Perkins Coie LLP v. Crescent Heights dismissed

District Court, W.D. Washington · No. 2:01-cv-01626 · Filed Oct 12, 2001 · Closed Feb 25, 2002 · Nature of suit: 190 Other contract actions

Role of Perkins Coie LLP v. Crescent Heights: Party · Outcome: Terminated 2002-02-25 — FJC Integrated Database disposition: Dismissed: settled Docket on CourtListener ↗

company name words appear in the caption; court in WA (not the issuer's state)

Southmark Corp v. Crescent Heights VI closed

District Court, N.D. Texas · No. 3:94-cv-00060 · Filed Jan 12, 1994 · Closed Aug 31, 1995 · Nature of suit: 422 Bankruptcy appeals rule 28 USC 158

Role of Southmark Corp v. Crescent Heights VI: Party · Outcome: Terminated 1995-08-31 — FJC Integrated Database disposition: Appeal affirmed (magistrate judge) Docket on CourtListener ↗

company name words appear in the caption; court in TX (not the issuer's state)

What was searched

Sources searched: CourtListener bulk data (RECAP dockets as of 2026-09-30; recall-first rule 10-24) — federal district + bankruptcy courts; live RECAP re-check pending. State courts: not yet searched. PACER: not searched. · Last checked Oct 24, 2026, 2:16 AM ET.

Court records show docket facts only; we never restate allegations as facts. Outcome wording comes from the docket feed; where it does not state a disposition we say so.

State courts: not yet searched. No state offers a lawful automated statewide source PartnerFacts can use today. Texas (re:SearchTX) terms prohibit storing results in a database open to third parties; New York (WebCivil) and Massachusetts (MassCourts) require a browser check that blocks scripted queries; California has no statewide index (58 county portals; Rule of Court 2.503 grants name-based access case by case); Florida, Utah and Illinois offer paid or partial access whose terms for automated use are unverified. Washington (dw.courts.wa.gov; bulk index reports under a JISC data-dissemination agreement), Delaware (CourtConnect; Court of Chancery not included) and Arizona (apps.azcourts.gov/publicaccess, which has an official channel to request high-volume access) are the candidates; PartnerFacts will request written permission before any automated search. Federal courts are searched through CourtListener / RECAP.

2. Regulatory actions

Not yet searched

What was searched

SEC enforcement searched: SEC litigation releases and administrative proceedings — respondent names in the sec.gov index titles (30,205 releases, 1995-09-19 to 2026-10-23); release text is read only to confirm a candidate. Names that appear only in the body of a release are not found. — not yet searched.

State securities regulators searched: AZ (Corporation Commission Securities Division), CA (DFPI — 16 of 12,159 DFPI respondent pages read so far; sponsor-name matches are read first), DE (DOJ Investor Protection Unit), TX (State Securities Board), WA (DFI) — last crawled Oct 23, 2026, 9:57 PM ET. Other states: not yet searched.

No SEC search has run yet for this sponsor group.

3. Bankruptcies

1 case: 1 open

Marquardt v. Crescent Heights Capital, LLC open

United States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. Washington · No. 24-80020 · Filed Aug 1, 2024

Role of Marquardt v. Crescent Heights Capital, LLC: Party · Outcome: Pending — no termination date on the docket (bulk snapshot 2026-09-30) Docket on CourtListener ↗

company name words appear in the caption; court in WA (not the issuer's state)

What was searched

Sources searched: Federal bankruptcy courts via CourtListener / RECAP archive (federal district courts, federal bankruptcy courts). State courts: not yet searched. PACER: not searched (RECAP only). · Last checked Oct 24, 2026, 2:16 AM ET.

Court records show docket facts only; we never restate allegations as facts. Outcome wording comes from the docket feed; where it does not state a disposition we say so.

4. Differences between public sources

No comparisons published

What is compared

No public statement by this sponsor group has been collected yet, so there is nothing to compare. Sources compared: the sponsor's own website (known from the issuer's own filings — Form C issuer website, EDGAR company profile — an approved profile claim or Form ADV Item 1.I of its matched adviser) · SEC Form D · SEC Form ADV (IAPD) · Internet Archive · No website is on file for this sponsor group yet.

5. Money to insiders

0 of 3 offerings report sales commissions; 0 report finder's fees; 1 reports proceeds to related persons totalling $20,000. (includes amounts the issuer reported as estimates)

Offering (latest filing)	Sales commissions	Finder's fees	To insiders	Paid to sell it	Source
Feb 2, 2017 D Crescent Heights Development LLC File 021-279937	$0	$0	$0	None listed on this filing	EDGAR ↗
Dec 19, 2014 D Dolcedo Way LLC File 021-230479	$0	$0	$20,000 (est.) This estimage is per month. The issuer will charge a monthly management equal to 2% per annum of all capital raised by the issuer which will be used to pay expenses related to the management, development, design and construction of real property.	None listed on this filing	EDGAR ↗
Jun 4, 2014 D 12600 Mulholland Dr LLC File 021-218520	$0	$0	$0	None listed on this filing	EDGAR ↗

How this is counted

Counts come from Form D Items 12–15 on the filings in our index (latest filing per offering; one offering = one SEC file number; an amendment updates its offering rather than adding one). "To insiders" = gross proceeds used for payments to executive officers, directors or promoters. "—" = not reported on that filing. Amounts marked (est.) were reported as estimates. "Paid to sell it" = sales compensation recipients named on that filing (Item 12), each linked to FINRA BrokerCheck when a CRD number is reported.

Counted across all 3 issuers in this group — every filing in our index, latest filing per offering (SEC file number).

Property records 0 documents · 0 ownership records · last checked Oct 23, 2026, 8:59 PM ET · NYC and Cook County lookups queued

0 recorded documents and 0 ownership records matched to Paradigm Developers in the sources searched.

Not found in sources searched as of Oct 23, 2026, 8:59 PM ET: Hillsborough County FL Clerk of Court Official Records daily index (publicrec.hillsclerk.com D/P/M files), 2 daily files (Oct 14, 2026 to Oct 15, 2026) — loaded Oct 23, 2026, 8:59 PM ET; Florida DOR NAL roll (Hillsborough 39) roll year 2026 — loaded Oct 23, 2026, 8:54 PM ET; Florida DOR NAL roll (Dade 23) roll year 2026 — loaded Oct 23, 2026, 8:58 PM ET; Harris County Appraisal District real_acct.txt roll year 2026 — loaded Oct 23, 2026, 8:58 PM ET; Dallas Central Appraisal District ACCOUNT_INFO.CSV roll year 2026 — loaded Oct 23, 2026, 8:58 PM ET. Not yet searched for this group (queued): NYC ACRIS via NYC Open Data (Real Property Parties 636b-3b5g, Master bnx9-e6tj, Legals 8h5j-fqxa, Document Control Codes 7isb-wh4c) · NYC PLUTO ownership via NYC Open Data (64uk-42ks) · Cook County IL Assessor via Cook County Open Data (Parcel Sales wvhk-k5uv; Parcel Addresses 3723-97qp). Records in other counties, and recorder indexes we do not yet cover, were not searched.

Property records coverage: New York City (ACRIS recorded documents and PLUTO ownership, looked up per issuer when its page is viewed; re-checked when the page is viewed again more than 30 days after the last check); Hillsborough County FL (recorded documents from Oct 14, 2026 forward; ownership from FL DOR roll 2026); Cook County IL (assessor ownership and deed/sale records, looked up per issuer when its page is viewed); Harris County TX and Dallas County TX (assessor ownership rolls only, 2026 roll; no deed, mortgage or sale records); Miami-Dade County FL (ownership from FL DOR roll only; Clerk recorded documents not yet searched). Recorder indexes for TX, AZ, IL and WA counties, mortgages and liens outside NYC and FL, lis pendens and foreclosure notices everywhere, Miami-Dade County FL recorded documents, Maricopa County AZ, King County WA, Salt Lake County UT, and all other counties are not yet searched. Last refresh by source: Hillsborough County FL Clerk daily index Oct 23, 2026, 8:59 PM ET; Dallas Central Appraisal District ACCOUNT_INFO.CSV Oct 23, 2026, 8:58 PM ET; Harris County Appraisal District real_acct.txt Oct 23, 2026, 8:58 PM ET; Florida DOR NAL roll (Dade 23) Oct 23, 2026, 8:58 PM ET; Florida DOR NAL roll (Hillsborough 39) Oct 23, 2026, 8:54 PM ET. NYC and Cook County are looked up per issuer when its page is viewed; the most recent such lookup on this site finished Oct 24, 2026, 3:30 AM ET. Parties are named as the recorder's index names them (role suffixes as recorded); no address, account number or trust date is shown for an individual, and individual owners of record (home ownership) are not matched or shown. Items still in human review are not shown.

Issuers in this group

Why each issuer is here is stated in the "Linked by" column. Low-confidence links are never shown — they wait for human review.

Source	Issuer	Linked by	Location	Industry	Filings	Sold (max)	Investors	Min. investment (latest filing)	Active
EDGAR ↗	1M 12600 Mulholland Dr LLC	shared people, shared management entity, same business address	BEVERLY HILLS, CA	Residential	1	$850,000 offering $850,000 · similar: $4,000,000–$20,000,000	0 similar: 4–46	$25,000 similar: $25,000–$100,000	2014–2014
EDGAR ↗	DW Dolcedo Way LLC	shared people, shared management entity, same business address, director listed on many unrelated issuers (not used to group)	BEVERLY HILLS, CA	Residential	1	$7,000,000 offering $7,000,000 · similar: $4,000,000–$20,000,000	7 similar: 4–46	$25,000 similar: $25,000–$100,000	2014–2014
EDGAR ↗	CH Crescent Heights Development LLC	shared people, director listed on many unrelated issuers (not used to group)	ENCINO, CA	Residential	1	$1,525,000 offering $1,525,000 · similar: $1,675,000–$12,980,153	10 similar: 5–37	$25,000 similar: $25,000–$86,942	2017–2017

"Similar" = offerings in the same industry claiming the same exemption, filed in the last 5 years: Residential / 506(c) (1,237 filings); Residential / 506(b) (4,183 filings); ranges are the middle half (25th–75th percentile). Computed by PartnerFacts from SEC EDGAR Form D data as of Oct 23, 2026, 5:45 PM ET. Rows without a range: fewer than 30 comparable filings, or not a Rule 506 offering. No ranking or score.

Timeline of offerings

Source	Filed	Issuer	Form	Industry	Offered	Sold
EDGAR ↗	Feb 2, 2017	Crescent Heights Development LLC	D	Residential	$1,525,000	$1,525,000
EDGAR ↗	Dec 19, 2014	Dolcedo Way LLC	D	Residential	$7,000,000	$7,000,000
EDGAR ↗	Jun 4, 2014	12600 Mulholland Dr LLC	D	Residential	$850,000	$850,000

Activity: 0 new offerings in the last 12 months across all issuers in this group (new offering = a Form D that is not an amendment, D/A) · most recent filing Feb 2, 2017. Industry history, as reported on each offering's latest filing: All 3 offerings reported: Residential (2014–2017).

People across the group

Name	Roles	Issuers here	First → last listed
TD Todd DeMann	Promoter, Executive Officer	3	Jun 4, 2014 → Feb 2, 2017
DK David Kramer	Promoter, Executive Officer	2	Dec 19, 2014 → Feb 2, 2017
PD Paradigm Developers LLC entity	Director	2	Jun 4, 2014 → Dec 19, 2014

Adviser registration (Form ADV)

Not yet searched. Sources to be searched: SEC Investment Adviser Information Reports — Form ADV data for SEC-registered advisers and exempt reporting advisers (file dated 2026-10-02); SEC Investment Adviser Public Disclosure (IAPD) firm search — registered and exempt reporting advisers · Search queued. Results are added automatically; check back later.

Meta advertising

Meta advertising Meta Pixel and page links found on the sponsor's own site; ads from Meta's Ad Library where the API returns them

Not yet searched.

Sources to be searched: the sponsor's website (none on record yet; a sponsor's website is known only from the issuer's own filings (Form C issuer website; EDGAR company profile), an approved profile claim or Form ADV Item 1.I of its matched adviser — we never look it up elsewhere) for Meta Pixel ids and Facebook / Instagram page links; Meta Ad Library API: not yet searched (API access pending). We never read facebook.com or instagram.com; readers get a link to Meta's public Ad Library instead.

Other offering types (Regulation A and Regulation Crowdfunding)

None found in sources searched.

Sources searched: SEC Regulation A Data Sets (Forms 1-A, 1-K, 1-Z; 2015 Q2 → 2026 Q3); SEC Crowdfunding Offerings Data Sets (Form C family; 2016 Q2 → 2026 Q3); EDGAR form index for 2026 Q3 → 2026 Q4 · Last checked Oct 23, 2026, 8:41 PM ET.

Export this report as PDF · Premium

Request diligence pack (Premium) PartnerFacts asks the sponsor for the standard information pack and delivers it to you labelled "provided by the sponsor".

Change history

No corrections have been requested for this page.

Request a correction

Free. Covers the grouping itself or any record shown here. Logged with status: received → under review → fixed / confirmed with source.

Sponsor response

Add a sourced explanation next to any fact. Reviewed before publishing.

Grouping is PartnerFacts' inference from public filings (shared related persons, management entities, business address). Everything else on this page is drawn from the filings themselves. Not the same sponsor? Request a correction.

Look further

One-tap searches on sites we do not index ourselves, with the name pre-filled (outside the US (as filed: BEVERLY HILLS), CA). Each opens in a new tab; what you find there is not verified by PartnerFacts.

Paradigm Developers

The short version

What the community is saying

Key records

1. Lawsuits

2. Regulatory actions

3. Bankruptcies

4. Differences between public sources

5. Money to insiders

Issuers in this group

Timeline of offerings

People across the group

Adviser registration (Form ADV)

Meta advertising

Other offering types (Regulation A and Regulation Crowdfunding)

Change history

Request a correction

Sponsor response

Look further

Social and web

Courts

Securities regulators

Business registries