PartnerFacts
Data last updated: Oct 23, 2026, 5:45 PM ETLatest filing: Oct 22, 2026Now: Oct 24, 2026, 7:31 AM ET

Sponsor Check › Sponsor group

O

Orchid

One sponsor team, 6 deal companies · Lake Wales, FL

Grouped because: 1 shared person, same business address (6 issuers), similar issuer names (2) (automatic match from the filings) · not the same sponsor?

6deal companies
$48.3Mreported sold
21investors
7Form D filings
2018–2020active
0new, last 12 mo

Data last updated Oct 23, 2026, 5:45 PM ET · Latest filing in this group Mar 16, 2020 · Courts (RECAP) last checked: Oct 24, 2026, 2:16 AM ET · SEC enforcement last checked: covered by the index scan as of Oct 24, 2026, 2:50 AM ET

The short version

Orchid is a sponsor group of 6 issuers that PartnerFacts links to one sponsor (shared people, same business address, similar issuer names; automatic match from the filings), filing 7 Form D filings between May 2018 and Mar 2020.

What this means One team, 6 deal companies, about 2 years of track record in SEC filings. We link the companies because the same people or address appear on their forms — tap "Request a correction" if that is wrong.

Combined reported sold: $48.3M to 21 investors (latest filing per issuer). Industries as reported: Residential (6). Issuers are based in FL (6).

What this means $48.3M raised across the group, about $2.3M per investor. Amounts come from each company's latest Form D; they are what the sponsor reported, not audited figures.

Principal people: John David Alexander (6 issuers, director and promoter).

What this means 6 deals for a one-person team on paper. The person on the most companies is usually the one running the show; their page lists every deal.

Activity: 0 new offerings in the last 12 months; latest filing Mar 16, 2020.

What this means No new raise filed in the past year.

Public records searched: federal courts (CourtListener / RECAP), SEC enforcement releases, state securities regulators (AK, AL, AR, AZ, CA, CT, DE, FINRA, GA, HI, ID, IL, KS, KY, LA, MA, MD, ME, MI, MO, MS, MT, NASAA, NC, ND, NH, NM, NV, OK, OR, PA, RI, SC, SD, TN, TX, VT, WA, WI, WV, WY), property records (NYC, FL, IL and TX counties) — 5 court cases matching the name, 5 bankruptcy cases matching the name listed in Key records below.

What this means 10 records came back, including 1 court case still open — open cases can take years and cost money. Each one is listed below with a link to the original document and a line saying why it matched. A name match is not proof it is the same person or company — read the why line and the document. Being sued or named in a release is an accusation, not a finding.

We compared 7 public filings for Orchid and found 1 difference, 1 worth asking the sponsor about: 6 Form Ds were filed more than 15 days after the first sale.

What this means These are differences between the sponsor's own SEC filings — both values, dates and sources are listed in Key records, section 4. Most have ordinary explanations; ask the sponsor.

What the community is saying

Community search for Orchid has not run yet — it is joining a line of 23,099 names; searches run around the clock at the hosts' allowed rate. Searched so far: 638 names.

Community comments are quoted as written by their authors. Sources searched: BiggerPockets forums (via DuckDuckGo, Brave, Bing and BiggerPockets search) and Reddit (search feed + public archive).

Key records

Five things investors ask first. Items still in human review are counted, not shown.

1. Lawsuits

5 cases: 1 closed (disposition not in docket feed), 1 open, 1 judgment, 2 dismissed

Orchid Terrace, Inc. v. Burgos closed
District Court, N.D. California · No. 5:17-cv-05276 · Filed Sep 12, 2017 · Closed Oct 2, 2017 · Nature of suit: 230 Rent Lease & Ejectment · Cause: 28:1441 Petition for Removal
Role of Orchid Terrace, Inc. v. Burgos: Party · Outcome: Terminated 2017-10-02 — FJC Integrated Database disposition: Remanded to state court Docket on CourtListener ↗
company name words appear in the caption; court in CA (not the issuer's state)
KING v. RIDGEWOOD CORP. open
District Court, D. New Jersey · No. 2:98-mc-00356 · Filed Aug 31, 1998
Role of RIDGEWOOD CORP.: Defendant · Outcome: Open — no termination date on the docket (bulk snapshot 2026-09-30) Docket on CourtListener ↗
exact company name; name has one distinctive word; court in NJ (not the issuer's state); different legal form (corp vs llc)
King v. Ridgewood Corp. judgment
District Court, E.D. New York · No. 1:98-cv-03849 · Filed May 29, 1998 · Closed Jul 20, 1998 · Nature of suit: 791 Employee Retirement Income Security Act
Role of Ridgewood Corp.: Defendant · Outcome: Terminated 1998-07-20 — FJC Integrated Database disposition: Judgment on default; judgment for plaintiff Docket on CourtListener ↗
exact company name; name has one distinctive word; court in NY (not the issuer's state); different legal form (corp vs llc)
Choice Hotels v. Ridgewood Limited dismissed
District Court, D. Maryland · No. 8:95-cv-03347 · Filed Nov 6, 1995 · Closed Jan 29, 1996 · Nature of suit: 190 Other contract actions
Role of Ridgewood Limited: Defendant · Outcome: Terminated 1996-01-29 — FJC Integrated Database disposition: Voluntarily dismissed Docket on CourtListener ↗
exact company name; name has one distinctive word; court in MD (not the issuer's state); different legal form (ltd vs llc)
Walker v. Ridgewood Limited dismissed
District Court, S.D. Ohio · No. 1:94-cv-00443 · Filed Jul 1, 1994 · Closed May 31, 1996 · Nature of suit: 890 Other statutory actions
Role of Ridgewood Limited: Defendant · Outcome: Terminated 1996-05-31 — FJC Integrated Database disposition: Dismissed: other Docket on CourtListener ↗
exact company name; name has one distinctive word; court in OH (not the issuer's state); different legal form (ltd vs llc)
What was searched

Sources searched: CourtListener bulk data (RECAP dockets as of 2026-09-30; recall-first rule 10-24) — federal district + bankruptcy courts State courts: not covered (one-tap state court links under Look further). PACER: not searched. · Last checked Oct 24, 2026, 2:16 AM ET.

Court records show docket facts only; we never restate allegations as facts. Outcome wording comes from the docket feed; where it does not state a disposition we say so.

State courts: not covered (one-tap state court links under Look further). No state offers a lawful automated statewide source PartnerFacts can use today. Texas (re:SearchTX) terms prohibit storing results in a database open to third parties; New York (WebCivil) and Massachusetts (MassCourts) require a browser check that blocks scripted queries; California has no statewide index (58 county portals; Rule of Court 2.503 grants name-based access case by case); Florida, Utah and Illinois offer paid or partial access whose terms for automated use are unverified. Washington (dw.courts.wa.gov; bulk index reports under a JISC data-dissemination agreement), Delaware (CourtConnect; Court of Chancery not included) and Arizona (apps.azcourts.gov/publicaccess, which has an official channel to request high-volume access) are the candidates; PartnerFacts will request written permission before any automated search. Federal courts are searched through CourtListener / RECAP.

2. Regulatory actions

None found in sources searched — SEC enforcement releases (index scan as of Oct 24, 2026, 2:50 AM ET) · state securities regulators: VA (crawled Oct 23, 2026)

What was searched

SEC enforcement searched: SEC litigation releases and administrative proceedings — respondent names in the sec.gov index titles (30,205 releases, 1995-09-19 to 2026-10-23); release text is read only to confirm a candidate. Names that appear only in the body of a release are not found. — Searched SEC litigation releases and administrative proceedings (1995→ / 2007→) (30,205 records as of Oct 24, 2026, 2:50 AM ET) — nothing matched Orchid..

State securities regulators: Securities regulators searched (3,318 actions): AZ Corporation Commission Securities Division (411 actions, 2017–2026), CA DFPI (25 actions, 2007–2024; listing starts 2002 — 16 of 12,159 DFPI respondent pages read so far; sponsor-name matches are read first), DE DOJ Investor Protection Unit (257 actions, 1987–2026), TX State Securities Board (586 actions, 2006–2026), WA DFI (2,039 actions, 2001–2026) — last crawled Oct 23, 2026, 9:57 PM ET. No machine-readable public listing today for CO, FL, IA, IN, MN, NE, NJ, NY, OH, UT, VA (see docs/state-regulators.md).

3. Bankruptcies

5 cases: 5 closed (disposition not in docket feed)

Ridgewood Corp closed
United States Bankruptcy Court, D. New Jersey · No. 10-30571 · Filed Jul 2, 2010 · Closed Sep 28, 2011
Role of Ridgewood Corp: Debtor · Outcome: Case closed 2011-09-28 (disposition not included in the bulk docket feed — see docket) Docket on CourtListener ↗
exact company name; name has one distinctive word; court in NJ (not the issuer's state); different legal form (corp vs llc)
Ridgewood Corporation closed
United States Bankruptcy Court, D. New Jersey · No. 10-28711 · Filed Jun 18, 2010 · Closed Sep 20, 2010
Role of Ridgewood Corporation: Debtor · Outcome: Case closed 2010-09-20 (disposition not included in the bulk docket feed — see docket) Docket on CourtListener ↗
exact company name; name has one distinctive word; court in NJ (not the issuer's state); different legal form (corp vs llc)
Riverstone, Inc. closed
United States Bankruptcy Court, W.D. Wisconsin · No. 1-09-17180 · Filed Oct 22, 2009 · Closed Jan 31, 2011
Role of Riverstone, Inc.: Debtor · Outcome: Case closed 2011-01-31 (disposition not included in the bulk docket feed — see docket) Docket on CourtListener ↗
exact company name; name has one distinctive word; court in WI (not the issuer's state); different legal form (inc vs llc)
Forman v. Ridgewood Corp. closed
United States Bankruptcy Court, D. New Jersey · No. 96-2642 · Filed Oct 15, 1996 · Closed May 27, 1997
Role of Ridgewood Corp.: Defendant · Outcome: Case closed 1997-05-27 (disposition not included in the bulk docket feed — see docket) Docket on CourtListener ↗
exact company name; name has one distinctive word; court in NJ (not the issuer's state); different legal form (corp vs llc)
Ridgewood Corporation closed
United States Bankruptcy Court, N.D. Illinois · No. 96-00884 · Filed Jan 11, 1996 · Closed May 1, 1997
Role of Ridgewood Corporation: Debtor · Outcome: Case closed 1997-05-01 (disposition not included in the bulk docket feed — see docket) Docket on CourtListener ↗
exact company name; name has one distinctive word; court in IL (not the issuer's state); different legal form (corp vs llc)
What was searched

Sources searched: Federal bankruptcy courts via CourtListener / RECAP archive (federal district courts, federal bankruptcy courts). State courts: not covered (one-tap state court links under Look further). PACER: not searched (RECAP only). · Last checked Oct 24, 2026, 2:16 AM ET.

Court records show docket facts only; we never restate allegations as facts. Outcome wording comes from the docket feed; where it does not state a disposition we say so.

State courts: not covered (one-tap state court links under Look further). No state offers a lawful automated statewide source PartnerFacts can use today. Texas (re:SearchTX) terms prohibit storing results in a database open to third parties; New York (WebCivil) and Massachusetts (MassCourts) require a browser check that blocks scripted queries; California has no statewide index (58 county portals; Rule of Court 2.503 grants name-based access case by case); Florida, Utah and Illinois offer paid or partial access whose terms for automated use are unverified. Washington (dw.courts.wa.gov; bulk index reports under a JISC data-dissemination agreement), Delaware (CourtConnect; Court of Chancery not included) and Arizona (apps.azcourts.gov/publicaccess, which has an official channel to request high-volume access) are the candidates; PartnerFacts will request written permission before any automated search. Federal courts are searched through CourtListener / RECAP.

4. Differences between public sources

No comparisons published

What is compared

No public statement by this sponsor group has been collected yet, so there is nothing to compare. Sources compared: the sponsor's own website (known from the issuer's own filings — Form C issuer website, EDGAR company profile — an approved profile claim or Form ADV Item 1.I of its matched adviser) · SEC Form D · SEC Form ADV (IAPD) · Internet Archive · No website is on file for this sponsor group yet.

1 difference found between the filings for Orchid — 1 worth asking about (compared 7 filings on Oct 24, 2026)

Worth asking · Dec 22, 2017 – Mar 16, 2020

6 Form Ds were filed more than 15 days after the first sale

Form D filed 146 days after the first sale — ORCHID GROVE LLC · Form D filed 24 days after the first sale — Citrus Landing Development, LLC · Form D filed 43 days after the first sale — Orchid Terrace Development, LLC · Form D filed 33 days after the first sale — Ridgewood, LLC · Form D filed 44 days after the first sale — Lucerne Park Development, LLC · and 1 more

What this means Late notices are common and carry no penalty by themselves. A pattern of late paperwork is worth asking the sponsor about.

Sources
What is compared

What is compared: every Form D and D/A we hold for this subject, side by side — filing dates vs. first-sale dates (the 15-day rule), amendment timing on open offerings (the yearly-amendment expectation), amounts sold, investor counts, offering amounts and minimums across amendments, industry and size bands, addresses, how each person's name and role is written, paid sellers' CRD numbers, and (for groups) where the member companies were formed and sit. Everything is as filed by the issuer; the SEC does not check it. Differences are common and usually have ordinary explanations — we show both values, the dates, and the source so you can ask. As of Oct 24, 2026.

5. Money to insiders

0 of 6 offerings report sales commissions; 0 report finder's fees; 5 report proceeds to related persons totalling $1,109,500. (includes amounts the issuer reported as estimates)

Offering (latest filing)Sales commissionsFinder's feesTo insidersPaid to sell itSource
Mar 16, 2020 D
Citrus Landing Development, LLC
File 021-362903
$0$0$0None listed on this filingEDGAR ↗
Feb 4, 2020 D
Orchid Terrace Development, LLC
File 021-359705
$0$0$84,000
Management fees of up to $84,000/annum will be paid to Atlanticblue Capital, LLC, as Manager of Issuer, which is a Florida limited liability company wholly-owned by John David Alexander, the person listed in Item 3.
None listed on this filingEDGAR ↗
Jul 1, 2019 D
Ridgewood, LLC
File 021-343142
$0$0$245,500 (est.)
Management fees of up to $245,500/annum will be paid to Atlantic Property Company, LLC, as Manager of Issuer, which is a Florida limited liability company wholly-owned by John David Alexander, the person named in Item 3.
None listed on this filingEDGAR ↗
May 15, 2019 D
Lucerne Park Development, LLC
File 021-339635
$0$0$160,000 (est.)None listed on this filingEDGAR ↗
May 18, 2018 D/A
ORCHID GROVE LLC
File 021-312718
$0$0$200,000
Management fees of up to $200,000 per annum will be paid to a limited liability company that acts as manager of the Issuer and is wholly-owned by related persons named in item 3 above.
None listed on this filingEDGAR ↗
May 18, 2018 D
Riverstone, LLC
File 021-312733
$0$0$420,000 (est.)
$250,000 will be paid to the person named in Item 3 in connection with a real property purchase by Issuer. Management fees of up to $170,000/annum will be paid to an LLC that is manager of Issuer and is wholly-owned by the person named in Item 3
None listed on this filingEDGAR ↗
How this is counted

Counts come from Form D Items 12–15 on the filings in our index (latest filing per offering; one offering = one SEC file number; an amendment updates its offering rather than adding one). "To insiders" = gross proceeds used for payments to executive officers, directors or promoters. "—" = not reported on that filing. Amounts marked (est.) were reported as estimates. "Paid to sell it" = sales compensation recipients named on that filing (Item 12), each linked to FINRA BrokerCheck when a CRD number is reported.

Counted across all 6 issuers in this group — every filing in our index, latest filing per offering (SEC file number).

Property records 0 documents · 0 ownership records · last checked Oct 24, 2026, 7:27 AM ET · NYC and Cook County lookup still to run

0 recorded documents and 0 ownership records matched to Orchid in the sources searched.

Not found in sources searched as of Oct 24, 2026, 7:27 AM ET: Hillsborough County FL Clerk of Court Official Records daily index (publicrec.hillsclerk.com D/P/M files), 2 daily files (Oct 14, 2026 to Oct 15, 2026) — loaded Oct 23, 2026, 8:59 PM ET; Harris County TX (HCAD ownership rolls 2015–2026) — 722,516 records, loaded Oct 24, 2026, 7:27 AM ET; Dallas County TX (DCAD ownership roll 2026) — 173,688 records, loaded Oct 23, 2026, 8:58 PM ET; Hillsborough County FL (FL DOR 2026 ownership roll + Clerk recorded-document index Oct 14, 2026 to Oct 15, 2026), Miami-Dade County FL (FL DOR 2026 ownership roll) — 294,950 records, loaded Oct 23, 2026, 8:58 PM ET. Still to be looked up for this group: NYC ACRIS via NYC Open Data (Real Property Parties 636b-3b5g, Master bnx9-e6tj, Legals 8h5j-fqxa, Document Control Codes 7isb-wh4c) · NYC PLUTO ownership via NYC Open Data (64uk-42ks) · Cook County IL Assessor via Cook County Open Data (Parcel Sales wvhk-k5uv; Parcel Addresses 3723-97qp). Records in other counties, and recorder indexes we do not yet cover, were not searched.

Property records coverage: New York City (ACRIS recorded documents and PLUTO ownership, looked up per issuer when its page is viewed; re-checked when the page is viewed again more than 30 days after the last check); Harris County TX (ownership only, no deed, mortgage or sale records; HCAD ownership rolls 2015–2026); Dallas County TX (ownership only, no deed, mortgage or sale records; DCAD ownership roll 2026); Hillsborough County FL (FL DOR 2026 ownership roll + Clerk recorded-document index Oct 14, 2026 to Oct 15, 2026), Miami-Dade County FL (FL DOR 2026 ownership roll); Cook County IL (assessor ownership and deed/sale records, looked up per issuer when its page is viewed). Recorder indexes (party names on deeds, mortgages and liens) in TX, AZ, NV, CA and WA counties and outside the Clerk index in FL, mortgages and liens outside NYC and Hillsborough County, lis pendens and foreclosure notices everywhere, Los Angeles County CA, Clark County NV, King County WA (loader ready; first load not finished), Cook County IL bulk pass (not finished; per-issuer lookups only so far), New York City bulk pass (not finished; per-issuer lookups only so far), Maricopa County AZ (loader ready; commercial-purpose statement not yet filed), Salt Lake County UT, and all other counties are not covered — not searched. Last refresh by source: Harris County Appraisal District real_acct.txt Oct 24, 2026, 7:27 AM ET; Hillsborough County FL Clerk daily index Oct 23, 2026, 8:59 PM ET; Dallas Central Appraisal District ACCOUNT_INFO.CSV Oct 23, 2026, 8:58 PM ET; Florida DOR NAL roll (Dade 23) Oct 23, 2026, 8:58 PM ET; Florida DOR NAL roll (Hillsborough 39) Oct 23, 2026, 8:54 PM ET. NYC and Cook County are also looked up per issuer when its page is viewed; the most recent such lookup on this site finished Oct 24, 2026, 3:30 AM ET. Parties are named as the recorder's index names them (role suffixes as recorded); no address, account number or trust date is shown for an individual, and individual owners of record (home ownership) are not matched or shown. Items still in human review are not shown.

Issuers in this group

Why each issuer is here is stated in the "Linked by" column. Low-confidence links are never shown — they wait for human review.

SourceIssuerLinked byLocationIndustryFilingsSold (max)InvestorsMin. investment (latest filing)Active
EDGAR ↗OG ORCHID GROVE LLCshared people, same business address, similar issuer namesLAKE WALES, FLResidential2$9,500,000
offering $9,500,000 · similar: $1,675,000–$12,980,153
6
similar: 5–37
$100,000
similar: $25,000–$86,942
2018–2018
EDGAR ↗R Riverstone, LLCshared people, same business addressLAKE WALES, FLResidential1$8,500,000
offering $8,500,000 · similar: $1,675,000–$12,980,153
1
similar: 5–37
$200,000
similar: $25,000–$86,942
2018–2018
EDGAR ↗LP Lucerne Park Development, LLCshared people, same business addressLAKE WALES, FLResidential1$8,000,000
offering $8,000,000 · similar: $1,675,000–$12,980,153
2
similar: 5–37
$200,000
similar: $25,000–$86,942
2019–2019
EDGAR ↗R Ridgewood, LLCshared people, same business addressLAKE WALES, FLResidential1$12,275,000
offering $12,275,000 · similar: $1,675,000–$12,980,153
3
similar: 5–37
$200,000
similar: $25,000–$86,942
2019–2019
EDGAR ↗OT Orchid Terrace Development, LLCshared people, same business address, similar issuer namesLAKE WALES, FLResidential1$4,200,000
offering $4,200,000 · similar: $1,675,000–$12,980,153
5
similar: 5–37
$200,000
similar: $25,000–$86,942
2020–2020
EDGAR ↗CL Citrus Landing Development, LLCshared people, same business addressLAKE WALES, FLResidential1$5,840,000
offering $5,840,000 · similar: $1,675,000–$12,980,153
4
similar: 5–37
$200,000
similar: $25,000–$86,942
2020–2020

"Similar" = offerings in the same industry claiming the same exemption, filed in the last 5 years: Residential / 506(b) (4,183 filings); ranges are the middle half (25th–75th percentile). Computed by PartnerFacts from SEC EDGAR Form D data as of Oct 23, 2026, 5:45 PM ET. Rows without a range: fewer than 30 comparable filings, or not a Rule 506 offering. No ranking or score.

Timeline of offerings

SourceFiledIssuerFormIndustryOfferedSold
EDGAR ↗Mar 16, 2020Citrus Landing Development, LLCDResidential$5,840,000$5,840,000
EDGAR ↗Feb 4, 2020Orchid Terrace Development, LLCDResidential$4,200,000$4,200,000
EDGAR ↗Jul 1, 2019Ridgewood, LLCDResidential$12,275,000$12,275,000
EDGAR ↗May 15, 2019Lucerne Park Development, LLCDResidential$8,000,000$8,000,000
EDGAR ↗May 18, 2018Riverstone, LLCDResidential$8,500,000$8,500,000
EDGAR ↗May 18, 2018ORCHID GROVE LLCD/AResidential$9,500,000$9,500,000
EDGAR ↗May 17, 2018ORCHID GROVE LLCDResidential$9,500,000$9,500,000

Activity: 0 new offerings in the last 12 months across all issuers in this group (new offering = a Form D that is not an amendment, D/A) · most recent filing Mar 16, 2020. Industry history, as reported on each offering's latest filing: All 6 offerings reported: Residential (2018–2020).

People across the group

NameRolesIssuers hereFirst → last listed
JA John David AlexanderDirector, Promoter6May 17, 2018 → Mar 16, 2020

Adviser registration (Form ADV)

Searched SEC Form ADV bulk data (registered + exempt reporting advisers) (24,962 records as of Oct 2, 2026, 8:00 AM ET) — nothing matched Orchid.

Meta advertising

No Meta Pixel ids or Facebook / Instagram page links on file for Orchid as of Oct 24, 2026 — the sponsor website is read for them once it is on file (runs automatically). Meta Ad Library: not searched by PartnerFacts (no API access); a one-tap Ad Library search is under Look further.

Other offering types (Regulation A and Regulation Crowdfunding)

Searched SEC Regulation A Data Sets (Forms 1-A, 1-K, 1-Z; 2015 Q2 → 2026 Q3); SEC Crowdfunding Offerings Data Sets (Form C family; 2016 Q2 → 2026 Q3); EDGAR form index for 2026 Q3 → 2026 Q4 (51,358 records as of Oct 23, 2026, 8:41 PM ET) — nothing matched this name.

Public profiles and social

No website or social profile named in Orchid's SEC filings (Form C, Reg A, Form ADV; checked Oct 24, 2026). Web search for this name: #232,333 of 374,652 in line (1,164 issuers searched so far). One-tap searches: Look further ↓

Export this report as PDF · Premium

Request diligence pack (Premium) PartnerFacts asks the sponsor for the standard information pack and delivers it to you labelled "provided by the sponsor".

Change history

No corrections have been requested for this page.

Request a correction

Free. Covers the grouping itself or any record shown here. Logged with status: received → under review → fixed / confirmed with source.

Sponsor response

Add a sourced explanation next to any fact. Reviewed before publishing.

Grouping is PartnerFacts' inference from public filings (shared related persons, management entities, business address). Everything else on this page is drawn from the filings themselves. Not the same sponsor? Request a correction.

Look further

One-tap searches on sites we do not index ourselves, with the name pre-filled (outside the US (as filed: LAKE WALES), FL). Each opens in a new tab; what you find there is not verified by PartnerFacts.