12 cases: 11 closed (disposition not in docket feed), 1 open
Noble Corp closed matched at sponsor-group level (Noble)
United States Bankruptcy Court, W.D. New York · No. 1-21-10548 · Filed May 24, 2021 · Closed Sep 17, 2021
Role of Noble Corp:
Debtor · Outcome:
Case closed 2021-09-17 (disposition not included in the bulk docket feed — see docket) Docket on CourtListener ↗exact company name; name has one distinctive word; court in NY (not the issuer's state)
Noble Corporation plc v. Paragon Litigation Trust closed matched at sponsor-group level (Noble)
United States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. Texas · No. 20-03354 · Filed Aug 4, 2020 · Closed Apr 11, 2024
Role of Noble Corporation plc:
Plaintiff · Outcome:
Case closed 2024-04-11 (disposition not included in the bulk docket feed — see docket) Docket on CourtListener ↗exact company name; name has one distinctive word; court in the group's state (TX)
Noble Corporation plc and Bully 1 (Switzerland) GmbH open matched at sponsor-group level (Noble)
United States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. Texas · No. 20-33826 · Filed Jul 31, 2020
Role of Noble Corporation plc:
Debtor · Outcome:
Open — no termination date on the docket (bulk snapshot 2026-09-30) Docket on CourtListener ↗exact company name; name has one distinctive word; court in the group's state (TX)
Kartzman v. NOBLE, INC. closed matched at sponsor-group level (Noble)
United States Bankruptcy Court, D. New Jersey · No. 18-01087 · Filed Feb 27, 2018 · Closed Jun 7, 2019
Role of NOBLE, INC.:
Defendant · Outcome:
Case closed 2019-06-07 (disposition not included in the bulk docket feed — see docket) Docket on CourtListener ↗exact company name; name has one distinctive word; court in NJ (not the issuer's state)
Paragon Litigation Trust v. NOBLE CORPORATION PLC closed matched at sponsor-group level (Noble)
United States Bankruptcy Court, D. Delaware · No. 17-51882 · Filed Dec 15, 2017 · Closed Sep 23, 2021 ·
Nature of suit:
13 Recovery of money/property - 548 fraudulent transfer
Role of NOBLE CORPORATION PLC:
Defendant · Outcome:
Case closed 2021-09-23 (disposition not included in the bulk docket feed — see docket) Docket on CourtListener ↗exact company name; name has one distinctive word; court in DE (not the issuer's state)
Goldstein, Chapter 7 Trustee v. Barnes and Noble, Inc closed matched at sponsor-group level (Noble)
United States Bankruptcy Court, D. Delaware · No. 01-08119 · Filed Oct 31, 2001 · Closed Apr 3, 2003
Role of Noble, Inc:
Defendant · Outcome:
Case closed 2003-04-03 (disposition not included in the bulk docket feed — see docket) Docket on CourtListener ↗exact company name; name has one distinctive word; court in DE (not the issuer's state); filed 2001, issuer incorporated 2012
Noble, Inc. closed matched at sponsor-group level (Noble)
United States Bankruptcy Court, D. Utah · No. 00-30398 · Filed Sep 14, 2000 · Closed Mar 5, 2001
Role of Noble, Inc.:
Debtor · Outcome:
Case closed 2001-03-05 (disposition not included in the bulk docket feed — see docket) Docket on CourtListener ↗exact company name; name has one distinctive word; court in UT (not the issuer's state); filed 2000, issuer incorporated 2012
Roy v. Noble Company closed matched at sponsor-group level (Noble)
United States Bankruptcy Court, M.D. Georgia · No. 00-52040 · Filed Jun 5, 2000 · Closed May 9, 2002
Role of Noble Company:
Defendant · Outcome:
Case closed 2002-05-09 (disposition not included in the bulk docket feed — see docket) Docket on CourtListener ↗exact company name; name has one distinctive word; court in GA (not the issuer's state); filed 2000, issuer incorporated 2012
MONARCH TILE, INC. v. THE NOBLE COMPANY closed matched at sponsor-group level (Noble)
United States Bankruptcy Court, N.D. Alabama · No. 99-80260 · Filed Dec 10, 1999 · Closed Feb 24, 2000
Role of THE NOBLE COMPANY:
Defendant · Outcome:
Case closed 2000-02-24 (disposition not included in the bulk docket feed — see docket) Docket on CourtListener ↗exact company name; name has one distinctive word; court in AL (not the issuer's state); filed 1999, issuer incorporated 2012
Spear v. Barnes and Noble, Inc. closed matched at sponsor-group level (Noble)
United States Bankruptcy Court, N.D. California · No. 97-04242 · Filed Apr 22, 1997 · Closed Jul 15, 1997
Role of Noble, Inc.:
Defendant · Outcome:
Case closed 1997-07-15 (disposition not included in the bulk docket feed — see docket) Docket on CourtListener ↗exact company name; name has one distinctive word; court in CA (not the issuer's state); filed 1997, issuer incorporated 2012
Whitaker v. The Noble Company closed matched at sponsor-group level (Noble)
United States Bankruptcy Court, M.D. Florida · No. 3:92-ap-09973 · Filed Jul 1, 1992 · Closed Mar 25, 1993
Role of The Noble Company:
Defendant · Outcome:
Case closed 1993-03-25 (disposition not included in the bulk docket feed — see docket) Docket on CourtListener ↗exact company name; name has one distinctive word; court in FL (not the issuer's state); filed 1992, issuer incorporated 2012
Noble Corporation closed matched at sponsor-group level (Noble)
United States Bankruptcy Court, N.D. Iowa · No. 88-40626 · Filed Apr 20, 1988 · Closed Jan 9, 1990
Role of Noble Corporation:
Debtor · Outcome:
Case closed 1990-01-09 (disposition not included in the bulk docket feed — see docket) Docket on CourtListener ↗exact company name; name has one distinctive word; court in IA (not the issuer's state); filed 1988, issuer incorporated 2012
What was searched
Sources searched: Federal bankruptcy courts via CourtListener / RECAP archive (federal district courts, federal bankruptcy courts). State courts: not covered (one-tap state court links under Look further). PACER: not searched (RECAP only). · Last checked Oct 24, 2026, 2:16 AM ET.
Court records show docket facts only; we never restate allegations as facts. Outcome wording comes from the docket feed; where it does not state a disposition we say so.
State courts: not covered (one-tap state court links under Look further). No state offers a lawful automated statewide source PartnerFacts can use today. Texas (re:SearchTX) terms prohibit storing results in a database open to third parties; New York (WebCivil) and Massachusetts (MassCourts) require a browser check that blocks scripted queries; California has no statewide index (58 county portals; Rule of Court 2.503 grants name-based access case by case); Florida, Utah and Illinois offer paid or partial access whose terms for automated use are unverified. Washington (dw.courts.wa.gov; bulk index reports under a JISC data-dissemination agreement), Delaware (CourtConnect; Court of Chancery not included) and Arizona (apps.azcourts.gov/publicaccess, which has an official channel to request high-volume access) are the candidates; PartnerFacts will request written permission before any automated search. Federal courts are searched through CourtListener / RECAP.