PartnerFacts
Data last updated: Oct 23, 2026, 5:45 PM ETLatest filing: Oct 22, 2026Now: Oct 24, 2026, 9:42 AM ET

Sponsor Check › Sponsor group

M

Matador

One sponsor team, 3 deal companies · West Hollywood, CA

Grouped because: 3 shared people, similar issuer names (2) (automatic match from the filings) · not the same sponsor?

3deal companies
$71.3Mreported sold
33investors
4Form D filings
2021–2025active
1new, last 12 mo
Follow this sponsor groupLook further ↓

Data last updated Oct 23, 2026, 5:45 PM ET · Latest filing in this group Dec 16, 2025 · Courts (RECAP) last checked: Oct 24, 2026, 2:16 AM ET · SEC enforcement last checked: covered by the index scan as of Oct 24, 2026, 2:50 AM ET

The short version

Matador is a sponsor group of 3 issuers that PartnerFacts links to one sponsor (shared people, similar issuer names; automatic match from the filings), filing 4 Form D filings between Jul 2021 and Dec 2025.

What this means One team, 3 deal companies, about 4 years of track record in SEC filings. We link the companies because the same people or address appear on their forms — tap "Request a correction" if that is wrong.

Combined reported sold: $71.3M to 33 investors (latest filing per issuer). Industries as reported: Pooled Investment Fund (2), "Other" (1). Issuers are based in CA (3).

What this means $71.3M raised across the group, about $2.16M per investor. Amounts come from each company's latest Form D; they are what the sponsor reported, not audited figures.

Principal people: Christopher Woodrow (3 issuers, executive officer, director, and promoter), Christopher Fenton (2 issuers, executive officer), K. Blaine Johnston (2 issuers, executive officer), Charles Bralver (1 issuer, director), Daniel McClure (1 issuer, director) and 7 more.

What this means The person on the most companies is usually the one running the show; their page lists every deal.

Activity: 1 new offering in the last 12 months; latest filing Dec 16, 2025.

What this means still raising money this year.

Adviser registration (Form ADV) on record: MCT ENTERTAINMENT ADVISORS LLC.

Public records searched: federal courts (CourtListener / RECAP), SEC enforcement releases, state securities regulators (AK, AL, AR, AZ, CA, CO, CT, DC, DE, FINRA, FL, GA, HI, ID, IL, KS, KY, LA, MA, MD, ME, MI, MO, MS, MT, NASAA, NC, ND, NH, NM, NV, NY, OH, OK, OR, PA, RI, SC, SD, TN, TX, UT, VT, WA, WI, WV, WY), property records (NYC, FL, IL and TX counties) — 32 court cases matching the name, 15 bankruptcy cases matching the name listed in Key records below.

What this means 47 records came back, including 3 court cases still open — open cases can take years and cost money. Each one is listed below with a link to the original document and a line saying why it matched. A name match is not proof it is the same person or company — read the why line and the document. Being sued or named in a release is an accusation, not a finding.

We compared 4 public filings for Matador and found 6 differences, 1 worth asking the sponsor about: Form D filed 63 days after the first sale; and more below.

What this means These are differences between the sponsor's own SEC filings — both values, dates and sources are listed in Key records, section 4. Most have ordinary explanations; ask the sponsor.

What the community is saying

Community search for Matador has not run yet — it is joining a line of 38,984 names; searches run around the clock at the hosts' allowed rate. Searched so far: 641 names.

Community comments are quoted as written by their authors. Sources searched: Bing (site:reddit.com / site:biggerpockets.com) and Reddit's own search, plus DuckDuckGo/Brave/BiggerPockets search when they are answering.

Key records

Five things investors ask first. Items still in human review are counted, not shown.

1. Lawsuits

32 cases: 3 open, 24 closed (disposition not in docket feed), 5 dismissed

CRIVELLA HOLDINGS LIMITED v. MESEARCH MEDIA TECHNOLOGIES, LIMITED open
District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · No. 2:25-cv-00719 · Filed May 23, 2025
Role of CRIVELLA HOLDINGS LIMITED v. MESEARCH MEDIA TECHNOLOGIES, LIMITED: Party · Outcome: Open — no termination date on the docket (bulk snapshot 2026-09-30) Docket on CourtListener ↗
company name words appear in the caption; court in PA (not the issuer's state)
CRIVELLA HOLDINGS LIMITED v. MESEARCH MEDIA TECHNOLOGIES, LIMITED open
District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · No. 2:25-cv-00333 · Filed Mar 5, 2025 · Nature of suit: Bankruptcy Appeal (801) · Cause: 28:0158 Notice of Appeal re Bankruptcy Matter (BA
Role of CRIVELLA HOLDINGS LIMITED v. MESEARCH MEDIA TECHNOLOGIES, LIMITED: Party · Outcome: Open — no termination date on the docket (bulk snapshot 2026-09-30) Docket on CourtListener ↗
company name words appear in the caption; court in PA (not the issuer's state)
iii-Interactive v. Videology Media Technologies, LLC closed
District Court, D. Maryland · No. 1:18-cv-01318 · Filed May 7, 2018 · Closed Oct 11, 2018
Role of iii-Interactive v. Videology Media Technologies, LLC: Party · Outcome: Terminated 2018-10-11 (disposition not included in the bulk docket feed — see docket) Docket on CourtListener ↗
company name words appear in the caption; court in MD (not the issuer's state)
One Twenty 2, LLC v. Videology Media Technologies, LLC dismissed
District Court, D. Maryland · No. 1:18-cv-01050 · Filed Apr 11, 2018 · Closed Sep 11, 2018 · Nature of suit: 190 Contract: Other · Cause: 28:1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Role of One Twenty 2, LLC v. Videology Media Technologies, LLC: Party · Outcome: Terminated 2018-09-11 — FJC Integrated Database disposition: Voluntarily dismissed Docket on CourtListener ↗
company name words appear in the caption; court in MD (not the issuer's state)
Baronsmedia.Com LLC v. Videology Media Technologies, LLC closed
District Court, D. Maryland · No. 1:18-cv-00154 · Filed Jan 17, 2018 · Closed Jul 18, 2018 · Nature of suit: 190 Contract: Other · Cause: 28:1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Role of Baronsmedia.Com LLC v. Videology Media Technologies, LLC: Party · Outcome: Terminated 2018-07-18 — FJC Integrated Database disposition: Stayed pending bankruptcy Docket on CourtListener ↗
company name words appear in the caption; court in MD (not the issuer's state)
Vigilant Insurance Company v. Accelerated Media Technologies, Inc. dismissed
District Court, D. Massachusetts · No. 1:14-cv-10272 · Filed Feb 6, 2014 · Closed May 19, 2016 · Nature of suit: 380 Other personal property damage
Role of Vigilant Insurance Company v. Accelerated Media Technologies, Inc.: Party · Outcome: Terminated 2016-05-19 — FJC Integrated Database disposition: Dismissed: settled Docket on CourtListener ↗
company name words appear in the caption; court in MA (not the issuer's state)
Guardian Media Technologies, Ltd. v. ACER America Corp open
District Court, S.D. Texas · No. 4:13-mc-00811 · Filed May 1, 2013
Role of Guardian Media Technologies, Ltd. v. ACER America Corp: Party · Outcome: Open — no termination date on the docket (bulk snapshot 2026-09-30) Docket on CourtListener ↗
company name words appear in the caption; court in TX (not the issuer's state)
Bosworth v. 25K Digital, Inc/Intertouch Media Technologies, Corp. dismissed
District Court, E.D. Virginia · No. 1:12-cv-00445 · Filed Apr 23, 2012 · Closed Dec 7, 2012 · Nature of suit: 190 Other contract actions
Role of Bosworth v. 25K Digital, Inc/Intertouch Media Technologies, Corp.: Party · Outcome: Terminated 2012-12-07 — FJC Integrated Database disposition: Dismissed: settled Docket on CourtListener ↗
company name words appear in the caption; court in VA (not the issuer's state)
Fleming v. Guardian Media Technologies, Ltd. closed
District Court, S.D. Texas · No. 4:09-mc-00394 · Filed Aug 11, 2009 · Closed Sep 1, 2009
Role of Fleming v. Guardian Media Technologies, Ltd.: Party · Outcome: Terminated 2009-09-01 (disposition not included in the bulk docket feed — see docket) Docket on CourtListener ↗
company name words appear in the caption; court in TX (not the issuer's state)
Guardian Media Technologies, Ltd. v. Syntax-Brillian Corp. closed
District Court, C.D. California · No. 2:08-cv-03933 · Filed Jun 16, 2008 · Closed Aug 6, 2008 · Nature of suit: 190 Other contract actions
Role of Guardian Media Technologies, Ltd. v. Syntax-Brillian Corp.: Party · Outcome: Terminated 2008-08-06 — FJC Integrated Database disposition: Stayed pending bankruptcy Docket on CourtListener ↗
company name words appear in the caption; court in the issuer's state (CA)
Media Technologies Licensing, LLC v. Tristar Productions, Inc. dismissed
District Court, E.D. Texas · No. 2:07-cv-00564 · Filed Dec 28, 2007 · Closed Feb 19, 2009 · Nature of suit: 890 Other statutory actions
Role of Media Technologies Licensing, LLC v. Tristar Productions, Inc.: Party · Outcome: Terminated 2009-02-19 — FJC Integrated Database disposition: Voluntarily dismissed Docket on CourtListener ↗
company name words appear in the caption; court in TX (not the issuer's state)
Acacia Media Technologies Corporation v. Cable America Corp closed
District Court, N.D. California · No. 5:05-cv-01598 · Filed Apr 18, 2005 · Closed Sep 30, 2008
Role of Acacia Media Technologies Corporation v. Cable America Corp: Party · Outcome: Terminated 2008-09-30 (disposition not included in the bulk docket feed — see docket) Docket on CourtListener ↗
company name words appear in the caption; court in the issuer's state (CA)
Acacia Media Technologies Corporation v. Innovative Ideas International closed
District Court, N.D. California · No. 5:05-cv-01576 · Filed Apr 15, 2005 · Closed Sep 30, 2008
Role of Acacia Media Technologies Corporation v. Innovative Ideas International: Party · Outcome: Terminated 2008-09-30 (disposition not included in the bulk docket feed — see docket) Docket on CourtListener ↗
company name words appear in the caption; court in the issuer's state (CA)
Acacia Media Technologies Corporation v. Lightspeedcash closed
District Court, N.D. California · No. 5:05-cv-01575 · Filed Apr 15, 2005 · Closed Sep 30, 2008
Role of Acacia Media Technologies Corporation v. Lightspeedcash: Party · Outcome: Terminated 2008-09-30 (disposition not included in the bulk docket feed — see docket) Docket on CourtListener ↗
company name words appear in the caption; court in the issuer's state (CA)
Acacia Media Technologies Corporation v. Adult Entertainment Broadcast Network closed
District Court, N.D. California · No. 5:05-cv-01573 · Filed Apr 15, 2005 · Closed Sep 30, 2008
Role of Acacia Media Technologies Corporation v. Adult Entertainment Broadcast Network: Party · Outcome: Terminated 2008-09-30 (disposition not included in the bulk docket feed — see docket) Docket on CourtListener ↗
company name words appear in the caption; court in the issuer's state (CA)
Acacia Media Technologies Corporation v. Cyber Trend Inc closed
District Court, N.D. California · No. 5:05-cv-01574 · Filed Apr 15, 2005 · Closed Sep 30, 2008
Role of Acacia Media Technologies Corporation v. Cyber Trend Inc: Party · Outcome: Terminated 2008-09-30 (disposition not included in the bulk docket feed — see docket) Docket on CourtListener ↗
company name words appear in the caption; court in the issuer's state (CA)
Acacia Media Technologies Corporation v. International Web Innovations Inc closed
District Court, N.D. California · No. 5:05-cv-01572 · Filed Apr 15, 2005 · Closed Sep 30, 2008
Role of Acacia Media Technologies Corporation v. International Web Innovations Inc: Party · Outcome: Terminated 2008-09-30 (disposition not included in the bulk docket feed — see docket) Docket on CourtListener ↗
company name words appear in the caption; court in the issuer's state (CA)
Acacia Media Technologies Corporation v. Ademia Multimedia LLC closed
District Court, N.D. California · No. 5:05-cv-01571 · Filed Apr 15, 2005 · Closed Sep 30, 2008
Role of Acacia Media Technologies Corporation v. Ademia Multimedia LLC: Party · Outcome: Terminated 2008-09-30 (disposition not included in the bulk docket feed — see docket) Docket on CourtListener ↗
company name words appear in the caption; court in the issuer's state (CA)
Acacia Media Technologies Corporation v. New Destiny Internet Group LLC closed
District Court, N.D. California · No. 5:05-cv-01568 · Filed Apr 15, 2005 · Closed Sep 30, 2008
Role of Acacia Media Technologies Corporation v. New Destiny Internet Group LLC: Party · Outcome: Terminated 2008-09-30 (disposition not included in the bulk docket feed — see docket) Docket on CourtListener ↗
company name words appear in the caption; court in the issuer's state (CA)
Acacia Media Technologies Corporation v. Audio Communications Inc closed
District Court, N.D. California · No. 5:05-cv-01569 · Filed Apr 15, 2005 · Closed Sep 30, 2008
Role of Acacia Media Technologies Corporation v. Audio Communications Inc: Party · Outcome: Terminated 2008-09-30 (disposition not included in the bulk docket feed — see docket) Docket on CourtListener ↗
company name words appear in the caption; court in the issuer's state (CA)
Acacia Media Technologies Corporation v. Cybernet Ventures Inc. closed
District Court, N.D. California · No. 5:05-cv-01563 · Filed Apr 15, 2005 · Closed Sep 30, 2008
Role of Acacia Media Technologies Corporation v. Cybernet Ventures Inc.: Party · Outcome: Terminated 2008-09-30 (disposition not included in the bulk docket feed — see docket) Docket on CourtListener ↗
company name words appear in the caption; court in the issuer's state (CA)
Acacia Media Technologies Corporation v. Global AVS Inc closed
District Court, N.D. California · No. 5:05-cv-01564 · Filed Apr 15, 2005 · Closed Sep 30, 2008
Role of Acacia Media Technologies Corporation v. Global AVS Inc: Party · Outcome: Terminated 2008-09-30 (disposition not included in the bulk docket feed — see docket) Docket on CourtListener ↗
company name words appear in the caption; court in the issuer's state (CA)
Acacia Media Technologies Corporation v. Game Link Inc closed
District Court, N.D. California · No. 5:05-cv-01561 · Filed Apr 15, 2005 · Closed Sep 30, 2008
Role of Acacia Media Technologies Corporation v. Game Link Inc: Party · Outcome: Terminated 2008-09-30 (disposition not included in the bulk docket feed — see docket) Docket on CourtListener ↗
company name words appear in the caption; court in the issuer's state (CA)
Acacia Media Technologies Corporation v. VS Media Inc closed
District Court, N.D. California · No. 5:05-cv-01570 · Filed Apr 15, 2005 · Closed Sep 30, 2008
Role of Acacia Media Technologies Corporation v. VS Media Inc: Party · Outcome: Terminated 2008-09-30 (disposition not included in the bulk docket feed — see docket) Docket on CourtListener ↗
company name words appear in the caption; court in the issuer's state (CA)
Acacia Media Technologies Corporation v. National A-1 Advertising Inc closed
District Court, N.D. California · No. 5:05-cv-01566 · Filed Apr 15, 2005 · Closed Sep 30, 2008
Role of Acacia Media Technologies Corporation v. National A-1 Advertising Inc: Party · Outcome: Terminated 2008-09-30 (disposition not included in the bulk docket feed — see docket) Docket on CourtListener ↗
company name words appear in the caption; court in the issuer's state (CA)
Acacia Media Technologies Corporation v. Armstrong Group closed
District Court, N.D. California · No. 5:05-cv-01543 · Filed Apr 14, 2005 · Closed Sep 30, 2008
Role of Acacia Media Technologies Corporation v. Armstrong Group: Party · Outcome: Terminated 2008-09-30 (disposition not included in the bulk docket feed — see docket) Docket on CourtListener ↗
company name words appear in the caption; court in the issuer's state (CA)
Acacia Media Technologies Corporation v. Mid-Continent Media, Inc. closed
District Court, N.D. California · No. 5:05-cv-01399 · Filed Apr 6, 2005 · Closed Sep 30, 2008
Role of Acacia Media Technologies Corporation v. Mid-Continent Media, Inc.: Party · Outcome: Terminated 2008-09-30 (disposition not included in the bulk docket feed — see docket) Docket on CourtListener ↗
company name words appear in the caption; court in the issuer's state (CA)
Acacia Media Technologies Corporation v. Mediacom Communications Corporation closed
District Court, N.D. California · No. 5:04-cv-03789 · Filed Sep 9, 2004 · Closed Sep 30, 2008
Role of Acacia Media Technologies Corporation v. Mediacom Communications Corporation: Party · Outcome: Terminated 2008-09-30 (disposition not included in the bulk docket feed — see docket) Docket on CourtListener ↗
company name words appear in the caption; court in the issuer's state (CA)
Pacific Media Technologies Inc v. Donald Trasatti dismissed
District Court, C.D. California · No. 2:04-cv-03215 · Filed May 6, 2004 · Closed Jun 28, 2004 · Nature of suit: 470 Civil (RICO)
Role of Pacific Media Technologies Inc v. Donald Trasatti: Party · Outcome: Terminated 2004-06-28 — FJC Integrated Database disposition: Voluntarily dismissed Docket on CourtListener ↗
company name words appear in the caption; court in the issuer's state (CA)
Media Technologies v. Inkworks closed
District Court, C.D. California · No. 2:03-cv-03013 · Filed Apr 30, 2003 · Closed May 30, 2003
Role of Media Technologies v. Inkworks: Party · Outcome: Terminated 2003-05-30 (disposition not included in the bulk docket feed — see docket) Docket on CourtListener ↗
company name words appear in the caption; court in the issuer's state (CA)
Media Technologies v. Upper Deck Company closed
District Court, C.D. California · No. 2:01-cv-09940 · Filed Nov 19, 2001 · Closed Dec 13, 2001
Role of Media Technologies v. Upper Deck Company: Party · Outcome: Terminated 2001-12-13 (disposition not included in the bulk docket feed — see docket) Docket on CourtListener ↗
company name words appear in the caption; court in the issuer's state (CA)
General Electric Capital Corporation v. Data & Media Technologies, Inc. closed
District Court, W.D. Missouri · No. 4:00-cv-01188 · Filed Nov 28, 2000 · Closed Aug 13, 2001 · Nature of suit: 190 Other contract actions
Role of General Electric Capital Corporation v. Data & Media Technologies, Inc.: Party · Outcome: Terminated 2001-08-13 — FJC Integrated Database disposition: Transfer to another district Docket on CourtListener ↗
company name words appear in the caption; court in MO (not the issuer's state)
What was searched

Sources searched: CourtListener bulk data (RECAP dockets as of 2026-09-30; recall-first rule 10-24) — federal district + bankruptcy courts State courts: not covered (one-tap state court links under Look further). PACER: not searched. · Last checked Oct 24, 2026, 2:16 AM ET.

Court records show docket facts only; we never restate allegations as facts. Outcome wording comes from the docket feed; where it does not state a disposition we say so.

State courts: not covered (one-tap state court links under Look further). No state offers a lawful automated statewide source PartnerFacts can use today. Texas (re:SearchTX) terms prohibit storing results in a database open to third parties; New York (WebCivil) and Massachusetts (MassCourts) require a browser check that blocks scripted queries; California has no statewide index (58 county portals; Rule of Court 2.503 grants name-based access case by case); Florida, Utah and Illinois offer paid or partial access whose terms for automated use are unverified. Washington (dw.courts.wa.gov; bulk index reports under a JISC data-dissemination agreement), Delaware (CourtConnect; Court of Chancery not included) and Arizona (apps.azcourts.gov/publicaccess, which has an official channel to request high-volume access) are the candidates; PartnerFacts will request written permission before any automated search. Federal courts are searched through CourtListener / RECAP.

2. Regulatory actions

None found in sources searched — SEC enforcement releases (index scan as of Oct 24, 2026, 2:50 AM ET) · state securities regulators: 48 regulators (FINRA, NASAA, 37 states) — crawled Oct 24, 2026, 8:48 AM ET

What was searched

SEC enforcement searched: SEC litigation releases and administrative proceedings — respondent names in the sec.gov index titles (30,205 releases, 1995-09-19 to 2026-10-23); release text is read only to confirm a candidate. Names that appear only in the body of a release are not found. — Searched SEC litigation releases and administrative proceedings (1995→ / 2007→) (30,205 records as of Oct 24, 2026, 2:50 AM ET) — nothing matched Matador..

State securities regulators: Securities regulators searched (64,910 actions): FINRA (38,350 actions, 1995–2026), NASAA (31 actions, 2000–2026; listing starts 1997), AK Division of Banking and Securities (273 actions, 1971–2025), AL Securities Commission (880 actions, 2001–2026), AR Securities Department (1,305 actions, 1998–2026), AZ Corporation Commission Securities Division (411 actions, 2017–2026), CA DFPI (25 actions, 2007–2024; listing starts 2002 — 16 of 12,159 DFPI respondent pages read so far; sponsor-name matches are read first), CO Division of Securities (731 actions, 2001–2026; older years from the Internet Archive (snapshot of 2026-05-02)), CT Department of Banking Securities Division (940 actions, 2006–2026; older years from the Internet Archive (snapshot of 2026-04-22)), DC DISB Securities Bureau (25 actions, 2012–2026), DE DOJ Investor Protection Unit (257 actions, 1987–2026), FL Office of Financial Regulation (49 actions, 2018–2026), GA Secretary of State Securities Division (65 actions, 2015–2026; listing starts 2012), HI DCCA Securities Enforcement Branch (26 actions, 2012–2026), ID Department of Finance Securities Bureau (663 actions, 1994–2026), IL Secretary of State Securities Department (4,122 actions, 2003–2023), KS Insurance Department Securities Division (58 actions), KY Department of Financial Institutions (342 actions, 2005–2026), LA Office of Financial Institutions Securities Division (13 actions, 2010–2025; listing starts 2008), MA Secretary of the Commonwealth Securities Division (125 actions, 2012–2025; live site blocks automated access — loaded from the Internet Archive snapshot of 2026-02-04), MD Attorney General Securities Division (1,054 actions, 2004–2026), ME Office of Securities (539 actions, 2000–2026), MI LARA Corporations, Securities & Commercial Licensing Bureau (201 actions), MO Secretary of State Securities Division (919 actions, 1998–2026), MS Secretary of State Securities Division (209 actions, 1995–2026), MT Commissioner of Securities and Insurance (597 actions, 2000–2026), NC Secretary of State Securities Division (265 actions, 2004–2024), ND Securities Department (711 actions, 1990–2026; the regulator no longer publishes this list live — loaded from the Internet Archive snapshot of 2026-01-06), NH Bureau of Securities Regulation (402 actions, 2002–2026), NM Regulation and Licensing Department Securities Division (90 actions, 2010–2025), NV Secretary of State Securities Division (118 actions, 2018–2026), NY Attorney General Investor Protection Bureau (44 actions, 2012–2026), OH Division of Securities (327 actions, 1993–2006), OK Department of Securities (2,531 actions, 1998–2026), OR Division of Financial Regulation (589 actions, 1988–2026), PA Department of Banking and Securities (1,448 actions, 2008–2024; the regulator no longer publishes this list live — loaded from the Internet Archive snapshot of 2024-08-09), RI DBR Securities Division (98 actions, 2005–2025), SC Attorney General Securities Division (540 actions, 2006–2026), SD Division of Insurance – Securities Regulation (106 actions, 2017–2026), TN Department of Commerce and Insurance Securities Division (405 actions, 1992–2026), TX State Securities Board (936 actions, 1999–2026), UT Division of Securities (772 actions, 2000–2026; older years from the Internet Archive (snapshot of 2010-05-27)), VT DFR Securities Division (137 actions, 2010–2026), WA DFI (2,039 actions, 2001–2026), WI DFI Division of Securities (1,072 actions, 1998–2026), WV Securities Commission (State Auditor) (64 actions), WY Secretary of State Compliance Division (6 actions, 2016–2024) — last crawled Oct 24, 2026, 8:48 AM ET. No machine-readable public listing today for IA, IN, MN, NE, NJ, VA (see docs/state-regulators.md).

3. Bankruptcies

15 cases: 4 open, 11 closed (disposition not in docket feed)

Crivella v. MeSearch Media Technologies Limited open
United States Bankruptcy Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · No. 25-02083 · Filed Nov 4, 2025 · Nature of suit: 51 Revocation of confirmation
Role of Crivella v. MeSearch Media Technologies Limited: Party · Outcome: Open — no termination date on the docket (bulk snapshot 2026-09-30) Docket on CourtListener ↗
company name words appear in the caption; court in PA (not the issuer's state)
MeSearch Media Technologies Limited v. Crivella Holdings Limited open
United States Bankruptcy Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · No. 25-02049 · Filed Aug 7, 2025
Role of MeSearch Media Technologies Limited v. Crivella Holdings Limited: Party · Outcome: Open — no termination date on the docket (bulk snapshot 2026-09-30) Docket on CourtListener ↗
company name words appear in the caption; court in PA (not the issuer's state)
MeSearch Media Technologies Limited v. Crivella Holdings Limited open
United States Bankruptcy Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · No. 25-02048 · Filed Aug 7, 2025
Role of MeSearch Media Technologies Limited v. Crivella Holdings Limited: Party · Outcome: Open — no termination date on the docket (bulk snapshot 2026-09-30) Docket on CourtListener ↗
company name words appear in the caption; court in PA (not the issuer's state)
MeSearch Media Technologies Limited open
United States Bankruptcy Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · No. 24-21982 · Filed Aug 13, 2024
Role of MeSearch Media Technologies Limited: Party · Outcome: Open — no termination date on the docket (bulk snapshot 2026-09-30) Docket on CourtListener ↗
company name words appear in the caption; court in PA (not the issuer's state)
Burtch v. Advanced Media Technologies, Inc. closed
United States Bankruptcy Court, D. Delaware · No. 14-50256 · Filed Apr 21, 2014 · Closed Sep 9, 2014
Role of Burtch v. Advanced Media Technologies, Inc.: Party · Outcome: Case closed 2014-09-09 (disposition not included in the bulk docket feed — see docket) Docket on CourtListener ↗
company name words appear in the caption; court in DE (not the issuer's state)
Official Unsecured Creditor's Committee of Br v. Advanced Media Technologies, Inc. closed
United States Bankruptcy Court, D. Delaware · No. 10-56187 · Filed Dec 28, 2010 · Closed Apr 12, 2012
Role of Official Unsecured Creditor's Committee of Br v. Advanced Media Technologies, Inc.: Party · Outcome: Case closed 2012-04-12 (disposition not included in the bulk docket feed — see docket) Docket on CourtListener ↗
company name words appear in the caption; court in DE (not the issuer's state)
Enron Corp. v. Computer Media Technologies closed
United States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. New York · No. 03-92848 · Filed Nov 13, 2003 · Closed Oct 1, 2007
Role of Enron Corp. v. Computer Media Technologies: Party · Outcome: Case closed 2007-10-01 (disposition not included in the bulk docket feed — see docket) Docket on CourtListener ↗
company name words appear in the caption; court in NY (not the issuer's state)
Schwab v. ADVANCE MEDIA TECHNOLOGIES, INC closed
United States Bankruptcy Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · No. 5:03-ap-50322 · Filed Oct 7, 2003 · Closed Oct 31, 2003
Role of Schwab v. ADVANCE MEDIA TECHNOLOGIES, INC: Party · Outcome: Case closed 2003-10-31 (disposition not included in the bulk docket feed — see docket) Docket on CourtListener ↗
company name words appear in the caption; court in PA (not the issuer's state)
Media Technologies Systems, Inc. closed
United States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. New York · No. 03-12848 · Filed May 6, 2003 · Closed Sep 30, 2011
Role of Media Technologies Systems, Inc.: Party · Outcome: Case closed 2011-09-30 (disposition not included in the bulk docket feed — see docket) Docket on CourtListener ↗
company name words appear in the caption; court in NY (not the issuer's state)
IMPULSE MEDIA TECHNOLOGIES, INC. closed
United States Bankruptcy Court, D. Nevada · No. 02-19830 · Filed Aug 27, 2002 · Closed Nov 3, 2003
Role of IMPULSE MEDIA TECHNOLOGIES, INC.: Party · Outcome: Case closed 2003-11-03 (disposition not included in the bulk docket feed — see docket) Docket on CourtListener ↗
company name words appear in the caption; court in NV (not the issuer's state)
Global Financial Press,Inc. v. National Media Technologies,Inc. closed
United States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · No. 01-00801 · Filed Aug 14, 2001 · Closed Feb 26, 2002
Role of Global Financial Press,Inc. v. National Media Technologies,Inc.: Party · Outcome: Case closed 2002-02-26 (disposition not included in the bulk docket feed — see docket) Docket on CourtListener ↗
company name words appear in the caption; court in PA (not the issuer's state)
HECHINGER INVESTMENT COMPANY OF DELAWARE INC. v. APPLIED MEDIA TECHNOLOGIES CORPORATION closed
United States Bankruptcy Court, D. Delaware · No. 01-01771 · Filed Jun 5, 2001 · Closed Mar 10, 2005
Role of HECHINGER INVESTMENT COMPANY OF DELAWARE INC. v. APPLIED MEDIA TECHNOLOGIES CORPORATION: Party · Outcome: Case closed 2005-03-10 (disposition not included in the bulk docket feed — see docket) Docket on CourtListener ↗
company name words appear in the caption; court in DE (not the issuer's state)
Knupfer v. Pioneer New Media Technologies closed
United States Bankruptcy Court, C.D. California · No. 2:00-ap-02103 · Filed Jun 22, 2000 · Closed Aug 1, 2000
Role of Knupfer v. Pioneer New Media Technologies: Party · Outcome: Case closed 2000-08-01 (disposition not included in the bulk docket feed — see docket) Docket on CourtListener ↗
company name words appear in the caption; court in the issuer's state (CA)
Media Technologies, Inc. closed
United States Bankruptcy Court, D. Maryland · No. 00-15482 · Filed May 16, 2000 · Closed Sep 18, 2000
Role of Media Technologies, Inc.: Party · Outcome: Case closed 2000-09-18 (disposition not included in the bulk docket feed — see docket) Docket on CourtListener ↗
company name words appear in the caption; court in MD (not the issuer's state)
Applied Media Technologies Corp. v. Brown closed
United States Bankruptcy Court, M.D. Florida · No. 8:95-ap-00412 · Filed Jun 12, 1995 · Closed Jul 31, 1996
Role of Applied Media Technologies Corp. v. Brown: Party · Outcome: Case closed 1996-07-31 (disposition not included in the bulk docket feed — see docket) Docket on CourtListener ↗
company name words appear in the caption; court in FL (not the issuer's state)
What was searched

Sources searched: Federal bankruptcy courts via CourtListener / RECAP archive (federal district courts, federal bankruptcy courts). State courts: not covered (one-tap state court links under Look further). PACER: not searched (RECAP only). · Last checked Oct 24, 2026, 2:16 AM ET.

Court records show docket facts only; we never restate allegations as facts. Outcome wording comes from the docket feed; where it does not state a disposition we say so.

State courts: not covered (one-tap state court links under Look further). No state offers a lawful automated statewide source PartnerFacts can use today. Texas (re:SearchTX) terms prohibit storing results in a database open to third parties; New York (WebCivil) and Massachusetts (MassCourts) require a browser check that blocks scripted queries; California has no statewide index (58 county portals; Rule of Court 2.503 grants name-based access case by case); Florida, Utah and Illinois offer paid or partial access whose terms for automated use are unverified. Washington (dw.courts.wa.gov; bulk index reports under a JISC data-dissemination agreement), Delaware (CourtConnect; Court of Chancery not included) and Arizona (apps.azcourts.gov/publicaccess, which has an official channel to request high-volume access) are the candidates; PartnerFacts will request written permission before any automated search. Federal courts are searched through CourtListener / RECAP.

4. Differences between public sources

No comparisons published

What is compared

No public statement by this sponsor group has been collected yet, so there is nothing to compare. Sources compared: the sponsor's own website (known from the issuer's own filings — Form C issuer website, EDGAR company profile — an approved profile claim or Form ADV Item 1.I of its matched adviser) · SEC Form D · SEC Form ADV (IAPD) · Internet Archive · No website is on file for this sponsor group yet.

6 differences found between the filings for Matador — 1 worth asking about (compared 4 filings on Oct 24, 2026)

Note · Jun 22, 2000 – Aug 1, 2000

Bankruptcy case: Knupfer v. Pioneer New Media Technologies — filed Jun 22, 2000

United States Bankruptcy Court, C.D. California docket "Knupfer v. Pioneer New Media Technologies" filed Jun 22, 2000, closed Aug 1, 2000. Media Capital Technologies Group Inc. (member issuer) is listed as Party ("Knupfer v. Pioneer New Media Technologies"). Our match estimate: 60%.

What this means A bankruptcy filing was found. Many are old or personal and have nothing to do with the deal — but ask what it was and when it closed.

Docket · United States Bankruptcy Court, C.D. California ↗Media Capital Technologies Group Inc. — PartnerFacts page ↗
Sources
Worth asking · Jun 18, 2021 – Aug 20, 2021

Form D filed 63 days after the first sale — Media Capital Technologies Group Inc.

The filing says the first sale was Jun 18, 2021. The Form D was filed Aug 20, 2021 — 63 days later. The rule: a Form D is generally due within 15 days after the first sale, so this one is 48 days past that.

What this means A late notice is common and carries no penalty by itself. It is worth asking the sponsor why the paperwork lagged.

Form D · Aug 20, 2021 ↗Media Capital Technologies Group Inc. — PartnerFacts page ↗
Sources
Note · Feb 21, 2023 – Mar 17, 2023

Form D filed 24 days after the first sale — Matador Film Partners LP

The filing says the first sale was Feb 21, 2023. The Form D was filed Mar 17, 2023 — 24 days later. The rule: a Form D is generally due within 15 days after the first sale, so this one is 9 days past that.

What this means A late notice is common and carries no penalty by itself. It is worth asking the sponsor why the paperwork lagged.

Form D · Mar 17, 2023 ↗Matador Film Partners LP — PartnerFacts page ↗
Sources
Note · Feb 21, 2023 – Mar 17, 2023

No amendment in the last 12 months on an offering that may still be open — Matador Film Partners LP (latest filing Mar 17, 2023)

The latest filing for this offering is dated Mar 17, 2023 (first sale Feb 21, 2023). It reports $53,750,000 sold of an indefinite amount offered. No later amendment is in our index as of Oct 24, 2026.

What this means SEC rules expect a yearly amendment while an offering is still going. The raise may simply have ended — a Form D does not say when it closed. Ask the sponsor whether the offering closed, when, and at what amount.

Form D · Mar 17, 2023 ↗Matador Film Partners LP — PartnerFacts page ↗
Sources
Note · Jul 1, 2021 – Jul 8, 2021

No amendment in the last 12 months on an offering that may still be open — Media Capital Technologies Group Inc. (latest filing Jul 8, 2021)

The latest filing for this offering is dated Jul 8, 2021 (first sale Jul 1, 2021). It reports $3,500,000 sold of $7,500,000 offered. No later amendment is in our index as of Oct 24, 2026.

What this means SEC rules expect a yearly amendment while an offering is still going. The raise may simply have ended — a Form D does not say when it closed. Ask the sponsor whether the offering closed, when, and at what amount.

Form D · Jul 8, 2021 ↗Media Capital Technologies Group Inc. — PartnerFacts page ↗
Sources
Note · Jul 8, 2021 – Dec 16, 2025

Christopher Woodrow is written 2 different ways on the filings

listed as "Christopher Woodrow" on 3 filings (from Jul 8, 2021), and "Christopher Robert Woodrow" on the Dec 16, 2025 filing.

What this means Same person, written differently — a middle name or suffix left off, or spelled another way. It is normal, but check that the full legal name matches your subscription documents.

Form D · Jul 8, 2021 ↗Form D · Dec 16, 2025 ↗Christopher Woodrow — PartnerFacts page ↗
Sources
What is compared

What is compared: every Form D and D/A we hold for this subject, side by side — filing dates vs. first-sale dates (the 15-day rule), amendment timing on open offerings (the yearly-amendment expectation), amounts sold, investor counts, offering amounts and minimums across amendments, industry and size bands, addresses, how each person's name and role is written, paid sellers' CRD numbers, and (for groups) where the member companies were formed and sit. Everything is as filed by the issuer; the SEC does not check it. Differences are common and usually have ordinary explanations — we show both values, the dates, and the source so you can ask. As of Oct 24, 2026.

5. Money to insiders

None reported on 4 offerings — no sales commissions, finder's fees or proceeds to insiders

Per-offering detail
Offering (latest filing)Sales commissionsFinder's feesTo insidersPaid to sell itSource
Dec 16, 2025 D
Matador Media Partners LP
File 021-567042
$0$0$0None listed on this filingEDGAR ↗
Mar 17, 2023 D
Matador Film Partners LP
File 021-476136
$0 (est.)$0 (est.)$0None listed on this filingEDGAR ↗
Aug 20, 2021 D
Media Capital Technologies Group Inc.
File 021-410660
$0$0$0 (est.)None listed on this filingEDGAR ↗
Jul 8, 2021 D
Media Capital Technologies Group Inc.
File 021-405588
$0$0$0 (est.)None listed on this filingEDGAR ↗

Counts come from Form D Items 12–15 on the filings in our index (latest filing per offering; one offering = one SEC file number; an amendment updates its offering rather than adding one). "To insiders" = gross proceeds used for payments to executive officers, directors or promoters. "—" = not reported on that filing. Amounts marked (est.) were reported as estimates. "Paid to sell it" = sales compensation recipients named on that filing (Item 12), each linked to FINRA BrokerCheck when a CRD number is reported.

Counted across all 3 issuers in this group — every filing in our index, latest filing per offering (SEC file number).

Property records 0 documents · 0 ownership records · last checked Oct 24, 2026, 9:34 AM ET · NYC and Cook County lookup still to run

0 recorded documents and 0 ownership records matched to Matador in the sources searched.

Not found in sources searched as of Oct 24, 2026, 9:34 AM ET: Hillsborough County FL Clerk of Court Official Records daily index (publicrec.hillsclerk.com D/P/M files), 2 daily files (Oct 14, 2026 to Oct 15, 2026) — loaded Oct 23, 2026, 8:59 PM ET; Harris County TX (HCAD ownership rolls 2005–2026) — 1,032,426 records, loaded Oct 24, 2026, 8:00 AM ET; Dallas County TX (DCAD ownership rolls 2021–2027) — 285,535 records, loaded Oct 24, 2026, 8:20 AM ET; Hillsborough County FL (FL DOR 2026 ownership roll + Clerk recorded-document index Oct 14, 2026 to Oct 15, 2026), Miami-Dade County FL (FL DOR 2026 ownership roll), Broward County FL (FL DOR 2026 ownership roll), Palm Beach County FL (FL DOR 2026 ownership roll) — 514,336 records, loaded Oct 24, 2026, 8:25 AM ET; King County WA (Assessor sale records 0000-00-00–2026-10-14; no owner-of-record names published) — 538,619 records, loaded Oct 24, 2026, 8:27 AM ET; Cook County IL (Assessor sale records 1982–2026 + ownership rolls 2014–2026) — 1,031,843 records, loaded Oct 24, 2026, 9:05 AM ET. Still to be looked up for this group: NYC ACRIS via NYC Open Data (Real Property Parties 636b-3b5g, Master bnx9-e6tj, Legals 8h5j-fqxa, Document Control Codes 7isb-wh4c) · NYC PLUTO ownership via NYC Open Data (64uk-42ks) · Cook County IL Assessor via Cook County Open Data (Parcel Sales wvhk-k5uv; Parcel Addresses 3723-97qp). Records in other counties, and recorder indexes we do not yet cover, were not searched.

Property records coverage: New York City (ACRIS recorded documents and PLUTO ownership, looked up per issuer when its page is viewed; re-checked when the page is viewed again more than 30 days after the last check); Harris County TX (ownership only, no deed, mortgage or sale records; HCAD ownership rolls 2005–2026); Dallas County TX (ownership only, no deed, mortgage or sale records; DCAD ownership rolls 2021–2027); Hillsborough County FL (FL DOR 2026 ownership roll + Clerk recorded-document index Oct 14, 2026 to Oct 15, 2026), Miami-Dade County FL (FL DOR 2026 ownership roll), Broward County FL (FL DOR 2026 ownership roll), Palm Beach County FL (FL DOR 2026 ownership roll); King County WA (Assessor sale records 0000-00-00–2026-10-14; no owner-of-record names published); Cook County IL (Assessor sale records 1982–2026 + ownership rolls 2014–2026); also looked up per issuer when its page is viewed. Recorder indexes (party names on deeds, mortgages and liens) in TX, AZ, NV, CA and WA counties and outside the Clerk index in FL, mortgages and liens outside NYC and Hillsborough County, lis pendens and foreclosure notices everywhere, Los Angeles County CA, Clark County NV, New York City bulk pass (not finished; per-issuer lookups only so far), Maricopa County AZ (loader ready; commercial-purpose statement not yet filed), Salt Lake County UT, and all other counties are not covered — not searched. Last refresh by source: Cook County IL Assessor via Cook County Open Data (Parcel Sales wvhk-k5uv; Parcel Addresses 3723-97qp) Oct 24, 2026, 9:05 AM ET; Cook County IL Assessor via Cook County Open Data (Parcel Sales wvhk-k5uv; Parcel Addresses 3723-97qp) Oct 24, 2026, 8:30 AM ET; King County WA Assessor Real Property Sales extract (EXTR_RPSale.csv) Oct 24, 2026, 8:27 AM ET; Florida DOR NAL roll (Palm Beach 60) Oct 24, 2026, 8:25 AM ET; Florida DOR NAL roll (Broward 16) Oct 24, 2026, 8:24 AM ET; Florida DOR NAL roll (Dade 23) Oct 24, 2026, 8:23 AM ET; Florida DOR NAL roll (Hillsborough 39) Oct 24, 2026, 8:21 AM ET; Dallas Central Appraisal District ACCOUNT_INFO.CSV Oct 24, 2026, 8:20 AM ET; Harris County Appraisal District real_acct.txt Oct 24, 2026, 8:00 AM ET; Hillsborough County FL Clerk daily index Oct 23, 2026, 8:59 PM ET. NYC and Cook County are also looked up per issuer when its page is viewed; the most recent such lookup on this site finished Oct 24, 2026, 3:30 AM ET. Parties are named as the recorder's index names them (role suffixes as recorded); no address, account number or trust date is shown for an individual, and individual owners of record (home ownership) are not matched or shown. Items still in human review are not shown.

Issuers in this group

Why each issuer is here is stated in the "Linked by" column. Low-confidence links are never shown — they wait for human review.

SourceIssuerLinked byLocationIndustryFilingsSold (max)InvestorsMin. investment (latest filing)Active
EDGAR ↗MC Media Capital Technologies Group Inc.shared peopleWest Hollywood, CAOther2$14,699,709
offering $14,699,709 · similar: $500,000–$7,000,000
18
similar: 2–14
$4,680
similar: $5,000–$50,000
2021–2021
EDGAR ↗MF Matador Film Partners LPshared people, similar issuer namesLOS ANGELES, CAPooled Investment Fund1$53,750,000
offering Indefinite · similar: $155,000–$5,250,000
13
similar: 4–27
No minimum reported
similar: $1,000–$100,000
2023–2023
EDGAR ↗MM Matador Media Partners LPshared people, similar issuer namesWEST HOLLYWOOD, CAPooled Investment Fund1$2,840,000
offering Indefinite · similar: $155,000–$5,250,000
2
similar: 4–27
No minimum reported
similar: $1,000–$100,000
2025–2025

"Similar" = offerings in the same industry claiming the same exemption, filed in the last 5 years: Other / 506(b) (18,678 filings); Pooled Investment Fund / 506(b) (83,801 filings); ranges are the middle half (25th–75th percentile). Computed by PartnerFacts from SEC EDGAR Form D data as of Oct 23, 2026, 5:45 PM ET. Rows without a range: fewer than 30 comparable filings, or not a Rule 506 offering. No ranking or score.

Timeline of offerings

SourceFiledIssuerFormIndustryOfferedSold
EDGAR ↗Dec 16, 2025Matador Media Partners LPDPooled Investment FundIndefinite$2,840,000
EDGAR ↗Mar 17, 2023Matador Film Partners LPDPooled Investment FundIndefinite$53,750,000
EDGAR ↗Aug 20, 2021Media Capital Technologies Group Inc.DOther$14,699,709$14,699,709
EDGAR ↗Jul 8, 2021Media Capital Technologies Group Inc.DOther$7,500,000$3,500,000

Activity: 1 new offering in the last 12 months across all issuers in this group (new offering = a Form D that is not an amendment, D/A) · most recent filing Dec 16, 2025. Industry history, as reported on each offering's latest filing: Previous offerings: Other (2021). Latest offering: Pooled Investment Fund (2023–2025; most recent Dec 16, 2025).

People across the group

NameRolesIssuers hereFirst → last listed
CW Christopher WoodrowExecutive Officer, Director, Promoter3Jul 8, 2021 → Dec 16, 2025
KJ K. Blaine JohnstonExecutive Officer2Jul 8, 2021 → Mar 17, 2023
CF Christopher FentonExecutive Officer2Jul 8, 2021 → Mar 17, 2023
RS Raj SinghExecutive Officer1Dec 16, 2025 → Dec 16, 2025
JL Jordan Harris LichtmanExecutive Officer1Dec 16, 2025 → Dec 16, 2025
ME MCT Entertainment Advisors LLC entityDirector1Mar 17, 2023 → Mar 17, 2023
MF Matador Film Management LLC entityExecutive Officer1Mar 17, 2023 → Mar 17, 2023
ML Michael LambertDirector1Jul 8, 2021 → Aug 20, 2021
CB Charles BralverDirector1Jul 8, 2021 → Aug 20, 2021
DM Daniel McClureDirector1Jul 8, 2021 → Aug 20, 2021
DA Dene AnderbergExecutive Officer1Jul 8, 2021 → Aug 20, 2021
PT Phillip TitoloDirector1Jul 8, 2021 → Aug 20, 2021

Business registration (state registry / Secretary of State)

None of the 3 issuers has a record in the registries searched.

Registries searched: AL (Alabama Secretary of State — Business Entity Records (arc-sos.state.al.us), searched by issuer name, data as of Oct 24, 2026); CO (Colorado Secretary of State — Business Entities in Colorado (data.colorado.gov), data as of Oct 23, 2026); CT (Connecticut Secretary of the State — Business Registry (data.ct.gov), data as of Oct 24, 2026); FL (Florida Department of State, Division of Corporations — quarterly corporate data file (Sunbiz), data as of Oct 7, 2026); NY (New York Department of State — Corporations and Other Entities (data.ny.gov: All Filings + Active Corporations), data as of Oct 20, 2026); OR (Oregon Secretary of State — Active Businesses, All (data.oregon.gov), data as of Oct 20, 2026); PA (Pennsylvania Department of State — Registered Businesses, Current (data.pa.gov), data as of Oct 6, 2026); TX (Texas Comptroller — Active Franchise Taxpayers incl. Secretary of State file data (data.texas.gov), data as of Oct 24, 2026). Registries of other states have not been searched: many publish no bulk file and require a CAPTCHA or bot challenge on their search page, which we do not bypass (Delaware, for example, offers no public bulk file). A registry listing is the state's own record of the entity; it says nothing about the offering itself.

Adviser registration (Form ADV)

MCT ENTERTAINMENT ADVISORS LLC — SEC-registered investment adviser · SEC registration status as reported: “Approved” since May 19, 2025 · SEC file 801-132816 · Main office: WEST HOLLYWOOD, CA · IAPD record ↗ · Form ADV filing (PDF) ↗

Regulatory assets under management: $154,005,499 as reported on Form ADV filed Mar 31, 2026 (Item 5.F(2)(c)) · 3 accounts (Item 5.F(2)(f))

Websites listed on Form ADV (Item 1.I): mediacap.io ↗

Item 11 disclosure questions as answered on Form ADV filed Mar 31, 2026: 0 of 24 answered “Yes”
  • No — Form ADV Item 11 asks: “Do any of the events below involve you or any of your supervised persons?”
  • No — Form ADV Item 11A(1) asks: “A. In the past ten years, have you or any advisory affiliate: (1) been convicted of or pled guilty or nolo contendere ("no contest") in a domestic, foreign, or military court to any felony?”
  • No — Form ADV Item 11A(2) asks: “A. (2) been charged with any felony?”
  • No — Form ADV Item 11B(1) asks: “B. In the past ten years, have you or any advisory affiliate: (1) been convicted of or pled guilty or nolo contendere ("no contest") in a domestic, foreign, or military court to a misdemeanor involving: investments or an investment-related business, or any fraud, false statements, or omissions, wrongful taking of property, bribery, perjury, forgery, counterfeiting, extortion, or a conspiracy to commit any of these offenses?”
  • No — Form ADV Item 11B(2) asks: “B. (2) been charged with a misdemeanor listed in Item 11.B(1)?”
  • No — Form ADV Item 11C(1) asks: “C. Has the SEC or the Commodity Futures Trading Commission (CFTC) ever: (1) found you or any advisory affiliate to have made a false statement or omission?”
  • No — Form ADV Item 11C(2) asks: “C. (2) found you or any advisory affiliate to have been involved in a violation of SEC or CFTC regulations or statutes?”
  • No — Form ADV Item 11C(3) asks: “C. (3) found you or any advisory affiliate to have been a cause of an investment-related business having its authorization to do business denied, suspended, revoked, or restricted?”
  • No — Form ADV Item 11C(4) asks: “C. (4) entered an order against you or any advisory affiliate in connection with investment-related activity?”
  • No — Form ADV Item 11C(5) asks: “C. (5) imposed a civil money penalty on you or any advisory affiliate, or ordered you or any advisory affiliate to cease and desist from any activity?”
  • No — Form ADV Item 11D(1) asks: “D. Has any other federal regulatory agency, any state regulatory agency, or any foreign financial regulatory authority: (1) ever found you or any advisory affiliate to have made a false statement or omission, or been dishonest, unfair, or unethical?”
  • No — Form ADV Item 11D(2) asks: “D. (2) ever found you or any advisory affiliate to have been involved in a violation of investment-related regulations or statutes?”
  • No — Form ADV Item 11D(3) asks: “D. (3) ever found you or any advisory affiliate to have been a cause of an investment-related business having its authorization to do business denied, suspended, revoked, or restricted?”
  • No — Form ADV Item 11D(4) asks: “D. (4) in the past ten years, entered an order against you or any advisory affiliate in connection with an investment-related activity?”
  • No — Form ADV Item 11D(5) asks: “D. (5) ever denied, suspended, or revoked your or any advisory affiliate's registration or license, or otherwise prevented you or any advisory affiliate, by order, from associating with an investment-related business or restricted your or any advisory affiliate's activity?”
  • No — Form ADV Item 11E(1) asks: “E. Has any self-regulatory organization or commodities exchange ever: (1) found you or any advisory affiliate to have made a false statement or omission?”
  • No — Form ADV Item 11E(2) asks: “E. (2) found you or any advisory affiliate to have been involved in a violation of its rules (other than a violation designated as a "minor rule violation" under a plan approved by the SEC)?”
  • No — Form ADV Item 11E(3) asks: “E. (3) found you or any advisory affiliate to have been the cause of an investment-related business having its authorization to do business denied, suspended, revoked, or restricted?”
  • No — Form ADV Item 11E(4) asks: “E. (4) disciplined you or any advisory affiliate by expelling or suspending you or the advisory affiliate from membership, barring or suspending you or the advisory affiliate from association with other members, or otherwise restricting your or the advisory affiliate's activities?”
  • No — Form ADV Item 11F asks: “F. Has an authorization to act as an attorney, accountant, or federal contractor granted to you or any advisory affiliate ever been revoked or suspended?”
  • No — Form ADV Item 11G asks: “G. Are you or any advisory affiliate now the subject of any regulatory proceeding that could result in a "yes" answer to any part of Item 11.C., 11.D., or 11.E.?”
  • No — Form ADV Item 11H(1)(a) asks: “H. (1) Has any domestic or foreign court: (a) in the past ten years, enjoined you or any advisory affiliate in connection with any investment-related activity?”
  • No — Form ADV Item 11H(1)(b) asks: “H. (1)(b) ever found that you or any advisory affiliate were involved in a violation of investment-related statutes or regulations?”
  • No — Form ADV Item 11H(1)(c) asks: “H. (1)(c) ever dismissed, pursuant to a settlement agreement, an investment-related civil action brought against you or any advisory affiliate by a state or foreign financial regulatory authority?”
  • No — Form ADV Item 11H(2) asks: “H. (2) Are you or any advisory affiliate now the subject of any civil proceeding that could result in a "yes" answer to any part of Item 11.H(1)?”

Answers as filed by the adviser on Form ADV Part 1A, Item 11; question text quoted from the form. Details of each “Yes” are in the Disclosure Reporting Pages of the Form ADV (PDF) ↗.

Matched on management entity listed on Form D = adviser name, same state (CA) · Form ADV data: SEC Investment Adviser Information Report (SEC-registered advisers), file dated 2026-10-02, loaded Oct 23, 2026, 8:39 PM ET · IAPD record last checked Oct 23, 2026, 8:36 PM ET

Meta advertising

No Meta Pixel ids or Facebook / Instagram page links on file for Matador as of Oct 24, 2026 — the sponsor website is read for them once it is on file (runs automatically). Meta Ad Library: not searched by PartnerFacts (no API access); a one-tap Ad Library search is under Look further.

Other offering types (Regulation A and Regulation Crowdfunding)

Searched SEC Regulation A Data Sets (Forms 1-A, 1-K, 1-Z; 2015 Q2 → 2026 Q3); SEC Crowdfunding Offerings Data Sets (Form C family; 2016 Q2 → 2026 Q3); EDGAR form index for 2026 Q3 → 2026 Q4 (51,358 records as of Oct 23, 2026, 8:41 PM ET) — nothing matched this name.

Public profiles and social

No website or social profile named in Matador's SEC filings (Form C, Reg A, Form ADV; checked Oct 24, 2026). Web search for this name: #130,350 of 374,652 in line (1,386 issuers searched so far). One-tap searches: Look further ↓

Export this report as PDF · Premium

Request diligence pack (Premium) PartnerFacts asks the sponsor for the standard information pack and delivers it to you labelled "provided by the sponsor".

Change history

No corrections have been requested for this page.

Request a correction

Free. Covers the grouping itself or any record shown here. Logged with status: received → under review → fixed / confirmed with source.

Sponsor response

Add a sourced explanation next to any fact. Reviewed before publishing.

Grouping is PartnerFacts' inference from public filings (shared related persons, management entities, business address). Everything else on this page is drawn from the filings themselves. Not the same sponsor? Request a correction.

Look further

One-tap searches on sites we do not index ourselves, with the name pre-filled (outside the US (as filed: WEST HOLLYWOOD), CA). Each opens in a new tab; what you find there is not verified by PartnerFacts.

Social and web

LinkedIn companies ↗Instagram ↗X (Twitter) ↗Facebook ↗YouTube ↗Google ↗Google Images ↗Google News ↗Meta Ad Library ↗

Courts

CourtListener / RECAP (federal) ↗PACER case locator (federal, login) ↗California — find the county court ↗Los Angeles Superior Court case search ↗

Securities regulators

SEC EDGAR full-text search ↗SEC action look-up ↗FINRA BrokerCheck ↗SEC IAPD adviser search ↗

Business registries

California Secretary of State business search ↗OpenCorporates ↗