PartnerFacts
Data last updated: Oct 23, 2026, 5:45 PM ETLatest filing: Oct 22, 2026Now: Oct 24, 2026, 8:06 AM ET

Sponsor Check › Sponsor group

L

Legend

One sponsor team, 6 deal companies · New York, NY

Grouped because: 1 shared person, 1 shared management entity, same business address (6 issuers), similar issuer names (6) (automatic match from the filings) · not the same sponsor?

6deal companies
$18Mreported sold
297investors
6Form D filings
2022–2022active
0new, last 12 mo

Data last updated Oct 23, 2026, 5:45 PM ET · Latest filing in this group Sep 1, 2022 · Courts (RECAP) last checked: Oct 24, 2026, 2:16 AM ET · SEC enforcement last checked: covered by the index scan as of Oct 24, 2026, 2:50 AM ET

The short version

Legend is a sponsor group of 6 issuers that PartnerFacts links to one sponsor (shared people, shared management entity, same business address, similar issuer names; automatic match from the filings), filing 6 Form D filings between May 2022 and Sep 2022.

What this means One team, 6 deal companies. We link the companies because the same people or address appear on their forms — tap "Request a correction" if that is wrong.

Combined reported sold: $18M to 297 investors (latest filing per issuer). Industries as reported: Pooled Investment Fund (6). Issuers are based in NY (6).

What this means $18M raised across the group, about $61K per investor. Amounts come from each company's latest Form D; they are what the sponsor reported, not audited figures.

Principal people: Legend Venture Partners LLC (6 issuers, executive officer and promoter, entity) and Steven Lacaj (6 issuers, executive officer and promoter).

What this means 6 deals for a two-person team on paper. The person on the most companies is usually the one running the show; their page lists every deal.

Activity: 0 new offerings in the last 12 months; latest filing Sep 1, 2022.

What this means No new raise filed in the past year.

Public records searched: federal courts (CourtListener / RECAP), SEC enforcement releases, state securities regulators (AK, AL, AR, AZ, CA, CT, DE, FINRA, GA, HI, ID, IL, KS, KY, LA, MA, MD, ME, MI, MO, MS, MT, NASAA, NC, ND, NH, NM, NV, OK, OR, PA, RI, SC, SD, TN, TX, VT, WA, WI, WV, WY), property records (NYC, FL, IL and TX counties) — 4 court cases matching the name, 3 bankruptcy cases matching the name listed in Key records below.

What this means 7 records came back, including 2 court cases still open — open cases can take years and cost money. Each one is listed below with a link to the original document and a line saying why it matched. A name match is not proof it is the same person or company — read the why line and the document. Being sued or named in a release is an accusation, not a finding.

We compared 6 public filings for Legend and found 8 differences, 3 worth asking the sponsor about: Regulator action naming a team member: Mario Gogliormella, Steven Lacaj, and Karim Ibrahim a/k/a/ Chris Hayes (Jun 12, 2024); Legend includes 6 deals that stopped filing before reaching their target; and more below.

What this means These are differences between the sponsor's own SEC filings — both values, dates and sources are listed in Key records, section 4. Most have ordinary explanations; ask the sponsor.

What the community is saying

Community search for Legend has not run yet — it is joining a line of 29,971 names; searches run around the clock at the hosts' allowed rate. Searched so far: 638 names.

Community comments are quoted as written by their authors. Sources searched: BiggerPockets forums (via DuckDuckGo, Brave, Bing and BiggerPockets search) and Reddit (search feed + public archive).

Key records

Five things investors ask first. Items still in human review are counted, not shown.

1. Lawsuits

4 cases: 2 open, 1 closed (disposition not in docket feed), 1 dismissed

Averitt Express, Inc. v. Legend, LLC open matched at sponsor-group level (Legend)
District Court, S.D. Mississippi · No. 2:26-cv-00058 · Filed Apr 15, 2026
Role of Legend, LLC: Defendant · Outcome: Open — no termination date on the docket (bulk snapshot 2026-09-30) Docket on CourtListener ↗
exact company name; name has one distinctive word; court in MS (not the issuer's state)
Browne v. Legend, LLC open matched at sponsor-group level (Legend)
District Court, S.D. Mississippi · No. 2:26-cv-00008 · Filed Jan 27, 2026
Role of Legend, LLC: Defendant · Outcome: Open — no termination date on the docket (bulk snapshot 2026-09-30) Docket on CourtListener ↗
exact company name; name has one distinctive word; court in MS (not the issuer's state)
Legend Corporation, The v. Aspen Guard, LLC closed matched at sponsor-group level (Legend)
District Court, D. Kansas · No. 2:24-cv-02129 · Filed Apr 3, 2024 · Closed May 10, 2024
Role of Legend Corporation, The: Plaintiff · Outcome: Terminated 2024-05-10 (disposition not included in the bulk docket feed — see docket) Docket on CourtListener ↗
exact company name; name has one distinctive word; court in KS (not the issuer's state)
Legend, Inc. v. Pranica dismissed matched at sponsor-group level (Legend)
District Court, S.D. New York · No. 1:94-cv-07521 · Filed Oct 17, 1994 · Closed Jun 22, 1995 · Nature of suit: 380 Other personal property damage
Role of Legend, Inc.: Plaintiff · Outcome: Terminated 1995-06-22 — FJC Integrated Database disposition: Dismissed: other Docket on CourtListener ↗
exact company name; name has one distinctive word; court in the group's state (NY); filed 1994, issuer incorporated 2021
What was searched

Sources searched: CourtListener bulk data (RECAP dockets as of 2026-09-30; recall-first rule 10-24) — federal district + bankruptcy courts State courts: not covered (one-tap state court links under Look further). PACER: not searched. · Last checked Oct 24, 2026, 2:16 AM ET.

Court records show docket facts only; we never restate allegations as facts. Outcome wording comes from the docket feed; where it does not state a disposition we say so.

State courts: not covered (one-tap state court links under Look further). No state offers a lawful automated statewide source PartnerFacts can use today. Texas (re:SearchTX) terms prohibit storing results in a database open to third parties; New York (WebCivil) and Massachusetts (MassCourts) require a browser check that blocks scripted queries; California has no statewide index (58 county portals; Rule of Court 2.503 grants name-based access case by case); Florida, Utah and Illinois offer paid or partial access whose terms for automated use are unverified. Washington (dw.courts.wa.gov; bulk index reports under a JISC data-dissemination agreement), Delaware (CourtConnect; Court of Chancery not included) and Arizona (apps.azcourts.gov/publicaccess, which has an official channel to request high-volume access) are the candidates; PartnerFacts will request written permission before any automated search. Federal courts are searched through CourtListener / RECAP.

2. Regulatory actions

None found in sources searched — SEC enforcement releases (index scan as of Oct 24, 2026, 2:50 AM ET) · state securities regulators: VA (crawled Oct 23, 2026)

What was searched

SEC enforcement searched: SEC litigation releases and administrative proceedings — respondent names in the sec.gov index titles (30,205 releases, 1995-09-19 to 2026-10-23); release text is read only to confirm a candidate. Names that appear only in the body of a release are not found. — Searched SEC litigation releases and administrative proceedings (1995→ / 2007→) (30,205 records as of Oct 24, 2026, 2:50 AM ET) — nothing matched Legend..

State securities regulators: Securities regulators searched (3,318 actions): AZ Corporation Commission Securities Division (411 actions, 2017–2026), CA DFPI (25 actions, 2007–2024; listing starts 2002 — 16 of 12,159 DFPI respondent pages read so far; sponsor-name matches are read first), DE DOJ Investor Protection Unit (257 actions, 1987–2026), TX State Securities Board (586 actions, 2006–2026), WA DFI (2,039 actions, 2001–2026) — last crawled Oct 23, 2026, 9:57 PM ET. No machine-readable public listing today for CO, FL, IA, IN, MN, NE, NJ, NY, OH, UT, VA (see docs/state-regulators.md).

3. Bankruptcies

3 cases: 3 closed (disposition not in docket feed)

Farris Mathews Branan Bobango Hellen & Dunlap PLC v. Legend Corporation closed matched at sponsor-group level (Legend)
United States Bankruptcy Court, W.D. Tennessee · No. 06-00233 · Filed May 10, 2006 · Closed Nov 27, 2006
Role of Legend Corporation: Defendant · Outcome: Case closed 2006-11-27 (disposition not included in the bulk docket feed — see docket) Docket on CourtListener ↗
exact company name; name has one distinctive word; court in TN (not the issuer's state); filed 2006, issuer incorporated 2021
Legend Inc closed matched at sponsor-group level (Legend)
United States Bankruptcy Court, D. Idaho · No. 97-00316 · Filed Feb 6, 1997 · Closed Sep 28, 1999
Role of Legend Inc: Debtor · Outcome: Case closed 1999-09-28 (disposition not included in the bulk docket feed — see docket) Docket on CourtListener ↗
exact company name; name has one distinctive word; court in ID (not the issuer's state); filed 1997, issuer incorporated 2021
Legend Corporation closed matched at sponsor-group level (Legend)
United States Bankruptcy Court, W.D. Tennessee · No. 93-26996 · Filed Jul 2, 1993 · Closed Apr 25, 2007
Role of Legend Corporation: Debtor · Outcome: Case closed 2007-04-25 (disposition not included in the bulk docket feed — see docket) Docket on CourtListener ↗
exact company name; name has one distinctive word; court in TN (not the issuer's state); filed 1993, issuer incorporated 2021
What was searched

Sources searched: Federal bankruptcy courts via CourtListener / RECAP archive (federal district courts, federal bankruptcy courts). State courts: not covered (one-tap state court links under Look further). PACER: not searched (RECAP only). · Last checked Oct 24, 2026, 2:16 AM ET.

Court records show docket facts only; we never restate allegations as facts. Outcome wording comes from the docket feed; where it does not state a disposition we say so.

State courts: not covered (one-tap state court links under Look further). No state offers a lawful automated statewide source PartnerFacts can use today. Texas (re:SearchTX) terms prohibit storing results in a database open to third parties; New York (WebCivil) and Massachusetts (MassCourts) require a browser check that blocks scripted queries; California has no statewide index (58 county portals; Rule of Court 2.503 grants name-based access case by case); Florida, Utah and Illinois offer paid or partial access whose terms for automated use are unverified. Washington (dw.courts.wa.gov; bulk index reports under a JISC data-dissemination agreement), Delaware (CourtConnect; Court of Chancery not included) and Arizona (apps.azcourts.gov/publicaccess, which has an official channel to request high-volume access) are the candidates; PartnerFacts will request written permission before any automated search. Federal courts are searched through CourtListener / RECAP.

4. Differences between public sources

No comparisons published

What is compared

No public statement by this sponsor group has been collected yet, so there is nothing to compare. Sources compared: the sponsor's own website (known from the issuer's own filings — Form C issuer website, EDGAR company profile — an approved profile claim or Form ADV Item 1.I of its matched adviser) · SEC Form D · SEC Form ADV (IAPD) · Internet Archive · No website is on file for this sponsor group yet.

8 differences found between the filings for Legend — 3 worth asking about (compared 6 filings on Oct 24, 2026)

Worth asking · Jun 12, 2024

Regulator action naming a team member: Mario Gogliormella, Steven Lacaj, and Karim Ibrahim a/k/a/ Chris Hayes (Jun 12, 2024)

An SEC litigation release dated Jun 12, 2024 names Steven Lacaj (listed on the same filings). Our match estimate: 80%. The release is the source; we do not summarize its outcome here.

What this means A regulator filed or announced an action naming this person or company (or someone on the same filings). Read the release; ask the sponsor what it was and how it ended.

Sources
Worth asking · May 12, 2022 – Sep 1, 2022

Legend includes 6 deals that stopped filing before reaching their target

Legend Ventures Fund 6, LLC (last filing Sep 1, 2022; $0 sold of $50,000,000); Legend Ventures Fund 5, LLC (last filing Sep 1, 2022; $0 sold of $50,000,000); LEGEND VENTURES FUND 4, LLC (last filing May 12, 2022; $0 sold of $50,000,000); LEGEND VENTURES FUND 1, LLC (last filing May 12, 2022; $11,500,000 sold of $50,000,000); LEGEND VENTURES FUND 2, LLC (last filing May 12, 2022; $4,500,000 sold of $50,000,000); LEGEND VENTURES FUND 3, LLC (last filing May 12, 2022; $2,000,000 sold of $50,000,000). Each has no filing in more than two years and reported under half its target sold.

What this means An issuer whose last filing is more than two years old and reported under half its target sold. The raise may have closed early or quietly stopped. Ask what happened to each.

Sources
Worth asking · Feb 28, 2022 – May 12, 2022

Form D filed 73 days after the first sale — LEGEND VENTURES FUND 1, LLC

The filing says the first sale was Feb 28, 2022. The Form D was filed May 12, 2022 — 73 days later. The rule: a Form D is generally due within 15 days after the first sale, so this one is 58 days past that.

What this means A late notice is common and carries no penalty by itself. It is worth asking the sponsor why the paperwork lagged.

Sources
Note · Apr 1, 2022 – May 12, 2022

Form D filed 41 days after the first sale — LEGEND VENTURES FUND 3, LLC

The filing says the first sale was Apr 1, 2022. The Form D was filed May 12, 2022 — 41 days later. The rule: a Form D is generally due within 15 days after the first sale, so this one is 26 days past that.

What this means A late notice is common and carries no penalty by itself. It is worth asking the sponsor why the paperwork lagged.

Sources
Note · Mar 30, 2022 – May 12, 2022

Form D filed 43 days after the first sale — LEGEND VENTURES FUND 2, LLC

The filing says the first sale was Mar 30, 2022. The Form D was filed May 12, 2022 — 43 days later. The rule: a Form D is generally due within 15 days after the first sale, so this one is 28 days past that.

What this means A late notice is common and carries no penalty by itself. It is worth asking the sponsor why the paperwork lagged.

Sources
Note · Apr 1, 2022 – May 12, 2022

No amendment in the last 12 months on an offering that may still be open — LEGEND VENTURES FUND 3, LLC (latest filing May 12, 2022)

The latest filing for this offering is dated May 12, 2022 (first sale Apr 1, 2022). It reports $2,000,000 sold of $50,000,000 offered. No later amendment is in our index as of Oct 24, 2026.

What this means SEC rules expect a yearly amendment while an offering is still going. The raise may simply have ended — a Form D does not say when it closed. Ask the sponsor whether the offering closed, when, and at what amount.

Sources
Note · Mar 30, 2022 – May 12, 2022

No amendment in the last 12 months on an offering that may still be open — LEGEND VENTURES FUND 2, LLC (latest filing May 12, 2022)

The latest filing for this offering is dated May 12, 2022 (first sale Mar 30, 2022). It reports $4,500,000 sold of $50,000,000 offered. No later amendment is in our index as of Oct 24, 2026.

What this means SEC rules expect a yearly amendment while an offering is still going. The raise may simply have ended — a Form D does not say when it closed. Ask the sponsor whether the offering closed, when, and at what amount.

Sources
Note · Feb 28, 2022 – May 12, 2022

No amendment in the last 12 months on an offering that may still be open — LEGEND VENTURES FUND 1, LLC (latest filing May 12, 2022)

The latest filing for this offering is dated May 12, 2022 (first sale Feb 28, 2022). It reports $11,500,000 sold of $50,000,000 offered. No later amendment is in our index as of Oct 24, 2026.

What this means SEC rules expect a yearly amendment while an offering is still going. The raise may simply have ended — a Form D does not say when it closed. Ask the sponsor whether the offering closed, when, and at what amount.

Sources
What is compared

What is compared: every Form D and D/A we hold for this subject, side by side — filing dates vs. first-sale dates (the 15-day rule), amendment timing on open offerings (the yearly-amendment expectation), amounts sold, investor counts, offering amounts and minimums across amendments, industry and size bands, addresses, how each person's name and role is written, paid sellers' CRD numbers, and (for groups) where the member companies were formed and sit. Everything is as filed by the issuer; the SEC does not check it. Differences are common and usually have ordinary explanations — we show both values, the dates, and the source so you can ask. As of Oct 24, 2026.

5. Money to insiders

None reported on 6 offerings — no sales commissions, finder's fees or proceeds to insiders

Per-offering detail
Offering (latest filing)Sales commissionsFinder's feesTo insidersPaid to sell itSource
Sep 1, 2022 D
Legend Ventures Fund 5, LLC
File 021-457771
$0$0$0None listed on this filingEDGAR ↗
Sep 1, 2022 D
Legend Ventures Fund 6, LLC
File 021-457774
$0$0$0None listed on this filingEDGAR ↗
May 12, 2022 D
LEGEND VENTURES FUND 1, LLC
File 021-445514
$0$0$0None listed on this filingEDGAR ↗
May 12, 2022 D
LEGEND VENTURES FUND 2, LLC
File 021-445515
$0$0$0None listed on this filingEDGAR ↗
May 12, 2022 D
LEGEND VENTURES FUND 3, LLC
File 021-445516
$0$0$0None listed on this filingEDGAR ↗
May 12, 2022 D
LEGEND VENTURES FUND 4, LLC
File 021-445517
$0$0$0None listed on this filingEDGAR ↗

Counts come from Form D Items 12–15 on the filings in our index (latest filing per offering; one offering = one SEC file number; an amendment updates its offering rather than adding one). "To insiders" = gross proceeds used for payments to executive officers, directors or promoters. "—" = not reported on that filing. Amounts marked (est.) were reported as estimates. "Paid to sell it" = sales compensation recipients named on that filing (Item 12), each linked to FINRA BrokerCheck when a CRD number is reported.

Counted across all 6 issuers in this group — every filing in our index, latest filing per offering (SEC file number).

Property records 0 documents · 0 ownership records · last checked Oct 24, 2026, 8:04 AM ET · NYC and Cook County lookup still to run

0 recorded documents and 0 ownership records matched to Legend in the sources searched.

Not found in sources searched as of Oct 24, 2026, 8:04 AM ET: Hillsborough County FL Clerk of Court Official Records daily index (publicrec.hillsclerk.com D/P/M files), 2 daily files (Oct 14, 2026 to Oct 15, 2026) — loaded Oct 23, 2026, 8:59 PM ET; Harris County TX (HCAD ownership rolls 2005–2026) — 1,032,426 records, loaded Oct 24, 2026, 8:00 AM ET; Dallas County TX (DCAD ownership rolls 2026–2027) — 191,381 records, loaded Oct 24, 2026, 8:04 AM ET; Hillsborough County FL (FL DOR 2026 ownership roll + Clerk recorded-document index Oct 14, 2026 to Oct 15, 2026), Miami-Dade County FL (FL DOR 2026 ownership roll) — 294,950 records, loaded Oct 23, 2026, 8:58 PM ET. Still to be looked up for this group: NYC ACRIS via NYC Open Data (Real Property Parties 636b-3b5g, Master bnx9-e6tj, Legals 8h5j-fqxa, Document Control Codes 7isb-wh4c) · NYC PLUTO ownership via NYC Open Data (64uk-42ks) · Cook County IL Assessor via Cook County Open Data (Parcel Sales wvhk-k5uv; Parcel Addresses 3723-97qp). Records in other counties, and recorder indexes we do not yet cover, were not searched.

Property records coverage: New York City (ACRIS recorded documents and PLUTO ownership, looked up per issuer when its page is viewed; re-checked when the page is viewed again more than 30 days after the last check); Harris County TX (ownership only, no deed, mortgage or sale records; HCAD ownership rolls 2005–2026); Dallas County TX (ownership only, no deed, mortgage or sale records; DCAD ownership rolls 2026–2027); Hillsborough County FL (FL DOR 2026 ownership roll + Clerk recorded-document index Oct 14, 2026 to Oct 15, 2026), Miami-Dade County FL (FL DOR 2026 ownership roll); Cook County IL (assessor ownership and deed/sale records, looked up per issuer when its page is viewed). Recorder indexes (party names on deeds, mortgages and liens) in TX, AZ, NV, CA and WA counties and outside the Clerk index in FL, mortgages and liens outside NYC and Hillsborough County, lis pendens and foreclosure notices everywhere, Los Angeles County CA, Clark County NV, King County WA (loader ready; first load not finished), Cook County IL bulk pass (not finished; per-issuer lookups only so far), New York City bulk pass (not finished; per-issuer lookups only so far), Maricopa County AZ (loader ready; commercial-purpose statement not yet filed), Salt Lake County UT, and all other counties are not covered — not searched. Last refresh by source: Dallas Central Appraisal District ACCOUNT_INFO.CSV Oct 24, 2026, 8:04 AM ET; Harris County Appraisal District real_acct.txt Oct 24, 2026, 8:00 AM ET; Hillsborough County FL Clerk daily index Oct 23, 2026, 8:59 PM ET; Florida DOR NAL roll (Dade 23) Oct 23, 2026, 8:58 PM ET; Florida DOR NAL roll (Hillsborough 39) Oct 23, 2026, 8:54 PM ET. NYC and Cook County are also looked up per issuer when its page is viewed; the most recent such lookup on this site finished Oct 24, 2026, 3:30 AM ET. Parties are named as the recorder's index names them (role suffixes as recorded); no address, account number or trust date is shown for an individual, and individual owners of record (home ownership) are not matched or shown. Items still in human review are not shown.

Issuers in this group

Why each issuer is here is stated in the "Linked by" column. Low-confidence links are never shown — they wait for human review.

SourceIssuerLinked byLocationIndustryFilingsSold (max)InvestorsMin. investment (latest filing)Active
EDGAR ↗LV LEGEND VENTURES FUND 3, LLCshared people, shared management entity, same business address, similar issuer namesNEW YORK, NYPooled Investment Fund1$2,000,000
offering $50,000,000 · similar: $500,000–$16,420,250
99
similar: 2–28
$19,000
similar: $5,000–$100,000
2022–2022
EDGAR ↗LV LEGEND VENTURES FUND 2, LLCshared people, shared management entity, same business address, similar issuer namesNEW YORK, NYPooled Investment Fund1$4,500,000
offering $50,000,000 · similar: $500,000–$16,420,250
99
similar: 2–28
$19,000
similar: $5,000–$100,000
2022–2022
EDGAR ↗LV LEGEND VENTURES FUND 1, LLCshared people, shared management entity, same business address, similar issuer namesNEW YORK, NYPooled Investment Fund1$11,500,000
offering $50,000,000 · similar: $500,000–$16,420,250
99
similar: 2–28
$19,000
similar: $5,000–$100,000
2022–2022
EDGAR ↗LV LEGEND VENTURES FUND 4, LLCshared people, shared management entity, same business address, similar issuer namesNEW YORK, NYPooled Investment Fund1$0
offering $50,000,000 · similar: $500,000–$16,420,250
0
similar: 2–28
$19,000
similar: $5,000–$100,000
2022–2022
EDGAR ↗LV Legend Ventures Fund 5, LLCshared people, shared management entity, same business address, similar issuer namesNEW YORK, NYPooled Investment Fund1$0
offering $50,000,000 · similar: $500,000–$16,420,250
0
similar: 2–28
$19,000
similar: $5,000–$100,000
2022–2022
EDGAR ↗LV Legend Ventures Fund 6, LLCshared people, shared management entity, same business address, similar issuer namesNEW YORK, NYPooled Investment Fund1$0
offering $50,000,000 · similar: $500,000–$16,420,250
0
similar: 2–28
$19,000
similar: $5,000–$100,000
2022–2022

"Similar" = offerings in the same industry claiming the same exemption, filed in the last 5 years: Pooled Investment Fund / 506(c) (8,096 filings); ranges are the middle half (25th–75th percentile). Computed by PartnerFacts from SEC EDGAR Form D data as of Oct 23, 2026, 5:45 PM ET. Rows without a range: fewer than 30 comparable filings, or not a Rule 506 offering. No ranking or score.

Timeline of offerings

SourceFiledIssuerFormIndustryOfferedSold
EDGAR ↗Sep 1, 2022Legend Ventures Fund 6, LLCDPooled Investment Fund$50,000,000$0
EDGAR ↗Sep 1, 2022Legend Ventures Fund 5, LLCDPooled Investment Fund$50,000,000$0
EDGAR ↗May 12, 2022LEGEND VENTURES FUND 4, LLCDPooled Investment Fund$50,000,000$0
EDGAR ↗May 12, 2022LEGEND VENTURES FUND 3, LLCDPooled Investment Fund$50,000,000$2,000,000
EDGAR ↗May 12, 2022LEGEND VENTURES FUND 2, LLCDPooled Investment Fund$50,000,000$4,500,000
EDGAR ↗May 12, 2022LEGEND VENTURES FUND 1, LLCDPooled Investment Fund$50,000,000$11,500,000

Activity: 0 new offerings in the last 12 months across all issuers in this group (new offering = a Form D that is not an amendment, D/A) · most recent filing Sep 1, 2022. Industry history, as reported on each offering's latest filing: All 6 offerings reported: Pooled Investment Fund (2022).

People across the group

NameRolesIssuers hereFirst → last listed
LV Legend Venture Partners LLC entityExecutive Officer, Promoter6May 12, 2022 → Sep 1, 2022
SL Steven LacajExecutive Officer, Promoter6May 12, 2022 → Sep 1, 2022

Adviser registration (Form ADV)

Searched SEC Form ADV bulk data (registered + exempt reporting advisers) (24,962 records as of Oct 2, 2026, 8:00 AM ET) — nothing matched Legend.

Meta advertising

No Meta Pixel ids or Facebook / Instagram page links on file for Legend as of Oct 24, 2026 — the sponsor website is read for them once it is on file (runs automatically). Meta Ad Library: not searched by PartnerFacts (no API access); a one-tap Ad Library search is under Look further.

Other offering types (Regulation A and Regulation Crowdfunding)

Searched SEC Regulation A Data Sets (Forms 1-A, 1-K, 1-Z; 2015 Q2 → 2026 Q3); SEC Crowdfunding Offerings Data Sets (Form C family; 2016 Q2 → 2026 Q3); EDGAR form index for 2026 Q3 → 2026 Q4 (51,358 records as of Oct 23, 2026, 8:41 PM ET) — nothing matched this name.

Public profiles and social

No website or social profile named in Legend's SEC filings (Form C, Reg A, Form ADV; checked Oct 24, 2026). Web search for this name: #155,313 of 374,652 in line (1,383 issuers searched so far). One-tap searches: Look further ↓

Export this report as PDF · Premium

Request diligence pack (Premium) PartnerFacts asks the sponsor for the standard information pack and delivers it to you labelled "provided by the sponsor".

Change history

No corrections have been requested for this page.

Request a correction

Free. Covers the grouping itself or any record shown here. Logged with status: received → under review → fixed / confirmed with source.

Sponsor response

Add a sourced explanation next to any fact. Reviewed before publishing.

Grouping is PartnerFacts' inference from public filings (shared related persons, management entities, business address). Everything else on this page is drawn from the filings themselves. Not the same sponsor? Request a correction.

Look further

One-tap searches on sites we do not index ourselves, with the name pre-filled (outside the US (as filed: NEW YORK), NY). Each opens in a new tab; what you find there is not verified by PartnerFacts.