PartnerFacts
Data last updated: Oct 23, 2026, 5:45 PM ETLatest filing: Oct 22, 2026Now: Oct 24, 2026, 5:27 AM ET

Sponsor Check › Sponsor group

ET

Environmental Technologies

One sponsor team, 2 deal companies · London, United Kingdom (as filed: X0)

Grouped because: 1 shared person, similar issuer names (2) (automatic match from the filings) · not the same sponsor?

2deal companies
$113Mreported sold
17investors
2Form D filings
2018–2022active
0new, last 12 mo

Data last updated Oct 23, 2026, 5:45 PM ET · Latest filing in this group Jun 21, 2022 · Courts (RECAP) last checked: Oct 24, 2026, 2:16 AM ET · SEC enforcement last checked: covered by the index scan as of Oct 24, 2026, 2:50 AM ET

The short version

Environmental Technologies is a sponsor group of 2 issuers that PartnerFacts links to one sponsor (shared management entity, similar issuer names; automatic match from the filings), filing 2 Form D filings between Jul 2018 and Jun 2022.

What this means One team, 2 deal companies, about 4 years of track record in SEC filings. We link the companies because the same people or address appear on their forms — tap "Request a correction" if that is wrong.

Combined reported sold: $113M to 17 investors (latest filing per issuer). Industries as reported: Pooled Investment Fund (2). Issuers are based in United Kingdom (as filed: X0) (2).

What this means $113M raised across the group, about $6.65M per investor. Amounts come from each company's latest Form D; they are what the sponsor reported, not audited figures.

Principal people: Manager ETF Partners LLP (2 issuers, promoter), General Partner ETF General Partner 3 L.P. (1 issuer, promoter, entity), General Partner ETF General Partner 4 L.P. (1 issuer, promoter, entity), General Partner of the General Partner ETF GP 3 LLP (1 issuer, promoter, entity), General Partner of the General Partner ETF GP 4 LLP (1 issuer, promoter, entity) and 3 more.

What this means The person on the most companies is usually the one running the show; their page lists every deal.

Activity: 0 new offerings in the last 12 months; latest filing Jun 21, 2022.

What this means No new raise filed in the past year.

Public records searched: federal courts (CourtListener / RECAP), SEC enforcement releases, state securities regulators (AZ, CA, DE, TX, WA), property records (NYC, FL, IL and TX counties) — 64 court cases matching the name, 40 bankruptcy cases matching the name listed in Key records below.

What this means 104 records came back, including 6 court cases still open — open cases can take years and cost money. Each one is listed below with a link to the original document and a line saying why it matched. A name match is not proof it is the same person or company — read the why line and the document. Being sued or named in a release is an accusation, not a finding.

We compared 2 public filings for Environmental Technologies and found 1 difference: No amendment in the last 12 months on an offering that may still be open.

What this means These are differences between the sponsor's own SEC filings — both values, dates and sources are listed in Key records, section 4. Most have ordinary explanations; ask the sponsor.

What the community is saying

Community search for Environmental Technologies has not run yet — it is joining a line of 16,501 names; searches run around the clock at the hosts' allowed rate. Searched so far: 28 names.

Community comments are quoted as written by their authors. Sources searched: BiggerPockets forums (via DuckDuckGo, Brave, Bing and BiggerPockets search) and Reddit (search feed + public archive).

Key records

Five things investors ask first. Items still in human review are counted, not shown.

1. Lawsuits

64 cases: 6 open, 18 closed (disposition not in docket feed), 7 judgment, 33 dismissed

Festa Sun Enterprises, Inc. v. Spruce Environmental Technologies, Inc open matched at sponsor-group level (Environmental Technologies)
District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · No. 2:25-cv-00647 · Filed May 9, 2025
Role of Festa Sun Enterprises, Inc. v. Spruce Environmental Technologies, Inc: Party · Outcome: Open — no termination date on the docket (bulk snapshot 2026-09-30) Docket on CourtListener ↗
company name words appear in the caption; court in PA (not the issuer's state)
Hamstra Builders, Inc. v. Bion Environmental Technologies, Inc. open matched at sponsor-group level (Environmental Technologies)
District Court, N.D. Indiana · No. 4:25-cv-00024 · Filed Apr 14, 2025 · Nature of suit: 190 Contract: Other · Cause: 28:1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Role of Hamstra Builders, Inc. v. Bion Environmental Technologies, Inc.: Party · Outcome: Open — no termination date on the docket (bulk snapshot 2026-09-30) Docket on CourtListener ↗
company name words appear in the caption; court in IN (not the issuer's state)
Schmelzer Environmental Technologies LLC v. LRC Properties LLC closed matched at sponsor-group level (Environmental Technologies)
District Court, D. South Carolina · No. 2:23-cv-00877 · Filed Mar 3, 2023 · Closed Nov 8, 2024
Role of Schmelzer Environmental Technologies LLC v. LRC Properties LLC: Party · Outcome: Terminated 2024-11-08 (disposition not included in the bulk docket feed — see docket) Docket on CourtListener ↗
company name words appear in the caption; court in SC (not the issuer's state)
Seychelle Environmental Technologies, Inc. v. Epic Water Filters closed matched at sponsor-group level (Environmental Technologies)
District Court, C.D. California · No. 8:22-cv-01385 · Filed Jul 26, 2022 · Closed Jun 23, 2023
Role of Seychelle Environmental Technologies, Inc. v. Epic Water Filters: Party · Outcome: Terminated 2023-06-23 (disposition not included in the bulk docket feed — see docket) Docket on CourtListener ↗
company name words appear in the caption; court in CA (not the issuer's state)
TCSS Environmental Technologies LLC v. Cavortex Technology International LLC closed matched at sponsor-group level (Environmental Technologies)
District Court, N.D. Texas · No. 3:20-cv-02754 · Filed Sep 2, 2020 · Closed Sep 23, 2021 · Nature of suit: Other Statutes: Arbitration · Cause: 9:9 Motion to Confirm Arbitration Award
Role of TCSS Environmental Technologies LLC v. Cavortex Technology International LLC: Party · Outcome: Terminated 2021-09-23 (disposition not included in the bulk docket feed — see docket) Docket on CourtListener ↗
company name words appear in the caption; court in TX (not the issuer's state)
Polar Environmental Technologies, Inc v. Rust-Oleum Corporation closed matched at sponsor-group level (Environmental Technologies)
District Court, D. Alaska · No. 4:20-cv-00017 · Filed May 5, 2020 · Closed Sep 19, 2022 · Nature of suit: Contract: Other · Cause: 28:1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Role of Polar Environmental Technologies, Inc v. Rust-Oleum Corporation: Party · Outcome: Terminated 2022-09-19 (disposition not included in the bulk docket feed — see docket) Docket on CourtListener ↗
company name words appear in the caption; court in AK (not the issuer's state)
Spruce Environmental Technologies, Inc. v. Festa Radon Technologies, Co. judgment matched at sponsor-group level (Environmental Technologies)
District Court, D. Massachusetts · No. 1:18-cv-11828 · Filed Aug 27, 2018 · Closed Apr 1, 2019 · Nature of suit: 896 Other Statutes: Arbitration · Cause: 09:1 U.S. Arbitration Act
Role of Spruce Environmental Technologies, Inc. v. Festa Radon Technologies, Co.: Party · Outcome: Terminated 2019-04-01 — FJC Integrated Database disposition: Judgment on award of arbitrator; judgment for plaintiff Docket on CourtListener ↗
company name words appear in the caption; court in MA (not the issuer's state)
Victoria Management, LLC v. Colloid Environmental Technologies Company, LLC dismissed matched at sponsor-group level (Environmental Technologies)
District Court, S.D. Florida · No. 1:18-cv-20264 · Filed Jan 22, 2018 · Closed Jul 31, 2018 · Nature of suit: 190 Contract: Other · Cause: 28:1446 Notice of Removal
Role of Victoria Management, LLC v. Colloid Environmental Technologies Company, LLC: Party · Outcome: Terminated 2018-07-31 — FJC Integrated Database disposition: Dismissed: other Docket on CourtListener ↗
company name words appear in the caption; court in FL (not the issuer's state)
Swanson v. Colloid Environmental Technologies Company, LLC dismissed matched at sponsor-group level (Environmental Technologies)
District Court, N.D. California · No. 4:17-cv-01972 · Filed Apr 10, 2017 · Closed Mar 5, 2018 · Nature of suit: 190 Contract: Other · Cause: 28:1441 Petition for Removal- Breach of Contract
Role of Swanson v. Colloid Environmental Technologies Company, LLC: Party · Outcome: Terminated 2018-03-05 — FJC Integrated Database disposition: Voluntarily dismissed Docket on CourtListener ↗
company name words appear in the caption; court in CA (not the issuer's state)
JEB Environmental Technologies v. EMS USA, Inc. dismissed matched at sponsor-group level (Environmental Technologies)
District Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · No. 4:16-cv-00702 · Filed Apr 27, 2016 · Closed May 30, 2017 · Nature of suit: 190 Contract: Other · Cause: 28:1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Role of JEB Environmental Technologies v. EMS USA, Inc.: Party · Outcome: Terminated 2017-05-30 — FJC Integrated Database disposition: Dismissed: settled Docket on CourtListener ↗
company name words appear in the caption; court in PA (not the issuer's state)
United States v. Summit Environmental Technologies, Inc. 3310 Win Street, Cuyahoga Falls, Ohio 44223 closed matched at sponsor-group level (Environmental Technologies)
District Court, N.D. Ohio · No. 5:15-mj-01143 · Filed Sep 9, 2015 · Closed Sep 18, 2015
Role of United States v. Summit Environmental Technologies, Inc. 3310 Win Street, Cuyahoga Falls, Ohio 44223: Party · Outcome: Terminated 2015-09-18 (disposition not included in the bulk docket feed — see docket) Docket on CourtListener ↗
company name words appear in the caption; court in OH (not the issuer's state)
United States v. Summit Environmental Technologies, Inc. 3310 Win Street, Cuyahoga Falls, Ohio 44223 closed matched at sponsor-group level (Environmental Technologies)
District Court, N.D. Ohio · No. 5:15-mj-01143 · Filed Sep 9, 2015 · Closed Sep 18, 2015
Role of United States v. Summit Environmental Technologies, Inc. 3310 Win Street, Cuyahoga Falls, Ohio 44223: Party · Outcome: Terminated 2015-09-18 (disposition not included in the bulk docket feed — see docket) Docket on CourtListener ↗
company name words appear in the caption; court in OH (not the issuer's state)
Marsulex Environmental Technologies v. Selip S.P.A. dismissed matched at sponsor-group level (Environmental Technologies)
District Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · No. 1:15-cv-00269 · Filed Feb 6, 2015 · Closed Nov 12, 2019 · Nature of suit: 190 Contract: Other · Cause: 28:1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Role of Marsulex Environmental Technologies v. Selip S.P.A.: Party · Outcome: Terminated 2019-11-12 — FJC Integrated Database disposition: Dismissed: settled Docket on CourtListener ↗
company name words appear in the caption; court in PA (not the issuer's state)
Archette Wellness Group Inc v. Seychelle Environmental Technologies Inc dismissed matched at sponsor-group level (Environmental Technologies)
District Court, C.D. California · No. 8:14-cv-00940 · Filed Jun 18, 2014 · Closed Mar 12, 2015 · Nature of suit: Contract: Other · Cause: 28:1441 Notice of Removal -- Other Contract
Role of Archette Wellness Group Inc v. Seychelle Environmental Technologies Inc: Party · Outcome: Terminated 2015-03-12 — FJC Integrated Database disposition: Dismissed: other Docket on CourtListener ↗
company name words appear in the caption; court in CA (not the issuer's state)
Morris v. BION Environmental Technologies, Inc. dismissed matched at sponsor-group level (Environmental Technologies)
District Court, E.D. New York · No. 2:14-cv-02732 · Filed May 1, 2014 · Closed Apr 9, 2015 · Nature of suit: 190 Other contract actions
Role of Morris v. BION Environmental Technologies, Inc.: Party · Outcome: Terminated 2015-04-09 — FJC Integrated Database disposition: Dismissed: other Docket on CourtListener ↗
company name words appear in the caption; court in NY (not the issuer's state)
Whitley v. Colloid Environmental Technologies Company dismissed matched at sponsor-group level (Environmental Technologies)
District Court, E.D. New York · No. 2:13-cv-06290 · Filed Nov 13, 2013 · Closed Mar 28, 2017 · Nature of suit: 190 Contract: Other · Cause: 28:1332 Diversity-Account Receivable
Role of Whitley v. Colloid Environmental Technologies Company: Party · Outcome: Terminated 2017-03-28 — FJC Integrated Database disposition: Dismissed: settled Docket on CourtListener ↗
company name words appear in the caption; court in NY (not the issuer's state)
Marsulex Environmental Technologies v. Stanley Consultants dismissed matched at sponsor-group level (Environmental Technologies)
District Court, D. Utah · No. 2:12-cv-00619 · Filed Jul 2, 2012 · Closed Nov 19, 2012 · Nature of suit: 190 Other contract actions
Role of Marsulex Environmental Technologies v. Stanley Consultants: Party · Outcome: Terminated 2012-11-19 — FJC Integrated Database disposition: Voluntarily dismissed Docket on CourtListener ↗
company name words appear in the caption; court in UT (not the issuer's state)
Amerex Environmental Technologies Inc. v. Amerair Industries Inc dismissed matched at sponsor-group level (Environmental Technologies)
District Court, N.D. Georgia · No. 1:12-cv-02211 · Filed Jun 26, 2012 · Closed Mar 20, 2013 · Nature of suit: 190 Other contract actions
Role of Amerex Environmental Technologies Inc. v. Amerair Industries Inc: Party · Outcome: Terminated 2013-03-20 — FJC Integrated Database disposition: Dismissed: settled Docket on CourtListener ↗
company name words appear in the caption; court in GA (not the issuer's state)
SOUTH MACOMB DISPOSAL AUTHORITY v. MODEL DEVELOPMENT, LLC, PETRO ENVIRONMENTAL TECHNOLOGIES, INC., and ASSURED ADMINISTRATION, LLC open matched at sponsor-group level (Environmental Technologies)
District Court, D. New Jersey · No. 2:12-mc-00120 · Filed May 15, 2012
Role of SOUTH MACOMB DISPOSAL AUTHORITY v. MODEL DEVELOPMENT, LLC, PETRO ENVIRONMENTAL TECHNOLOGIES, INC., and ASSURED ADMINISTRATION, LLC: Party · Outcome: Open — no termination date on the docket (bulk snapshot 2026-09-30) Docket on CourtListener ↗
company name words appear in the caption; court in NJ (not the issuer's state)
CM Reed Almeda 1-3062, LLC v. Alpine Environmental Technologies Corporation dismissed matched at sponsor-group level (Environmental Technologies)
District Court, S.D. Texas · No. 4:12-cv-01269 · Filed Apr 20, 2012 · Closed Apr 4, 2013 · Nature of suit: 290 Other real property actions
Role of CM Reed Almeda 1-3062, LLC v. Alpine Environmental Technologies Corporation: Party · Outcome: Terminated 2013-04-04 — FJC Integrated Database disposition: Dismissed: other Docket on CourtListener ↗
company name words appear in the caption; court in TX (not the issuer's state)
BRANCH BANKING AND TRUST COMPANY v. ENVIRONMENTAL TECHNOLOGIES INC judgment
District Court, M.D. Georgia · No. 5:12-cv-00115 · Filed Mar 30, 2012 · Closed Aug 28, 2013 · Nature of suit: Contract: Other · Cause: 28:1332 Diversity-Contract Default
Role of BRANCH BANKING AND TRUST COMPANY v. ENVIRONMENTAL TECHNOLOGIES INC: Party · Outcome: Terminated 2013-08-28 — FJC Integrated Database disposition: Judgment on motion before trial; judgment for plaintiff Docket on CourtListener ↗
company name words appear in the caption; court in GA (not the issuer's state)
Amerair Industries, LLC v. Amerex Environmental Technologies Inc. dismissed matched at sponsor-group level (Environmental Technologies)
District Court, N.D. Georgia · No. 1:12-cv-00852 · Filed Mar 12, 2012 · Closed Apr 13, 2012 · Nature of suit: 890 Other statutory actions
Role of Amerair Industries, LLC v. Amerex Environmental Technologies Inc.: Party · Outcome: Terminated 2012-04-13 — FJC Integrated Database disposition: Dismissed: settled Docket on CourtListener ↗
company name words appear in the caption; court in GA (not the issuer's state)
Amerair Industries, LLC v. Amerex Environmental Technologies Inc. closed matched at sponsor-group level (Environmental Technologies)
District Court, N.D. Georgia · No. 1:12-mi-00025 · Filed Feb 27, 2012 · Closed Mar 12, 2012
Role of Amerair Industries, LLC v. Amerex Environmental Technologies Inc.: Party · Outcome: Terminated 2012-03-12 (disposition not included in the bulk docket feed — see docket) Docket on CourtListener ↗
company name words appear in the caption; court in GA (not the issuer's state)
Amerex Environmental Technologies Inc v. Foster closed matched at sponsor-group level (Environmental Technologies)
District Court, N.D. Alabama · No. 2:12-mc-00641 · Filed Feb 23, 2012 · Closed Apr 20, 2012
Role of Amerex Environmental Technologies Inc v. Foster: Party · Outcome: Terminated 2012-04-20 (disposition not included in the bulk docket feed — see docket) Docket on CourtListener ↗
company name words appear in the caption; court in AL (not the issuer's state)
Amerex Environmental Technologies, Inc. v. John Foster closed matched at sponsor-group level (Environmental Technologies)
District Court, N.D. Illinois · No. 1:12-cv-00643 · Filed Jan 30, 2012 · Closed Aug 9, 2012
Role of Amerex Environmental Technologies, Inc. v. John Foster: Party · Outcome: Terminated 2012-08-09 (disposition not included in the bulk docket feed — see docket) Docket on CourtListener ↗
company name words appear in the caption; court in IL (not the issuer's state)
Crystal Enterprises, Inc. v. Integrated Environmental Technologies, Ltd dismissed matched at sponsor-group level (Environmental Technologies)
District Court, W.D. Washington · No. 3:12-cv-05027 · Filed Jan 11, 2012 · Closed Jun 27, 2013 · Nature of suit: 190 Other contract actions
Role of Crystal Enterprises, Inc. v. Integrated Environmental Technologies, Ltd: Party · Outcome: Terminated 2013-06-27 — FJC Integrated Database disposition: Dismissed: settled Docket on CourtListener ↗
company name words appear in the caption; court in WA (not the issuer's state)
Leaf Funding Inc. v. Sansi Environmental Technologies LLC judgment matched at sponsor-group level (Environmental Technologies)
District Court, D. Delaware · No. 1:11-cv-00823 · Filed Sep 15, 2011 · Closed Oct 11, 2012 · Nature of suit: 190 Other contract actions
Role of Leaf Funding Inc. v. Sansi Environmental Technologies LLC: Party · Outcome: Terminated 2012-10-11 — FJC Integrated Database disposition: Judgment on default; judgment for plaintiff Docket on CourtListener ↗
company name words appear in the caption; court in DE (not the issuer's state)
AMEREX ENVIRONMENTAL TECHNOLOGIES, INC. v. FOSTER closed matched at sponsor-group level (Environmental Technologies)
District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · No. 2:11-cv-00349 · Filed Mar 16, 2011 · Closed Mar 7, 2013 · Nature of suit: Contract: Other · Cause: 28:1332 Diversity-Other Contract
Role of AMEREX ENVIRONMENTAL TECHNOLOGIES, INC. v. FOSTER: Party · Outcome: Terminated 2013-03-07 — FJC Integrated Database disposition: Statistical closing Docket on CourtListener ↗
company name words appear in the caption; court in PA (not the issuer's state)
Pierce Associates, Inc. v. Potomac Environmental Technologies, Inc. dismissed matched at sponsor-group level (Environmental Technologies)
District Court, E.D. Virginia · No. 1:10-cv-00725 · Filed Jun 28, 2010 · Closed Dec 27, 2011 · Nature of suit: 190 Other contract actions
Role of Pierce Associates, Inc. v. Potomac Environmental Technologies, Inc.: Party · Outcome: Terminated 2011-12-27 — FJC Integrated Database disposition: Dismissed: settled Docket on CourtListener ↗
company name words appear in the caption; court in VA (not the issuer's state)
Sierra Environmental Technologies, Inc. v. Gale judgment matched at sponsor-group level (Environmental Technologies)
District Court, E.D. California · No. 2:09-cv-03201 · Filed Nov 17, 2009 · Closed Mar 11, 2010 · Nature of suit: Other Statutory Actions · Cause: 28:1331 Fed. Question
Role of Sierra Environmental Technologies, Inc. v. Gale: Party · Outcome: Terminated 2010-03-11 — FJC Integrated Database disposition: Judgment on motion before trial; judgment for defendant Docket on CourtListener ↗
company name words appear in the caption; court in CA (not the issuer's state)
Wise v. Wise Environmental Technologies, LLC dismissed matched at sponsor-group level (Environmental Technologies)
District Court, N.D. Ohio · No. 1:09-cv-02076 · Filed Sep 8, 2009 · Closed Mar 29, 2013 · Nature of suit: Racketeer/Corrupt Organization · Cause: 18:1961 Racketeering (RICO) Act
Role of Wise v. Wise Environmental Technologies, LLC: Party · Outcome: Terminated 2013-03-29 — FJC Integrated Database disposition: Dismissed: other Docket on CourtListener ↗
company name words appear in the caption; court in OH (not the issuer's state)
Drake Enterprises, Inc. v. Colloid Environmental Technologies Company dismissed matched at sponsor-group level (Environmental Technologies)
District Court, N.D. Illinois · No. 1:08-cv-06753 · Filed Nov 25, 2008 · Closed Oct 18, 2010 · Nature of suit: Contract: Other · Cause: 28:1441 Petition for Removal
Role of Drake Enterprises, Inc. v. Colloid Environmental Technologies Company: Party · Outcome: Terminated 2010-10-18 — FJC Integrated Database disposition: Dismissed: settled Docket on CourtListener ↗
company name words appear in the caption; court in IL (not the issuer's state)
Americananglian Environmental Technologies, L.P. v. The City of Scranton, Pennsylvania open matched at sponsor-group level (Environmental Technologies)
District Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · No. 3:07-mc-00015 · Filed Jan 17, 2007
Role of Americananglian Environmental Technologies, L.P. v. The City of Scranton, Pennsylvania: Party · Outcome: Open — no termination date on the docket (bulk snapshot 2026-09-30) Docket on CourtListener ↗
company name words appear in the caption; court in PA (not the issuer's state)
Americananglian Environmental Technologies, L.P. v. Doherty dismissed matched at sponsor-group level (Environmental Technologies)
District Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · No. 3:06-cv-02319 · Filed Dec 4, 2006 · Closed May 23, 2007 · Nature of suit: 190 Other contract actions
Role of Americananglian Environmental Technologies, L.P. v. Doherty: Party · Outcome: Terminated 2007-05-23 — FJC Integrated Database disposition: Dismissed: settled Docket on CourtListener ↗
company name words appear in the caption; court in PA (not the issuer's state)
United States v. Environmental Technologies Group Inc. closed
District Court, W.D. Michigan · No. 1:06-cr-00251 · Filed Oct 20, 2006 · Closed Mar 8, 2007
Role of United States v. Environmental Technologies Group Inc.: Party · Outcome: Terminated 2007-03-08 (disposition not included in the bulk docket feed — see docket) Docket on CourtListener ↗
company name words appear in the caption; court in MI (not the issuer's state); criminal docket
United States v. Environmental Technologies Group Inc. closed
District Court, W.D. Michigan · No. 1:06-cr-00251 · Filed Oct 20, 2006 · Closed Mar 8, 2007
Role of United States v. Environmental Technologies Group Inc.: Party · Outcome: Terminated 2007-03-08 (disposition not included in the bulk docket feed — see docket) Docket on CourtListener ↗
company name words appear in the caption; court in MI (not the issuer's state); criminal docket
United States v. Environmental Technologies Group Inc. closed
District Court, W.D. Michigan · No. 1:06-cr-00251 · Filed Oct 20, 2006 · Closed Mar 8, 2007
Role of United States v. Environmental Technologies Group Inc.: Party · Outcome: Terminated 2007-03-08 (disposition not included in the bulk docket feed — see docket) Docket on CourtListener ↗
company name words appear in the caption; court in MI (not the issuer's state); criminal docket
United States v. WABASH ENVIRONMENTAL TECHNOLOGIES, LLC closed matched at sponsor-group level (Environmental Technologies)
District Court, S.D. Indiana · No. 1:06-cr-00139 · Filed Sep 12, 2006 · Closed Nov 15, 2007
Role of United States v. WABASH ENVIRONMENTAL TECHNOLOGIES, LLC: Party · Outcome: Terminated 2007-11-15 (disposition not included in the bulk docket feed — see docket) Docket on CourtListener ↗
company name words appear in the caption; court in IN (not the issuer's state); criminal docket
United States v. WABASH ENVIRONMENTAL TECHNOLOGIES, LLC closed matched at sponsor-group level (Environmental Technologies)
District Court, S.D. Indiana · No. 1:06-cr-00139 · Filed Sep 12, 2006 · Closed Nov 15, 2007
Role of United States v. WABASH ENVIRONMENTAL TECHNOLOGIES, LLC: Party · Outcome: Terminated 2007-11-15 (disposition not included in the bulk docket feed — see docket) Docket on CourtListener ↗
company name words appear in the caption; court in IN (not the issuer's state); criminal docket
AMERICANANGLIAN ENVIRONMENTAL TECHNOLOGIES, L.P. v. DOHERTY dismissed matched at sponsor-group level (Environmental Technologies)
District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · No. 2:06-cv-03362 · Filed Jul 31, 2006 · Closed Nov 14, 2006 · Nature of suit: 150 Overpayments & enforcement of judgments
Role of AMERICANANGLIAN ENVIRONMENTAL TECHNOLOGIES, L.P. v. DOHERTY: Party · Outcome: Terminated 2006-11-14 — FJC Integrated Database disposition: Dismissed: settled Docket on CourtListener ↗
company name words appear in the caption; court in PA (not the issuer's state)
Tonkawa Foundry Inc v. GMD Environmental Technologies Inc dismissed matched at sponsor-group level (Environmental Technologies)
District Court, W.D. Oklahoma · No. 5:06-cv-00600 · Filed Jun 2, 2006 · Closed Dec 14, 2007 · Nature of suit: 370 Other fraud
Role of Tonkawa Foundry Inc v. GMD Environmental Technologies Inc: Party · Outcome: Terminated 2007-12-14 — FJC Integrated Database disposition: Dismissed: settled Docket on CourtListener ↗
company name words appear in the caption; court in OK (not the issuer's state)
Romic Environmental Technologies, Inc. v. Presvac Systems (Burlington), Ltd. dismissed matched at sponsor-group level (Environmental Technologies)
District Court, D. Arizona · No. 2:06-cv-01355 · Filed May 19, 2006 · Closed Aug 28, 2007 · Nature of suit: Contract: Other · Cause: 28:1332 Diversity-Other Contract
Role of Romic Environmental Technologies, Inc. v. Presvac Systems (Burlington), Ltd.: Party · Outcome: Terminated 2007-08-28 — FJC Integrated Database disposition: Voluntarily dismissed Docket on CourtListener ↗
company name words appear in the caption; court in AZ (not the issuer's state)
Norman S. Wright Mechanical Equipment Corporation v. Potomac Environmental Technologies dismissed matched at sponsor-group level (Environmental Technologies)
District Court, N.D. California · No. 3:06-cv-02065 · Filed Mar 22, 2006 · Closed Jun 8, 2006 · Nature of suit: Contract: Other · Cause: 28:1332 Diversity-Other Contract
Role of Norman S. Wright Mechanical Equipment Corporation v. Potomac Environmental Technologies: Party · Outcome: Terminated 2006-06-08 — FJC Integrated Database disposition: Dismissed: settled Docket on CourtListener ↗
company name words appear in the caption; court in CA (not the issuer's state)
RHOADS INDUSTRIES, INC. v. INTEGRATED ENVIRONMENTAL TECHNOLOGIES, LLC dismissed matched at sponsor-group level (Environmental Technologies)
District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · No. 2:06-cv-00831 · Filed Feb 24, 2006 · Closed Jul 10, 2006 · Nature of suit: 190 Other contract actions
Role of RHOADS INDUSTRIES, INC. v. INTEGRATED ENVIRONMENTAL TECHNOLOGIES, LLC: Party · Outcome: Terminated 2006-07-10 — FJC Integrated Database disposition: Dismissed: settled Docket on CourtListener ↗
company name words appear in the caption; court in PA (not the issuer's state)
Ellsworth Corporation v. K-F Environmental Technologies, Inc. judgment matched at sponsor-group level (Environmental Technologies)
District Court, D. Maryland · No. 1:06-cv-00118 · Filed Jan 17, 2006 · Closed Feb 2, 2009 · Nature of suit: Contract: Other · Cause: 28:1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Role of Ellsworth Corporation v. K-F Environmental Technologies, Inc.: Party · Outcome: Terminated 2009-02-02 — FJC Integrated Database disposition: Judgment on default; judgment for plaintiff Docket on CourtListener ↗
company name words appear in the caption; court in MD (not the issuer's state)
Dunn v. Eagle Environmental Technologies LTD. open matched at sponsor-group level (Environmental Technologies)
District Court, E.D. Texas · No. 6:05-mc-00022 · Filed Sep 2, 2005
Role of Dunn v. Eagle Environmental Technologies LTD.: Party · Outcome: Open — no termination date on the docket (bulk snapshot 2026-09-30) Docket on CourtListener ↗
company name words appear in the caption; court in TX (not the issuer's state)
Asia Pacific Environmental Technology Inc v. Integrated Environmental Technologies LLC judgment matched at sponsor-group level (Environmental Technologies)
District Court, E.D. Washington · No. 2:05-cv-05077 · Filed Jul 11, 2005 · Closed Jul 2, 2007 · Nature of suit: Contract: Other · Cause: 28:1332oc Diversity-Other Contract
Role of Asia Pacific Environmental Technology Inc v. Integrated Environmental Technologies LLC: Party · Outcome: Terminated 2007-07-02 — FJC Integrated Database disposition: Judgment on motion before trial; judgment for defendant Docket on CourtListener ↗
company name words appear in the caption; court in WA (not the issuer's state)
Asia Pacific Environmental Technology Inc v. Integrated Environmental Technologies LLC closed matched at sponsor-group level (Environmental Technologies)
District Court, E.D. Washington · No. 2:05-cv-00204 · Filed Jul 11, 2005 · Closed Jul 15, 2005 · Nature of suit: 190 Other contract actions
Role of Asia Pacific Environmental Technology Inc v. Integrated Environmental Technologies LLC: Party · Outcome: Terminated 2005-07-15 — FJC Integrated Database disposition: Statistical closing Docket on CourtListener ↗
company name words appear in the caption; court in WA (not the issuer's state)
Ellsworth Corporation v. K-F Environmental Technologies, Inc. dismissed matched at sponsor-group level (Environmental Technologies)
District Court, E.D. Louisiana · No. 2:05-cv-02240 · Filed Jun 14, 2005 · Closed Feb 13, 2006 · Nature of suit: 140 Negotiable instruments
Role of Ellsworth Corporation v. K-F Environmental Technologies, Inc.: Party · Outcome: Terminated 2006-02-13 — FJC Integrated Database disposition: Voluntarily dismissed Docket on CourtListener ↗
company name words appear in the caption; court in LA (not the issuer's state)
Brady v. Southern Minnesota Environmental Technologies Corp. judgment matched at sponsor-group level (Environmental Technologies)
District Court, D. Minnesota · No. 0:05-cv-00845 · Filed Apr 28, 2005 · Closed Nov 4, 2005 · Nature of suit: 791 Employee Retirement Income Security Act
Role of Brady v. Southern Minnesota Environmental Technologies Corp.: Party · Outcome: Terminated 2005-11-04 — FJC Integrated Database disposition: Judgment on default Docket on CourtListener ↗
company name words appear in the caption; court in MN (not the issuer's state)
Wooldridge v. Eagle Environmental Technologies Ltd closed matched at sponsor-group level (Environmental Technologies)
District Court, N.D. Oklahoma · No. 4:05-cv-00207 · Filed Apr 15, 2005 · Closed Jul 24, 2007 · Nature of suit: 850 Securities, Commodities, Exchange
Role of Wooldridge v. Eagle Environmental Technologies Ltd: Party · Outcome: Terminated 2007-07-24 — FJC Integrated Database disposition: Statistical closing Docket on CourtListener ↗
company name words appear in the caption; court in OK (not the issuer's state)
Jackson Walker LLP v. Wetland Environmental Technologies LLC dismissed matched at sponsor-group level (Environmental Technologies)
District Court, N.D. Texas · No. 3:05-cv-00671 · Filed Apr 6, 2005 · Closed Mar 29, 2006 · Nature of suit: Contract: Other Contract · Cause: 28:1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Role of Jackson Walker LLP v. Wetland Environmental Technologies LLC: Party · Outcome: Terminated 2006-03-29 — FJC Integrated Database disposition: Dismissed: other Docket on CourtListener ↗
company name words appear in the caption; court in TX (not the issuer's state)
Integrated Environmental Technologies LLC v. Asia Pacific Environmental Technology Inc dismissed matched at sponsor-group level (Environmental Technologies)
District Court, E.D. Washington · No. 2:04-cv-05138 · Filed Dec 23, 2004 · Closed Jul 22, 2005 · Nature of suit: 190 Other contract actions
Role of Integrated Environmental Technologies LLC v. Asia Pacific Environmental Technology Inc: Party · Outcome: Terminated 2005-07-22 — FJC Integrated Database disposition: Dismissed: other Docket on CourtListener ↗
company name words appear in the caption; court in WA (not the issuer's state)
JONES v. WABASH ENVIRONMENTAL TECHNOLOGIES, LLC dismissed matched at sponsor-group level (Environmental Technologies)
District Court, S.D. Indiana · No. 2:04-cv-00314 · Filed Dec 6, 2004 · Closed Mar 21, 2005 · Nature of suit: 190 Other contract actions
Role of JONES v. WABASH ENVIRONMENTAL TECHNOLOGIES, LLC: Party · Outcome: Terminated 2005-03-21 — FJC Integrated Database disposition: Dismissed: other Docket on CourtListener ↗
company name words appear in the caption; court in IN (not the issuer's state)
Fletcher Farr & Ayotte, PC, Architecture Planning v. Colloid Environmental Technologies Company dismissed matched at sponsor-group level (Environmental Technologies)
District Court, D. Oregon · No. 3:03-cv-01629 · Filed Nov 25, 2003 · Closed Jan 17, 2006 · Nature of suit: 791 Employee Retirement Income Security Act
Role of Fletcher Farr & Ayotte, PC, Architecture Planning v. Colloid Environmental Technologies Company: Party · Outcome: Terminated 2006-01-17 — FJC Integrated Database disposition: Dismissed: settled Docket on CourtListener ↗
company name words appear in the caption; court in OR (not the issuer's state)
EASTERN WATERPROOFING AND RESTORATION CO., INC. v. COLLOID ENVIRONMENTAL TECHNOLOGIES COMPANY dismissed matched at sponsor-group level (Environmental Technologies)
District Court, District of Columbia · No. 1:02-cv-02196 · Filed Nov 7, 2002 · Closed May 27, 2003 · Nature of suit: 190 Other contract actions
Role of EASTERN WATERPROOFING AND RESTORATION CO., INC. v. COLLOID ENVIRONMENTAL TECHNOLOGIES COMPANY: Party · Outcome: Terminated 2003-05-27 — FJC Integrated Database disposition: Dismissed: settled Docket on CourtListener ↗
company name words appear in the caption; court in DC (not the issuer's state)
CARL A. DUNN v. EAGLE ENVIRONMENTAL TECHNOLOGIES, LTD. dismissed matched at sponsor-group level (Environmental Technologies)
District Court, D. Nevada · No. 3:02-cv-00565 · Filed Oct 24, 2002 · Closed Oct 31, 2002 · Nature of suit: 890 Other statutory actions
Role of CARL A. DUNN v. EAGLE ENVIRONMENTAL TECHNOLOGIES, LTD.: Party · Outcome: Terminated 2002-10-31 — FJC Integrated Database disposition: Dismissed: other Docket on CourtListener ↗
company name words appear in the caption; court in NV (not the issuer's state)
Carl A. Dunn V Eagle Environmental Technologies, Ltd.[Case converted to CV-N-02-0565-DWH(RAM)] closed matched at sponsor-group level (Environmental Technologies)
District Court, D. Nevada · No. 3:02-ms-00021 · Filed Sep 25, 2002 · Closed Sep 25, 2002
Role of Carl A. Dunn V Eagle Environmental Technologies, Ltd.[Case converted to CV-N-02-0565-DWH(RAM)]: Party · Outcome: Terminated 2002-09-25 (disposition not included in the bulk docket feed — see docket) Docket on CourtListener ↗
company name words appear in the caption; court in NV (not the issuer's state)
ENVIRONMENTAL TECHNOLOGIES v. NEIL ZANIBONI dismissed
District Court, D. Nevada · No. 2:99-cv-00444 · Filed Apr 14, 1999 · Closed Feb 4, 2003 · Nature of suit: 190 Other contract actions
Role of ENVIRONMENTAL TECHNOLOGIES v. NEIL ZANIBONI: Party · Outcome: Terminated 2003-02-04 — FJC Integrated Database disposition: Dismissed: settled Docket on CourtListener ↗
company name words appear in the caption; court in NV (not the issuer's state)
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. ENVIRONMENTAL TECHNOLOGIES OF dismissed
District Court, D. Nevada · No. · Filed Dec 10, 1998 · Closed Dec 16, 1998 · Nature of suit: 893 Environmental matters
Role of UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. ENVIRONMENTAL TECHNOLOGIES OF: Party · Outcome: Terminated 1998-12-16 — FJC Integrated Database disposition: Dismissed: settled Docket on CourtListener ↗
company name words appear in the caption; court in NV (not the issuer's state)
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA EX REL v. SMITH ENVIRONMENTAL TECHNOLOGIES dismissed matched at sponsor-group level (Environmental Technologies)
District Court, S.D. Indiana · No. 1:97-cv-01309 · Filed Aug 11, 1997 · Closed Mar 9, 1998 · Nature of suit: 130 Miller act
Role of UNITED STATES OF AMERICA EX REL v. SMITH ENVIRONMENTAL TECHNOLOGIES: Party · Outcome: Terminated 1998-03-09 — FJC Integrated Database disposition: Voluntarily dismissed Docket on CourtListener ↗
company name words appear in the caption; court in IN (not the issuer's state)
ENVIRONMENTAL TECHNOLOGIES v. INTRACON, ET ALENT, INC. dismissed
District Court, D. Nevada · No. · Filed Jun 21, 1994 · Closed Jun 3, 1996 · Nature of suit: 190 Other contract actions
Role of ENVIRONMENTAL TECHNOLOGIES v. INTRACON, ET ALENT, INC.: Party · Outcome: Terminated 1996-06-03 — FJC Integrated Database disposition: Dismissed: settled Docket on CourtListener ↗
company name words appear in the caption; court in NV (not the issuer's state)
GEORGE E BOOTH CO INC v. ENVIRONMENTAL TECHNOLOGIES CORP dismissed
District Court, S.D. Indiana · No. 1:92-cv-01584 · Filed Nov 12, 1992 · Closed Jan 27, 1994 · Nature of suit: 190 Other contract actions
Role of GEORGE E BOOTH CO INC v. ENVIRONMENTAL TECHNOLOGIES CORP: Party · Outcome: Terminated 1994-01-27 — FJC Integrated Database disposition: Dismissed: settled Docket on CourtListener ↗
company name words appear in the caption; court in IN (not the issuer's state)
ACCREDITED ENVIRONMENTAL TECHNOLOGIES, INC. v. J.S. BRADDOCK AGENCY open matched at sponsor-group level (Environmental Technologies)
District Court, D. New Jersey · No. 1:18-cv-01511 · Filed —
Role of ACCREDITED ENVIRONMENTAL TECHNOLOGIES, INC. v. J.S. BRADDOCK AGENCY: Party · Outcome: Open — no termination date on the docket (bulk snapshot 2026-09-30) Docket on CourtListener ↗
company name words appear in the caption; court in NJ (not the issuer's state)
What was searched

Sources searched: CourtListener bulk data (RECAP dockets as of 2026-09-30; recall-first rule 10-24) — federal district + bankruptcy courts State courts: not covered (one-tap state court links under Look further). PACER: not searched. · Last checked Oct 24, 2026, 2:16 AM ET.

Court records show docket facts only; we never restate allegations as facts. Outcome wording comes from the docket feed; where it does not state a disposition we say so.

State courts: not covered (one-tap state court links under Look further). No state offers a lawful automated statewide source PartnerFacts can use today. Texas (re:SearchTX) terms prohibit storing results in a database open to third parties; New York (WebCivil) and Massachusetts (MassCourts) require a browser check that blocks scripted queries; California has no statewide index (58 county portals; Rule of Court 2.503 grants name-based access case by case); Florida, Utah and Illinois offer paid or partial access whose terms for automated use are unverified. Washington (dw.courts.wa.gov; bulk index reports under a JISC data-dissemination agreement), Delaware (CourtConnect; Court of Chancery not included) and Arizona (apps.azcourts.gov/publicaccess, which has an official channel to request high-volume access) are the candidates; PartnerFacts will request written permission before any automated search. Federal courts are searched through CourtListener / RECAP.

2. Regulatory actions

None found in sources searched — SEC enforcement releases (index scan as of Oct 24, 2026, 2:50 AM ET) · state securities regulators: AZ, CA, DE, TX, WA (crawled Oct 23, 2026)

What was searched

SEC enforcement searched: SEC litigation releases and administrative proceedings — respondent names in the sec.gov index titles (30,205 releases, 1995-09-19 to 2026-10-23); release text is read only to confirm a candidate. Names that appear only in the body of a release are not found. — Searched SEC litigation releases and administrative proceedings (1995→ / 2007→) (30,205 records as of Oct 24, 2026, 2:50 AM ET) — nothing matched Environmental Technologies..

State securities regulators searched: AZ (Corporation Commission Securities Division), CA (DFPI — 16 of 12,159 DFPI respondent pages read so far; sponsor-name matches are read first), DE (DOJ Investor Protection Unit), TX (State Securities Board), WA (DFI) — last crawled Oct 23, 2026, 9:57 PM ET. Other states are not covered.

3. Bankruptcies

40 cases: 40 closed (disposition not in docket feed)

Pacific Environmental Technologies, Inc. closed matched at sponsor-group level (Environmental Technologies)
United States Bankruptcy Court, C.D. California · No. 2:21-bk-16058 · Filed Jul 28, 2021 · Closed Aug 2, 2022
Role of Pacific Environmental Technologies, Inc.: Party · Outcome: Case closed 2022-08-02 (disposition not included in the bulk docket feed — see docket) Docket on CourtListener ↗
company name words appear in the caption; court in CA (not the issuer's state)
Verde Environmental Technologies, Inc. d/b/a Verde v. C2R Global Manufacturing, Inc. closed matched at sponsor-group level (Environmental Technologies)
United States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. Wisconsin · No. 20-02028 · Filed Feb 17, 2020 · Closed Aug 30, 2021
Role of Verde Environmental Technologies, Inc. d/b/a Verde v. C2R Global Manufacturing, Inc.: Party · Outcome: Case closed 2021-08-30 (disposition not included in the bulk docket feed — see docket) Docket on CourtListener ↗
company name words appear in the caption; court in WI (not the issuer's state)
Environmental Technologies, Inc. closed matched at sponsor-group level (Environmental Technologies)
United States Bankruptcy Court, M.D. Georgia · No. 18-50220 · Filed Feb 5, 2018 · Closed May 6, 2019
Role of Environmental Technologies, Inc.: Debtor · Outcome: Case closed 2019-05-06 (disposition not included in the bulk docket feed — see docket) Docket on CourtListener ↗
exact company name; court in GA (not the issuer's state)
SULLIVAN TRUSTEE v. Specialized Environmental Technologies, Inc. d/b/a closed matched at sponsor-group level (Environmental Technologies)
United States Bankruptcy Court, D. Minnesota · No. 17-03145 · Filed Dec 28, 2017 · Closed Aug 31, 2018
Role of SULLIVAN TRUSTEE v. Specialized Environmental Technologies, Inc. d/b/a: Party · Outcome: Case closed 2018-08-31 (disposition not included in the bulk docket feed — see docket) Docket on CourtListener ↗
company name words appear in the caption; court in MN (not the issuer's state)
Environmental Technologies LLC closed matched at sponsor-group level (Environmental Technologies)
United States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. New York · No. 17-13045 · Filed Oct 30, 2017 · Closed Apr 26, 2018
Role of Environmental Technologies LLC: Debtor · Outcome: Case closed 2018-04-26 (disposition not included in the bulk docket feed — see docket) Docket on CourtListener ↗
exact company name; court in NY (not the issuer's state)
Environmental Technologies International, Inc. - Adversary Proceeding closed
United States Bankruptcy Court, M.D. Florida · No. 8:15-ap-00875 · Filed Sep 24, 2015 · Closed Mar 29, 2016 · Nature of suit: 02 Other (e.g. other actions that would have been brought in state court if unrelated to bankruptcy)
Role of Environmental Technologies International, Inc. - Adversary Proceeding: Party · Outcome: Case closed 2016-03-29 (disposition not included in the bulk docket feed — see docket) Docket on CourtListener ↗
company name words appear in the caption; court in FL (not the issuer's state)
Environmental Technologies International, Inc. - Adversary Proceeding closed
United States Bankruptcy Court, M.D. Florida · No. 8:15-ap-00786 · Filed Sep 2, 2015 · Closed Jul 6, 2017 · Nature of suit: 01 Determination of removed claim or cause
Role of Environmental Technologies International, Inc. - Adversary Proceeding: Party · Outcome: Case closed 2017-07-06 (disposition not included in the bulk docket feed — see docket) Docket on CourtListener ↗
company name words appear in the caption; court in FL (not the issuer's state)
Environmental Technologies International, Inc. closed
United States Bankruptcy Court, M.D. Florida · No. 8:15-bk-06910 · Filed Jul 1, 2015 · Closed Feb 12, 2018
Role of Environmental Technologies International, Inc.: Party · Outcome: Case closed 2018-02-12 (disposition not included in the bulk docket feed — see docket) Docket on CourtListener ↗
company name words appear in the caption; court in FL (not the issuer's state)
Total Environmental Technologies Solutions, LLC closed matched at sponsor-group level (Environmental Technologies)
United States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. Texas · No. 14-33952 · Filed Jul 17, 2014 · Closed Oct 20, 2014
Role of Total Environmental Technologies Solutions, LLC: Party · Outcome: Case closed 2014-10-20 (disposition not included in the bulk docket feed — see docket) Docket on CourtListener ↗
company name words appear in the caption; court in TX (not the issuer's state)
RESTAURANT ENVIRONMENTAL TECHNOLOGIES INC closed matched at sponsor-group level (Environmental Technologies)
United States Bankruptcy Court, D. Puerto Rico · No. 13-02413 · Filed Mar 28, 2013 · Closed Apr 1, 2014
Role of RESTAURANT ENVIRONMENTAL TECHNOLOGIES INC: Party · Outcome: Case closed 2014-04-01 (disposition not included in the bulk docket feed — see docket) Docket on CourtListener ↗
company name words appear in the caption; court in PR (not the issuer's state)
Atlantic Environmental Technologies, Inc. closed matched at sponsor-group level (Environmental Technologies)
United States Bankruptcy Court, D. Massachusetts · No. 12-19840 · Filed Dec 20, 2012 · Closed Dec 31, 2015
Role of Atlantic Environmental Technologies, Inc.: Party · Outcome: Case closed 2015-12-31 (disposition not included in the bulk docket feed — see docket) Docket on CourtListener ↗
company name words appear in the caption; court in MA (not the issuer's state)
Miller v. OMEGA Environmental Technologies closed matched at sponsor-group level (Environmental Technologies)
United States Bankruptcy Court, D. Delaware · No. 11-52670 · Filed Jul 19, 2011 · Closed Sep 25, 2012
Role of Miller v. OMEGA Environmental Technologies: Party · Outcome: Case closed 2012-09-25 (disposition not included in the bulk docket feed — see docket) Docket on CourtListener ↗
company name words appear in the caption; court in DE (not the issuer's state)
Potomac Environmental Technologies, Inc. v. Pierce Associates, Inc. closed matched at sponsor-group level (Environmental Technologies)
United States Bankruptcy Court, D. Maryland · No. 10-00817 · Filed Oct 25, 2010 · Closed Mar 14, 2011
Role of Potomac Environmental Technologies, Inc. v. Pierce Associates, Inc.: Party · Outcome: Case closed 2011-03-14 (disposition not included in the bulk docket feed — see docket) Docket on CourtListener ↗
company name words appear in the caption; court in MD (not the issuer's state)
Potomac Environmental Technologies, Inc. and Wais Jalali closed matched at sponsor-group level (Environmental Technologies)
United States Bankruptcy Court, D. Maryland · No. 10-33825 · Filed Oct 18, 2010 · Closed May 8, 2015
Role of Potomac Environmental Technologies, Inc. and Wais Jalali: Party · Outcome: Case closed 2015-05-08 (disposition not included in the bulk docket feed — see docket) Docket on CourtListener ↗
company name words appear in the caption; court in MD (not the issuer's state)
Sansai Environmental Technologies, LLC closed matched at sponsor-group level (Environmental Technologies)
United States Bankruptcy Court, N.D. Ohio · No. 10-12360 · Filed Mar 22, 2010 · Closed Aug 11, 2010
Role of Sansai Environmental Technologies, LLC: Party · Outcome: Case closed 2010-08-11 (disposition not included in the bulk docket feed — see docket) Docket on CourtListener ↗
company name words appear in the caption; court in OH (not the issuer's state)
Consolidated Environmental Technologies, Inc. closed matched at sponsor-group level (Environmental Technologies)
United States Bankruptcy Court, W.D. Texas · No. 06-60732 · Filed Sep 20, 2006 · Closed Mar 6, 2007
Role of Consolidated Environmental Technologies, Inc.: Party · Outcome: Case closed 2007-03-06 (disposition not included in the bulk docket feed — see docket) Docket on CourtListener ↗
company name words appear in the caption; court in TX (not the issuer's state)
Spectrum Environmental Technologies, Inc. closed matched at sponsor-group level (Environmental Technologies)
United States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. California · No. 06-23633 · Filed Sep 14, 2006 · Closed Feb 27, 2007
Role of Spectrum Environmental Technologies, Inc.: Party · Outcome: Case closed 2007-02-27 (disposition not included in the bulk docket feed — see docket) Docket on CourtListener ↗
company name words appear in the caption; court in CA (not the issuer's state)
Boyd v. ASI Environmental Technologies closed matched at sponsor-group level (Environmental Technologies)
United States Bankruptcy Court, W.D. Michigan · No. 04-88219 · Filed Feb 12, 2004 · Closed Aug 24, 2004
Role of Boyd v. ASI Environmental Technologies: Party · Outcome: Case closed 2004-08-24 (disposition not included in the bulk docket feed — see docket) Docket on CourtListener ↗
company name words appear in the caption; court in MI (not the issuer's state)
Bethlehem Steel Corporation v. K-F Environmental Technologies, Inc. closed matched at sponsor-group level (Environmental Technologies)
United States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. New York · No. 03-09511 · Filed Sep 29, 2003 · Closed Jan 5, 2009
Role of Bethlehem Steel Corporation v. K-F Environmental Technologies, Inc.: Party · Outcome: Case closed 2009-01-05 (disposition not included in the bulk docket feed — see docket) Docket on CourtListener ↗
company name words appear in the caption; court in NY (not the issuer's state)
Great Western Chemical Company v. Romic Environmental Technologies closed matched at sponsor-group level (Environmental Technologies)
United States Bankruptcy Court, D. Oregon · No. 02-03573 · Filed Dec 10, 2002 · Closed Mar 6, 2003
Role of Great Western Chemical Company v. Romic Environmental Technologies: Party · Outcome: Case closed 2003-03-06 (disposition not included in the bulk docket feed — see docket) Docket on CourtListener ↗
company name words appear in the caption; court in OR (not the issuer's state)
Westwood Trust v. Wetland Environmental Technologies, LLC closed matched at sponsor-group level (Environmental Technologies)
United States Bankruptcy Court, N.D. Texas · No. 02-04020 · Filed Feb 5, 2002 · Closed Sep 10, 2002
Role of Westwood Trust v. Wetland Environmental Technologies, LLC: Party · Outcome: Case closed 2002-09-10 (disposition not included in the bulk docket feed — see docket) Docket on CourtListener ↗
company name words appear in the caption; court in TX (not the issuer's state)
Environmental Technologies Group, Inc. closed
United States Bankruptcy Court, W.D. Michigan · No. 02-01058 · Filed Jan 30, 2002 · Closed Mar 16, 2006
Role of Environmental Technologies Group, Inc.: Party · Outcome: Case closed 2006-03-16 (disposition not included in the bulk docket feed — see docket) Docket on CourtListener ↗
company name words appear in the caption; court in MI (not the issuer's state)
Costich v. American Environmental Technologies, Inc. closed matched at sponsor-group level (Environmental Technologies)
United States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. New York · No. 01-05316 · Filed Jun 26, 2001 · Closed Dec 19, 2001
Role of Costich v. American Environmental Technologies, Inc.: Party · Outcome: Case closed 2001-12-19 (disposition not included in the bulk docket feed — see docket) Docket on CourtListener ↗
company name words appear in the caption; court in NY (not the issuer's state)
UltraFab, Inc. v. Modular Environmental Technologies, Inc. closed matched at sponsor-group level (Environmental Technologies)
United States Bankruptcy Court, W.D. Texas · No. 01-06056 · Filed May 3, 2001 · Closed Dec 21, 2001
Role of UltraFab, Inc. v. Modular Environmental Technologies, Inc.: Party · Outcome: Case closed 2001-12-21 (disposition not included in the bulk docket feed — see docket) Docket on CourtListener ↗
company name words appear in the caption; court in TX (not the issuer's state)
Electro Environmental Technologies closed matched at sponsor-group level (Environmental Technologies)
United States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. New York · No. 8-01-82892 · Filed Apr 12, 2001 · Closed Apr 11, 2003
Role of Electro Environmental Technologies: Party · Outcome: Case closed 2003-04-11 (disposition not included in the bulk docket feed — see docket) Docket on CourtListener ↗
company name words appear in the caption; court in NY (not the issuer's state)
JOY ENVIRONMENTAL TECHNOLOGIES, INC. closed matched at sponsor-group level (Environmental Technologies)
United States Bankruptcy Court, D. Delaware · No. 99-02527 · Filed Jun 28, 1999 · Closed Nov 13, 2001
Role of JOY ENVIRONMENTAL TECHNOLOGIES, INC.: Party · Outcome: Case closed 2001-11-13 (disposition not included in the bulk docket feed — see docket) Docket on CourtListener ↗
company name words appear in the caption; court in DE (not the issuer's state)
Mitchell v. Matrix Environmental Technologies, Inc. closed matched at sponsor-group level (Environmental Technologies)
United States Bankruptcy Court, W.D. North Carolina · No. 99-03056 · Filed Apr 20, 1999 · Closed Jun 21, 2000
Role of Mitchell v. Matrix Environmental Technologies, Inc.: Party · Outcome: Case closed 2000-06-21 (disposition not included in the bulk docket feed — see docket) Docket on CourtListener ↗
company name words appear in the caption; court in NC (not the issuer's state)
Associated Environmental Technologies closed matched at sponsor-group level (Environmental Technologies)
United States Bankruptcy Court, D. Maryland · No. 98-65770 · Filed Nov 6, 1998 · Closed Oct 16, 2003
Role of Associated Environmental Technologies: Party · Outcome: Case closed 2003-10-16 (disposition not included in the bulk docket feed — see docket) Docket on CourtListener ↗
company name words appear in the caption; court in MD (not the issuer's state)
Selective Environmental Technologies,Inc v. Morgan Franklin Funds, Inc. closed matched at sponsor-group level (Environmental Technologies)
United States Bankruptcy Court, N.D. Georgia · No. 98-06122 · Filed Mar 2, 1998 · Closed Dec 31, 1998
Role of Selective Environmental Technologies,Inc v. Morgan Franklin Funds, Inc.: Party · Outcome: Case closed 1998-12-31 (disposition not included in the bulk docket feed — see docket) Docket on CourtListener ↗
company name words appear in the caption; court in GA (not the issuer's state)
Matrix Environmental Technologies Southeast, Inc. closed matched at sponsor-group level (Environmental Technologies)
United States Bankruptcy Court, W.D. North Carolina · No. 97-31048 · Filed Apr 25, 1997 · Closed Oct 15, 2001
Role of Matrix Environmental Technologies Southeast, Inc.: Party · Outcome: Case closed 2001-10-15 (disposition not included in the bulk docket feed — see docket) Docket on CourtListener ↗
company name words appear in the caption; court in NC (not the issuer's state)
Modular Environmental Technologies, Inc. closed matched at sponsor-group level (Environmental Technologies)
United States Bankruptcy Court, N.D. Georgia · No. 95-67171 · Filed May 25, 1995 · Closed Mar 6, 1996
Role of Modular Environmental Technologies, Inc.: Party · Outcome: Case closed 1996-03-06 (disposition not included in the bulk docket feed — see docket) Docket on CourtListener ↗
company name words appear in the caption; court in GA (not the issuer's state)
Replicant Environmental Technologies closed matched at sponsor-group level (Environmental Technologies)
United States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. Illinois · No. 94-31218 · Filed Nov 10, 1994 · Closed Jan 23, 1995
Role of Replicant Environmental Technologies: Party · Outcome: Case closed 1995-01-23 (disposition not included in the bulk docket feed — see docket) Docket on CourtListener ↗
company name words appear in the caption; court in IL (not the issuer's state)
McCormick v. World-Wide Environmental Technologies closed matched at sponsor-group level (Environmental Technologies)
United States Bankruptcy Court, N.D. California · No. 94-03352 · Filed Aug 8, 1994 · Closed Jan 11, 2000
Role of McCormick v. World-Wide Environmental Technologies: Party · Outcome: Case closed 2000-01-11 (disposition not included in the bulk docket feed — see docket) Docket on CourtListener ↗
company name words appear in the caption; court in CA (not the issuer's state)
World-Wide Environmental Technologies v. Kadin closed matched at sponsor-group level (Environmental Technologies)
United States Bankruptcy Court, N.D. California · No. 94-03316 · Filed Jul 6, 1994 · Closed Feb 13, 1997
Role of World-Wide Environmental Technologies v. Kadin: Party · Outcome: Case closed 1997-02-13 (disposition not included in the bulk docket feed — see docket) Docket on CourtListener ↗
company name words appear in the caption; court in CA (not the issuer's state)
World-Wide Environmental Technologies closed matched at sponsor-group level (Environmental Technologies)
United States Bankruptcy Court, N.D. California · No. 94-31913 · Filed May 10, 1994 · Closed Aug 18, 1997
Role of World-Wide Environmental Technologies: Party · Outcome: Case closed 1997-08-18 (disposition not included in the bulk docket feed — see docket) Docket on CourtListener ↗
company name words appear in the caption; court in CA (not the issuer's state)
World-Wide Environmental Technologies v. Reichert closed matched at sponsor-group level (Environmental Technologies)
United States Bankruptcy Court, N.D. California · No. 94-03275 · Filed Feb 25, 1994 · Closed Feb 19, 1997
Role of World-Wide Environmental Technologies v. Reichert: Party · Outcome: Case closed 1997-02-19 (disposition not included in the bulk docket feed — see docket) Docket on CourtListener ↗
company name words appear in the caption; court in CA (not the issuer's state)
John T. Carroll, III, Trustee v. Danella Environmental Technologies, Inc. closed matched at sponsor-group level (Environmental Technologies)
United States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · No. 92-02265 · Filed Jun 26, 1992 · Closed Dec 14, 1992
Role of John T. Carroll, III, Trustee v. Danella Environmental Technologies, Inc.: Party · Outcome: Case closed 1992-12-14 (disposition not included in the bulk docket feed — see docket) Docket on CourtListener ↗
company name words appear in the caption; court in PA (not the issuer's state)
International Environmental Technologies closed matched at sponsor-group level (Environmental Technologies)
United States Bankruptcy Court, M.D. Florida · No. 8:92-bk-06792 · Filed May 18, 1992 · Closed Sep 21, 1993
Role of International Environmental Technologies: Party · Outcome: Case closed 1993-09-21 (disposition not included in the bulk docket feed — see docket) Docket on CourtListener ↗
company name words appear in the caption; court in FL (not the issuer's state)
Whitaker v. Joy Environmental Technologies Inc. closed matched at sponsor-group level (Environmental Technologies)
United States Bankruptcy Court, M.D. Florida · No. 3:92-ap-03111 · Filed May 18, 1992 · Closed Sep 18, 1997
Role of Whitaker v. Joy Environmental Technologies Inc.: Party · Outcome: Case closed 1997-09-18 (disposition not included in the bulk docket feed — see docket) Docket on CourtListener ↗
company name words appear in the caption; court in FL (not the issuer's state)
Whitaker v. Environmental Technologies Inc. closed
United States Bankruptcy Court, M.D. Florida · No. 3:91-ap-00800 · Filed Jul 11, 1991 · Closed Sep 22, 1993
Role of Whitaker v. Environmental Technologies Inc.: Party · Outcome: Case closed 1993-09-22 (disposition not included in the bulk docket feed — see docket) Docket on CourtListener ↗
company name words appear in the caption; court in FL (not the issuer's state)
What was searched

Sources searched: Federal bankruptcy courts via CourtListener / RECAP archive (federal district courts, federal bankruptcy courts). State courts: not covered (one-tap state court links under Look further). PACER: not searched (RECAP only). · Last checked Oct 24, 2026, 2:16 AM ET.

Court records show docket facts only; we never restate allegations as facts. Outcome wording comes from the docket feed; where it does not state a disposition we say so.

State courts: not covered (one-tap state court links under Look further). No state offers a lawful automated statewide source PartnerFacts can use today. Texas (re:SearchTX) terms prohibit storing results in a database open to third parties; New York (WebCivil) and Massachusetts (MassCourts) require a browser check that blocks scripted queries; California has no statewide index (58 county portals; Rule of Court 2.503 grants name-based access case by case); Florida, Utah and Illinois offer paid or partial access whose terms for automated use are unverified. Washington (dw.courts.wa.gov; bulk index reports under a JISC data-dissemination agreement), Delaware (CourtConnect; Court of Chancery not included) and Arizona (apps.azcourts.gov/publicaccess, which has an official channel to request high-volume access) are the candidates; PartnerFacts will request written permission before any automated search. Federal courts are searched through CourtListener / RECAP.

4. Differences between public sources

No comparisons published

What is compared

No public statement by this sponsor group has been collected yet, so there is nothing to compare. Sources compared: the sponsor's own website (known from the issuer's own filings — Form C issuer website, EDGAR company profile — an approved profile claim or Form ADV Item 1.I of its matched adviser) · SEC Form D · SEC Form ADV (IAPD) · Internet Archive · No website is on file for this sponsor group yet.

1 difference found between the filings for Environmental Technologies (compared 2 filings on Oct 24, 2026)

Note · Jun 6, 2022 – Jun 21, 2022

No amendment in the last 12 months on an offering that may still be open — Environmental Technologies Fund 4 L.P. (latest filing Jun 21, 2022)

The latest filing for this offering is dated Jun 21, 2022 (first sale Jun 6, 2022). It reports $113,003,608 sold of an indefinite amount offered. No later amendment is in our index as of Oct 24, 2026.

What this means SEC rules expect a yearly amendment while an offering is still going. The raise may simply have ended — a Form D does not say when it closed. Ask the sponsor whether the offering closed, when, and at what amount.

Sources
What is compared

What is compared: every Form D and D/A we hold for this subject, side by side — filing dates vs. first-sale dates (the 15-day rule), amendment timing on open offerings (the yearly-amendment expectation), amounts sold, investor counts, offering amounts and minimums across amendments, industry and size bands, addresses, how each person's name and role is written, paid sellers' CRD numbers, and (for groups) where the member companies were formed and sit. Everything is as filed by the issuer; the SEC does not check it. Differences are common and usually have ordinary explanations — we show both values, the dates, and the source so you can ask. As of Oct 24, 2026.

5. Money to insiders

None reported on 2 offerings — no sales commissions, finder's fees or proceeds to insiders

Per-offering detail
Offering (latest filing)Sales commissionsFinder's feesTo insidersPaid to sell itSource
Jun 21, 2022 D
Environmental Technologies Fund 4 L.P.
File 021-449734
$0$0$0 (est.)
Certain affiliates of the General Partner named in Item 3 may receive payments deemed to be made from the proceeds of the offering including management fees and/or incentive allocations. The amount of such fees cannot be estimated at this time.
None listed on this filingEDGAR ↗
Jul 23, 2018 D
Environmental Technologies Fund 3 L.P.
File 021-317492
$0$0$0 (est.)
Certain affiliates of the General Partner named in Item 3 may receive payments deemed to be made from the proceeds of the offering including management fees and/or incentive allocations. The amount of such fees cannot be estimated at this time.
None listed on this filingEDGAR ↗

Counts come from Form D Items 12–15 on the filings in our index (latest filing per offering; one offering = one SEC file number; an amendment updates its offering rather than adding one). "To insiders" = gross proceeds used for payments to executive officers, directors or promoters. "—" = not reported on that filing. Amounts marked (est.) were reported as estimates. "Paid to sell it" = sales compensation recipients named on that filing (Item 12), each linked to FINRA BrokerCheck when a CRD number is reported.

Counted across all 2 issuers in this group — every filing in our index, latest filing per offering (SEC file number).

Property records 0 documents · 0 ownership records · last checked Oct 23, 2026, 8:59 PM ET · NYC and Cook County lookup still to run

0 recorded documents and 0 ownership records matched to Environmental Technologies in the sources searched.

Not found in sources searched as of Oct 23, 2026, 8:59 PM ET: Hillsborough County FL Clerk of Court Official Records daily index (publicrec.hillsclerk.com D/P/M files), 2 daily files (Oct 14, 2026 to Oct 15, 2026) — loaded Oct 23, 2026, 8:59 PM ET; Florida DOR NAL roll (Hillsborough 39) roll year 2026 — loaded Oct 23, 2026, 8:54 PM ET; Florida DOR NAL roll (Dade 23) roll year 2026 — loaded Oct 23, 2026, 8:58 PM ET; Harris County Appraisal District real_acct.txt roll year 2026 — loaded Oct 23, 2026, 8:58 PM ET; Dallas Central Appraisal District ACCOUNT_INFO.CSV roll year 2026 — loaded Oct 23, 2026, 8:58 PM ET. Still to be looked up for this group: NYC ACRIS via NYC Open Data (Real Property Parties 636b-3b5g, Master bnx9-e6tj, Legals 8h5j-fqxa, Document Control Codes 7isb-wh4c) · NYC PLUTO ownership via NYC Open Data (64uk-42ks) · Cook County IL Assessor via Cook County Open Data (Parcel Sales wvhk-k5uv; Parcel Addresses 3723-97qp). Records in other counties, and recorder indexes we do not yet cover, were not searched.

Property records coverage: New York City (ACRIS recorded documents and PLUTO ownership, looked up per issuer when its page is viewed; re-checked when the page is viewed again more than 30 days after the last check); Hillsborough County FL (recorded documents from Oct 14, 2026 forward; ownership from FL DOR roll 2026); Cook County IL (assessor ownership and deed/sale records, looked up per issuer when its page is viewed); Harris County TX and Dallas County TX (assessor ownership rolls only, 2026 roll; no deed, mortgage or sale records); Miami-Dade County FL (ownership from FL DOR roll only; Clerk recorded documents not covered). Recorder indexes for TX, AZ, IL and WA counties, mortgages and liens outside NYC and FL, lis pendens and foreclosure notices everywhere, Miami-Dade County FL recorded documents, Maricopa County AZ, King County WA, Salt Lake County UT, and all other counties are not covered — not searched. Last refresh by source: Hillsborough County FL Clerk daily index Oct 23, 2026, 8:59 PM ET; Dallas Central Appraisal District ACCOUNT_INFO.CSV Oct 23, 2026, 8:58 PM ET; Harris County Appraisal District real_acct.txt Oct 23, 2026, 8:58 PM ET; Florida DOR NAL roll (Dade 23) Oct 23, 2026, 8:58 PM ET; Florida DOR NAL roll (Hillsborough 39) Oct 23, 2026, 8:54 PM ET. NYC and Cook County are looked up per issuer when its page is viewed; the most recent such lookup on this site finished Oct 24, 2026, 3:30 AM ET. Parties are named as the recorder's index names them (role suffixes as recorded); no address, account number or trust date is shown for an individual, and individual owners of record (home ownership) are not matched or shown. Items still in human review are not shown.

Issuers in this group

Why each issuer is here is stated in the "Linked by" column. Low-confidence links are never shown — they wait for human review.

SourceIssuerLinked byLocationIndustryFilingsSold (max)InvestorsMin. investment (latest filing)Active
EDGAR ↗ET Environmental Technologies Fund 3 L.P.shared management entity, similar issuer namesLONDON, United Kingdom (as filed: X0)Pooled Investment Fund1$0
offering Indefinite · similar: $155,000–$5,250,000
0
similar: 4–27
No minimum reported
similar: $1,000–$100,000
2018–2018
EDGAR ↗ET Environmental Technologies Fund 4 L.P.shared management entity, similar issuer namesLONDON, United Kingdom (as filed: X0)Pooled Investment Fund1$113,003,608
offering Indefinite · similar: $155,000–$5,250,000
17
similar: 4–27
No minimum reported
similar: $1,000–$100,000
2022–2022

"Similar" = offerings in the same industry claiming the same exemption, filed in the last 5 years: Pooled Investment Fund / 506(b) (83,801 filings); ranges are the middle half (25th–75th percentile). Computed by PartnerFacts from SEC EDGAR Form D data as of Oct 23, 2026, 5:45 PM ET. Rows without a range: fewer than 30 comparable filings, or not a Rule 506 offering. No ranking or score.

Timeline of offerings

SourceFiledIssuerFormIndustryOfferedSold
EDGAR ↗Jun 21, 2022Environmental Technologies Fund 4 L.P.DPooled Investment FundIndefinite$113,003,608
EDGAR ↗Jul 23, 2018Environmental Technologies Fund 3 L.P.DPooled Investment FundIndefinite$0

Activity: 0 new offerings in the last 12 months across all issuers in this group (new offering = a Form D that is not an amendment, D/A) · most recent filing Jun 21, 2022. Industry history, as reported on each offering's latest filing: All 2 offerings reported: Pooled Investment Fund (2018–2022).

People across the group

NameRolesIssuers hereFirst → last listed
ML Manager ETF Partners LLPPromoter2Jul 23, 2018 → Jun 21, 2022
GP General Partner ETF General Partner 4 L.P. entityPromoter1Jun 21, 2022 → Jun 21, 2022
MM Managing Member of the General Partner of the General Partner ETF Partner GP 4 Limited entityPromoter1Jun 21, 2022 → Jun 21, 2022
ZV Zoe VanderWolkDirector1Jun 21, 2022 → Jun 21, 2022
GP General Partner of the General Partner ETF GP 4 LLP entityPromoter1Jun 21, 2022 → Jun 21, 2022
GP General Partner ETF General Partner 3 L.P. entityPromoter1Jul 23, 2018 → Jul 23, 2018
MM Managing Member of the General Partner of the General Partner ETF Partner GP 3 Limited entityPromoter1Jul 23, 2018 → Jul 23, 2018
GP General Partner of the General Partner ETF GP 3 LLP entityPromoter1Jul 23, 2018 → Jul 23, 2018

Adviser registration (Form ADV)

Searched SEC Form ADV bulk data (registered + exempt reporting advisers) (24,962 records as of Oct 2, 2026, 8:00 AM ET) — nothing matched Environmental Technologies.

Meta advertising

No Meta Pixel ids or Facebook / Instagram page links on file for Environmental Technologies as of Oct 24, 2026 — the sponsor website is read for them once it is on file (runs automatically). Meta Ad Library: not searched by PartnerFacts (no API access); a one-tap Ad Library search is under Look further.

Other offering types (Regulation A and Regulation Crowdfunding)

Searched SEC Regulation A Data Sets (Forms 1-A, 1-K, 1-Z; 2015 Q2 → 2026 Q3); SEC Crowdfunding Offerings Data Sets (Form C family; 2016 Q2 → 2026 Q3); EDGAR form index for 2026 Q3 → 2026 Q4 (51,358 records as of Oct 23, 2026, 8:41 PM ET) — nothing matched this name.

Public profiles and social

No website or social profile named in Environmental Technologies's SEC filings (Form C, Reg A, Form ADV; checked Oct 24, 2026). Web search for this name: #153,086 of 374,652 in line (14 issuers searched so far). One-tap searches: Look further ↓

Export this report as PDF · Premium

Request diligence pack (Premium) PartnerFacts asks the sponsor for the standard information pack and delivers it to you labelled "provided by the sponsor".

Change history

No corrections have been requested for this page.

Request a correction

Free. Covers the grouping itself or any record shown here. Logged with status: received → under review → fixed / confirmed with source.

Sponsor response

Add a sourced explanation next to any fact. Reviewed before publishing.

Grouping is PartnerFacts' inference from public filings (shared related persons, management entities, business address). Everything else on this page is drawn from the filings themselves. Not the same sponsor? Request a correction.

Look further

One-tap searches on sites we do not index ourselves, with the name pre-filled (outside the US (as filed: LONDON), X0). Each opens in a new tab; what you find there is not verified by PartnerFacts.

Business registries