PartnerFacts
Data last updated: Oct 23, 2026, 5:45 PM ETLatest filing: Oct 22, 2026Now: Oct 24, 2026, 7:49 AM ET

Sponsor Check › Sponsor group

D

Domain

One sponsor team, 3 deal companies · Princeton, NJ

Grouped because: 6 shared people, same business address (3 issuers), similar issuer names (2) · 3 issuers also list a director who sits on many unrelated issuers (not used to group) (automatic match from the filings) · not the same sponsor?

3deal companies
$538.4Mreported sold
73investors
5Form D filings
2009–2016active
0new, last 12 mo

Data last updated Oct 23, 2026, 5:45 PM ET · Latest filing in this group Dec 7, 2016 · Courts (RECAP) last checked: Oct 24, 2026, 2:16 AM ET · SEC enforcement last checked: covered by the index scan as of Oct 24, 2026, 2:50 AM ET

The short version

Domain is a sponsor group of 3 issuers that PartnerFacts links to one sponsor (shared people, same business address, similar issuer names; automatic match from the filings), filing 5 Form D filings between Jun 2009 and Dec 2016.

What this means One team, 3 deal companies, about 7 years of track record in SEC filings. We link the companies because the same people or address appear on their forms — tap "Request a correction" if that is wrong.

Combined reported sold: $538.4M to 73 investors (latest filing per issuer). Industries as reported: Pooled Investment Fund (3). Issuers are based in NJ (3).

What this means $538.4M raised across the group, about $7.38M per investor. Amounts come from each company's latest Form D; they are what the sponsor reported, not audited figures.

Principal people: Brian H. Dovey (3 issuers, executive officer), Brian Halak (3 issuers, executive officer), James Blair (3 issuers, executive officer), Kathleen Schoemaker (3 issuers, executive officer), Nicole Vitullo (3 issuers, executive officer) and 3 more.

What this means The person on the most companies is usually the one running the show; their page lists every deal.

Activity: 0 new offerings in the last 12 months; latest filing Dec 7, 2016.

What this means No new raise filed in the past year.

Public records searched: federal courts (CourtListener / RECAP), SEC enforcement releases, state securities regulators (AK, AL, AR, AZ, CA, CT, DE, FINRA, GA, HI, ID, IL, KS, KY, LA, MA, MD, ME, MI, MO, MS, MT, NASAA, NC, ND, NH, NM, NV, OK, OR, PA, RI, SC, SD, TN, TX, VT, WA, WI, WV, WY), property records (NYC, FL, IL and TX counties) — 2 court cases matching the name, 1 bankruptcy case matching the name listed in Key records below.

What this means 3 records came back. Each one is listed below with a link to the original document and a line saying why it matched. A name match is not proof it is the same person or company — read the why line and the document. Being sued or named in a release is an accusation, not a finding.

We compared 5 public filings for Domain and found 6 differences, 2 worth asking the sponsor about: KATHLEEN SCHOEMAKER is no longer listed on the Dec 7, 2016 amendment; Nimesh Shah is no longer listed on the Dec 7, 2016 amendment; and more below.

What this means These are differences between the sponsor's own SEC filings — both values, dates and sources are listed in Key records, section 4. Most have ordinary explanations; ask the sponsor.

What the community is saying

Community search for Domain has not run yet — it is joining a line of 27,919 names; searches run around the clock at the hosts' allowed rate. Searched so far: 638 names.

Community comments are quoted as written by their authors. Sources searched: BiggerPockets forums (via DuckDuckGo, Brave, Bing and BiggerPockets search) and Reddit (search feed + public archive).

Key records

Five things investors ask first. Items still in human review are counted, not shown.

1. Lawsuits

2 cases: 1 closed (disposition not in docket feed), 1 dismissed

Domain, Inc v. BASF Corporation closed matched at sponsor-group level (Domain)
District Court, D. Minnesota · No. 0:99-cv-00384 · Filed Mar 9, 1999 · Closed Jun 21, 1999 · Nature of suit: 410 Antitrust
Role of Domain, Inc: Plaintiff · Outcome: Terminated 1999-06-21 — FJC Integrated Database disposition: Multi-district litigation transfer Docket on CourtListener ↗
exact company name; name has one distinctive word; court in MN (not the issuer's state); filed 1999, issuer incorporated 2009
MMM SALES INC v. DOMAIN INC dismissed matched at sponsor-group level (Domain)
District Court, C.D. California · No. · Filed Sep 20, 1985 · Closed Aug 17, 1987 · Nature of suit: 190 Other contract actions
Role of DOMAIN INC: Defendant · Outcome: Terminated 1987-08-17 — FJC Integrated Database disposition: Dismissed: lack of jurisdiction Docket on CourtListener ↗
exact company name; name has one distinctive word; court in CA (not the issuer's state); filed 1985, issuer incorporated 2009
What was searched

Sources searched: CourtListener bulk data (RECAP dockets as of 2026-09-30; recall-first rule 10-24) — federal district + bankruptcy courts State courts: not covered (one-tap state court links under Look further). PACER: not searched. · Last checked Oct 24, 2026, 2:16 AM ET.

Court records show docket facts only; we never restate allegations as facts. Outcome wording comes from the docket feed; where it does not state a disposition we say so.

State courts: not covered (one-tap state court links under Look further). No state offers a lawful automated statewide source PartnerFacts can use today. Texas (re:SearchTX) terms prohibit storing results in a database open to third parties; New York (WebCivil) and Massachusetts (MassCourts) require a browser check that blocks scripted queries; California has no statewide index (58 county portals; Rule of Court 2.503 grants name-based access case by case); Florida, Utah and Illinois offer paid or partial access whose terms for automated use are unverified. Washington (dw.courts.wa.gov; bulk index reports under a JISC data-dissemination agreement), Delaware (CourtConnect; Court of Chancery not included) and Arizona (apps.azcourts.gov/publicaccess, which has an official channel to request high-volume access) are the candidates; PartnerFacts will request written permission before any automated search. Federal courts are searched through CourtListener / RECAP.

2. Regulatory actions

None found in sources searched — SEC enforcement releases (index scan as of Oct 24, 2026, 2:50 AM ET) · state securities regulators: VA (crawled Oct 23, 2026)

What was searched

SEC enforcement searched: SEC litigation releases and administrative proceedings — respondent names in the sec.gov index titles (30,205 releases, 1995-09-19 to 2026-10-23); release text is read only to confirm a candidate. Names that appear only in the body of a release are not found. — Searched SEC litigation releases and administrative proceedings (1995→ / 2007→) (30,205 records as of Oct 24, 2026, 2:50 AM ET) — nothing matched Domain..

State securities regulators: Securities regulators searched (3,318 actions): AZ Corporation Commission Securities Division (411 actions, 2017–2026), CA DFPI (25 actions, 2007–2024; listing starts 2002 — 16 of 12,159 DFPI respondent pages read so far; sponsor-name matches are read first), DE DOJ Investor Protection Unit (257 actions, 1987–2026), TX State Securities Board (586 actions, 2006–2026), WA DFI (2,039 actions, 2001–2026) — last crawled Oct 23, 2026, 9:57 PM ET. No machine-readable public listing today for CO, FL, IA, IN, MN, NE, NJ, NY, OH, UT, VA (see docs/state-regulators.md).

3. Bankruptcies

1 case: 1 closed (disposition not in docket feed)

Whitaker v. Domain Inc. closed matched at sponsor-group level (Domain)
United States Bankruptcy Court, M.D. Florida · No. 3:91-ap-02489 · Filed Oct 30, 1991 · Closed Nov 4, 1994
Role of Domain Inc.: Defendant · Outcome: Case closed 1994-11-04 (disposition not included in the bulk docket feed — see docket) Docket on CourtListener ↗
exact company name; name has one distinctive word; court in FL (not the issuer's state); filed 1991, issuer incorporated 2009
What was searched

Sources searched: Federal bankruptcy courts via CourtListener / RECAP archive (federal district courts, federal bankruptcy courts). State courts: not covered (one-tap state court links under Look further). PACER: not searched (RECAP only). · Last checked Oct 24, 2026, 2:16 AM ET.

Court records show docket facts only; we never restate allegations as facts. Outcome wording comes from the docket feed; where it does not state a disposition we say so.

State courts: not covered (one-tap state court links under Look further). No state offers a lawful automated statewide source PartnerFacts can use today. Texas (re:SearchTX) terms prohibit storing results in a database open to third parties; New York (WebCivil) and Massachusetts (MassCourts) require a browser check that blocks scripted queries; California has no statewide index (58 county portals; Rule of Court 2.503 grants name-based access case by case); Florida, Utah and Illinois offer paid or partial access whose terms for automated use are unverified. Washington (dw.courts.wa.gov; bulk index reports under a JISC data-dissemination agreement), Delaware (CourtConnect; Court of Chancery not included) and Arizona (apps.azcourts.gov/publicaccess, which has an official channel to request high-volume access) are the candidates; PartnerFacts will request written permission before any automated search. Federal courts are searched through CourtListener / RECAP.

4. Differences between public sources

No comparisons published

What is compared

No public statement by this sponsor group has been collected yet, so there is nothing to compare. Sources compared: the sponsor's own website (known from the issuer's own filings — Form C issuer website, EDGAR company profile — an approved profile claim or Form ADV Item 1.I of its matched adviser) · SEC Form D · SEC Form ADV (IAPD) · Internet Archive · No website is on file for this sponsor group yet.

6 differences found between the filings for Domain — 2 worth asking about (compared 5 filings on Oct 24, 2026)

Note · Dec 28, 2010 – Sep 29, 2011

Bankruptcy case: Lawyers Title Insurance Corporation v. Vitullo — filed Dec 28, 2010

United States Bankruptcy Court, D. New Jersey docket "Lawyers Title Insurance Corporation v. Vitullo" filed Dec 28, 2010, closed Sep 29, 2011. Nicole Vitullo (listed on the same filings) is listed as Defendant ("Vitullo"). Our match estimate: 70%.

What this means A bankruptcy filing was found. Many are old or personal and have nothing to do with the deal — but ask what it was and when it closed.

Sources
Note · Dec 15, 2014 – Dec 7, 2016

No amendment in the last 12 months on an offering that may still be open — Domain Partners IX, L.P. (latest filing Dec 7, 2016)

The latest filing for this offering is dated Dec 7, 2016 (first sale Dec 15, 2014). It reports $163,636,363 sold of an indefinite amount offered. No later amendment is in our index as of Oct 24, 2026.

What this means SEC rules expect a yearly amendment while an offering is still going. The raise may simply have ended — a Form D does not say when it closed. Ask the sponsor whether the offering closed, when, and at what amount.

Sources
Note · Jun 4, 2009 – Jun 18, 2009

No amendment in the last 12 months on an offering that may still be open — Domain Partners VIII, L.P. (latest filing Jun 18, 2009)

The latest filing for this offering is dated Jun 18, 2009 (first sale Jun 4, 2009). It reports $371,070,000 sold of an indefinite amount offered. No later amendment is in our index as of Oct 24, 2026.

What this means SEC rules expect a yearly amendment while an offering is still going. The raise may simply have ended — a Form D does not say when it closed. Ask the sponsor whether the offering closed, when, and at what amount.

Sources
Note · May 26, 2009 – Jun 10, 2009

No amendment in the last 12 months on an offering that may still be open — DP VIII Associates, L.P. (latest filing Jun 10, 2009)

The latest filing for this offering is dated Jun 10, 2009 (first sale May 26, 2009). It reports $3,673,000 sold of an indefinite amount offered. No later amendment is in our index as of Oct 24, 2026.

What this means SEC rules expect a yearly amendment while an offering is still going. The raise may simply have ended — a Form D does not say when it closed. Ask the sponsor whether the offering closed, when, and at what amount.

Sources
Worth asking · Dec 3, 2015 – Dec 7, 2016

KATHLEEN SCHOEMAKER is no longer listed on the Dec 7, 2016 amendment — Domain Partners IX, L.P.

KATHLEEN SCHOEMAKER appears on the Dec 3, 2015 Form D/A (executive officer) but not on the Dec 7, 2016 Form D/A for the same offering.

What this means People leave, and the issuer must list only current officers, directors and promoters. It is still worth asking why this person left and who replaced them.

Sources
Worth asking · Dec 3, 2015 – Dec 7, 2016

Nimesh Shah is no longer listed on the Dec 7, 2016 amendment — Domain Partners IX, L.P.

Nimesh Shah appears on the Dec 3, 2015 Form D/A (executive officer) but not on the Dec 7, 2016 Form D/A for the same offering.

What this means People leave, and the issuer must list only current officers, directors and promoters. It is still worth asking why this person left and who replaced them.

Sources
What is compared

What is compared: every Form D and D/A we hold for this subject, side by side — filing dates vs. first-sale dates (the 15-day rule), amendment timing on open offerings (the yearly-amendment expectation), amounts sold, investor counts, offering amounts and minimums across amendments, industry and size bands, addresses, how each person's name and role is written, paid sellers' CRD numbers, and (for groups) where the member companies were formed and sit. Everything is as filed by the issuer; the SEC does not check it. Differences are common and usually have ordinary explanations — we show both values, the dates, and the source so you can ask. As of Oct 24, 2026.

5. Money to insiders

None reported on 3 offerings — no sales commissions, finder's fees or proceeds to insiders

Per-offering detail
Offering (latest filing)Sales commissionsFinder's feesTo insidersPaid to sell itSource
Dec 7, 2016 D/A
Domain Partners IX, L.P.
File 021-230865
$0$0$0None listed on this filingEDGAR ↗
Jun 18, 2009 D
Domain Partners VIII, L.P.
File 021-132078
$0$0$0None listed on this filingEDGAR ↗
Jun 10, 2009 D
DP VIII Associates, L.P.
File 021-131856
$0$0$0None listed on this filingEDGAR ↗

Counts come from Form D Items 12–15 on the filings in our index (latest filing per offering; one offering = one SEC file number; an amendment updates its offering rather than adding one). "To insiders" = gross proceeds used for payments to executive officers, directors or promoters. "—" = not reported on that filing. Amounts marked (est.) were reported as estimates. "Paid to sell it" = sales compensation recipients named on that filing (Item 12), each linked to FINRA BrokerCheck when a CRD number is reported.

Counted across all 3 issuers in this group — every filing in our index, latest filing per offering (SEC file number).

Property records 0 documents · 0 ownership records · last checked Oct 24, 2026, 7:46 AM ET · NYC and Cook County lookup still to run

0 recorded documents and 0 ownership records matched to Domain in the sources searched.

Not found in sources searched as of Oct 24, 2026, 7:46 AM ET: Hillsborough County FL Clerk of Court Official Records daily index (publicrec.hillsclerk.com D/P/M files), 2 daily files (Oct 14, 2026 to Oct 15, 2026) — loaded Oct 23, 2026, 8:59 PM ET; Harris County TX (HCAD ownership rolls 2009–2026) — 921,719 records, loaded Oct 24, 2026, 7:46 AM ET; Dallas County TX (DCAD ownership roll 2026) — 173,688 records, loaded Oct 23, 2026, 8:58 PM ET; Hillsborough County FL (FL DOR 2026 ownership roll + Clerk recorded-document index Oct 14, 2026 to Oct 15, 2026), Miami-Dade County FL (FL DOR 2026 ownership roll) — 294,950 records, loaded Oct 23, 2026, 8:58 PM ET. Still to be looked up for this group: NYC ACRIS via NYC Open Data (Real Property Parties 636b-3b5g, Master bnx9-e6tj, Legals 8h5j-fqxa, Document Control Codes 7isb-wh4c) · NYC PLUTO ownership via NYC Open Data (64uk-42ks) · Cook County IL Assessor via Cook County Open Data (Parcel Sales wvhk-k5uv; Parcel Addresses 3723-97qp). Records in other counties, and recorder indexes we do not yet cover, were not searched.

Property records coverage: New York City (ACRIS recorded documents and PLUTO ownership, looked up per issuer when its page is viewed; re-checked when the page is viewed again more than 30 days after the last check); Harris County TX (ownership only, no deed, mortgage or sale records; HCAD ownership rolls 2009–2026); Dallas County TX (ownership only, no deed, mortgage or sale records; DCAD ownership roll 2026); Hillsborough County FL (FL DOR 2026 ownership roll + Clerk recorded-document index Oct 14, 2026 to Oct 15, 2026), Miami-Dade County FL (FL DOR 2026 ownership roll); Cook County IL (assessor ownership and deed/sale records, looked up per issuer when its page is viewed). Recorder indexes (party names on deeds, mortgages and liens) in TX, AZ, NV, CA and WA counties and outside the Clerk index in FL, mortgages and liens outside NYC and Hillsborough County, lis pendens and foreclosure notices everywhere, Los Angeles County CA, Clark County NV, King County WA (loader ready; first load not finished), Cook County IL bulk pass (not finished; per-issuer lookups only so far), New York City bulk pass (not finished; per-issuer lookups only so far), Maricopa County AZ (loader ready; commercial-purpose statement not yet filed), Salt Lake County UT, and all other counties are not covered — not searched. Last refresh by source: Harris County Appraisal District real_acct.txt Oct 24, 2026, 7:46 AM ET; Hillsborough County FL Clerk daily index Oct 23, 2026, 8:59 PM ET; Dallas Central Appraisal District ACCOUNT_INFO.CSV Oct 23, 2026, 8:58 PM ET; Florida DOR NAL roll (Dade 23) Oct 23, 2026, 8:58 PM ET; Florida DOR NAL roll (Hillsborough 39) Oct 23, 2026, 8:54 PM ET. NYC and Cook County are also looked up per issuer when its page is viewed; the most recent such lookup on this site finished Oct 24, 2026, 3:30 AM ET. Parties are named as the recorder's index names them (role suffixes as recorded); no address, account number or trust date is shown for an individual, and individual owners of record (home ownership) are not matched or shown. Items still in human review are not shown.

Issuers in this group

Why each issuer is here is stated in the "Linked by" column. Low-confidence links are never shown — they wait for human review.

SourceIssuerLinked byLocationIndustryFilingsSold (max)InvestorsMin. investment (latest filing)Active
EDGAR ↗DV DP VIII Associates, L.P.shared people, same business address, director listed on many unrelated issuers (not used to group)PRINCETON, NJPooled Investment Fund1$3,673,00035$50,0002009–2009
EDGAR ↗DP Domain Partners VIII, L.P.shared people, same business address, similar issuer names, director listed on many unrelated issuers (not used to group)PRINCETON, NJPooled Investment Fund1$371,070,00032$5,000,0002009–2009
EDGAR ↗DP Domain Partners IX, L.P.shared people, same business address, similar issuer names, director listed on many unrelated issuers (not used to group)PRINCETON, NJPooled Investment Fund3$163,636,363
offering Indefinite · similar: $155,000–$5,250,000
6
similar: 4–27
No minimum reported
similar: $1,000–$100,000
2014–2016

"Similar" = offerings in the same industry claiming the same exemption, filed in the last 5 years: Pooled Investment Fund / 506(b) (83,801 filings); ranges are the middle half (25th–75th percentile). Computed by PartnerFacts from SEC EDGAR Form D data as of Oct 23, 2026, 5:45 PM ET. Rows without a range: fewer than 30 comparable filings, or not a Rule 506 offering. No ranking or score.

Timeline of offerings

SourceFiledIssuerFormIndustryOfferedSold
EDGAR ↗Dec 7, 2016Domain Partners IX, L.P.D/APooled Investment FundIndefinite$163,636,363
EDGAR ↗Dec 3, 2015Domain Partners IX, L.P.D/APooled Investment FundIndefinite$163,636,363
EDGAR ↗Dec 24, 2014Domain Partners IX, L.P.DPooled Investment FundIndefinite$163,636,363
EDGAR ↗Jun 18, 2009Domain Partners VIII, L.P.DPooled Investment FundIndefinite$371,070,000
EDGAR ↗Jun 10, 2009DP VIII Associates, L.P.DPooled Investment FundIndefinite$3,673,000

Activity: 0 new offerings in the last 12 months across all issuers in this group (new offering = a Form D that is not an amendment, D/A) · most recent filing Dec 7, 2016. Industry history, as reported on each offering's latest filing: All 3 offerings reported: Pooled Investment Fund (2009–2014).

People across the group

NameRolesIssuers hereFirst → last listed
BD Brian H. DoveyExecutive Officer3Jun 10, 2009 → Dec 7, 2016
BH Brian HalakExecutive Officer3Jun 10, 2009 → Dec 7, 2016
JB James BlairExecutive Officer3Jun 10, 2009 → Dec 7, 2016
NV Nicole VitulloExecutive Officer3Jun 10, 2009 → Dec 7, 2016
KS KATHLEEN SCHOEMAKERExecutive Officer3Jun 10, 2009 → Dec 3, 2015
JT Jesse TreuExecutive Officer2Jun 10, 2009 → Jun 18, 2009
KK Kim KamdarExecutive Officer1Dec 24, 2014 → Dec 7, 2016
NS Nimesh ShahExecutive Officer1Dec 24, 2014 → Dec 3, 2015

Adviser registration (Form ADV)

Searched SEC Form ADV bulk data (registered + exempt reporting advisers) (24,962 records as of Oct 2, 2026, 8:00 AM ET) — nothing matched Domain.

Meta advertising

No Meta Pixel ids or Facebook / Instagram page links on file for Domain as of Oct 24, 2026 — the sponsor website is read for them once it is on file (runs automatically). Meta Ad Library: not searched by PartnerFacts (no API access); a one-tap Ad Library search is under Look further.

Other offering types (Regulation A and Regulation Crowdfunding)

Searched SEC Regulation A Data Sets (Forms 1-A, 1-K, 1-Z; 2015 Q2 → 2026 Q3); SEC Crowdfunding Offerings Data Sets (Form C family; 2016 Q2 → 2026 Q3); EDGAR form index for 2026 Q3 → 2026 Q4 (51,358 records as of Oct 23, 2026, 8:41 PM ET) — nothing matched this name.

Public profiles and social

No website or social profile named in Domain's SEC filings (Form C, Reg A, Form ADV; checked Oct 24, 2026). Web search for this name: #370,222 of 374,652 in line (1,345 issuers searched so far). One-tap searches: Look further ↓

Export this report as PDF · Premium

Request diligence pack (Premium) PartnerFacts asks the sponsor for the standard information pack and delivers it to you labelled "provided by the sponsor".

Change history

No corrections have been requested for this page.

Request a correction

Free. Covers the grouping itself or any record shown here. Logged with status: received → under review → fixed / confirmed with source.

Sponsor response

Add a sourced explanation next to any fact. Reviewed before publishing.

Grouping is PartnerFacts' inference from public filings (shared related persons, management entities, business address). Everything else on this page is drawn from the filings themselves. Not the same sponsor? Request a correction.

Look further

One-tap searches on sites we do not index ourselves, with the name pre-filled (outside the US (as filed: PRINCETON), NJ). Each opens in a new tab; what you find there is not verified by PartnerFacts.