PartnerFacts
Data last updated: Oct 23, 2026, 5:45 PM ETLatest filing: Oct 22, 2026Now: Oct 24, 2026, 5:28 AM ET

Sponsor Check › Sponsor group

D

Digital

One sponsor team, 3 deal companies · Bethesda, MD

Grouped because: 5 shared people, same business address (3 issuers), similar issuer names (2) (automatic match from the filings) · not the same sponsor?

3deal companies
$28.5Mreported sold
33investors
11Form D filings
2010–2016active
0new, last 12 mo

Data last updated Oct 23, 2026, 5:45 PM ET · Latest filing in this group Aug 31, 2016 · Courts (RECAP) last checked: Oct 24, 2026, 2:16 AM ET · SEC enforcement last checked: covered by the index scan as of Oct 24, 2026, 2:50 AM ET

The short version

Digital is a sponsor group of 3 issuers that PartnerFacts links to one sponsor (shared people, same business address, similar issuer names; automatic match from the filings), filing 11 Form D filings between Oct 2010 and Aug 2016.

What this means One team, 3 deal companies, about 6 years of track record in SEC filings. We link the companies because the same people or address appear on their forms — tap "Request a correction" if that is wrong.

Combined reported sold: $28.5M to 33 investors (latest filing per issuer). Industries as reported: Other Technology (3). Issuers are based in MD (3).

What this means $28.5M raised across the group, about $862K per investor. Amounts come from each company's latest Form D; they are what the sponsor reported, not audited figures.

Principal people: Jay Sunny Bajaj (3 issuers, executive officer and director), Ken S Bajaj (3 issuers, executive officer and director), Collin M Dretsch (2 issuers, executive officer), Noah Asher (2 issuers, executive officer), Paul G Murray (2 issuers, executive officer) and 14 more.

What this means The person on the most companies is usually the one running the show; their page lists every deal.

Activity: 0 new offerings in the last 12 months; latest filing Aug 31, 2016.

What this means No new raise filed in the past year.

Public records searched: federal courts (CourtListener / RECAP), SEC enforcement releases, state securities regulators (AZ, CA, DE, TX, WA), property records (NYC, FL, IL and TX counties) — 7 court cases matching the name, 4 bankruptcy cases matching the name listed in Key records below.

What this means 11 records came back, including 1 court case still open — open cases can take years and cost money. Each one is listed below with a link to the original document and a line saying why it matched. A name match is not proof it is the same person or company — read the why line and the document. Being sued or named in a release is an accusation, not a finding.

We compared 11 public filings for Digital and found 14 differences, 1 worth asking the sponsor about: 4 people are no longer listed on a later amendment; and more below.

What this means These are differences between the sponsor's own SEC filings — both values, dates and sources are listed in Key records, section 4. Most have ordinary explanations; ask the sponsor.

What the community is saying

Community search for Digital has not run yet — it is joining a line of 16,917 names; searches run around the clock at the hosts' allowed rate. Searched so far: 28 names.

Community comments are quoted as written by their authors. Sources searched: BiggerPockets forums (via DuckDuckGo, Brave, Bing and BiggerPockets search) and Reddit (search feed + public archive).

Key records

Five things investors ask first. Items still in human review are counted, not shown.

1. Lawsuits

7 cases: 1 open, 4 dismissed, 2 judgment

Lynn v. Digital Management LLC open
District Court, D. Maryland · No. 1:25-cv-04211 · Filed Dec 19, 2025
Role of Digital Management LLC: Defendant · Outcome: Open — no termination date on the docket (bulk snapshot 2026-09-30) Docket on CourtListener ↗
exact company name; name has one distinctive word; court in the issuer's state (MD)
DIGITAL MANAGEMENT, INC. v. CONTRERAS-SWEET dismissed
District Court, District of Columbia · No. 1:15-cv-01996 · Filed Nov 13, 2015 · Closed Dec 16, 2015 · Nature of suit: 890 Other Statutory Actions · Cause: 05:0701 Judicial Review of Agency Decision
Role of DIGITAL MANAGEMENT, INC.: Plaintiff · Outcome: Terminated 2015-12-16 — FJC Integrated Database disposition: Voluntarily dismissed Docket on CourtListener ↗
exact company name; name has one distinctive word; court in DC (not the issuer's state); different legal form (inc vs llc)
Band Pro Film and Digital Inc v. ARRI Inc dismissed matched at sponsor-group level (Digital)
District Court, C.D. California · No. 2:12-cv-03226 · Filed Apr 12, 2012 · Closed Oct 18, 2013 · Nature of suit: 890 Other Statutory Actions · Cause: 28:1331 Fed. Question
Role of Digital Inc: Plaintiff · Outcome: Terminated 2013-10-18 — FJC Integrated Database disposition: Dismissed: other Docket on CourtListener ↗
exact company name; name has one distinctive word; court in CA (not the issuer's state)
BiNatl Communication v. Corp Digital dismissed matched at sponsor-group level (Digital)
District Court, S.D. California · No. 3:95-cv-03755 · Filed Nov 16, 1995 · Closed Mar 22, 1996 · Nature of suit: 190 Other contract actions
Role of Corp Digital: Defendant · Outcome: Terminated 1996-03-22 — FJC Integrated Database disposition: Dismissed: settled Docket on CourtListener ↗
exact company name; name has one distinctive word; court in CA (not the issuer's state); filed 1995, issuer incorporated 2012
POSITRON INC v. DIGITAL INC dismissed matched at sponsor-group level (Digital)
District Court, N.D. Illinois · No. · Filed Dec 30, 1987 · Closed May 20, 1988 · Nature of suit: 370 Other fraud
Role of DIGITAL INC: Defendant · Outcome: Terminated 1988-05-20 — FJC Integrated Database disposition: Dismissed: settled Docket on CourtListener ↗
exact company name; name has one distinctive word; court in IL (not the issuer's state); filed 1987, issuer incorporated 2012
DIGITAL CORP v. DATAGUARD CORP ETAL judgment matched at sponsor-group level (Digital)
District Court, N.D. Illinois · No. · Filed Jul 29, 1987 · Closed Jan 11, 1988 · Nature of suit: 190 Other contract actions
Role of DIGITAL CORP: Plaintiff · Outcome: Terminated 1988-01-11 — FJC Integrated Database disposition: Judgment on default; judgment for plaintiff Docket on CourtListener ↗
exact company name; name has one distinctive word; court in IL (not the issuer's state); filed 1987, issuer incorporated 2012
DIGITAL CO v. GENL ROBOTICS ETAL judgment matched at sponsor-group level (Digital)
District Court, E.D. Wisconsin · No. · Filed Jun 16, 1987 · Closed Aug 3, 1987 · Nature of suit: 190 Other contract actions
Role of DIGITAL CO: Plaintiff · Outcome: Terminated 1987-08-03 — FJC Integrated Database disposition: Judgment on default; judgment for plaintiff Docket on CourtListener ↗
exact company name; name has one distinctive word; court in WI (not the issuer's state); filed 1987, issuer incorporated 2012
What was searched

Sources searched: CourtListener bulk data (RECAP dockets as of 2026-09-30; recall-first rule 10-24) — federal district + bankruptcy courts State courts: not covered (one-tap state court links under Look further). PACER: not searched. · Last checked Oct 24, 2026, 2:16 AM ET.

Court records show docket facts only; we never restate allegations as facts. Outcome wording comes from the docket feed; where it does not state a disposition we say so.

State courts: not covered (one-tap state court links under Look further). No state offers a lawful automated statewide source PartnerFacts can use today. Texas (re:SearchTX) terms prohibit storing results in a database open to third parties; New York (WebCivil) and Massachusetts (MassCourts) require a browser check that blocks scripted queries; California has no statewide index (58 county portals; Rule of Court 2.503 grants name-based access case by case); Florida, Utah and Illinois offer paid or partial access whose terms for automated use are unverified. Washington (dw.courts.wa.gov; bulk index reports under a JISC data-dissemination agreement), Delaware (CourtConnect; Court of Chancery not included) and Arizona (apps.azcourts.gov/publicaccess, which has an official channel to request high-volume access) are the candidates; PartnerFacts will request written permission before any automated search. Federal courts are searched through CourtListener / RECAP.

2. Regulatory actions

None found in sources searched — SEC enforcement releases (index scan as of Oct 24, 2026, 2:50 AM ET) · state securities regulators: AZ, CA, DE, TX, WA (crawled Oct 23, 2026)

What was searched

SEC enforcement searched: SEC litigation releases and administrative proceedings — respondent names in the sec.gov index titles (30,205 releases, 1995-09-19 to 2026-10-23); release text is read only to confirm a candidate. Names that appear only in the body of a release are not found. — Searched SEC litigation releases and administrative proceedings (1995→ / 2007→) (30,205 records as of Oct 24, 2026, 2:50 AM ET) — nothing matched Digital..

State securities regulators searched: AZ (Corporation Commission Securities Division), CA (DFPI — 16 of 12,159 DFPI respondent pages read so far; sponsor-name matches are read first), DE (DOJ Investor Protection Unit), TX (State Securities Board), WA (DFI) — last crawled Oct 23, 2026, 9:57 PM ET. Other states are not covered.

3. Bankruptcies

4 cases: 4 closed (disposition not in docket feed)

RE DIGITAL, INC. v. Kellen closed matched at sponsor-group level (Digital)
United States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. California · No. 12-90083 · Filed Feb 28, 2012 · Closed Aug 27, 2013
Role of DIGITAL, INC.: Plaintiff · Outcome: Case closed 2013-08-27 (disposition not included in the bulk docket feed — see docket) Docket on CourtListener ↗
exact company name; name has one distinctive word; court in CA (not the issuer's state)
The Company Digital LLC closed matched at sponsor-group level (Digital)
United States Bankruptcy Court, C.D. California · No. 2:11-bk-48274 · Filed Sep 8, 2011 · Closed Jan 25, 2012
Role of The Company Digital LLC: Debtor · Outcome: Case closed 2012-01-25 (disposition not included in the bulk docket feed — see docket) Docket on CourtListener ↗
exact company name; name has one distinctive word; court in CA (not the issuer's state)
Digital Corporation closed matched at sponsor-group level (Digital)
United States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. Virginia · No. 03-10217 · Filed Jan 14, 2003 · Closed Mar 8, 2004
Role of Digital Corporation: Debtor · Outcome: Case closed 2004-03-08 (disposition not included in the bulk docket feed — see docket) Docket on CourtListener ↗
exact company name; name has one distinctive word; court in VA (not the issuer's state); filed 2003, issuer incorporated 2012
Sutphin Printing and Digital Corp closed matched at sponsor-group level (Digital)
United States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. New York · No. 1-02-20284 · Filed Aug 14, 2002 · Closed Mar 18, 2003
Role of Digital Corp: Debtor · Outcome: Case closed 2003-03-18 (disposition not included in the bulk docket feed — see docket) Docket on CourtListener ↗
exact company name; name has one distinctive word; court in NY (not the issuer's state); filed 2002, issuer incorporated 2012
What was searched

Sources searched: Federal bankruptcy courts via CourtListener / RECAP archive (federal district courts, federal bankruptcy courts). State courts: not covered (one-tap state court links under Look further). PACER: not searched (RECAP only). · Last checked Oct 24, 2026, 2:16 AM ET.

Court records show docket facts only; we never restate allegations as facts. Outcome wording comes from the docket feed; where it does not state a disposition we say so.

State courts: not covered (one-tap state court links under Look further). No state offers a lawful automated statewide source PartnerFacts can use today. Texas (re:SearchTX) terms prohibit storing results in a database open to third parties; New York (WebCivil) and Massachusetts (MassCourts) require a browser check that blocks scripted queries; California has no statewide index (58 county portals; Rule of Court 2.503 grants name-based access case by case); Florida, Utah and Illinois offer paid or partial access whose terms for automated use are unverified. Washington (dw.courts.wa.gov; bulk index reports under a JISC data-dissemination agreement), Delaware (CourtConnect; Court of Chancery not included) and Arizona (apps.azcourts.gov/publicaccess, which has an official channel to request high-volume access) are the candidates; PartnerFacts will request written permission before any automated search. Federal courts are searched through CourtListener / RECAP.

4. Differences between public sources

No comparisons published

What is compared

No public statement by this sponsor group has been collected yet, so there is nothing to compare. Sources compared: the sponsor's own website (known from the issuer's own filings — Form C issuer website, EDGAR company profile — an approved profile claim or Form ADV Item 1.I of its matched adviser) · SEC Form D · SEC Form ADV (IAPD) · Internet Archive · No website is on file for this sponsor group yet.

14 differences found between the filings for Digital — 1 worth asking about (compared 11 filings on Oct 24, 2026)

Worth asking · Aug 10, 2012 – Mar 11, 2016

4 people are no longer listed on a later amendment

Vikas Bansal is no longer listed on the Mar 11, 2016 amendment — Digital Management, LLC · Andrew J Musliner is no longer listed on the Mar 11, 2016 amendment — Digital Management, LLC · Paul G Murray is no longer listed on the Mar 11, 2016 amendment — Digital Management, LLC · Paul G Murray is no longer listed on the Jul 8, 2015 amendment — Digital Mobile Innovations, LLC

What this means People leave; the issuer lists only current officers, directors and promoters. Ask why and who replaced them.

Sources
Note · Jan 29, 2014 – Mar 24, 2014

Form D filed 54 days after the first sale — Digital Mobile Innovations, LLC

The filing says the first sale was Jan 29, 2014. The Form D was filed Mar 24, 2014 — 54 days later. The rule: a Form D is generally due within 15 days after the first sale, so this one is 39 days past that.

What this means A late notice is common and carries no penalty by itself. It is worth asking the sponsor why the paperwork lagged.

Sources
Note · Feb 6, 2014 – Feb 26, 2014

Form D filed 20 days after the first sale — Digital Mobile Innovations, LLC

The filing says the first sale was Feb 6, 2014. The Form D was filed Feb 26, 2014 — 20 days later. The rule: a Form D is generally due within 15 days after the first sale, so this one is 5 days past that.

What this means A late notice is common and carries no penalty by itself. It is worth asking the sponsor why the paperwork lagged.

Sources
Note · May 17, 2013 – Jun 3, 2013

Form D filed 17 days after the first sale — Digital Management, LLC

The filing says the first sale was May 17, 2013. The Form D was filed Jun 3, 2013 — 17 days later. The rule: a Form D is generally due within 15 days after the first sale, so this one is 2 days past that.

What this means A late notice is common and carries no penalty by itself. It is worth asking the sponsor why the paperwork lagged.

Sources
Note · Aug 10, 2012 – Mar 11, 2016

Offering amount changed between filings — Digital Management, LLC

The Aug 10, 2012 filing says $2,338,333 offered; the Mar 11, 2016 Form D/A says $2,845,000.

What this means The target raise changed. Raising the cap is common when a deal grows; ask whether the extra money has the same terms and use.

Sources
Note · Feb 26, 2014 – Jul 8, 2015

Offering amount changed between filings — Digital Mobile Innovations, LLC

The Feb 26, 2014 filing says $2,572,500 offered; the Jul 8, 2015 Form D/A says an indefinite amount.

What this means The target raise changed. Raising the cap is common when a deal grows; ask whether the extra money has the same terms and use.

Sources
Note · Mar 24, 2014 – Jan 22, 2015

Offering amount changed between filings — Digital Mobile Innovations, LLC

The Mar 24, 2014 filing says $2,950,000 offered; the Jan 22, 2015 Form D/A says an indefinite amount.

What this means The target raise changed. Raising the cap is common when a deal grows; ask whether the extra money has the same terms and use.

Sources
Note · Feb 6, 2014 – Jul 8, 2015

No amendment in the last 12 months on an offering that may still be open — Digital Mobile Innovations, LLC (latest filing Jul 8, 2015)

The latest filing for this offering is dated Jul 8, 2015 (first sale Feb 6, 2014). It reports $5,062,361 sold of an indefinite amount offered. No later amendment is in our index as of Oct 24, 2026.

What this means SEC rules expect a yearly amendment while an offering is still going. The raise may simply have ended — a Form D does not say when it closed. Ask the sponsor whether the offering closed, when, and at what amount.

Sources
Note · Jan 29, 2014 – Jan 22, 2015

No amendment in the last 12 months on an offering that may still be open — Digital Mobile Innovations, LLC (latest filing Jan 22, 2015)

The latest filing for this offering is dated Jan 22, 2015 (first sale Jan 29, 2014). It reports $2,950,000 sold of an indefinite amount offered. No later amendment is in our index as of Oct 24, 2026.

What this means SEC rules expect a yearly amendment while an offering is still going. The raise may simply have ended — a Form D does not say when it closed. Ask the sponsor whether the offering closed, when, and at what amount.

Sources
Note · Oct 1, 2013 – Oct 15, 2013

No amendment in the last 12 months on an offering that may still be open — Digital Mobile Innovations, LLC (latest filing Oct 15, 2013)

The latest filing for this offering is dated Oct 15, 2013 (first sale Oct 1, 2013). It reports $0 sold of an indefinite amount offered. No later amendment is in our index as of Oct 24, 2026.

What this means SEC rules expect a yearly amendment while an offering is still going. The raise may simply have ended — a Form D does not say when it closed. Ask the sponsor whether the offering closed, when, and at what amount.

Sources
Note · Jul 8, 2015 – Mar 11, 2016

Noah Asher is written 2 different ways on the filings

listed as "Noah Asher" on 2 filings (from Jul 8, 2015), and "Noah S Asher" on the Mar 11, 2016 filing.

What this means Same person, written differently — a middle name or suffix left off, or spelled another way. It is normal, but check that the full legal name matches your subscription documents.

Sources
Note · Aug 10, 2012 – Aug 31, 2016

4 address changes between filings

Address moved from Potomac, MD to Bethesda, MD — Digital Management, LLC · Address moved from Bethesda, MD to Potomac, MD — Digital Management, LLC · Address moved from Bethesda, MD to Potomac, MD — Digital Mobile Innovations, LLC · Address moved from Gaithersburg, MD to Bethesda, MD — Digital Management, LLC

What this means Businesses move. If you were told one city and the forms say another, ask which is current.

Sources
Note · Oct 14, 2010 – Aug 10, 2012

Reported revenue range changed between filings — Digital Management, LLC

"$5,000,001 - $25,000,000" (Oct 14, 2010); then "Decline to Disclose" (Aug 10, 2012).

What this means This is the size band the issuer picks for itself on the form. A change can mean the business grew or shrank — or that it chose not to say. Ask for current numbers.

Sources
Note · Oct 14, 2010 – Aug 31, 2016

Issuer used a different name before — Digital Management, LLC

SEC records list prior names for this filer: Digital Management, Inc.. The current name on file is "Digital Management, LLC".

What this means A name change is normal, but your documents may show the old name. Match the CIK, not just the name.

Sources
What is compared

What is compared: every Form D and D/A we hold for this subject, side by side — filing dates vs. first-sale dates (the 15-day rule), amendment timing on open offerings (the yearly-amendment expectation), amounts sold, investor counts, offering amounts and minimums across amendments, industry and size bands, addresses, how each person's name and role is written, paid sellers' CRD numbers, and (for groups) where the member companies were formed and sit. Everything is as filed by the issuer; the SEC does not check it. Differences are common and usually have ordinary explanations — we show both values, the dates, and the source so you can ask. As of Oct 24, 2026.

5. Money to insiders

None reported on 8 offerings — no sales commissions, finder's fees or proceeds to insiders

Per-offering detail
Offering (latest filing)Sales commissionsFinder's feesTo insidersPaid to sell itSource
Aug 31, 2016 D
Digital Management, LLC
File 021-269836
$0$0$0None listed on this filingEDGAR ↗
Aug 31, 2016 D
DIGITAL MANAGEMENT HOLDINGS, LLC
File 021-269833
$0$0$0None listed on this filingEDGAR ↗
Mar 11, 2016 D/A
Digital Management, LLC
File 021-182495
$0$0$0None listed on this filingEDGAR ↗
Jul 8, 2015 D/A
Digital Mobile Innovations, LLC
File 021-212513
$0$0$0None listed on this filingEDGAR ↗
Jan 22, 2015 D/A
Digital Mobile Innovations, LLC
File 021-214115
$0$0$0None listed on this filingEDGAR ↗
Oct 15, 2013 D
Digital Mobile Innovations, LLC
File 021-204533
$0$0$0None listed on this filingEDGAR ↗
Jun 3, 2013 D
Digital Management, LLC
File 021-197354
$0$0$0None listed on this filingEDGAR ↗
Oct 14, 2010 D
Digital Management, LLC
File 021-149032
$0$0$0None listed on this filingEDGAR ↗

Counts come from Form D Items 12–15 on the filings in our index (latest filing per offering; one offering = one SEC file number; an amendment updates its offering rather than adding one). "To insiders" = gross proceeds used for payments to executive officers, directors or promoters. "—" = not reported on that filing. Amounts marked (est.) were reported as estimates. "Paid to sell it" = sales compensation recipients named on that filing (Item 12), each linked to FINRA BrokerCheck when a CRD number is reported.

Counted across all 3 issuers in this group — every filing in our index, latest filing per offering (SEC file number).

Property records 0 documents · 0 ownership records · last checked Oct 23, 2026, 8:59 PM ET · NYC and Cook County lookup still to run

0 recorded documents and 0 ownership records matched to Digital in the sources searched.

Not found in sources searched as of Oct 23, 2026, 8:59 PM ET: Hillsborough County FL Clerk of Court Official Records daily index (publicrec.hillsclerk.com D/P/M files), 2 daily files (Oct 14, 2026 to Oct 15, 2026) — loaded Oct 23, 2026, 8:59 PM ET; Florida DOR NAL roll (Hillsborough 39) roll year 2026 — loaded Oct 23, 2026, 8:54 PM ET; Florida DOR NAL roll (Dade 23) roll year 2026 — loaded Oct 23, 2026, 8:58 PM ET; Harris County Appraisal District real_acct.txt roll year 2026 — loaded Oct 23, 2026, 8:58 PM ET; Dallas Central Appraisal District ACCOUNT_INFO.CSV roll year 2026 — loaded Oct 23, 2026, 8:58 PM ET. Still to be looked up for this group: NYC ACRIS via NYC Open Data (Real Property Parties 636b-3b5g, Master bnx9-e6tj, Legals 8h5j-fqxa, Document Control Codes 7isb-wh4c) · NYC PLUTO ownership via NYC Open Data (64uk-42ks) · Cook County IL Assessor via Cook County Open Data (Parcel Sales wvhk-k5uv; Parcel Addresses 3723-97qp). Records in other counties, and recorder indexes we do not yet cover, were not searched.

Property records coverage: New York City (ACRIS recorded documents and PLUTO ownership, looked up per issuer when its page is viewed; re-checked when the page is viewed again more than 30 days after the last check); Hillsborough County FL (recorded documents from Oct 14, 2026 forward; ownership from FL DOR roll 2026); Cook County IL (assessor ownership and deed/sale records, looked up per issuer when its page is viewed); Harris County TX and Dallas County TX (assessor ownership rolls only, 2026 roll; no deed, mortgage or sale records); Miami-Dade County FL (ownership from FL DOR roll only; Clerk recorded documents not covered). Recorder indexes for TX, AZ, IL and WA counties, mortgages and liens outside NYC and FL, lis pendens and foreclosure notices everywhere, Miami-Dade County FL recorded documents, Maricopa County AZ, King County WA, Salt Lake County UT, and all other counties are not covered — not searched. Last refresh by source: Hillsborough County FL Clerk daily index Oct 23, 2026, 8:59 PM ET; Dallas Central Appraisal District ACCOUNT_INFO.CSV Oct 23, 2026, 8:58 PM ET; Harris County Appraisal District real_acct.txt Oct 23, 2026, 8:58 PM ET; Florida DOR NAL roll (Dade 23) Oct 23, 2026, 8:58 PM ET; Florida DOR NAL roll (Hillsborough 39) Oct 23, 2026, 8:54 PM ET. NYC and Cook County are looked up per issuer when its page is viewed; the most recent such lookup on this site finished Oct 24, 2026, 3:30 AM ET. Parties are named as the recorder's index names them (role suffixes as recorded); no address, account number or trust date is shown for an individual, and individual owners of record (home ownership) are not matched or shown. Items still in human review are not shown.

Issuers in this group

Why each issuer is here is stated in the "Linked by" column. Low-confidence links are never shown — they wait for human review.

SourceIssuerLinked byLocationIndustryFilingsSold (max)InvestorsMin. investment (latest filing)Active
EDGAR ↗DM Digital Management, LLCshared people, same business address, similar issuer namesBETHESDA, MDOther Technology5$4,192,218
offering $4,192,218 · similar: $1,100,015–$10,001,163
19
similar: 2–14
No minimum reported
similar: $5,000–$50,000
2010–2016
EDGAR ↗DM Digital Mobile Innovations, LLCshared people, same business addressBETHESDA, MDOther Technology5$5,062,361
offering Indefinite · similar: $1,100,015–$10,001,163
5
similar: 2–14
No minimum reported
similar: $5,000–$50,000
2013–2015
EDGAR ↗DM DIGITAL MANAGEMENT HOLDINGS, LLCshared people, same business address, similar issuer namesBETHESDA, MDOther Technology1$19,203,747
offering $19,203,747 · similar: $1,100,015–$10,001,163
9
similar: 2–14
No minimum reported
similar: $5,000–$50,000
2016–2016

"Similar" = offerings in the same industry claiming the same exemption, filed in the last 5 years: Other Technology / 506(b) (17,390 filings); ranges are the middle half (25th–75th percentile). Computed by PartnerFacts from SEC EDGAR Form D data as of Oct 23, 2026, 5:45 PM ET. Rows without a range: fewer than 30 comparable filings, or not a Rule 506 offering. No ranking or score.

Timeline of offerings

SourceFiledIssuerFormIndustryOfferedSold
EDGAR ↗Aug 31, 2016DIGITAL MANAGEMENT HOLDINGS, LLCDOther Technology$19,203,747$19,203,747
EDGAR ↗Aug 31, 2016Digital Management, LLCDOther Technology$4,192,218$4,192,218
EDGAR ↗Mar 11, 2016Digital Management, LLCD/AOther Technology$2,845,000$2,845,000
EDGAR ↗Jul 8, 2015Digital Mobile Innovations, LLCD/AOther TechnologyIndefinite$5,062,361
EDGAR ↗Jan 22, 2015Digital Mobile Innovations, LLCD/AOther TechnologyIndefinite$2,950,000
EDGAR ↗Mar 24, 2014Digital Mobile Innovations, LLCDOther Technology$2,950,000$2,950,000
EDGAR ↗Feb 26, 2014Digital Mobile Innovations, LLCDOther Technology$2,572,500$2,572,500
EDGAR ↗Oct 15, 2013Digital Mobile Innovations, LLCDOther TechnologyIndefinite$0
EDGAR ↗Jun 3, 2013Digital Management, LLCDOther Technology$200,000$200,000
EDGAR ↗Aug 10, 2012Digital Management, LLCDOther Technology$2,338,333$2,338,333
EDGAR ↗Oct 14, 2010Digital Management, LLCDOther Technology$1,705,581$1,705,581

Activity: 0 new offerings in the last 12 months across all issuers in this group (new offering = a Form D that is not an amendment, D/A) · most recent filing Aug 31, 2016. Industry history, as reported on each offering's latest filing: All 8 offerings reported: Other Technology (2010–2016).

People across the group

NameRolesIssuers hereFirst → last listed
JB Jay Sunny BajajExecutive Officer, Director3Oct 14, 2010 → Aug 31, 2016
KB Ken S BajajExecutive Officer, Director3Aug 10, 2012 → Aug 31, 2016
CD Collin M DretschExecutive Officer2Jun 3, 2013 → Aug 31, 2016
NA Noah AsherExecutive Officer2Jul 8, 2015 → Aug 31, 2016
PM Paul G MurrayExecutive Officer2Aug 10, 2012 → Jan 22, 2015
BG Bradley J. GrossDirector1Aug 31, 2016 → Aug 31, 2016
SY STUART J YARBROUGHDirector1Aug 31, 2016 → Aug 31, 2016
HN Harsh NandaDirector1Aug 31, 2016 → Aug 31, 2016
RP RICHARD N PERLEDirector1Aug 31, 2016 → Aug 31, 2016
JW JOHN E WELCHExecutive Officer1Aug 31, 2016 → Aug 31, 2016
CT Charles ThompsonExecutive Officer1Oct 14, 2010 → Mar 11, 2016
MM Michael McHughExecutive Officer1Oct 14, 2010 → Mar 11, 2016
SG Srinivas GangaExecutive Officer1Oct 14, 2010 → Mar 11, 2016
SD Scott B DeutschmanExecutive Officer1Oct 14, 2010 → Mar 11, 2016
AM Adam McNairExecutive Officer1Mar 11, 2016 → Mar 11, 2016
AM Andrew J MuslinerExecutive Officer1Oct 14, 2010 → Jun 3, 2013
RS Robert B SmithExecutive Officer1Jun 3, 2013 → Jun 3, 2013
VB Vikas BansalExecutive Officer1Oct 14, 2010 → Aug 10, 2012
WL William J. LutiExecutive Officer1Oct 14, 2010 → Oct 14, 2010

Adviser registration (Form ADV)

Searched SEC Form ADV bulk data (registered + exempt reporting advisers) (24,962 records as of Oct 2, 2026, 8:00 AM ET) — nothing matched Digital.

Meta advertising

No Meta Pixel ids or Facebook / Instagram page links on file for Digital as of Oct 24, 2026 — the sponsor website is read for them once it is on file (runs automatically). Meta Ad Library: not searched by PartnerFacts (no API access); a one-tap Ad Library search is under Look further.

Other offering types (Regulation A and Regulation Crowdfunding)

Searched SEC Regulation A Data Sets (Forms 1-A, 1-K, 1-Z; 2015 Q2 → 2026 Q3); SEC Crowdfunding Offerings Data Sets (Form C family; 2016 Q2 → 2026 Q3); EDGAR form index for 2026 Q3 → 2026 Q4 (51,358 records as of Oct 23, 2026, 8:41 PM ET) — nothing matched this name.

Public profiles and social

No website or social profile named in Digital's SEC filings (Form C, Reg A, Form ADV; checked Oct 24, 2026). Web search for this name: #283,954 of 374,652 in line (14 issuers searched so far). One-tap searches: Look further ↓

Export this report as PDF · Premium

Request diligence pack (Premium) PartnerFacts asks the sponsor for the standard information pack and delivers it to you labelled "provided by the sponsor".

Change history

No corrections have been requested for this page.

Request a correction

Free. Covers the grouping itself or any record shown here. Logged with status: received → under review → fixed / confirmed with source.

Sponsor response

Add a sourced explanation next to any fact. Reviewed before publishing.

Grouping is PartnerFacts' inference from public filings (shared related persons, management entities, business address). Everything else on this page is drawn from the filings themselves. Not the same sponsor? Request a correction.

Look further

One-tap searches on sites we do not index ourselves, with the name pre-filled (outside the US (as filed: BETHESDA), MD). Each opens in a new tab; what you find there is not verified by PartnerFacts.