PartnerFacts
Data last updated: Oct 23, 2026, 5:45 PM ETLatest filing: Oct 22, 2026Now: Oct 24, 2026, 5:15 AM ET

Sponsor Check › Sponsor group

CL

Crypto Lotus

One sponsor team, 4 deal companies · Berkeley, CA

Grouped because: 5 shared people, same business address (3 issuers), similar issuer names (3) (automatic match from the filings) · not the same sponsor?

4deal companies
$66.4Mreported sold
50investors
6Form D filings
2017–2022active
0new, last 12 mo
Follow this sponsor groupLook further ↓

Data last updated Oct 23, 2026, 5:45 PM ET · Latest filing in this group Feb 25, 2022 · Courts (RECAP) last checked: Oct 24, 2026, 2:16 AM ET · SEC enforcement last checked: covered by the index scan as of Oct 24, 2026, 2:50 AM ET

The short version

Crypto Lotus is a sponsor group of 4 issuers that PartnerFacts links to one sponsor (shared people, same business address, similar issuer names; automatic match from the filings), filing 6 Form D filings between Jul 2017 and Feb 2022.

What this means One team, 4 deal companies, about 5 years of track record in SEC filings. We link the companies because the same people or address appear on their forms — tap "Request a correction" if that is wrong.

Combined reported sold: $66.4M to 50 investors (latest filing per issuer). Industries as reported: Pooled Investment Fund (3), Other Technology (1). Issuers are based in CA (4).

What this means $66.4M raised across the group, about $1.33M per investor. Amounts come from each company's latest Form D; they are what the sponsor reported, not audited figures.

Principal people: Joshua Goldbard (4 issuers, executive officer and director), Apneet Jolly (3 issuers, executive officer and director), Aviad Haimi-Cohen (3 issuers, executive officer and director), Kevin B Fischer (3 issuers, executive officer and director), Nathana Sharma (2 issuers, executive officer and director) and 5 more.

What this means The person on the most companies is usually the one running the show; their page lists every deal.

Activity: 0 new offerings in the last 12 months; latest filing Feb 25, 2022.

What this means No new raise filed in the past year.

Public records searched: federal courts (CourtListener / RECAP), SEC enforcement releases, state securities regulators (AZ, CA, DE, TX, WA), property records (NYC, FL, IL and TX counties) — 1 bankruptcy case matching the name listed in Key records below.

What this means 1 record came back. Each one is listed below with a link to the original document and a line saying why it matched. A name match is not proof it is the same person or company — read the why line and the document. Being sued or named in a release is an accusation, not a finding.

We compared 6 public filings for Crypto Lotus and found 9 differences, 1 worth asking the sponsor about: Form D filed 295 days after the first sale; and more below.

What this means These are differences between the sponsor's own SEC filings — both values, dates and sources are listed in Key records, section 4. Most have ordinary explanations; ask the sponsor.

What the community is saying

Community search for Crypto Lotus has not run yet — it is joining a line of 10,954 names; searches run around the clock at the hosts' allowed rate. Searched so far: 27 names.

Community comments are quoted as written by their authors. Sources searched: BiggerPockets forums (via DuckDuckGo, Brave, Bing and BiggerPockets search) and Reddit (search feed + public archive).

Key records

Five things investors ask first. Items still in human review are counted, not shown.

1. Lawsuits

None found in sources searched — federal courts (CourtListener / RECAP), checked Oct 24, 2026

What was searched

Sources searched: CourtListener bulk data (RECAP dockets as of 2026-09-30; recall-first rule 10-24) — federal district + bankruptcy courts State courts: not covered (one-tap state court links under Look further). PACER: not searched. · Last checked Oct 24, 2026, 2:16 AM ET.

State courts: not covered (one-tap state court links under Look further). No state offers a lawful automated statewide source PartnerFacts can use today. Texas (re:SearchTX) terms prohibit storing results in a database open to third parties; New York (WebCivil) and Massachusetts (MassCourts) require a browser check that blocks scripted queries; California has no statewide index (58 county portals; Rule of Court 2.503 grants name-based access case by case); Florida, Utah and Illinois offer paid or partial access whose terms for automated use are unverified. Washington (dw.courts.wa.gov; bulk index reports under a JISC data-dissemination agreement), Delaware (CourtConnect; Court of Chancery not included) and Arizona (apps.azcourts.gov/publicaccess, which has an official channel to request high-volume access) are the candidates; PartnerFacts will request written permission before any automated search. Federal courts are searched through CourtListener / RECAP.

2. Regulatory actions

None found in sources searched — SEC enforcement releases (index scan as of Oct 24, 2026, 2:50 AM ET) · state securities regulators: AZ, CA, DE, TX, WA (crawled Oct 23, 2026)

What was searched

SEC enforcement searched: SEC litigation releases and administrative proceedings — respondent names in the sec.gov index titles (30,205 releases, 1995-09-19 to 2026-10-23); release text is read only to confirm a candidate. Names that appear only in the body of a release are not found. — Searched SEC litigation releases and administrative proceedings (1995→ / 2007→) (30,205 records as of Oct 24, 2026, 2:50 AM ET) — nothing matched Crypto Lotus..

State securities regulators searched: AZ (Corporation Commission Securities Division), CA (DFPI — 16 of 12,159 DFPI respondent pages read so far; sponsor-name matches are read first), DE (DOJ Investor Protection Unit), TX (State Securities Board), WA (DFI) — last crawled Oct 23, 2026, 9:57 PM ET. Other states are not covered.

3. Bankruptcies

1 case: 1 open

FTX Recovery Trust v. Crypto Lotus Fund B International, Ltd. open matched at sponsor-group level (Crypto Lotus)
United States Bankruptcy Court, D. Delaware · No. 26-50256 · Filed May 12, 2026 · Nature of suit: 91 Declaratory judgment; 02 Other (e.g. other actions that would have been brought in state court if unrelated to bankruptcy)
Role of Crypto Lotus Fund B International, Ltd.: Defendant · Outcome: Open — no termination date on the docket (bulk snapshot 2026-09-30) Docket on CourtListener ↗
exact company name; court in DE (not the issuer's state); group issuer "crypto lotus fund b international" is a party
What was searched

Sources searched: Federal bankruptcy courts via CourtListener / RECAP archive (federal district courts, federal bankruptcy courts). State courts: not covered (one-tap state court links under Look further). PACER: not searched (RECAP only). · Last checked Oct 24, 2026, 2:16 AM ET.

Court records show docket facts only; we never restate allegations as facts. Outcome wording comes from the docket feed; where it does not state a disposition we say so.

State courts: not covered (one-tap state court links under Look further). No state offers a lawful automated statewide source PartnerFacts can use today. Texas (re:SearchTX) terms prohibit storing results in a database open to third parties; New York (WebCivil) and Massachusetts (MassCourts) require a browser check that blocks scripted queries; California has no statewide index (58 county portals; Rule of Court 2.503 grants name-based access case by case); Florida, Utah and Illinois offer paid or partial access whose terms for automated use are unverified. Washington (dw.courts.wa.gov; bulk index reports under a JISC data-dissemination agreement), Delaware (CourtConnect; Court of Chancery not included) and Arizona (apps.azcourts.gov/publicaccess, which has an official channel to request high-volume access) are the candidates; PartnerFacts will request written permission before any automated search. Federal courts are searched through CourtListener / RECAP.

4. Differences between public sources

No comparisons published

What is compared

No public statement by this sponsor group has been collected yet, so there is nothing to compare. Sources compared: the sponsor's own website (known from the issuer's own filings — Form C issuer website, EDGAR company profile — an approved profile claim or Form ADV Item 1.I of its matched adviser) · SEC Form D · SEC Form ADV (IAPD) · Internet Archive · No website is on file for this sponsor group yet.

9 differences found between the filings for Crypto Lotus — 1 worth asking about (compared 6 filings on Oct 24, 2026)

Worth asking · May 6, 2021 – Feb 25, 2022

Form D filed 295 days after the first sale — MobileCoin, Inc.

The filing says the first sale was May 6, 2021. The Form D was filed Feb 25, 2022 — 295 days later. The rule: a Form D is generally due within 15 days after the first sale, so this one is 280 days past that.

What this means The notice went in months after money was taken in. Late notices are common and carry no penalty by themselves, but it is fair to ask the sponsor why the paperwork lagged.

Form D · Feb 25, 2022 ↗MobileCoin, Inc. — PartnerFacts page ↗
Sources
Note · Apr 2, 2018 – May 21, 2018

Form D filed 49 days after the first sale — MobileCoin, Inc.

The filing says the first sale was Apr 2, 2018. The Form D was filed May 21, 2018 — 49 days later. The rule: a Form D is generally due within 15 days after the first sale, so this one is 34 days past that.

What this means A late notice is common and carries no penalty by itself. It is worth asking the sponsor why the paperwork lagged.

Form D · May 21, 2018 ↗MobileCoin, Inc. — PartnerFacts page ↗
Sources
Note · Jul 4, 2017 – Jul 19, 2017

No amendment in the last 12 months on an offering that may still be open — Crypto Lotus Fund A LP (latest filing Jul 19, 2017)

The latest filing for this offering is dated Jul 19, 2017 (first sale Jul 4, 2017). It reports $0 sold of an indefinite amount offered. No later amendment is in our index as of Oct 24, 2026.

What this means SEC rules expect a yearly amendment while an offering is still going. The raise may simply have ended — a Form D does not say when it closed. Ask the sponsor whether the offering closed, when, and at what amount.

Form D · Jul 19, 2017 ↗Crypto Lotus Fund A LP — PartnerFacts page ↗
Sources
Note · Jul 19, 2017 – Jan 25, 2018

Joshua Goldbard is written 2 different ways on the filings

listed as "Joshua Louis Goldbard" on the Jul 19, 2017 filing, and "Joshua Goldbard" on 5 filings (from Jan 25, 2018).

What this means Same person, written differently — a middle name or suffix left off, or spelled another way. It is normal, but check that the full legal name matches your subscription documents.

Form D · Jul 19, 2017 ↗Form D · Jan 25, 2018 ↗Joshua Goldbard — PartnerFacts page ↗
Sources
Note · Jul 19, 2017 – Jan 25, 2018

Kevin B Fischer is written 2 different ways on the filings

listed as "Kevin Fischer" on the Jul 19, 2017 filing, and "Kevin B Fischer" on 2 filings (from Jan 25, 2018).

What this means Same person, written differently — a middle name or suffix left off, or spelled another way. It is normal, but check that the full legal name matches your subscription documents.

Form D · Jul 19, 2017 ↗Form D · Jan 25, 2018 ↗Kevin B Fischer — PartnerFacts page ↗
Sources
Note · Feb 26, 2021 – Feb 25, 2022

Address moved from Millbrae, CA to San Francisco, CA — MobileCoin, Inc.

The people listed on the Feb 26, 2021 filing give Millbrae, CA; on the Feb 25, 2022 filing they give San Francisco, CA.

What this means Businesses move; this just shows the two places and dates. If you were told one city and the forms say another, ask which is current.

Form D · Feb 26, 2021 ↗Form D · Feb 25, 2022 ↗MobileCoin, Inc. — PartnerFacts page ↗
Sources
Note · May 21, 2018 – Feb 26, 2021

Address moved from San Francisco, CA to Millbrae, CA — MobileCoin, Inc.

The people listed on the May 21, 2018 filing give San Francisco, CA; on the Feb 26, 2021 filing they give Millbrae, CA.

What this means Businesses move; this just shows the two places and dates. If you were told one city and the forms say another, ask which is current.

Form D · May 21, 2018 ↗Form D · Feb 26, 2021 ↗MobileCoin, Inc. — PartnerFacts page ↗
Sources
Note · Jul 19, 2017 – Feb 25, 2022

Member companies were formed in 3 different states

California (2), Cayman Islands (1), Delaware (1) — out of 4 member issuers. The odd ones out: Crypto Lotus Fund B (International), Ltd. (Cayman Islands); MobileCoin, Inc. (Delaware).

What this means Sponsors often form each deal company in Delaware or Wyoming no matter where the property is. A mix is common; it just tells you which state's rules each company lives under.

Crypto Lotus — sponsor group page ↗Crypto Lotus Fund B (International), Ltd. — PartnerFacts page ↗MobileCoin, Inc. — PartnerFacts page ↗
Sources
What is compared

What is compared: every Form D and D/A we hold for this subject, side by side — filing dates vs. first-sale dates (the 15-day rule), amendment timing on open offerings (the yearly-amendment expectation), amounts sold, investor counts, offering amounts and minimums across amendments, industry and size bands, addresses, how each person's name and role is written, paid sellers' CRD numbers, and (for groups) where the member companies were formed and sit. Everything is as filed by the issuer; the SEC does not check it. Differences are common and usually have ordinary explanations — we show both values, the dates, and the source so you can ask. As of Oct 24, 2026.

5. Money to insiders

0 of 6 offerings report sales commissions; 0 report finder's fees; 0 report proceeds to related persons. (includes amounts the issuer reported as estimates)

Offering (latest filing)Sales commissionsFinder's feesTo insidersPaid to sell itSource
Feb 25, 2022 D
MobileCoin, Inc.
File 021-435009
$0$0$0None listed on this filingEDGAR ↗
Feb 26, 2021 D
MobileCoin, Inc.
File 021-390631
$0$0$0None listed on this filingEDGAR ↗
May 21, 2018 D
MobileCoin, Inc.
File 021-312829
$0$0$0None listed on this filingEDGAR ↗
Feb 1, 2018 D
Crypto Lotus Fund B (International), Ltd.
File 021-304635
$0$0$0
Principals may be entitled to a management fee and performance fee based on assets of the Fund.
None listed on this filingEDGAR ↗
Jan 25, 2018 D
Crypto Lotus Fund B, LLC
File 021-304112
$0$0$0
Crypto Lotus LLC and certain persons listed in item 3 may receive a management fee based on the value of the issuer's assets and/or a performance fee based on the issuer's profits.
None listed on this filingEDGAR ↗
Jul 19, 2017 D
Crypto Lotus Fund A LP
File 021-291004
$0$0$0 (est.)NONE no CRD number reportedEDGAR ↗
How this is counted

Counts come from Form D Items 12–15 on the filings in our index (latest filing per offering; one offering = one SEC file number; an amendment updates its offering rather than adding one). "To insiders" = gross proceeds used for payments to executive officers, directors or promoters. "—" = not reported on that filing. Amounts marked (est.) were reported as estimates. "Paid to sell it" = sales compensation recipients named on that filing (Item 12), each linked to FINRA BrokerCheck when a CRD number is reported.

Counted across all 4 issuers in this group — every filing in our index, latest filing per offering (SEC file number).

Property records 0 documents · 0 ownership records · last checked Oct 23, 2026, 8:59 PM ET · NYC and Cook County lookup still to run

0 recorded documents and 0 ownership records matched to Crypto Lotus in the sources searched.

Not found in sources searched as of Oct 23, 2026, 8:59 PM ET: Hillsborough County FL Clerk of Court Official Records daily index (publicrec.hillsclerk.com D/P/M files), 2 daily files (Oct 14, 2026 to Oct 15, 2026) — loaded Oct 23, 2026, 8:59 PM ET; Florida DOR NAL roll (Hillsborough 39) roll year 2026 — loaded Oct 23, 2026, 8:54 PM ET; Florida DOR NAL roll (Dade 23) roll year 2026 — loaded Oct 23, 2026, 8:58 PM ET; Harris County Appraisal District real_acct.txt roll year 2026 — loaded Oct 23, 2026, 8:58 PM ET; Dallas Central Appraisal District ACCOUNT_INFO.CSV roll year 2026 — loaded Oct 23, 2026, 8:58 PM ET. Still to be looked up for this group: NYC ACRIS via NYC Open Data (Real Property Parties 636b-3b5g, Master bnx9-e6tj, Legals 8h5j-fqxa, Document Control Codes 7isb-wh4c) · NYC PLUTO ownership via NYC Open Data (64uk-42ks) · Cook County IL Assessor via Cook County Open Data (Parcel Sales wvhk-k5uv; Parcel Addresses 3723-97qp). Records in other counties, and recorder indexes we do not yet cover, were not searched.

Property records coverage: New York City (ACRIS recorded documents and PLUTO ownership, looked up per issuer when its page is viewed; re-checked when the page is viewed again more than 30 days after the last check); Hillsborough County FL (recorded documents from Oct 14, 2026 forward; ownership from FL DOR roll 2026); Cook County IL (assessor ownership and deed/sale records, looked up per issuer when its page is viewed); Harris County TX and Dallas County TX (assessor ownership rolls only, 2026 roll; no deed, mortgage or sale records); Miami-Dade County FL (ownership from FL DOR roll only; Clerk recorded documents not covered). Recorder indexes for TX, AZ, IL and WA counties, mortgages and liens outside NYC and FL, lis pendens and foreclosure notices everywhere, Miami-Dade County FL recorded documents, Maricopa County AZ, King County WA, Salt Lake County UT, and all other counties are not covered — not searched. Last refresh by source: Hillsborough County FL Clerk daily index Oct 23, 2026, 8:59 PM ET; Dallas Central Appraisal District ACCOUNT_INFO.CSV Oct 23, 2026, 8:58 PM ET; Harris County Appraisal District real_acct.txt Oct 23, 2026, 8:58 PM ET; Florida DOR NAL roll (Dade 23) Oct 23, 2026, 8:58 PM ET; Florida DOR NAL roll (Hillsborough 39) Oct 23, 2026, 8:54 PM ET. NYC and Cook County are looked up per issuer when its page is viewed; the most recent such lookup on this site finished Oct 24, 2026, 3:30 AM ET. Parties are named as the recorder's index names them (role suffixes as recorded); no address, account number or trust date is shown for an individual, and individual owners of record (home ownership) are not matched or shown. Items still in human review are not shown.

Issuers in this group

Why each issuer is here is stated in the "Linked by" column. Low-confidence links are never shown — they wait for human review.

SourceIssuerLinked byLocationIndustryFilingsSold (max)InvestorsMin. investment (latest filing)Active
EDGAR ↗CL Crypto Lotus Fund A LPshared people, same business address, similar issuer namesBERKELEY, CAPooled Investment Fund1$0
offering Indefinite · similar: $155,000–$5,250,000
2
similar: 4–27
No minimum reported
similar: $1,000–$100,000
2017–2017
EDGAR ↗CL Crypto Lotus Fund B, LLCshared people, same business address, similar issuer namesBERKELEY, CAPooled Investment Fund1$0
offering Indefinite · similar: $155,000–$5,250,000
0
similar: 4–27
No minimum reported
similar: $1,000–$100,000
2018–2018
EDGAR ↗CL Crypto Lotus Fund B (International), Ltd.shared people, same business address, similar issuer namesBerkeley, CAPooled Investment Fund1$0
offering Indefinite · similar: $155,000–$5,250,000
0
similar: 4–27
No minimum reported
similar: $1,000–$100,000
2018–2018
EDGAR ↗M MobileCoin, Inc.shared peopleSAN FRANCISCO, CAOther Technology3$66,447,078
offering $66,447,078 · similar: $1,100,015–$10,001,163
48
similar: 2–14
No minimum reported
similar: $5,000–$50,000
2018–2022

"Similar" = offerings in the same industry claiming the same exemption, filed in the last 5 years: Pooled Investment Fund / 506(b) (83,801 filings); Other Technology / 506(b) (17,390 filings); ranges are the middle half (25th–75th percentile). Computed by PartnerFacts from SEC EDGAR Form D data as of Oct 23, 2026, 5:45 PM ET. Rows without a range: fewer than 30 comparable filings, or not a Rule 506 offering. No ranking or score.

Timeline of offerings

SourceFiledIssuerFormIndustryOfferedSold
EDGAR ↗Feb 25, 2022MobileCoin, Inc.DOther Technology$66,447,078$66,447,078
EDGAR ↗Feb 26, 2021MobileCoin, Inc.DOther Technology$6,348,976$6,348,976
EDGAR ↗May 21, 2018MobileCoin, Inc.DOther Technology$29,714,434$29,714,434
EDGAR ↗Feb 1, 2018Crypto Lotus Fund B (International), Ltd.DPooled Investment FundIndefinite$0
EDGAR ↗Jan 25, 2018Crypto Lotus Fund B, LLCDPooled Investment FundIndefinite$0
EDGAR ↗Jul 19, 2017Crypto Lotus Fund A LPDPooled Investment FundIndefinite$0

Activity: 0 new offerings in the last 12 months across all issuers in this group (new offering = a Form D that is not an amendment, D/A) · most recent filing Feb 25, 2022. Industry history, as reported on each offering's latest filing: Previous offerings: Pooled Investment Fund (2017–2018). Latest offering: Other Technology (2018–2022; most recent Feb 25, 2022).

People across the group

NameRolesIssuers hereFirst → last listed
JG Joshua GoldbardExecutive Officer, Director4Jul 19, 2017 → Feb 25, 2022
AC Aviad Haimi-CohenExecutive Officer, Director3Jan 25, 2018 → Feb 25, 2022
AJ Apneet JollyExecutive Officer, Director3Jul 19, 2017 → Feb 1, 2018
KF Kevin B FischerExecutive Officer, Director3Jul 19, 2017 → Feb 1, 2018
NS Nathana SharmaExecutive Officer, Director2Jan 25, 2018 → Feb 1, 2018
TH Todd HuffmanDirector1May 21, 2018 → Feb 25, 2022
SH Sara Drakeley HallDirector1Feb 25, 2022 → Feb 25, 2022
SS Suresh Toby SegaranDirector1Feb 26, 2021 → Feb 26, 2021
SG Shane GlynnExecutive Officer, Director1May 21, 2018 → May 21, 2018
SB Shoshana O'BrienExecutive Officer1Feb 1, 2018 → Feb 1, 2018

Adviser registration (Form ADV)

Searched SEC Form ADV bulk data (registered + exempt reporting advisers) (24,962 records as of Oct 2, 2026, 8:00 AM ET) — nothing matched Crypto Lotus.

Meta advertising

No Meta Pixel ids or Facebook / Instagram page links on file for Crypto Lotus as of Oct 24, 2026 — the sponsor website is read for them once it is on file (runs automatically). Meta Ad Library: not searched by PartnerFacts (no API access); a one-tap Ad Library search is under Look further.

Other offering types (Regulation A and Regulation Crowdfunding)

Searched SEC Regulation A Data Sets (Forms 1-A, 1-K, 1-Z; 2015 Q2 → 2026 Q3); SEC Crowdfunding Offerings Data Sets (Form C family; 2016 Q2 → 2026 Q3); EDGAR form index for 2026 Q3 → 2026 Q4 (51,358 records as of Oct 23, 2026, 8:41 PM ET) — nothing matched this name.

Public profiles and social

No website or social profile named in Crypto Lotus's SEC filings (Form C, Reg A, Form ADV; checked Oct 24, 2026). Web search for this name: #164,656 of 374,652 in line (14 issuers searched so far). One-tap searches: Look further ↓

Export this report as PDF · Premium

Request diligence pack (Premium) PartnerFacts asks the sponsor for the standard information pack and delivers it to you labelled "provided by the sponsor".

Change history

No corrections have been requested for this page.

Request a correction

Free. Covers the grouping itself or any record shown here. Logged with status: received → under review → fixed / confirmed with source.

Sponsor response

Add a sourced explanation next to any fact. Reviewed before publishing.

Grouping is PartnerFacts' inference from public filings (shared related persons, management entities, business address). Everything else on this page is drawn from the filings themselves. Not the same sponsor? Request a correction.

Look further

One-tap searches on sites we do not index ourselves, with the name pre-filled (outside the US (as filed: BERKELEY), CA). Each opens in a new tab; what you find there is not verified by PartnerFacts.

Social and web

LinkedIn companies ↗Instagram ↗X (Twitter) ↗Facebook ↗YouTube ↗Google ↗Google Images ↗Google News ↗Meta Ad Library ↗

Courts

CourtListener / RECAP (federal) ↗PACER case locator (federal, login) ↗California — find the county court ↗Los Angeles Superior Court case search ↗

Securities regulators

SEC EDGAR full-text search ↗SEC action look-up ↗FINRA BrokerCheck ↗SEC IAPD adviser search ↗

Business registries

California Secretary of State business search ↗OpenCorporates ↗