The short version
Group linked by Carolyn J. Wilder is a sponsor group of 2 issuers that PartnerFacts links to one sponsor (shared people, same person name on both filings, shared principal (person on 60+ issuers) at the same address or management entity, same business address, similar issuer names; automatic match from the filings), filing 3 Form D filings in Feb 2009.
What this means One team, 2 deal companies. We link the companies because the same people or address appear on their forms — tap "Request a correction" if that is wrong.
Combined reported sold: $1.89M to 2 investors (latest filing per issuer). Industries as reported: Telecommunications (2). Issuers are based in GA (2).
What this means $1.89M raised across the group, about $945K per investor. Amounts come from each company's latest Form D; they are what the sponsor reported, not audited figures.
Principal people: Carolyn J. Wilder (2 issuers, executive officer), Christian Reeves (2 issuers, executive officer), Dane F. Ershen (2 issuers, executive officer), David J. Saska (2 issuers, executive officer), Donald P. Houghton (2 issuers, executive officer) and 15 more.
What this means The person on the most companies is usually the one running the show; their page lists every deal.
Activity: 0 new offerings in the last 12 months; latest filing Feb 12, 2009.
What this means No new raise filed in the past year.
Public records searched: federal courts (CourtListener / RECAP), SEC enforcement releases, state securities regulators (AK, AL, AR, AZ, CA, CO, CT, DC, DE, FINRA, FL, GA, HI, ID, IL, KS, KY, LA, MA, MD, ME, MI, MO, MS, MT, NASAA, NC, ND, NH, NM, NV, NY, OH, OK, OR, PA, RI, SC, SD, TN, TX, UT, VT, WA, WI, WV, WY), property records (NYC, FL, IL and TX counties) — 13 court cases matching the name, 17 bankruptcy cases matching the name listed in Key records below.
What this means 30 records came back, including 1 court case still open — open cases can take years and cost money. Each one is listed below with a link to the original document and a line saying why it matched. A name match is not proof it is the same person or company — read the why line and the document. Being sued or named in a release is an accusation, not a finding.