PartnerFacts
Data last updated: Oct 23, 2026, 5:45 PM ETLatest filing: Oct 22, 2026Now: Oct 24, 2026, 6:54 AM ET

Sponsor Check › Sponsor group

C

Cedarfield

One sponsor team, 3 deal companies · Beverly Hills, CA

Grouped because: 1 shared person, 1 shared management entity, same business address (3 issuers) (automatic match from the filings) · not the same sponsor?

3deal companies
$400Mreported sold
23investors
3Form D filings
2021–2022active
0new, last 12 mo
Follow this sponsor groupLook further ↓

Data last updated Oct 23, 2026, 5:45 PM ET · Latest filing in this group Aug 23, 2022 · Courts (RECAP) last checked: Oct 24, 2026, 2:16 AM ET · SEC enforcement last checked: covered by the index scan as of Oct 24, 2026, 2:50 AM ET

The short version

Cedarfield is a sponsor group of 3 issuers that PartnerFacts links to one sponsor (shared people, shared management entity, same business address; automatic match from the filings), filing 3 Form D filings between Dec 2021 and Aug 2022.

What this means One team, 3 deal companies, about 1 year of track record in SEC filings. We link the companies because the same people or address appear on their forms — tap "Request a correction" if that is wrong.

Combined reported sold: $400M to 23 investors (latest filing per issuer). Industries as reported: "Other" (3). Issuers are based in CA (3).

What this means $400M raised across the group, about $17.4M per investor. Amounts come from each company's latest Form D; they are what the sponsor reported, not audited figures.

Principal people: Isser Elishis (3 issuers, director), The Cedarfield Group LLC (2 issuers, director, entity) and Whiskey Service LLC (1 issuer, director, entity).

What this means The person on the most companies is usually the one running the show; their page lists every deal.

Activity: 0 new offerings in the last 12 months; latest filing Aug 23, 2022.

What this means No new raise filed in the past year.

Public records searched: federal courts (CourtListener / RECAP), SEC enforcement releases, state securities regulators (AR, AZ, CA, CT, DE, FINRA, GA, HI, ID, LA, ME, MO, MS, MT, NASAA, NC, NH, NM, OR, RI, TX, WA), property records (NYC, FL, IL and TX counties) — 6 court cases matching the name, 11 bankruptcy cases matching the name listed in Key records below.

What this means 17 records came back, including 2 court cases still open — open cases can take years and cost money. Each one is listed below with a link to the original document and a line saying why it matched. A name match is not proof it is the same person or company — read the why line and the document. Being sued or named in a release is an accusation, not a finding.

We compared 3 public filings for Cedarfield and found 7 differences: Bankruptcy case: Sand Castle Realty, a California corporation; Form D filed 54 days after the first sale; and more below.

What this means These are differences between the sponsor's own SEC filings — both values, dates and sources are listed in Key records, section 4. Most have ordinary explanations; ask the sponsor.

What the community is saying

Community search for Cedarfield has not run yet — it is #9,884 of 21,487 in line; searches run around the clock at the hosts' allowed rate. Searched so far: 363 names.

Community comments are quoted as written by their authors. Sources searched: BiggerPockets forums (via DuckDuckGo, Brave, Bing and BiggerPockets search) and Reddit (search feed + public archive).

Key records

Five things investors ask first. Items still in human review are counted, not shown.

1. Lawsuits

6 cases: 2 open, 2 judgment, 1 dismissed, 1 closed (disposition not in docket feed)

AFCO Credit Corporation v. Sand Castle South Homeowners Association, Inc open
District Court, D. South Carolina · No. 4:26-cv-01831 · Filed May 5, 2026 · Nature of suit: 190 Contract: Other · Cause: 28:1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Role of AFCO Credit Corporation v. Sand Castle South Homeowners Association, Inc: Party · Outcome: Open — no termination date on the docket (bulk snapshot 2026-09-30) Docket on CourtListener ↗
company name words appear in the caption; court in SC (not the issuer's state)
Minor 1 through John Doe 1 v. Sand Castle Caterers, Inc. open
District Court, E.D. New York · No. 1:24-cv-02391 · Filed Mar 30, 2024
Role of Minor 1 through John Doe 1 v. Sand Castle Caterers, Inc.: Party · Outcome: Open — no termination date on the docket (bulk snapshot 2026-09-30) Docket on CourtListener ↗
company name words appear in the caption; court in NY (not the issuer's state)
Nevada Sand Castle, LLC v. Green Tree Servicing LLC judgment
District Court, D. Nevada · No. 2:15-cv-00588 · Filed Mar 31, 2015 · Closed Feb 22, 2017 · Nature of suit: Real Property: Other · Cause: 28:1332 Diversity-Petition for Removal
Role of Nevada Sand Castle, LLC v. Green Tree Servicing LLC: Party · Outcome: Terminated 2017-02-22 — FJC Integrated Database disposition: Judgment on motion before trial; judgment for defendant Docket on CourtListener ↗
company name words appear in the caption; court in NV (not the issuer's state)
GMAC/Residential v. Stone Castle judgment
District Court, D. Minnesota · No. 0:02-cv-03470 · Filed Aug 23, 2002 · Closed Nov 30, 2002 · Nature of suit: 190 Other contract actions
Role of GMAC/Residential v. Stone Castle: Party · Outcome: Terminated 2002-11-30 — FJC Integrated Database disposition: Judgment on default; judgment for plaintiff Docket on CourtListener ↗
company name words appear in the caption; court in MN (not the issuer's state)
Sand Castle Builders v. Rittenhouse dismissed
District Court, C.D. Illinois · No. 3:01-cv-03308 · Filed Oct 12, 2001 · Closed May 9, 2002 · Nature of suit: 190 Other contract actions
Role of Sand Castle Builders v. Rittenhouse: Party · Outcome: Terminated 2002-05-09 — FJC Integrated Database disposition: Voluntarily dismissed Docket on CourtListener ↗
company name words appear in the caption; court in IL (not the issuer's state)
Sand Castle Bldr Inc v. Rittenhouse closed
District Court, N.D. Illinois · No. 1:01-cv-03786 · Filed May 22, 2001 · Closed Sep 25, 2001 · Nature of suit: 190 Other contract actions
Role of Sand Castle Bldr Inc v. Rittenhouse: Party · Outcome: Terminated 2001-09-25 — FJC Integrated Database disposition: Transfer to another district Docket on CourtListener ↗
company name words appear in the caption; court in IL (not the issuer's state)
What was searched

Sources searched: CourtListener bulk data (RECAP dockets as of 2026-09-30; recall-first rule 10-24) — federal district + bankruptcy courts State courts: not covered (one-tap state court links under Look further). PACER: not searched. · Last checked Oct 24, 2026, 2:16 AM ET.

Court records show docket facts only; we never restate allegations as facts. Outcome wording comes from the docket feed; where it does not state a disposition we say so.

State courts: not covered (one-tap state court links under Look further). No state offers a lawful automated statewide source PartnerFacts can use today. Texas (re:SearchTX) terms prohibit storing results in a database open to third parties; New York (WebCivil) and Massachusetts (MassCourts) require a browser check that blocks scripted queries; California has no statewide index (58 county portals; Rule of Court 2.503 grants name-based access case by case); Florida, Utah and Illinois offer paid or partial access whose terms for automated use are unverified. Washington (dw.courts.wa.gov; bulk index reports under a JISC data-dissemination agreement), Delaware (CourtConnect; Court of Chancery not included) and Arizona (apps.azcourts.gov/publicaccess, which has an official channel to request high-volume access) are the candidates; PartnerFacts will request written permission before any automated search. Federal courts are searched through CourtListener / RECAP.

2. Regulatory actions

None found in sources searched — SEC enforcement releases (index scan as of Oct 24, 2026, 2:50 AM ET) · state securities regulators: NV (crawled Oct 23, 2026)

What was searched

SEC enforcement searched: SEC litigation releases and administrative proceedings — respondent names in the sec.gov index titles (30,205 releases, 1995-09-19 to 2026-10-23); release text is read only to confirm a candidate. Names that appear only in the body of a release are not found. — Searched SEC litigation releases and administrative proceedings (1995→ / 2007→) (30,205 records as of Oct 24, 2026, 2:50 AM ET) — nothing matched Cedarfield..

State securities regulators: Securities regulators searched (3,318 actions): AZ Corporation Commission Securities Division (411 actions, 2017–2026), CA DFPI (25 actions, 2007–2024; listing starts 2002), DE DOJ Investor Protection Unit (257 actions, 1987–2026), TX State Securities Board (586 actions, 2006–2026), WA DFI (2,039 actions, 2001–2026) — 16 of 12,159 DFPI respondent pages read so far; sponsor-name matches are read first — last crawled Oct 23, 2026, 9:57 PM ET. No machine-readable public listing today for IA, IN, KS, MI, NE, NV (see docs/state-regulators.md).

3. Bankruptcies

11 cases: 2 open, 9 closed (disposition not in docket feed)

Conn's Distribution Trust v. Sand Castle Strategy, LLC open
United States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. Texas · No. 26-03406 · Filed Jul 21, 2026
Role of Conn's Distribution Trust v. Sand Castle Strategy, LLC: Party · Outcome: Open — no termination date on the docket (bulk snapshot 2026-09-30) Docket on CourtListener ↗
company name words appear in the caption; court in TX (not the issuer's state)
Sand Castle Construction and Hardscape, LLC open
United States Bankruptcy Court, D. New Hampshire · No. 24-10460 · Filed Jul 2, 2024
Role of Sand Castle Construction and Hardscape, LLC: Party · Outcome: Open — no termination date on the docket (bulk snapshot 2026-09-30) Docket on CourtListener ↗
company name words appear in the caption; court in NH (not the issuer's state)
Stone Castle Capital LLC closed
United States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. New York · No. 24-22281 · Filed Apr 1, 2024 · Closed Jun 10, 2024
Role of Stone Castle Capital LLC: Party · Outcome: Case closed 2024-06-10 (disposition not included in the bulk docket feed — see docket) Docket on CourtListener ↗
company name words appear in the caption; court in NY (not the issuer's state)
Sand Castle South Timeshare Owners Association, Inc. closed
United States Bankruptcy Court, D. South Carolina · No. 19-80101 · Filed Dec 16, 2019 · Closed Aug 17, 2020 · Nature of suit: 02 Other (e.g. other actions that would have been brought in state court if unrelated to bankruptcy); 498 Other Action; 31 Approval of sale of property of estate and of a co-owner - 363(h)
Role of Sand Castle South Timeshare Owners Association, Inc.: Party · Outcome: Case closed 2020-08-17 (disposition not included in the bulk docket feed — see docket) Docket on CourtListener ↗
company name words appear in the caption; court in SC (not the issuer's state)
Sand Castle South Timeshare Owners Association, Inc. closed
United States Bankruptcy Court, D. South Carolina · No. 19-02764 · Filed May 22, 2019 · Closed Jan 5, 2021
Role of Sand Castle South Timeshare Owners Association, Inc.: Party · Outcome: Case closed 2021-01-05 (disposition not included in the bulk docket feed — see docket) Docket on CourtListener ↗
company name words appear in the caption; court in SC (not the issuer's state)
Sand Castle Design Corporation closed
United States Bankruptcy Court, M.D. Florida · No. 8:03-bk-09702 · Filed May 12, 2003 · Closed Jun 8, 2006
Role of Sand Castle Design Corporation: Party · Outcome: Case closed 2006-06-08 (disposition not included in the bulk docket feed — see docket) Docket on CourtListener ↗
company name words appear in the caption; court in FL (not the issuer's state)
Sand Castle Builders Inc. closed
United States Bankruptcy Court, D. South Carolina · No. 02-07409 · Filed Jun 21, 2002 · Closed Jan 18, 2006
Role of Sand Castle Builders Inc.: Party · Outcome: Case closed 2006-01-18 (disposition not included in the bulk docket feed — see docket) Docket on CourtListener ↗
company name words appear in the caption; court in SC (not the issuer's state)
Sand Castle Realty, a California corporation closed
United States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. California · No. 91-03224 · Filed Mar 26, 1991 · Closed Jun 3, 1991
Role of Sand Castle Realty, a California corporation: Party · Outcome: Case closed 1991-06-03 (disposition not included in the bulk docket feed — see docket) Docket on CourtListener ↗
company name words appear in the caption; court in the issuer's state (CA)
Sand Castle Group Inc. closed
United States Bankruptcy Court, M.D. Florida · No. 8:87-bk-05122 · Filed Sep 22, 1987 · Closed Feb 8, 1988
Role of Sand Castle Group Inc.: Party · Outcome: Case closed 1988-02-08 (disposition not included in the bulk docket feed — see docket) Docket on CourtListener ↗
company name words appear in the caption; court in FL (not the issuer's state)
Sand Castle, Inc. closed
United States Bankruptcy Court, N.D. Georgia · No. 87-02696 · Filed Apr 7, 1987 · Closed Sep 1, 1988
Role of Sand Castle, Inc.: Party · Outcome: Case closed 1988-09-01 (disposition not included in the bulk docket feed — see docket) Docket on CourtListener ↗
company name words appear in the caption; court in GA (not the issuer's state)
Sand Castle, Inc. closed
United States Bankruptcy Court, N.D. Georgia · No. 86-00824 · Filed Feb 4, 1986 · Closed Oct 22, 1987
Role of Sand Castle, Inc.: Party · Outcome: Case closed 1987-10-22 (disposition not included in the bulk docket feed — see docket) Docket on CourtListener ↗
company name words appear in the caption; court in GA (not the issuer's state)
What was searched

Sources searched: Federal bankruptcy courts via CourtListener / RECAP archive (federal district courts, federal bankruptcy courts). State courts: not covered (one-tap state court links under Look further). PACER: not searched (RECAP only). · Last checked Oct 24, 2026, 2:16 AM ET.

Court records show docket facts only; we never restate allegations as facts. Outcome wording comes from the docket feed; where it does not state a disposition we say so.

State courts: not covered (one-tap state court links under Look further). No state offers a lawful automated statewide source PartnerFacts can use today. Texas (re:SearchTX) terms prohibit storing results in a database open to third parties; New York (WebCivil) and Massachusetts (MassCourts) require a browser check that blocks scripted queries; California has no statewide index (58 county portals; Rule of Court 2.503 grants name-based access case by case); Florida, Utah and Illinois offer paid or partial access whose terms for automated use are unverified. Washington (dw.courts.wa.gov; bulk index reports under a JISC data-dissemination agreement), Delaware (CourtConnect; Court of Chancery not included) and Arizona (apps.azcourts.gov/publicaccess, which has an official channel to request high-volume access) are the candidates; PartnerFacts will request written permission before any automated search. Federal courts are searched through CourtListener / RECAP.

4. Differences between public sources

No comparisons published

What is compared

No public statement by this sponsor group has been collected yet, so there is nothing to compare. Sources compared: the sponsor's own website (known from the issuer's own filings — Form C issuer website, EDGAR company profile — an approved profile claim or Form ADV Item 1.I of its matched adviser) · SEC Form D · SEC Form ADV (IAPD) · Internet Archive · No website is on file for this sponsor group yet.

7 differences found between the filings for Cedarfield (compared 3 filings on Oct 24, 2026)

Note · Mar 26, 1991 – Jun 3, 1991

Bankruptcy case: Sand Castle Realty, a California corporation — filed Mar 26, 1991

United States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. California docket "Sand Castle Realty, a California corporation" filed Mar 26, 1991, closed Jun 3, 1991. Sand Castle Investment LLC (member issuer) is listed as Party ("Sand Castle Realty, a California corporation"). Our match estimate: 60%.

What this means A bankruptcy filing was found. Many are old or personal and have nothing to do with the deal — but ask what it was and when it closed.

Docket · United States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. California ↗Sand Castle Investment LLC — PartnerFacts page ↗
Sources
Note · Jun 30, 2022 – Aug 23, 2022

Form D filed 54 days after the first sale — Brick Castle Investment LLC

The filing says the first sale was Jun 30, 2022. The Form D was filed Aug 23, 2022 — 54 days later. The rule: a Form D is generally due within 15 days after the first sale, so this one is 39 days past that.

What this means A late notice is common and carries no penalty by itself. It is worth asking the sponsor why the paperwork lagged.

Form D · Aug 23, 2022 ↗Brick Castle Investment LLC — PartnerFacts page ↗
Sources
Note · Nov 24, 2021 – Dec 17, 2021

Form D filed 23 days after the first sale — Sand Castle Investment LLC

The filing says the first sale was Nov 24, 2021. The Form D was filed Dec 17, 2021 — 23 days later. The rule: a Form D is generally due within 15 days after the first sale, so this one is 8 days past that.

What this means A late notice is common and carries no penalty by itself. It is worth asking the sponsor why the paperwork lagged.

Form D · Dec 17, 2021 ↗Sand Castle Investment LLC — PartnerFacts page ↗
Sources
Note · Nov 24, 2021 – Dec 17, 2021

Form D filed 23 days after the first sale — Stone Castle Investment LLC

The filing says the first sale was Nov 24, 2021. The Form D was filed Dec 17, 2021 — 23 days later. The rule: a Form D is generally due within 15 days after the first sale, so this one is 8 days past that.

What this means A late notice is common and carries no penalty by itself. It is worth asking the sponsor why the paperwork lagged.

Form D · Dec 17, 2021 ↗Stone Castle Investment LLC — PartnerFacts page ↗
Sources
Note · Jun 30, 2022 – Aug 23, 2022

No amendment in the last 12 months on an offering that may still be open — Brick Castle Investment LLC (latest filing Aug 23, 2022)

The latest filing for this offering is dated Aug 23, 2022 (first sale Jun 30, 2022). It reports $150,000,000 sold of an indefinite amount offered. No later amendment is in our index as of Oct 24, 2026.

What this means SEC rules expect a yearly amendment while an offering is still going. The raise may simply have ended — a Form D does not say when it closed. Ask the sponsor whether the offering closed, when, and at what amount.

Form D · Aug 23, 2022 ↗Brick Castle Investment LLC — PartnerFacts page ↗
Sources
Note · Nov 24, 2021 – Dec 17, 2021

No amendment in the last 12 months on an offering that may still be open — Sand Castle Investment LLC (latest filing Dec 17, 2021)

The latest filing for this offering is dated Dec 17, 2021 (first sale Nov 24, 2021). It reports $125,000,000 sold of an indefinite amount offered. No later amendment is in our index as of Oct 24, 2026.

What this means SEC rules expect a yearly amendment while an offering is still going. The raise may simply have ended — a Form D does not say when it closed. Ask the sponsor whether the offering closed, when, and at what amount.

Form D · Dec 17, 2021 ↗Sand Castle Investment LLC — PartnerFacts page ↗
Sources
Note · Nov 24, 2021 – Dec 17, 2021

No amendment in the last 12 months on an offering that may still be open — Stone Castle Investment LLC (latest filing Dec 17, 2021)

The latest filing for this offering is dated Dec 17, 2021 (first sale Nov 24, 2021). It reports $125,000,000 sold of an indefinite amount offered. No later amendment is in our index as of Oct 24, 2026.

What this means SEC rules expect a yearly amendment while an offering is still going. The raise may simply have ended — a Form D does not say when it closed. Ask the sponsor whether the offering closed, when, and at what amount.

Form D · Dec 17, 2021 ↗Stone Castle Investment LLC — PartnerFacts page ↗
Sources
What is compared

What is compared: every Form D and D/A we hold for this subject, side by side — filing dates vs. first-sale dates (the 15-day rule), amendment timing on open offerings (the yearly-amendment expectation), amounts sold, investor counts, offering amounts and minimums across amendments, industry and size bands, addresses, how each person's name and role is written, paid sellers' CRD numbers, and (for groups) where the member companies were formed and sit. Everything is as filed by the issuer; the SEC does not check it. Differences are common and usually have ordinary explanations — we show both values, the dates, and the source so you can ask. As of Oct 24, 2026.

5. Money to insiders

None reported on 3 offerings — no sales commissions, finder's fees or proceeds to insiders

Per-offering detail
Offering (latest filing)Sales commissionsFinder's feesTo insidersPaid to sell itSource
Aug 23, 2022 D
Brick Castle Investment LLC
File 021-456767
$0$0$0None listed on this filingEDGAR ↗
Dec 17, 2021 D
Stone Castle Investment LLC
File 021-425520
$0$0$0None listed on this filingEDGAR ↗
Dec 17, 2021 D
Sand Castle Investment LLC
File 021-425527
$0$0$0None listed on this filingEDGAR ↗

Counts come from Form D Items 12–15 on the filings in our index (latest filing per offering; one offering = one SEC file number; an amendment updates its offering rather than adding one). "To insiders" = gross proceeds used for payments to executive officers, directors or promoters. "—" = not reported on that filing. Amounts marked (est.) were reported as estimates. "Paid to sell it" = sales compensation recipients named on that filing (Item 12), each linked to FINRA BrokerCheck when a CRD number is reported.

Counted across all 3 issuers in this group — every filing in our index, latest filing per offering (SEC file number).

Property records 0 documents · 0 ownership records · last checked Oct 24, 2026, 6:52 AM ET · NYC and Cook County lookup still to run

0 recorded documents and 0 ownership records matched to Cedarfield in the sources searched.

Not found in sources searched as of Oct 24, 2026, 6:52 AM ET: Hillsborough County FL Clerk of Court Official Records daily index (publicrec.hillsclerk.com D/P/M files), 2 daily files (Oct 14, 2026 to Oct 15, 2026) — loaded Oct 23, 2026, 8:59 PM ET; Harris County TX (HCAD ownership rolls 2023–2026) — 433,871 records, loaded Oct 24, 2026, 6:52 AM ET; Dallas County TX (DCAD ownership roll 2026) — 173,688 records, loaded Oct 23, 2026, 8:58 PM ET; Hillsborough County FL (FL DOR 2026 ownership roll + Clerk recorded-document index Oct 14, 2026 to Oct 15, 2026), Miami-Dade County FL (FL DOR 2026 ownership roll) — 294,950 records, loaded Oct 23, 2026, 8:58 PM ET. Still to be looked up for this group: NYC ACRIS via NYC Open Data (Real Property Parties 636b-3b5g, Master bnx9-e6tj, Legals 8h5j-fqxa, Document Control Codes 7isb-wh4c) · NYC PLUTO ownership via NYC Open Data (64uk-42ks) · Cook County IL Assessor via Cook County Open Data (Parcel Sales wvhk-k5uv; Parcel Addresses 3723-97qp). Records in other counties, and recorder indexes we do not yet cover, were not searched.

Property records coverage: New York City (ACRIS recorded documents and PLUTO ownership, looked up per issuer when its page is viewed; re-checked when the page is viewed again more than 30 days after the last check); Harris County TX (ownership only, no deed, mortgage or sale records; HCAD ownership rolls 2023–2026); Dallas County TX (ownership only, no deed, mortgage or sale records; DCAD ownership roll 2026); Hillsborough County FL (FL DOR 2026 ownership roll + Clerk recorded-document index Oct 14, 2026 to Oct 15, 2026), Miami-Dade County FL (FL DOR 2026 ownership roll); Cook County IL (assessor ownership and deed/sale records, looked up per issuer when its page is viewed). Recorder indexes (party names on deeds, mortgages and liens) in TX, AZ, NV, CA and WA counties and outside the Clerk index in FL, mortgages and liens outside NYC and Hillsborough County, lis pendens and foreclosure notices everywhere, Los Angeles County CA, Clark County NV, King County WA (loader ready; first load not finished), Cook County IL bulk pass (not finished; per-issuer lookups only so far), New York City bulk pass (not finished; per-issuer lookups only so far), Maricopa County AZ (loader ready; commercial-purpose statement not yet filed), Salt Lake County UT, and all other counties are not covered — not searched. Last refresh by source: Harris County Appraisal District real_acct.txt Oct 24, 2026, 6:52 AM ET; Hillsborough County FL Clerk daily index Oct 23, 2026, 8:59 PM ET; Dallas Central Appraisal District ACCOUNT_INFO.CSV Oct 23, 2026, 8:58 PM ET; Florida DOR NAL roll (Dade 23) Oct 23, 2026, 8:58 PM ET; Florida DOR NAL roll (Hillsborough 39) Oct 23, 2026, 8:54 PM ET. NYC and Cook County are also looked up per issuer when its page is viewed; the most recent such lookup on this site finished Oct 24, 2026, 3:30 AM ET. Parties are named as the recorder's index names them (role suffixes as recorded); no address, account number or trust date is shown for an individual, and individual owners of record (home ownership) are not matched or shown. Items still in human review are not shown.

Issuers in this group

Why each issuer is here is stated in the "Linked by" column. Low-confidence links are never shown — they wait for human review.

SourceIssuerLinked byLocationIndustryFilingsSold (max)InvestorsMin. investment (latest filing)Active
EDGAR ↗SC Stone Castle Investment LLCshared people, shared management entity, same business addressBEVERLY HILLS, CAOther1$125,000,000
offering Indefinite · similar: $500,000–$7,000,000
8
similar: 2–14
No minimum reported
similar: $5,000–$50,000
2021–2021
EDGAR ↗SC Sand Castle Investment LLCshared people, shared management entity, same business addressBEVERLY HILLS, CAOther1$125,000,000
offering Indefinite · similar: $500,000–$7,000,000
8
similar: 2–14
No minimum reported
similar: $5,000–$50,000
2021–2021
EDGAR ↗BC Brick Castle Investment LLCshared people, same business addressBEVERLY HILLS, CAOther1$150,000,000
offering Indefinite · similar: $500,000–$7,000,000
7
similar: 2–14
No minimum reported
similar: $5,000–$50,000
2022–2022

"Similar" = offerings in the same industry claiming the same exemption, filed in the last 5 years: Other / 506(b) (18,678 filings); ranges are the middle half (25th–75th percentile). Computed by PartnerFacts from SEC EDGAR Form D data as of Oct 23, 2026, 5:45 PM ET. Rows without a range: fewer than 30 comparable filings, or not a Rule 506 offering. No ranking or score.

Timeline of offerings

SourceFiledIssuerFormIndustryOfferedSold
EDGAR ↗Aug 23, 2022Brick Castle Investment LLCDOtherIndefinite$150,000,000
EDGAR ↗Dec 17, 2021Sand Castle Investment LLCDOtherIndefinite$125,000,000
EDGAR ↗Dec 17, 2021Stone Castle Investment LLCDOtherIndefinite$125,000,000

Activity: 0 new offerings in the last 12 months across all issuers in this group (new offering = a Form D that is not an amendment, D/A) · most recent filing Aug 23, 2022. Industry history, as reported on each offering's latest filing: All 3 offerings reported: Other (2021–2022).

People across the group

NameRolesIssuers hereFirst → last listed
IE Isser ElishisDirector3Dec 17, 2021 → Aug 23, 2022
TC The Cedarfield Group LLC entityDirector2Dec 17, 2021 → Dec 17, 2021
WS Whiskey Service LLC entityDirector1Aug 23, 2022 → Aug 23, 2022

Adviser registration (Form ADV)

Searched SEC Form ADV bulk data (registered + exempt reporting advisers) (24,962 records as of Oct 2, 2026, 8:00 AM ET) — nothing matched Cedarfield.

Meta advertising

No Meta Pixel ids or Facebook / Instagram page links on file for Cedarfield as of Oct 24, 2026 — the sponsor website is read for them once it is on file (runs automatically). Meta Ad Library: not searched by PartnerFacts (no API access); a one-tap Ad Library search is under Look further.

Other offering types (Regulation A and Regulation Crowdfunding)

Searched SEC Regulation A Data Sets (Forms 1-A, 1-K, 1-Z; 2015 Q2 → 2026 Q3); SEC Crowdfunding Offerings Data Sets (Form C family; 2016 Q2 → 2026 Q3); EDGAR form index for 2026 Q3 → 2026 Q4 (51,358 records as of Oct 23, 2026, 8:41 PM ET) — nothing matched this name.

Public profiles and social

No website or social profile named in Cedarfield's SEC filings (Form C, Reg A, Form ADV; checked Oct 24, 2026). Web search for this name: #147,089 of 374,652 in line (561 issuers searched so far). One-tap searches: Look further ↓

Export this report as PDF · Premium

Request diligence pack (Premium) PartnerFacts asks the sponsor for the standard information pack and delivers it to you labelled "provided by the sponsor".

Change history

No corrections have been requested for this page.

Request a correction

Free. Covers the grouping itself or any record shown here. Logged with status: received → under review → fixed / confirmed with source.

Sponsor response

Add a sourced explanation next to any fact. Reviewed before publishing.

Grouping is PartnerFacts' inference from public filings (shared related persons, management entities, business address). Everything else on this page is drawn from the filings themselves. Not the same sponsor? Request a correction.

Look further

One-tap searches on sites we do not index ourselves, with the name pre-filled (outside the US (as filed: BEVERLY HILLS), CA). Each opens in a new tab; what you find there is not verified by PartnerFacts.

Social and web

LinkedIn companies ↗Instagram ↗X (Twitter) ↗Facebook ↗YouTube ↗Google ↗Google Images ↗Google News ↗Meta Ad Library ↗

Courts

CourtListener / RECAP (federal) ↗PACER case locator (federal, login) ↗California — find the county court ↗Los Angeles Superior Court case search ↗

Securities regulators

SEC EDGAR full-text search ↗SEC action look-up ↗FINRA BrokerCheck ↗SEC IAPD adviser search ↗

Business registries

California Secretary of State business search ↗OpenCorporates ↗