PartnerFacts
Data last updated: Oct 23, 2026, 5:45 PM ETLatest filing: Oct 22, 2026Now: Oct 24, 2026, 5:23 AM ET

Sponsor Check › Sponsor group

CA

Castle Analytics

One sponsor team, 3 deal companies · Lafayette, CA

Grouped because: 8 shared people, 1 shared management entity, same business address (3 issuers) (automatic match from the filings) · not the same sponsor?

3deal companies
$8.93Mreported sold
84investors
24Form D filings
2017–2026active
0new, last 12 mo

Data last updated Oct 23, 2026, 5:45 PM ET · Latest filing in this group Mar 4, 2026 · Courts (RECAP) last checked: Oct 24, 2026, 2:16 AM ET · SEC enforcement last checked: covered by the index scan as of Oct 24, 2026, 2:50 AM ET

The short version

Castle Analytics is a sponsor group of 3 issuers that PartnerFacts links to one sponsor (shared people, shared management entity, same business address; automatic match from the filings), filing 24 Form D filings between Sep 2017 and Mar 2026.

What this means One team, 3 deal companies, about 9 years of track record in SEC filings. We link the companies because the same people or address appear on their forms — tap "Request a correction" if that is wrong.

Combined reported sold: $8.93M to 84 investors (latest filing per issuer). Industries as reported: Pooled Investment Fund (3). Issuers are based in CA (3).

What this means $8.93M raised across the group, about $106K per investor. Amounts come from each company's latest Form D; they are what the sponsor reported, not audited figures.

Principal people: Daniel Hoover (3 issuers, executive officer and director), Matthew Sitzmann (3 issuers, executive officer), Peter Eberle (3 issuers, executive officer), Amanda Gates (2 issuers, director), Brian Friel (2 issuers, director) and 4 more.

What this means The person on the most companies is usually the one running the show; their page lists every deal.

Activity: 0 new offerings in the last 12 months; latest filing Mar 4, 2026.

What this means No new raise filed in the past year.

Public records searched: federal courts (CourtListener / RECAP), SEC enforcement releases, state securities regulators (AZ, CA, DE, TX, WA), property records (NYC, FL, IL and TX counties) — none found.

What this means Nothing turned up where we looked (4 sources). That does not prove there is nothing — it means none was found in those sources on that date.

We compared 24 public filings for Castle Analytics and found 18 differences, 8 worth asking the sponsor about: Amount sold went down between filings; Investor count went down between filings; and more below.

What this means These are differences between the sponsor's own SEC filings — both values, dates and sources are listed in Key records, section 4. Most have ordinary explanations; ask the sponsor.

What the community is saying

Community search for Castle Analytics has not run yet — it is joining a line of 14,818 names; searches run around the clock at the hosts' allowed rate. Searched so far: 28 names.

Community comments are quoted as written by their authors. Sources searched: BiggerPockets forums (via DuckDuckGo, Brave, Bing and BiggerPockets search) and Reddit (search feed + public archive).

Key records

Five things investors ask first. Items still in human review are counted, not shown.

1. Lawsuits

None found in sources searched — federal courts (CourtListener / RECAP), checked Oct 24, 2026

What was searched

Sources searched: CourtListener bulk data (RECAP dockets as of 2026-09-30; recall-first rule 10-24) — federal district + bankruptcy courts State courts: not covered (one-tap state court links under Look further). PACER: not searched. · Last checked Oct 24, 2026, 2:16 AM ET.

State courts: not covered (one-tap state court links under Look further). No state offers a lawful automated statewide source PartnerFacts can use today. Texas (re:SearchTX) terms prohibit storing results in a database open to third parties; New York (WebCivil) and Massachusetts (MassCourts) require a browser check that blocks scripted queries; California has no statewide index (58 county portals; Rule of Court 2.503 grants name-based access case by case); Florida, Utah and Illinois offer paid or partial access whose terms for automated use are unverified. Washington (dw.courts.wa.gov; bulk index reports under a JISC data-dissemination agreement), Delaware (CourtConnect; Court of Chancery not included) and Arizona (apps.azcourts.gov/publicaccess, which has an official channel to request high-volume access) are the candidates; PartnerFacts will request written permission before any automated search. Federal courts are searched through CourtListener / RECAP.

2. Regulatory actions

None found in sources searched — SEC enforcement releases (index scan as of Oct 24, 2026, 2:50 AM ET) · state securities regulators: AZ, CA, DE, TX, WA (crawled Oct 23, 2026)

What was searched

SEC enforcement searched: SEC litigation releases and administrative proceedings — respondent names in the sec.gov index titles (30,205 releases, 1995-09-19 to 2026-10-23); release text is read only to confirm a candidate. Names that appear only in the body of a release are not found. — Searched SEC litigation releases and administrative proceedings (1995→ / 2007→) (30,205 records as of Oct 24, 2026, 2:50 AM ET) — nothing matched Castle Analytics..

State securities regulators searched: AZ (Corporation Commission Securities Division), CA (DFPI — 16 of 12,159 DFPI respondent pages read so far; sponsor-name matches are read first), DE (DOJ Investor Protection Unit), TX (State Securities Board), WA (DFI) — last crawled Oct 23, 2026, 9:57 PM ET. Other states are not covered.

3. Bankruptcies

None found in sources searched — federal bankruptcy courts (CourtListener / RECAP), checked Oct 24, 2026

What was searched

Sources searched: Federal bankruptcy courts via CourtListener / RECAP archive (federal district courts, federal bankruptcy courts). State courts: not covered (one-tap state court links under Look further). PACER: not searched (RECAP only). · Last checked Oct 24, 2026, 2:16 AM ET.

State courts: not covered (one-tap state court links under Look further). No state offers a lawful automated statewide source PartnerFacts can use today. Texas (re:SearchTX) terms prohibit storing results in a database open to third parties; New York (WebCivil) and Massachusetts (MassCourts) require a browser check that blocks scripted queries; California has no statewide index (58 county portals; Rule of Court 2.503 grants name-based access case by case); Florida, Utah and Illinois offer paid or partial access whose terms for automated use are unverified. Washington (dw.courts.wa.gov; bulk index reports under a JISC data-dissemination agreement), Delaware (CourtConnect; Court of Chancery not included) and Arizona (apps.azcourts.gov/publicaccess, which has an official channel to request high-volume access) are the candidates; PartnerFacts will request written permission before any automated search. Federal courts are searched through CourtListener / RECAP.

4. Differences between public sources

No comparisons published

What is compared

No public statement by this sponsor group has been collected yet, so there is nothing to compare. Sources compared: the sponsor's own website (known from the issuer's own filings — Form C issuer website, EDGAR company profile — an approved profile claim or Form ADV Item 1.I of its matched adviser) · SEC Form D · SEC Form ADV (IAPD) · Internet Archive · No website is on file for this sponsor group yet.

18 differences found between the filings for Castle Analytics — 8 worth asking about (compared 24 filings on Oct 24, 2026)

Worth asking · Mar 15, 2022 – Mar 14, 2023

Amount sold went down between filings — Castle Magnus Bitcoin Fund LP

The Mar 15, 2022 filing says $6,773,925 sold; the Mar 14, 2023 Form D/A says $200,000 sold — $6,573,925 less.

What this means Amounts sold normally only go up as a raise continues. A drop can mean investors were refunded, a figure was corrected, or an earlier number was wrong. Ask the sponsor which it was.

Sources
Worth asking · Mar 31, 2022 – Mar 14, 2023

Amount sold went down between filings — Castle Fund Partners LP

The Mar 31, 2022 filing says $15,663,099 sold; the Mar 14, 2023 Form D/A says $0 sold — $15,663,099 less.

What this means Amounts sold normally only go up as a raise continues. A drop can mean investors were refunded, a figure was corrected, or an earlier number was wrong. Ask the sponsor which it was.

Sources
Worth asking · Jul 25, 2018 – Dec 20, 2018

Amount sold went down between filings — Castle Fund Partners LP

The Jul 25, 2018 filing says $5,725,346 sold; the Dec 20, 2018 Form D/A says $2,900,516 sold — $2,824,830 less.

What this means Amounts sold normally only go up as a raise continues. A drop can mean investors were refunded, a figure was corrected, or an earlier number was wrong. Ask the sponsor which it was.

Sources
Worth asking · Mar 15, 2022 – Mar 14, 2023

Investor count went down between filings — Castle Magnus Bitcoin Fund LP

The Mar 15, 2022 filing reports 11 investors; the Mar 14, 2023 Form D/A reports 1 investor.

What this means Investor counts normally only grow. A smaller number can mean investors left or were refunded, or a count was corrected. Ask the sponsor what happened.

Sources
Worth asking · Mar 31, 2022 – Mar 14, 2023

Investor count went down between filings — Castle Fund Partners LP

The Mar 31, 2022 filing reports 63 investors; the Mar 14, 2023 Form D/A reports 0 investors.

What this means Investor counts normally only grow. A smaller number can mean investors left or were refunded, or a count was corrected. Ask the sponsor what happened.

Sources
Worth asking · Dec 20, 2018 – Dec 10, 2019

Investor count went down between filings — Castle Fund Partners LP

The Dec 20, 2018 filing reports 28 investors; the Dec 10, 2019 Form D/A reports 23 investors.

What this means Investor counts normally only grow. A smaller number can mean investors left or were refunded, or a count was corrected. Ask the sponsor what happened.

Sources
Worth asking · Oct 21, 2017 – Mar 31, 2022

Form D filed 1,622 days after the first sale — Castle Fund Partners LP

The filing says the first sale was Oct 21, 2017. The Form D was filed Mar 31, 2022 — 1,622 days later. The rule: a Form D is generally due within 15 days after the first sale, so this one is 1,607 days past that.

What this means The notice went in months after money was taken in. Late notices are common and carry no penalty by themselves, but it is fair to ask the sponsor why the paperwork lagged.

Sources
Worth asking · Jun 5, 2018 – Mar 5, 2025

12 people are no longer listed on a later amendment

Castle Analytics LLC is no longer listed on the Mar 5, 2025 amendment — Castle Magnus Bitcoin Fund LP · Castle Analytics LLC is no longer listed on the Mar 5, 2025 amendment — Castle Fund Partners LP · Matthew Sitzmann is no longer listed on the Mar 5, 2025 amendment — Castle Magnus Bitcoin Fund LP · Matthew Sitzmann is no longer listed on the Mar 5, 2025 amendment — Castle Fund Partners LP · Matthew Sitzmann is no longer listed on the May 16, 2024 amendment — CASTLE DIGITAL INDEX FUND IDF LLC · and 7 more

What this means People leave; the issuer lists only current officers, directors and promoters. Ask why and who replaced them.

Sources
Note · Jan 10, 2022 – Mar 31, 2022

Daniel Hoover's role changed at Castle Fund Partners LP: director → executive officer

The Jan 10, 2022 filing lists Daniel Hoover as director; the Mar 31, 2022 Form D lists executive officer.

What this means Roles on Form D are self-reported by the issuer. A change can mean a real change in who runs the company, or just a different box ticked. Ask who makes decisions today.

Sources
Note · Oct 21, 2017 – Jan 10, 2022

No amendment in the last 12 months on an offering that may still be open — Castle Fund Partners LP (latest filing Jan 10, 2022)

The latest filing for this offering is dated Jan 10, 2022 (first sale Oct 21, 2017). It reports $15,663,099 sold of an indefinite amount offered. No later amendment is in our index as of Oct 24, 2026.

What this means SEC rules expect a yearly amendment while an offering is still going. The raise may simply have ended — a Form D does not say when it closed. Ask the sponsor whether the offering closed, when, and at what amount.

Sources
Note · Jan 1, 2021 – Jan 11, 2021

No amendment in the last 12 months on an offering that may still be open — Castle Magnus Bitcoin Fund LP (latest filing Jan 11, 2021)

The latest filing for this offering is dated Jan 11, 2021 (first sale Jan 1, 2021). It reports $1,025,000 sold of an indefinite amount offered. No later amendment is in our index as of Oct 24, 2026.

What this means SEC rules expect a yearly amendment while an offering is still going. The raise may simply have ended — a Form D does not say when it closed. Ask the sponsor whether the offering closed, when, and at what amount.

Sources
Note · Aug 1, 2018 – Dec 20, 2018

No amendment in the last 12 months on an offering that may still be open — Castle Magnus Bitcoin Fund LP (latest filing Dec 20, 2018)

The latest filing for this offering is dated Dec 20, 2018 (first sale Aug 1, 2018). It reports $500,000 sold of an indefinite amount offered. No later amendment is in our index as of Oct 24, 2026.

What this means SEC rules expect a yearly amendment while an offering is still going. The raise may simply have ended — a Form D does not say when it closed. Ask the sponsor whether the offering closed, when, and at what amount.

Sources
Note · Sep 8, 2017 – May 16, 2023

Matthew Sitzmann is written 2 different ways on the filings

listed as "Matthew Sitzmann" on 16 filings (from Sep 8, 2017), and "Matthew M. Sitzmann" on the May 16, 2023 filing.

What this means Same person, written differently — a middle name or suffix left off, or spelled another way. It is normal, but check that the full legal name matches your subscription documents.

Sources
Note · Sep 8, 2017 – Jun 5, 2018

Castle Analytics LLC is written 2 different ways on the filings

listed as "Castle Analytics" on the Sep 8, 2017 filing, and "Castle Analytics LLC" on 15 filings (from Jun 5, 2018).

What this means Same person, written differently — a middle name or suffix left off, or spelled another way. It is normal, but check that the full legal name matches your subscription documents.

Sources
Note · Sep 8, 2017 – May 16, 2024

4 address changes between filings

Address moved from Richmond, CA to Lafayette, CA — CASTLE DIGITAL INDEX FUND IDF LLC · Address moved from Richmond, CA to Lafayette, CA — Castle Magnus Bitcoin Fund LP · Address moved from Richmond, CA to Lafayette, CA — Castle Fund Partners LP · Address moved from Lafayette, CA to Richmond, CA — Castle Fund Partners LP

What this means Businesses move. If you were told one city and the forms say another, ask which is current.

Sources
Note · Jun 5, 2018 – Mar 5, 2025

Reported net asset value range changed between filings — Castle Magnus Bitcoin Fund LP

"Decline to Disclose" (Jun 5, 2018); then "$5,000,001 - $25,000,000" (Mar 5, 2025).

What this means This is the size band the issuer picks for itself on the form. A change can mean the business grew or shrank — or that it chose not to say. Ask for current numbers.

Sources
Note · Sep 8, 2017 – Mar 5, 2025

Reported net asset value range changed between filings — Castle Fund Partners LP

"Decline to Disclose" (Sep 8, 2017); then "$25,000,001 - $50,000,000" (Mar 5, 2025).

What this means This is the size band the issuer picks for itself on the form. A change can mean the business grew or shrank — or that it chose not to say. Ask for current numbers.

Sources
Note · Jun 5, 2018 – Mar 4, 2026

Issuer used a different name before — Castle Magnus Bitcoin Fund LP

SEC records list prior names for this filer: Castle Funds LP. The current name on file is "Castle Magnus Bitcoin Fund LP".

What this means A name change is normal, but your documents may show the old name. Match the CIK, not just the name.

Sources
What is compared

What is compared: every Form D and D/A we hold for this subject, side by side — filing dates vs. first-sale dates (the 15-day rule), amendment timing on open offerings (the yearly-amendment expectation), amounts sold, investor counts, offering amounts and minimums across amendments, industry and size bands, addresses, how each person's name and role is written, paid sellers' CRD numbers, and (for groups) where the member companies were formed and sit. Everything is as filed by the issuer; the SEC does not check it. Differences are common and usually have ordinary explanations — we show both values, the dates, and the source so you can ask. As of Oct 24, 2026.

5. Money to insiders

None reported on 6 offerings — no sales commissions, finder's fees or proceeds to insiders

Per-offering detail
Offering (latest filing)Sales commissionsFinder's feesTo insidersPaid to sell itSource
Mar 4, 2026 D/A
Castle Magnus Bitcoin Fund LP
File 021-392449
$0 (est.)$0 (est.)$0 (est.)
Castle Analytics LLC and certain persons listed in item 3 may receive a management fee based on the value of the issuer's assets and/or a performance fee based on the value of the issuer's profits.
None listed on this filingEDGAR ↗
Mar 4, 2026 D/A
Castle Fund Partners LP
File 021-439752
$0 (est.)$0 (est.)$0 (est.)
Castle Analytics LLC and certain persons listed in item 3 may receive a management fee based on the value of the issuer's assets and/or a performance fee based on the value of the issuer's profits.
None listed on this filingEDGAR ↗
Mar 4, 2026 D/A
CASTLE DIGITAL INDEX FUND IDF LLC
File 021-481759
$0$0$0
Castle Analytics LLC and certain persons listed in item 3 may receive a management fee based on the value of the issuer's assets and/or a performance fee based on the value of the issuer's profits.
None listed on this filingEDGAR ↗
Jan 10, 2022 D/A
Castle Fund Partners LP
File 021-294334
$0 (est.)$0 (est.)$0 (est.)
Castle Analytics LLC and certain persons listed in item 3 may receive a management fee based on the value of the issuer's assets and/or a performance fee based on the value of the issuer's profits.
None listed on this filingEDGAR ↗
Jan 11, 2021 D
Castle Magnus Bitcoin Fund LP
File 021-385821
$0 (est.)$0 (est.)$0 (est.)
Castle Analytics LLC and certain persons listed in Item 3 may receive a management fee based on the value of the issuer's assets and/or a performance fee based on the value of the issuer's profits.
None listed on this filingEDGAR ↗
Dec 20, 2018 D/A
Castle Magnus Bitcoin Fund LP
File 021-313834
$0 (est.)$0 (est.)$0 (est.)
Castle Analytics LLC and certain persons listed in Item 3 may receive a management fee based on the value of the issuer's assets and/or a performance fee based on the value of the issuer's profits.
None listed on this filingEDGAR ↗

Counts come from Form D Items 12–15 on the filings in our index (latest filing per offering; one offering = one SEC file number; an amendment updates its offering rather than adding one). "To insiders" = gross proceeds used for payments to executive officers, directors or promoters. "—" = not reported on that filing. Amounts marked (est.) were reported as estimates. "Paid to sell it" = sales compensation recipients named on that filing (Item 12), each linked to FINRA BrokerCheck when a CRD number is reported.

Counted across all 3 issuers in this group — every filing in our index, latest filing per offering (SEC file number).

Property records 0 documents · 0 ownership records · last checked Oct 23, 2026, 8:59 PM ET · NYC and Cook County lookup still to run

0 recorded documents and 0 ownership records matched to Castle Analytics in the sources searched.

Not found in sources searched as of Oct 23, 2026, 8:59 PM ET: Hillsborough County FL Clerk of Court Official Records daily index (publicrec.hillsclerk.com D/P/M files), 2 daily files (Oct 14, 2026 to Oct 15, 2026) — loaded Oct 23, 2026, 8:59 PM ET; Florida DOR NAL roll (Hillsborough 39) roll year 2026 — loaded Oct 23, 2026, 8:54 PM ET; Florida DOR NAL roll (Dade 23) roll year 2026 — loaded Oct 23, 2026, 8:58 PM ET; Harris County Appraisal District real_acct.txt roll year 2026 — loaded Oct 23, 2026, 8:58 PM ET; Dallas Central Appraisal District ACCOUNT_INFO.CSV roll year 2026 — loaded Oct 23, 2026, 8:58 PM ET. Still to be looked up for this group: NYC ACRIS via NYC Open Data (Real Property Parties 636b-3b5g, Master bnx9-e6tj, Legals 8h5j-fqxa, Document Control Codes 7isb-wh4c) · NYC PLUTO ownership via NYC Open Data (64uk-42ks) · Cook County IL Assessor via Cook County Open Data (Parcel Sales wvhk-k5uv; Parcel Addresses 3723-97qp). Records in other counties, and recorder indexes we do not yet cover, were not searched.

Property records coverage: New York City (ACRIS recorded documents and PLUTO ownership, looked up per issuer when its page is viewed; re-checked when the page is viewed again more than 30 days after the last check); Hillsborough County FL (recorded documents from Oct 14, 2026 forward; ownership from FL DOR roll 2026); Cook County IL (assessor ownership and deed/sale records, looked up per issuer when its page is viewed); Harris County TX and Dallas County TX (assessor ownership rolls only, 2026 roll; no deed, mortgage or sale records); Miami-Dade County FL (ownership from FL DOR roll only; Clerk recorded documents not covered). Recorder indexes for TX, AZ, IL and WA counties, mortgages and liens outside NYC and FL, lis pendens and foreclosure notices everywhere, Miami-Dade County FL recorded documents, Maricopa County AZ, King County WA, Salt Lake County UT, and all other counties are not covered — not searched. Last refresh by source: Hillsborough County FL Clerk daily index Oct 23, 2026, 8:59 PM ET; Dallas Central Appraisal District ACCOUNT_INFO.CSV Oct 23, 2026, 8:58 PM ET; Harris County Appraisal District real_acct.txt Oct 23, 2026, 8:58 PM ET; Florida DOR NAL roll (Dade 23) Oct 23, 2026, 8:58 PM ET; Florida DOR NAL roll (Hillsborough 39) Oct 23, 2026, 8:54 PM ET. NYC and Cook County are looked up per issuer when its page is viewed; the most recent such lookup on this site finished Oct 24, 2026, 3:30 AM ET. Parties are named as the recorder's index names them (role suffixes as recorded); no address, account number or trust date is shown for an individual, and individual owners of record (home ownership) are not matched or shown. Items still in human review are not shown.

Issuers in this group

Why each issuer is here is stated in the "Linked by" column. Low-confidence links are never shown — they wait for human review.

SourceIssuerLinked byLocationIndustryFilingsSold (max)InvestorsMin. investment (latest filing)Active
EDGAR ↗CF Castle Fund Partners LPshared people, shared management entity, same business addressLAFAYETTE, CAPooled Investment Fund11$15,663,099
offering Indefinite · similar: $500,000–$16,420,250
63
similar: 2–28
No minimum reported
similar: $5,000–$100,000
2017–2026
EDGAR ↗CM Castle Magnus Bitcoin Fund LPshared people, shared management entity, same business addressLAFAYETTE, CAPooled Investment Fund9$6,937,048
offering Indefinite · similar: $500,000–$16,420,250
19
similar: 2–28
No minimum reported
similar: $5,000–$100,000
2018–2026
EDGAR ↗CD CASTLE DIGITAL INDEX FUND IDF LLCshared people, same business addressLAFAYETTE, CAPooled Investment Fund4$594,055
offering Indefinite · similar: $155,000–$5,250,000
2
similar: 4–27
No minimum reported
similar: $1,000–$100,000
2023–2026

"Similar" = offerings in the same industry claiming the same exemption, filed in the last 5 years: Pooled Investment Fund / 506(c) (8,096 filings); Pooled Investment Fund / 506(b) (83,801 filings); ranges are the middle half (25th–75th percentile). Computed by PartnerFacts from SEC EDGAR Form D data as of Oct 23, 2026, 5:45 PM ET. Rows without a range: fewer than 30 comparable filings, or not a Rule 506 offering. No ranking or score.

Timeline of offerings

SourceFiledIssuerFormIndustryOfferedSold
EDGAR ↗Mar 4, 2026CASTLE DIGITAL INDEX FUND IDF LLCD/APooled Investment FundIndefinite$594,055
EDGAR ↗Mar 4, 2026Castle Magnus Bitcoin Fund LPD/APooled Investment FundIndefinite$6,937,048
EDGAR ↗Mar 4, 2026Castle Fund Partners LPD/APooled Investment FundIndefinite$1,403,800
EDGAR ↗Mar 5, 2025CASTLE DIGITAL INDEX FUND IDF LLCD/APooled Investment FundIndefinite$594,055
EDGAR ↗Mar 5, 2025Castle Magnus Bitcoin Fund LPD/APooled Investment FundIndefinite$6,738,209
EDGAR ↗Mar 5, 2025Castle Fund Partners LPD/APooled Investment FundIndefinite$1,403,800
EDGAR ↗May 16, 2024CASTLE DIGITAL INDEX FUND IDF LLCD/APooled Investment FundIndefinite$594,055
EDGAR ↗Mar 14, 2024Castle Magnus Bitcoin Fund LPD/APooled Investment FundIndefinite$6,673,209
EDGAR ↗Mar 14, 2024Castle Fund Partners LPD/APooled Investment FundIndefinite$1,101,141
EDGAR ↗May 16, 2023CASTLE DIGITAL INDEX FUND IDF LLCDPooled Investment FundIndefinite$244,375
EDGAR ↗Mar 14, 2023Castle Magnus Bitcoin Fund LPD/APooled Investment FundIndefinite$200,000
EDGAR ↗Mar 14, 2023Castle Fund Partners LPD/APooled Investment FundIndefinite$0
EDGAR ↗Mar 31, 2022Castle Fund Partners LPDPooled Investment FundIndefinite$15,663,099
EDGAR ↗Mar 15, 2022Castle Magnus Bitcoin Fund LPD/APooled Investment FundIndefinite$6,773,925
EDGAR ↗Jan 10, 2022Castle Fund Partners LPD/APooled Investment FundIndefinite$15,663,099
EDGAR ↗Mar 16, 2021Castle Magnus Bitcoin Fund LPDPooled Investment FundIndefinite$0
EDGAR ↗Jan 11, 2021Castle Magnus Bitcoin Fund LPDPooled Investment FundIndefinite$1,025,000
EDGAR ↗Jan 11, 2021Castle Fund Partners LPD/APooled Investment FundIndefinite$11,302,878
EDGAR ↗Dec 10, 2019Castle Fund Partners LPD/APooled Investment FundIndefinite$5,725,346
EDGAR ↗Dec 20, 2018Castle Magnus Bitcoin Fund LPD/APooled Investment FundIndefinite$500,000
EDGAR ↗Dec 20, 2018Castle Fund Partners LPD/APooled Investment FundIndefinite$2,900,516
EDGAR ↗Jul 25, 2018Castle Fund Partners LPD/APooled Investment FundIndefinite$5,725,346
EDGAR ↗Jun 5, 2018Castle Magnus Bitcoin Fund LPDPooled Investment FundIndefinite$0
EDGAR ↗Sep 8, 2017Castle Fund Partners LPDPooled Investment FundIndefinite$0

Activity: 0 new offerings in the last 12 months across all issuers in this group (new offering = a Form D that is not an amendment, D/A) · most recent filing Mar 4, 2026. Industry history, as reported on each offering's latest filing: All 6 offerings reported: Pooled Investment Fund (2017–2023).

People across the group

NameRolesIssuers hereFirst → last listed
PE Peter EberleExecutive Officer3Jan 11, 2021 → Mar 4, 2026
DH Daniel HooverExecutive Officer, Director3Jan 11, 2021 → Mar 4, 2026
MS Matthew SitzmannExecutive Officer3Sep 8, 2017 → Mar 14, 2024
CA Castle Analytics LLC entityExecutive Officer2Sep 8, 2017 → Mar 14, 2024
BF Brian FrielDirector2Jan 11, 2021 → Jan 10, 2022
AG Amanda GatesDirector2Jan 11, 2021 → Jan 11, 2021
CC Charles ChoiExecutive Officer2Sep 8, 2017 → Dec 10, 2019
NM Nicholas MussallemExecutive Officer2Sep 8, 2017 → Dec 10, 2019
TB Timothy BeemanExecutive Officer2Jun 5, 2018 → Dec 10, 2019

Adviser registration (Form ADV)

Searched SEC Form ADV bulk data (registered + exempt reporting advisers) (24,962 records as of Oct 2, 2026, 8:00 AM ET) — nothing matched Castle Analytics.

Meta advertising

No Meta Pixel ids or Facebook / Instagram page links on file for Castle Analytics as of Oct 24, 2026 — the sponsor website is read for them once it is on file (runs automatically). Meta Ad Library: not searched by PartnerFacts (no API access); a one-tap Ad Library search is under Look further.

Other offering types (Regulation A and Regulation Crowdfunding)

Searched SEC Regulation A Data Sets (Forms 1-A, 1-K, 1-Z; 2015 Q2 → 2026 Q3); SEC Crowdfunding Offerings Data Sets (Form C family; 2016 Q2 → 2026 Q3); EDGAR form index for 2026 Q3 → 2026 Q4 (51,358 records as of Oct 23, 2026, 8:41 PM ET) — nothing matched this name.

Public profiles and social

No website or social profile named in Castle Analytics's SEC filings (Form C, Reg A, Form ADV; checked Oct 24, 2026). Web search for this name: #39,242 of 374,652 in line (14 issuers searched so far). One-tap searches: Look further ↓

Export this report as PDF · Premium

Request diligence pack (Premium) PartnerFacts asks the sponsor for the standard information pack and delivers it to you labelled "provided by the sponsor".

Change history

No corrections have been requested for this page.

Request a correction

Free. Covers the grouping itself or any record shown here. Logged with status: received → under review → fixed / confirmed with source.

Sponsor response

Add a sourced explanation next to any fact. Reviewed before publishing.

Grouping is PartnerFacts' inference from public filings (shared related persons, management entities, business address). Everything else on this page is drawn from the filings themselves. Not the same sponsor? Request a correction.

Look further

One-tap searches on sites we do not index ourselves, with the name pre-filled (outside the US (as filed: LAFAYETTE), CA). Each opens in a new tab; what you find there is not verified by PartnerFacts.