PartnerFacts
Data last updated: Oct 23, 2026, 5:45 PM ETLatest filing: Oct 22, 2026Now: Oct 24, 2026, 5:21 AM ET

Sponsor Check › Sponsor group

A

Ars

One sponsor team, 2 deal companies · New York, NY

Grouped because: 1 shared management entity, same business address (2 issuers) (automatic match from the filings) · not the same sponsor?

2deal companies
$205.5Mreported sold
197investors
16Form D filings
2009–2020active
0new, last 12 mo

Data last updated Oct 23, 2026, 5:45 PM ET · Latest filing in this group Jan 31, 2020 · Courts (RECAP) last checked: Oct 24, 2026, 2:11 AM ET · SEC enforcement last checked: covered by the index scan as of Oct 24, 2026, 2:50 AM ET

The short version

Ars is a sponsor group of 2 issuers that PartnerFacts links to one sponsor (shared management entity, same business address; automatic match from the filings), filing 16 Form D filings between Mar 2009 and Jan 2020.

What this means One team, 2 deal companies, about 11 years of track record in SEC filings. We link the companies because the same people or address appear on their forms — tap "Request a correction" if that is wrong.

Combined reported sold: $205.5M to 197 investors (latest filing per issuer). Industries as reported: Pooled Investment Fund (2). Issuers are based in NY (2).

What this means $205.5M raised across the group, about $1.04M per investor. Amounts come from each company's latest Form D; they are what the sponsor reported, not audited figures.

Principal people: ARS Investment Partners, LLC (2 issuers, executive officer, entity), Andrew J. Melnick (1 issuer, executive officer), Artemis US Corp. (1 issuer, executive officer, entity), LGC Associates, LLC (1 issuer, executive officer, entity), Leon G. Cooperman (1 issuer, executive officer) and 10 more.

What this means The person on the most companies is usually the one running the show; their page lists every deal.

Activity: 0 new offerings in the last 12 months; latest filing Jan 31, 2020.

What this means No new raise filed in the past year.

Adviser registration (Form ADV) on record: ARS INVESTMENT PARTNERS, LLC.

Public records searched: federal courts (CourtListener / RECAP), SEC enforcement releases, state securities regulators (AZ, CA, DE, TX, WA), property records (NYC, FL, IL and TX counties) — 17 court cases matching the name, 19 bankruptcy cases matching the name listed in Key records below.

What this means 36 records came back, including 2 court cases still open — open cases can take years and cost money. Each one is listed below with a link to the original document and a line saying why it matched. A name match is not proof it is the same person or company — read the why line and the document. Being sued or named in a release is an accusation, not a finding.

We compared 16 public filings for Ars and found 11 differences, 7 worth asking the sponsor about: Amount sold went down between filings; Investor count went down between filings; and more below.

What this means These are differences between the sponsor's own SEC filings — both values, dates and sources are listed in Key records, section 4. Most have ordinary explanations; ask the sponsor.

What the community is saying

Community search for Ars has not run yet — it is joining a line of 13,647 names; searches run around the clock at the hosts' allowed rate. Searched so far: 28 names.

Community comments are quoted as written by their authors. Sources searched: BiggerPockets forums (via DuckDuckGo, Brave, Bing and BiggerPockets search) and Reddit (search feed + public archive).

Key records

Five things investors ask first. Items still in human review are counted, not shown.

1. Lawsuits

17 cases: 5 closed (disposition not in docket feed), 7 dismissed, 3 judgment, 2 open

Lenz v. Pine Street Moguls, LLC closed
District Court, E.D. Louisiana · No. 2:24-cv-02259 · Filed Sep 16, 2024 · Closed Apr 9, 2025
Role of Lenz v. Pine Street Moguls, LLC: Party · Outcome: Terminated 2025-04-09 (disposition not included in the bulk docket feed — see docket) Docket on CourtListener ↗
company name words appear in the caption; court in LA (not the issuer's state)
99 SECOND REALTY, LLC v. 187 PINE STREET ASSOCIATES, LLC closed
District Court, D. New Jersey · No. 2:20-cv-13794 · Filed Oct 1, 2020 · Closed Jan 3, 2022 · Nature of suit: 220 Real Property: Foreclosure · Cause: 12:191 Bank Foreclosure
Role of 99 SECOND REALTY, LLC v. 187 PINE STREET ASSOCIATES, LLC: Party · Outcome: Terminated 2022-01-03 (disposition not included in the bulk docket feed — see docket) Docket on CourtListener ↗
company name words appear in the caption; court in NJ (not the issuer's state)
GM Pine Street Garage LLC v. GM Pine Street Garage Fund LLC dismissed
District Court, W.D. Washington · No. 2:13-cv-01088 · Filed Jun 24, 2013 · Closed Aug 22, 2013 · Nature of suit: 890 Other statutory actions
Role of GM Pine Street Garage LLC v. GM Pine Street Garage Fund LLC: Party · Outcome: Terminated 2013-08-22 — FJC Integrated Database disposition: Voluntarily dismissed Docket on CourtListener ↗
company name words appear in the caption; court in WA (not the issuer's state)
Grinage v. Pine Street Mortgage judgment
District Court, N.D. Georgia · No. 1:11-cv-02493 · Filed Jul 28, 2011 · Closed Mar 15, 2012 · Nature of suit: 220 Foreclosure
Role of Grinage v. Pine Street Mortgage: Party · Outcome: Terminated 2012-03-15 — FJC Integrated Database disposition: Judgment on motion before trial; judgment for defendant Docket on CourtListener ↗
company name words appear in the caption; court in GA (not the issuer's state)
Old Republic National Title Insurance Company v. GM Pine Street Garage, LLC dismissed
District Court, W.D. Washington · No. 2:10-cv-01782 · Filed Nov 2, 2010 · Closed Nov 5, 2012 · Nature of suit: 190 Other contract actions
Role of Old Republic National Title Insurance Company v. GM Pine Street Garage, LLC: Party · Outcome: Terminated 2012-11-05 — FJC Integrated Database disposition: Voluntarily dismissed Docket on CourtListener ↗
company name words appear in the caption; court in WA (not the issuer's state)
Nu-Chan, LLC v. 20 Pine Street LLC dismissed
District Court, S.D. New York · No. 1:09-cv-00477 · Filed Jan 16, 2009 · Closed Jul 13, 2011 · Nature of suit: Other Statutory Actions · Cause: 28:1331 Fed. Question
Role of Nu-Chan, LLC v. 20 Pine Street LLC: Party · Outcome: Terminated 2011-07-13 — FJC Integrated Database disposition: Voluntarily dismissed Docket on CourtListener ↗
company name words appear in the caption; court in the issuer's state (NY)
Somerset Capital Partners v. Poole dismissed
District Court, S.D. West Virginia · No. 2:07-cv-00196 · Filed Mar 28, 2007 · Closed Apr 23, 2007 · Nature of suit: 140 Negotiable instruments
Role of Somerset Capital Partners: Plaintiff · Outcome: Terminated 2007-04-23 — FJC Integrated Database disposition: Voluntarily dismissed Docket on CourtListener ↗
exact company name; name has one distinctive word; court in WV (not the issuer's state)
Somerset Capital Partners v. Poole dismissed
District Court, N.D. West Virginia · No. 1:07-cv-00036 · Filed Mar 15, 2007 · Closed Apr 24, 2007 · Nature of suit: 190 Other contract actions
Role of Somerset Capital Partners: Plaintiff · Outcome: Terminated 2007-04-24 — FJC Integrated Database disposition: Voluntarily dismissed Docket on CourtListener ↗
exact company name; name has one distinctive word; court in WV (not the issuer's state)
Arques Investors, LLP v. Pine Street Investors, LLC judgment
District Court, D. Oregon · No. 3:04-cv-00992 · Filed Jul 23, 2004 · Closed Dec 20, 2004 · Nature of suit: 140 Negotiable instruments
Role of Arques Investors, LLP v. Pine Street Investors, LLC: Party · Outcome: Terminated 2004-12-20 — FJC Integrated Database disposition: Judgment on motion before trial; judgment for plaintiff Docket on CourtListener ↗
company name words appear in the caption; court in OR (not the issuer's state)
Pine Street Realty Corporation v. Bellanger closed
District Court, D. Massachusetts · No. 1:03-cv-12617 · Filed Dec 30, 2003 · Closed Feb 18, 2004 · Nature of suit: 290 Other real property actions
Role of Pine Street Realty Corporation v. Bellanger: Party · Outcome: Terminated 2004-02-18 — FJC Integrated Database disposition: Remanded to state court Docket on CourtListener ↗
company name words appear in the caption; court in MA (not the issuer's state)
United States v. ENERGY STAR SYSTEMS 198 NORTH PINE STREET LANGHORNE, PA open
District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · No. 2:02-mj-00797 · Filed Sep 19, 2002
Role of United States v. ENERGY STAR SYSTEMS 198 NORTH PINE STREET LANGHORNE, PA: Party · Outcome: Open — no termination date on the docket (bulk snapshot 2026-09-30) Docket on CourtListener ↗
company name words appear in the caption; court in PA (not the issuer's state)
United States v. ENERGY STAR SYSTEMS 198 NORTH PINE STREET LANGHORNE, PA open
District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · No. 2:02-mj-00797 · Filed Sep 19, 2002
Role of United States v. ENERGY STAR SYSTEMS 198 NORTH PINE STREET LANGHORNE, PA: Party · Outcome: Open — no termination date on the docket (bulk snapshot 2026-09-30) Docket on CourtListener ↗
company name words appear in the caption; court in PA (not the issuer's state)
Pine Street Mews v. One Beacon Insurance closed
District Court, S.D. New York · No. 1:02-cv-01582 · Filed Feb 28, 2002 · Closed May 8, 2003
Role of Pine Street Mews v. One Beacon Insurance: Party · Outcome: Terminated 2003-05-08 (disposition not included in the bulk docket feed — see docket) Docket on CourtListener ↗
company name words appear in the caption; court in the issuer's state (NY)
Pine Street Partners v. Ahern & Partners dismissed
District Court, S.D. Florida · No. 9:97-cv-08168 · Filed Mar 14, 1997 · Closed Dec 7, 1998 · Nature of suit: 190 Other contract actions
Role of Pine Street Partners v. Ahern & Partners: Party · Outcome: Terminated 1998-12-07 — FJC Integrated Database disposition: Dismissed: settled Docket on CourtListener ↗
company name words appear in the caption; court in FL (not the issuer's state)
Pine Street Inn v. Unum Life Insurance dismissed
District Court, D. Massachusetts · No. 1:94-cv-10998 · Filed May 18, 1994 · Closed Apr 27, 1995 · Nature of suit: 791 Employee Retirement Income Security Act
Role of Pine Street Inn v. Unum Life Insurance: Party · Outcome: Terminated 1995-04-27 — FJC Integrated Database disposition: Voluntarily dismissed Docket on CourtListener ↗
company name words appear in the caption; court in MA (not the issuer's state)
Billings & Co.,Inc. v. Pine Street Realty judgment
District Court, D. Rhode Island · No. 1:90-cv-00326 · Filed Jul 6, 1990 · Closed Jun 28, 1991 · Nature of suit: 190 Other contract actions
Role of Billings & Co.,Inc. v. Pine Street Realty: Party · Outcome: Terminated 1991-06-28 — FJC Integrated Database disposition: Judgment on consent; judgment for plaintiff Docket on CourtListener ↗
company name words appear in the caption; court in RI (not the issuer's state)
USA v. Pine Street Drug Inc closed
District Court, E.D. Arkansas · No. 4:89-mc-01601 · Filed Nov 29, 1989 · Closed May 27, 1993
Role of USA v. Pine Street Drug Inc: Party · Outcome: Terminated 1993-05-27 (disposition not included in the bulk docket feed — see docket) Docket on CourtListener ↗
company name words appear in the caption; court in AR (not the issuer's state)
What was searched

Sources searched: CourtListener bulk data (RECAP dockets as of 2026-09-30; recall-first rule 10-24) — federal district + bankruptcy courts State courts: not covered (one-tap state court links under Look further). PACER: not searched. · Last checked Oct 24, 2026, 2:11 AM ET. Searched so far: 2 of 2 issuers in this group; 0 still to be searched. Results are added automatically.

Court records show docket facts only; we never restate allegations as facts. Outcome wording comes from the docket feed; where it does not state a disposition we say so.

State courts: not covered (one-tap state court links under Look further). No state offers a lawful automated statewide source PartnerFacts can use today. Texas (re:SearchTX) terms prohibit storing results in a database open to third parties; New York (WebCivil) and Massachusetts (MassCourts) require a browser check that blocks scripted queries; California has no statewide index (58 county portals; Rule of Court 2.503 grants name-based access case by case); Florida, Utah and Illinois offer paid or partial access whose terms for automated use are unverified. Washington (dw.courts.wa.gov; bulk index reports under a JISC data-dissemination agreement), Delaware (CourtConnect; Court of Chancery not included) and Arizona (apps.azcourts.gov/publicaccess, which has an official channel to request high-volume access) are the candidates; PartnerFacts will request written permission before any automated search. Federal courts are searched through CourtListener / RECAP.

2. Regulatory actions

None found in sources searched — SEC enforcement releases (index scan as of Oct 24, 2026, 2:50 AM ET) · state securities regulators: AZ, CA, DE, TX, WA (crawled Oct 23, 2026)

What was searched

SEC enforcement searched: SEC litigation releases and administrative proceedings — respondent names in the sec.gov index titles (30,205 releases, 1995-09-19 to 2026-10-23); release text is read only to confirm a candidate. Names that appear only in the body of a release are not found. — Searched SEC litigation releases and administrative proceedings (1995→ / 2007→) (30,205 records as of Oct 24, 2026, 2:50 AM ET) — nothing matched Ars..

State securities regulators searched: AZ (Corporation Commission Securities Division), CA (DFPI — 16 of 12,159 DFPI respondent pages read so far; sponsor-name matches are read first), DE (DOJ Investor Protection Unit), TX (State Securities Board), WA (DFI) — last crawled Oct 23, 2026, 9:57 PM ET. Other states are not covered.

3. Bankruptcies

19 cases: 2 open, 17 closed (disposition not in docket feed)

E Port 237 Pine Street LLC open
United States Bankruptcy Court, D. New Jersey · No. 26-13846 · Filed Apr 7, 2026
Role of E Port 237 Pine Street LLC: Party · Outcome: Open — no termination date on the docket (bulk snapshot 2026-09-30) Docket on CourtListener ↗
company name words appear in the caption; court in NJ (not the issuer's state)
1700 Pine Street Operations LLC open
United States Bankruptcy Court, N.D. Texas · No. 25-80367 · Filed Jul 9, 2025
Role of 1700 Pine Street Operations LLC: Party · Outcome: Open — no termination date on the docket (bulk snapshot 2026-09-30) Docket on CourtListener ↗
company name words appear in the caption; court in TX (not the issuer's state)
Pine Street Tenant NY LLC closed
United States Bankruptcy Court, D. Delaware · No. 21-10358 · Filed Jan 31, 2021 · Closed Jun 30, 2021
Role of Pine Street Tenant NY LLC: Party · Outcome: Case closed 2021-06-30 (disposition not included in the bulk docket feed — see docket) Docket on CourtListener ↗
company name words appear in the caption; court in DE (not the issuer's state)
TSI Pine Street, LLC closed
United States Bankruptcy Court, D. Delaware · No. 20-12234 · Filed Sep 14, 2020 · Closed Sep 23, 2021
Role of TSI Pine Street, LLC: Party · Outcome: Case closed 2021-09-23 (disposition not included in the bulk docket feed — see docket) Docket on CourtListener ↗
company name words appear in the caption; court in DE (not the issuer's state)
850 Pine Street LLC <b><font color="red">Jointly Administered under 20-30336.</font></b> closed
United States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. Texas · No. 20-30398 · Filed Jan 21, 2020 · Closed Sep 17, 2020
Role of 850 Pine Street LLC <b><font color="red">Jointly Administered under 20-30336.</font></b>: Party · Outcome: Case closed 2020-09-17 (disposition not included in the bulk docket feed — see docket) Docket on CourtListener ↗
company name words appear in the caption; court in TX (not the issuer's state)
Wood v. 601 Pine Street Investment Group Inc closed
United States Bankruptcy Court, W.D. Washington · No. 18-01071 · Filed May 31, 2018 · Closed Aug 15, 2019
Role of Wood v. 601 Pine Street Investment Group Inc: Party · Outcome: Case closed 2019-08-15 (disposition not included in the bulk docket feed — see docket) Docket on CourtListener ↗
company name words appear in the caption; court in WA (not the issuer's state)
790 Pine Street LLC closed
United States Bankruptcy Court, D. Massachusetts · No. 16-10013 · Filed Jan 4, 2016 · Closed May 16, 2016
Role of 790 Pine Street LLC: Party · Outcome: Case closed 2016-05-16 (disposition not included in the bulk docket feed — see docket) Docket on CourtListener ↗
company name words appear in the caption; court in MA (not the issuer's state)
790 Pine Street LLC closed
United States Bankruptcy Court, D. Massachusetts · No. 15-11797 · Filed May 5, 2015 · Closed Nov 4, 2015
Role of 790 Pine Street LLC: Party · Outcome: Case closed 2015-11-04 (disposition not included in the bulk docket feed — see docket) Docket on CourtListener ↗
company name words appear in the caption; court in MA (not the issuer's state)
17 West Pine Street, LLC closed
United States Bankruptcy Court, M.D. Florida · No. 6:14-bk-12240 · Filed Nov 1, 2014 · Closed May 7, 2015
Role of 17 West Pine Street, LLC: Party · Outcome: Case closed 2015-05-07 (disposition not included in the bulk docket feed — see docket) Docket on CourtListener ↗
company name words appear in the caption; court in FL (not the issuer's state)
17 West Pine Street, LLC closed
United States Bankruptcy Court, M.D. Florida · No. 6:12-bk-09306 · Filed Jul 9, 2012 · Closed Jun 14, 2013
Role of 17 West Pine Street, LLC: Party · Outcome: Case closed 2013-06-14 (disposition not included in the bulk docket feed — see docket) Docket on CourtListener ↗
company name words appear in the caption; court in FL (not the issuer's state)
GM Pine Street Garage LLC closed
United States Bankruptcy Court, W.D. Washington · No. 11-17493 · Filed Jun 23, 2011 · Closed Mar 21, 2014
Role of GM Pine Street Garage LLC: Party · Outcome: Case closed 2014-03-21 (disposition not included in the bulk docket feed — see docket) Docket on CourtListener ↗
company name words appear in the caption; court in WA (not the issuer's state)
Pine Street Real Estate, LLC v. Renaut closed
United States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. Ohio · No. 2:10-ap-02142 · Filed Apr 2, 2010 · Closed Sep 28, 2010
Role of Pine Street Real Estate, LLC v. Renaut: Party · Outcome: Case closed 2010-09-28 (disposition not included in the bulk docket feed — see docket) Docket on CourtListener ↗
company name words appear in the caption; court in OH (not the issuer's state)
Savage & Associates, P.C. as the Unsecured Claim E v. 100 Pine Street, LLC closed
United States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. New York · No. 03-02650 · Filed Apr 26, 2003 · Closed Jan 26, 2004
Role of Savage & Associates, P.C. as the Unsecured Claim E v. 100 Pine Street, LLC: Party · Outcome: Case closed 2004-01-26 (disposition not included in the bulk docket feed — see docket) Docket on CourtListener ↗
company name words appear in the caption; court in the issuer's state (NY)
Casciato Northrup v. Pine Street Salvage Co. closed
United States Bankruptcy Court, W.D. Texas · No. 02-07057 · Filed Dec 30, 2002 · Closed Sep 16, 2003
Role of Casciato Northrup v. Pine Street Salvage Co.: Party · Outcome: Case closed 2003-09-16 (disposition not included in the bulk docket feed — see docket) Docket on CourtListener ↗
company name words appear in the caption; court in TX (not the issuer's state)
Vebeliunas v. 50 Pine Street Partners, L.P. closed
United States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. New York · No. 98-09330 · Filed Oct 21, 1998 · Closed Jun 10, 1999
Role of Vebeliunas v. 50 Pine Street Partners, L.P.: Party · Outcome: Case closed 1999-06-10 (disposition not included in the bulk docket feed — see docket) Docket on CourtListener ↗
company name words appear in the caption; court in the issuer's state (NY)
1516 Pine Street Partnership v. Kennedy closed
United States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · No. 95-00067 · Filed Feb 14, 1995 · Closed Jan 24, 1996
Role of 1516 Pine Street Partnership v. Kennedy: Party · Outcome: Case closed 1996-01-24 (disposition not included in the bulk docket feed — see docket) Docket on CourtListener ↗
company name words appear in the caption; court in PA (not the issuer's state)
4514 Pine Street Associates closed
United States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · No. 91-10052 · Filed Jan 4, 1991 · Closed Sep 24, 1993
Role of 4514 Pine Street Associates: Party · Outcome: Case closed 1993-09-24 (disposition not included in the bulk docket feed — see docket) Docket on CourtListener ↗
company name words appear in the caption; court in PA (not the issuer's state)
Sparks v. Pine Street Builders & Supply Co., Inc. closed
United States Bankruptcy Court, D. South Carolina · No. 89-08154 · Filed Aug 2, 1989 · Closed Oct 19, 1990
Role of Sparks v. Pine Street Builders & Supply Co., Inc.: Party · Outcome: Case closed 1990-10-19 (disposition not included in the bulk docket feed — see docket) Docket on CourtListener ↗
company name words appear in the caption; court in SC (not the issuer's state)
Pine Street Liquors, Inc closed
United States Bankruptcy Court, D. New Jersey · No. 88-4942 · Filed Jul 28, 1988 · Closed Dec 7, 1992
Role of Pine Street Liquors, Inc: Party · Outcome: Case closed 1992-12-07 (disposition not included in the bulk docket feed — see docket) Docket on CourtListener ↗
company name words appear in the caption; court in NJ (not the issuer's state)
What was searched

Sources searched: Federal bankruptcy courts via CourtListener / RECAP archive (federal district courts, federal bankruptcy courts). State courts: not covered (one-tap state court links under Look further). PACER: not searched (RECAP only). · Last checked Oct 24, 2026, 2:11 AM ET. Searched so far: 2 of 2 issuers in this group; 0 still to be searched. Results are added automatically.

Court records show docket facts only; we never restate allegations as facts. Outcome wording comes from the docket feed; where it does not state a disposition we say so.

State courts: not covered (one-tap state court links under Look further). No state offers a lawful automated statewide source PartnerFacts can use today. Texas (re:SearchTX) terms prohibit storing results in a database open to third parties; New York (WebCivil) and Massachusetts (MassCourts) require a browser check that blocks scripted queries; California has no statewide index (58 county portals; Rule of Court 2.503 grants name-based access case by case); Florida, Utah and Illinois offer paid or partial access whose terms for automated use are unverified. Washington (dw.courts.wa.gov; bulk index reports under a JISC data-dissemination agreement), Delaware (CourtConnect; Court of Chancery not included) and Arizona (apps.azcourts.gov/publicaccess, which has an official channel to request high-volume access) are the candidates; PartnerFacts will request written permission before any automated search. Federal courts are searched through CourtListener / RECAP.

4. Differences between public sources

No comparisons published

What is compared

No public statement by this sponsor group has been collected yet, so there is nothing to compare. Sources compared: the sponsor's own website (known from the issuer's own filings — Form C issuer website, EDGAR company profile — an approved profile claim or Form ADV Item 1.I of its matched adviser) · SEC Form D · SEC Form ADV (IAPD) · Internet Archive · No website is on file for this sponsor group yet.

11 differences found between the filings for Ars — 7 worth asking about (compared 16 filings on Oct 24, 2026)

Worth asking · Apr 12, 2011 – Jan 30, 2017

Amount sold went down between filings — PINE STREET ASSOCIATES, L.P.

The Apr 12, 2011 filing says $169,000,000 sold; the Jan 30, 2017 Form D/A says $78,248,342 sold — $90,751,658 less.

What this means Amounts sold normally only go up as a raise continues. A drop can mean investors were refunded, a figure was corrected, or an earlier number was wrong. Ask the sponsor which it was.

Sources
Worth asking · Apr 6, 2010 – Apr 12, 2011

Investor count went down between filings — PINE STREET ASSOCIATES, L.P.

The Apr 6, 2010 filing reports 53 investors; the Apr 12, 2011 Form D/A reports 39 investors.

What this means Investor counts normally only grow. A smaller number can mean investors left or were refunded, or a count was corrected. Ask the sponsor what happened.

Sources
Worth asking · Feb 25, 2010 – Feb 25, 2011

Investor count went down between filings — SOMERSET CAPITAL PARTNERS, L.P.

The Feb 25, 2010 filing reports 100 investors; the Feb 25, 2011 Form D/A reports 38 investors.

What this means Investor counts normally only grow. A smaller number can mean investors left or were refunded, or a count was corrected. Ask the sponsor what happened.

Sources
Worth asking · Mar 1, 1999 – Jan 31, 2019

Form D filed 7,276 days after the first sale — SOMERSET CAPITAL PARTNERS, L.P.

The filing says the first sale was Mar 1, 1999. The Form D was filed Jan 31, 2019 — 7,276 days later. The rule: a Form D is generally due within 15 days after the first sale, so this one is 7,261 days past that.

What this means The notice went in months after money was taken in. Late notices are common and carry no penalty by themselves, but it is fair to ask the sponsor why the paperwork lagged.

Sources
Worth asking · Jan 1, 1994 – Jan 31, 2019

Form D filed 9,161 days after the first sale — PINE STREET ASSOCIATES, L.P.

The filing says the first sale was Jan 1, 1994. The Form D was filed Jan 31, 2019 — 9,161 days later. The rule: a Form D is generally due within 15 days after the first sale, so this one is 9,146 days past that.

What this means The notice went in months after money was taken in. Late notices are common and carry no penalty by themselves, but it is fair to ask the sponsor why the paperwork lagged.

Sources
Worth asking · Mar 1, 1999 – Mar 10, 2009

Form D filed 3,662 days after the first sale — SOMERSET CAPITAL PARTNERS, L.P.

The filing says the first sale was Mar 1, 1999. The Form D was filed Mar 10, 2009 — 3,662 days later. The rule: a Form D is generally due within 15 days after the first sale, so this one is 3,647 days past that.

What this means The notice went in months after money was taken in. Late notices are common and carry no penalty by themselves, but it is fair to ask the sponsor why the paperwork lagged.

Sources
Worth asking · Mar 10, 2009 – Jan 31, 2020

11 people are no longer listed on a later amendment

LGC Associates, LLC is no longer listed on the Jan 31, 2020 amendment — PINE STREET ASSOCIATES, L.P. · Leon G. Cooperman is no longer listed on the Jan 30, 2017 amendment — PINE STREET ASSOCIATES, L.P. · Somerset Capital Advisers, LLC is no longer listed on the Jan 30, 2017 amendment — SOMERSET CAPITAL PARTNERS, L.P. · PS Management, Inc. is no longer listed on the Jan 30, 2017 amendment — PINE STREET ASSOCIATES, L.P. · Michael Schaenen is no longer listed on the Jun 6, 2016 amendment — SOMERSET CAPITAL PARTNERS, L.P. · and 6 more

What this means People leave; the issuer lists only current officers, directors and promoters. Ask why and who replaced them.

Sources
Note · Apr 6, 2010 – Jan 30, 2017

4 role changes for the same people across filings

LGC Associates, LLC's role changed at PINE STREET ASSOCIATES, L.P.: promoter → executive officer · PS Ventures, LLC's role changed at PINE STREET ASSOCIATES, L.P.: promoter → executive officer · LGC Associates, LLC's role changed at PINE STREET ASSOCIATES, L.P.: executive officer → promoter · PS Ventures, LLC's role changed at PINE STREET ASSOCIATES, L.P.: executive officer → promoter

What this means Roles on Form D are self-reported. Ask who runs the company today.

Sources
Note · Jan 1, 1994 – Jan 31, 2020

4 offerings have no amendment in the last 12 months and may still be open

No amendment in the last 12 months on an offering that may still be open — SOMERSET CAPITAL PARTNERS, L.P. (latest filing Jan 31, 2020) · No amendment in the last 12 months on an offering that may still be open — PINE STREET ASSOCIATES, L.P. (latest filing Jan 31, 2020) · No amendment in the last 12 months on an offering that may still be open — SOMERSET CAPITAL PARTNERS, L.P. (latest filing Jan 31, 2019) · No amendment in the last 12 months on an offering that may still be open — PINE STREET ASSOCIATES, L.P. (latest filing Jan 31, 2019)

What this means SEC rules expect a yearly amendment while an offering is still going. Ask the sponsor which of these raises have closed.

Sources
Note · Feb 25, 2010 – Feb 25, 2011

Minimum investment changed between filings — SOMERSET CAPITAL PARTNERS, L.P.

The Feb 25, 2010 filing lists a minimum of $1,000,000; the Feb 25, 2011 Form D/A lists $500,000.

What this means A different minimum usually means the offering terms changed. Check which terms apply to you.

Sources
Note · Mar 15, 2010 – Jan 31, 2020

Issuer used a different name before — PINE STREET ASSOCIATES, L.P.

SEC records list prior names for this filer: PINE STREET ASSOCIATES LP. The current name on file is "PINE STREET ASSOCIATES, L.P.".

What this means A name change is normal, but your documents may show the old name. Match the CIK, not just the name.

Sources
What is compared

What is compared: every Form D and D/A we hold for this subject, side by side — filing dates vs. first-sale dates (the 15-day rule), amendment timing on open offerings (the yearly-amendment expectation), amounts sold, investor counts, offering amounts and minimums across amendments, industry and size bands, addresses, how each person's name and role is written, paid sellers' CRD numbers, and (for groups) where the member companies were formed and sit. Everything is as filed by the issuer; the SEC does not check it. Differences are common and usually have ordinary explanations — we show both values, the dates, and the source so you can ask. As of Oct 24, 2026.

5. Money to insiders

None reported on 4 offerings — no sales commissions, finder's fees or proceeds to insiders

Per-offering detail
Offering (latest filing)Sales commissionsFinder's feesTo insidersPaid to sell itSource
Jan 31, 2020 D/A
SOMERSET CAPITAL PARTNERS, L.P.
File 021-127577
$0 (est.)$0 (est.)$0 (est.)
The Investment Manager receives customary management fees as provided in the Issuer's offering documents.
None listed on this filingEDGAR ↗
Jan 31, 2020 D/A
PINE STREET ASSOCIATES, L.P.
File 021-91719-9N
$0$0$0
The Investment Manager receives customary management fees as provided in the Issuer's offering documents.
None listed on this filingEDGAR ↗
Jan 31, 2019 D
PINE STREET ASSOCIATES, L.P.
File 021-331891
$0$0$0
The Investment Manager receives customary management fees as provided in the Issuer's offering documents.
None listed on this filingEDGAR ↗
Jan 31, 2019 D
SOMERSET CAPITAL PARTNERS, L.P.
File 021-331890
$0 (est.)$0 (est.)$0 (est.)
The Investment Manager receives customary management fees as provided in the Issuer's offering documents.
None listed on this filingEDGAR ↗

Counts come from Form D Items 12–15 on the filings in our index (latest filing per offering; one offering = one SEC file number; an amendment updates its offering rather than adding one). "To insiders" = gross proceeds used for payments to executive officers, directors or promoters. "—" = not reported on that filing. Amounts marked (est.) were reported as estimates. "Paid to sell it" = sales compensation recipients named on that filing (Item 12), each linked to FINRA BrokerCheck when a CRD number is reported.

Counted across all 2 issuers in this group — every filing in our index, latest filing per offering (SEC file number).

Property records 0 documents · 0 ownership records · last checked Oct 23, 2026, 8:59 PM ET · NYC and Cook County lookup still to run

0 recorded documents and 0 ownership records matched to Ars in the sources searched.

Not found in sources searched as of Oct 23, 2026, 8:59 PM ET: Hillsborough County FL Clerk of Court Official Records daily index (publicrec.hillsclerk.com D/P/M files), 2 daily files (Oct 14, 2026 to Oct 15, 2026) — loaded Oct 23, 2026, 8:59 PM ET; Florida DOR NAL roll (Hillsborough 39) roll year 2026 — loaded Oct 23, 2026, 8:54 PM ET; Florida DOR NAL roll (Dade 23) roll year 2026 — loaded Oct 23, 2026, 8:58 PM ET; Harris County Appraisal District real_acct.txt roll year 2026 — loaded Oct 23, 2026, 8:58 PM ET; Dallas Central Appraisal District ACCOUNT_INFO.CSV roll year 2026 — loaded Oct 23, 2026, 8:58 PM ET. Still to be looked up for this group: NYC ACRIS via NYC Open Data (Real Property Parties 636b-3b5g, Master bnx9-e6tj, Legals 8h5j-fqxa, Document Control Codes 7isb-wh4c) · NYC PLUTO ownership via NYC Open Data (64uk-42ks) · Cook County IL Assessor via Cook County Open Data (Parcel Sales wvhk-k5uv; Parcel Addresses 3723-97qp). Records in other counties, and recorder indexes we do not yet cover, were not searched.

Property records coverage: New York City (ACRIS recorded documents and PLUTO ownership, looked up per issuer when its page is viewed; re-checked when the page is viewed again more than 30 days after the last check); Hillsborough County FL (recorded documents from Oct 14, 2026 forward; ownership from FL DOR roll 2026); Cook County IL (assessor ownership and deed/sale records, looked up per issuer when its page is viewed); Harris County TX and Dallas County TX (assessor ownership rolls only, 2026 roll; no deed, mortgage or sale records); Miami-Dade County FL (ownership from FL DOR roll only; Clerk recorded documents not covered). Recorder indexes for TX, AZ, IL and WA counties, mortgages and liens outside NYC and FL, lis pendens and foreclosure notices everywhere, Miami-Dade County FL recorded documents, Maricopa County AZ, King County WA, Salt Lake County UT, and all other counties are not covered — not searched. Last refresh by source: Hillsborough County FL Clerk daily index Oct 23, 2026, 8:59 PM ET; Dallas Central Appraisal District ACCOUNT_INFO.CSV Oct 23, 2026, 8:58 PM ET; Harris County Appraisal District real_acct.txt Oct 23, 2026, 8:58 PM ET; Florida DOR NAL roll (Dade 23) Oct 23, 2026, 8:58 PM ET; Florida DOR NAL roll (Hillsborough 39) Oct 23, 2026, 8:54 PM ET. NYC and Cook County are looked up per issuer when its page is viewed; the most recent such lookup on this site finished Oct 24, 2026, 3:30 AM ET. Parties are named as the recorder's index names them (role suffixes as recorded); no address, account number or trust date is shown for an individual, and individual owners of record (home ownership) are not matched or shown. Items still in human review are not shown.

Issuers in this group

Why each issuer is here is stated in the "Linked by" column. Low-confidence links are never shown — they wait for human review.

SourceIssuerLinked byLocationIndustryFilingsSold (max)InvestorsMin. investment (latest filing)Active
EDGAR ↗SC SOMERSET CAPITAL PARTNERS, L.P.shared management entity, same business addressNEW YORK, NYPooled Investment Fund9$127,292,581
offering Indefinite · similar: $155,000–$5,250,000
144
similar: 4–27
$500,000
similar: $1,000–$100,000
2009–2020
EDGAR ↗PS PINE STREET ASSOCIATES, L.P.shared management entity, same business addressNEW YORK, NYPooled Investment Fund7$169,000,000
offering Indefinite · similar: $155,000–$5,250,000
53
similar: 4–27
$1,000,000
similar: $1,000–$100,000
2010–2020

"Similar" = offerings in the same industry claiming the same exemption, filed in the last 5 years: Pooled Investment Fund / 506(b) (83,801 filings); ranges are the middle half (25th–75th percentile). Computed by PartnerFacts from SEC EDGAR Form D data as of Oct 23, 2026, 5:45 PM ET. Rows without a range: fewer than 30 comparable filings, or not a Rule 506 offering. No ranking or score.

Timeline of offerings

SourceFiledIssuerFormIndustryOfferedSold
EDGAR ↗Jan 31, 2020SOMERSET CAPITAL PARTNERS, L.P.D/APooled Investment FundIndefinite$127,292,581
EDGAR ↗Jan 31, 2020PINE STREET ASSOCIATES, L.P.D/APooled Investment FundIndefinite$78,248,342
EDGAR ↗Jan 31, 2019SOMERSET CAPITAL PARTNERS, L.P.DPooled Investment FundIndefinite$127,292,581
EDGAR ↗Jan 31, 2019PINE STREET ASSOCIATES, L.P.DPooled Investment FundIndefinite$78,248,342
EDGAR ↗Jan 31, 2018SOMERSET CAPITAL PARTNERS, L.P.D/APooled Investment FundIndefinite$127,292,581
EDGAR ↗Jan 31, 2018PINE STREET ASSOCIATES, L.P.D/APooled Investment FundIndefinite$78,248,342
EDGAR ↗Jan 30, 2017PINE STREET ASSOCIATES, L.P.D/APooled Investment FundIndefinite$78,248,342
EDGAR ↗Jan 30, 2017SOMERSET CAPITAL PARTNERS, L.P.D/APooled Investment FundIndefinite$127,292,581
EDGAR ↗Jun 6, 2016SOMERSET CAPITAL PARTNERS, L.P.D/APooled Investment FundIndefinite$127,292,581
EDGAR ↗Mar 29, 2012SOMERSET CAPITAL PARTNERS, L.P.D/APooled Investment FundIndefinite$118,981,702
EDGAR ↗Apr 12, 2011PINE STREET ASSOCIATES, L.P.D/APooled Investment FundIndefinite$169,000,000
EDGAR ↗Feb 25, 2011SOMERSET CAPITAL PARTNERS, L.P.D/APooled Investment FundIndefinite$118,981,702
EDGAR ↗Apr 6, 2010PINE STREET ASSOCIATES, L.P.D/APooled Investment FundIndefinite$114,679,299
EDGAR ↗Mar 15, 2010PINE STREET ASSOCIATES, L.P.D/APooled Investment FundIndefinite$114,679,299
EDGAR ↗Feb 25, 2010SOMERSET CAPITAL PARTNERS, L.P.D/APooled Investment FundIndefinite$116,249,776
EDGAR ↗Mar 10, 2009SOMERSET CAPITAL PARTNERS, L.P.DPooled Investment FundIndefinite$90,512,607

Activity: 0 new offerings in the last 12 months across all issuers in this group (new offering = a Form D that is not an amendment, D/A) · most recent filing Jan 31, 2020. Industry history, as reported on each offering's latest filing: All 4 offerings reported: Pooled Investment Fund (2009–2019).

People across the group

NameRolesIssuers hereFirst → last listed
AI ARS Investment Partners, LLC entityExecutive Officer2Jan 30, 2017 → Jan 31, 2020
PV PS Ventures, LLC entityExecutive Officer1Apr 6, 2010 → Jan 31, 2020
SC Somerset Capital Management, LLC entityExecutive Officer1Jun 6, 2016 → Jan 31, 2020
AU Artemis US Corp. entityExecutive Officer1Jan 31, 2020 → Jan 31, 2020
LA LGC Associates, LLC entityExecutive Officer1Apr 6, 2010 → Jan 31, 2019
SC Somerset Capital Advisers, LLC entityExecutive Officer1Jun 6, 2016 → Jun 6, 2016
MS Michael SchaenenExecutive Officer1Mar 10, 2009 → Mar 29, 2012
TM Trevor MaunderExecutive Officer1Mar 29, 2012 → Mar 29, 2012
PT Porter Ross Taylor IIIExecutive Officer1Mar 29, 2012 → Mar 29, 2012
LC Leon G. CoopermanExecutive Officer1Mar 15, 2010 → Apr 12, 2011
PM PS Management, Inc. entityExecutive Officer1Apr 12, 2011 → Apr 12, 2011
LM Louis MargolisExecutive Officer1Mar 15, 2010 → Mar 15, 2010
AM Andrew J. MelnickExecutive Officer1Mar 10, 2009 → Mar 10, 2009
TL Tracy F. LaveryExecutive Officer1Mar 10, 2009 → Mar 10, 2009
SG Stuart B. GoldbergExecutive Officer1Mar 10, 2009 → Mar 10, 2009

Adviser registration (Form ADV)

ARS INVESTMENT PARTNERS, LLC — SEC-registered investment adviser · SEC registration status as reported: “Approved” since Jul 12, 1971 · SEC file 801-7566 · Main office: NEW YORK, NY · IAPD record ↗ · Form ADV filing (PDF) ↗

Regulatory assets under management: $2,705,726,063 as reported on Form ADV filed Apr 27, 2026 (Item 5.F(2)(c)) · 937 accounts (Item 5.F(2)(f))

Websites listed on Form ADV (Item 1.I): WWW.LINKEDIN.COM/COMPANY/ARSINVESTMENTPARTNERSLLC ↗

Item 11 disclosure questions as answered on Form ADV filed Apr 27, 2026: 0 of 24 answered “Yes”
  • No — Form ADV Item 11 asks: “Do any of the events below involve you or any of your supervised persons?”
  • No — Form ADV Item 11A(1) asks: “A. In the past ten years, have you or any advisory affiliate: (1) been convicted of or pled guilty or nolo contendere ("no contest") in a domestic, foreign, or military court to any felony?”
  • No — Form ADV Item 11A(2) asks: “A. (2) been charged with any felony?”
  • No — Form ADV Item 11B(1) asks: “B. In the past ten years, have you or any advisory affiliate: (1) been convicted of or pled guilty or nolo contendere ("no contest") in a domestic, foreign, or military court to a misdemeanor involving: investments or an investment-related business, or any fraud, false statements, or omissions, wrongful taking of property, bribery, perjury, forgery, counterfeiting, extortion, or a conspiracy to commit any of these offenses?”
  • No — Form ADV Item 11B(2) asks: “B. (2) been charged with a misdemeanor listed in Item 11.B(1)?”
  • No — Form ADV Item 11C(1) asks: “C. Has the SEC or the Commodity Futures Trading Commission (CFTC) ever: (1) found you or any advisory affiliate to have made a false statement or omission?”
  • No — Form ADV Item 11C(2) asks: “C. (2) found you or any advisory affiliate to have been involved in a violation of SEC or CFTC regulations or statutes?”
  • No — Form ADV Item 11C(3) asks: “C. (3) found you or any advisory affiliate to have been a cause of an investment-related business having its authorization to do business denied, suspended, revoked, or restricted?”
  • No — Form ADV Item 11C(4) asks: “C. (4) entered an order against you or any advisory affiliate in connection with investment-related activity?”
  • No — Form ADV Item 11C(5) asks: “C. (5) imposed a civil money penalty on you or any advisory affiliate, or ordered you or any advisory affiliate to cease and desist from any activity?”
  • No — Form ADV Item 11D(1) asks: “D. Has any other federal regulatory agency, any state regulatory agency, or any foreign financial regulatory authority: (1) ever found you or any advisory affiliate to have made a false statement or omission, or been dishonest, unfair, or unethical?”
  • No — Form ADV Item 11D(2) asks: “D. (2) ever found you or any advisory affiliate to have been involved in a violation of investment-related regulations or statutes?”
  • No — Form ADV Item 11D(3) asks: “D. (3) ever found you or any advisory affiliate to have been a cause of an investment-related business having its authorization to do business denied, suspended, revoked, or restricted?”
  • No — Form ADV Item 11D(4) asks: “D. (4) in the past ten years, entered an order against you or any advisory affiliate in connection with an investment-related activity?”
  • No — Form ADV Item 11D(5) asks: “D. (5) ever denied, suspended, or revoked your or any advisory affiliate's registration or license, or otherwise prevented you or any advisory affiliate, by order, from associating with an investment-related business or restricted your or any advisory affiliate's activity?”
  • No — Form ADV Item 11E(1) asks: “E. Has any self-regulatory organization or commodities exchange ever: (1) found you or any advisory affiliate to have made a false statement or omission?”
  • No — Form ADV Item 11E(2) asks: “E. (2) found you or any advisory affiliate to have been involved in a violation of its rules (other than a violation designated as a "minor rule violation" under a plan approved by the SEC)?”
  • No — Form ADV Item 11E(3) asks: “E. (3) found you or any advisory affiliate to have been the cause of an investment-related business having its authorization to do business denied, suspended, revoked, or restricted?”
  • No — Form ADV Item 11E(4) asks: “E. (4) disciplined you or any advisory affiliate by expelling or suspending you or the advisory affiliate from membership, barring or suspending you or the advisory affiliate from association with other members, or otherwise restricting your or the advisory affiliate's activities?”
  • No — Form ADV Item 11F asks: “F. Has an authorization to act as an attorney, accountant, or federal contractor granted to you or any advisory affiliate ever been revoked or suspended?”
  • No — Form ADV Item 11G asks: “G. Are you or any advisory affiliate now the subject of any regulatory proceeding that could result in a "yes" answer to any part of Item 11.C., 11.D., or 11.E.?”
  • No — Form ADV Item 11H(1)(a) asks: “H. (1) Has any domestic or foreign court: (a) in the past ten years, enjoined you or any advisory affiliate in connection with any investment-related activity?”
  • No — Form ADV Item 11H(1)(b) asks: “H. (1)(b) ever found that you or any advisory affiliate were involved in a violation of investment-related statutes or regulations?”
  • No — Form ADV Item 11H(1)(c) asks: “H. (1)(c) ever dismissed, pursuant to a settlement agreement, an investment-related civil action brought against you or any advisory affiliate by a state or foreign financial regulatory authority?”
  • No — Form ADV Item 11H(2) asks: “H. (2) Are you or any advisory affiliate now the subject of any civil proceeding that could result in a "yes" answer to any part of Item 11.H(1)?”

Answers as filed by the adviser on Form ADV Part 1A, Item 11; question text quoted from the form. Details of each “Yes” are in the Disclosure Reporting Pages of the Form ADV (PDF) ↗.

Matched on management entity listed on Form D = adviser name, same state (NY) · Form ADV data: SEC Investment Adviser Information Report (SEC-registered advisers), file dated 2026-10-02, loaded Oct 23, 2026, 8:39 PM ET · IAPD record last checked Oct 23, 2026, 8:36 PM ET

Meta advertising

No Meta Pixel ids or Facebook / Instagram page links on file for Ars as of Oct 24, 2026 — the sponsor website is read for them once it is on file (runs automatically). Meta Ad Library: not searched by PartnerFacts (no API access); a one-tap Ad Library search is under Look further.

Other offering types (Regulation A and Regulation Crowdfunding)

Searched SEC Regulation A Data Sets (Forms 1-A, 1-K, 1-Z; 2015 Q2 → 2026 Q3); SEC Crowdfunding Offerings Data Sets (Form C family; 2016 Q2 → 2026 Q3); EDGAR form index for 2026 Q3 → 2026 Q4 (51,358 records as of Oct 23, 2026, 8:41 PM ET) — nothing matched this name.

Public profiles and social

No website or social profile named in Ars's SEC filings (Form C, Reg A, Form ADV; checked Oct 24, 2026). Web search for this name: #221,767 of 374,652 in line (14 issuers searched so far). One-tap searches: Look further ↓

Export this report as PDF · Premium

Request diligence pack (Premium) PartnerFacts asks the sponsor for the standard information pack and delivers it to you labelled "provided by the sponsor".

Change history

No corrections have been requested for this page.

Request a correction

Free. Covers the grouping itself or any record shown here. Logged with status: received → under review → fixed / confirmed with source.

Sponsor response

Add a sourced explanation next to any fact. Reviewed before publishing.

Grouping is PartnerFacts' inference from public filings (shared related persons, management entities, business address). Everything else on this page is drawn from the filings themselves. Not the same sponsor? Request a correction.

Look further

One-tap searches on sites we do not index ourselves, with the name pre-filled (outside the US (as filed: NEW YORK), NY). Each opens in a new tab; what you find there is not verified by PartnerFacts.